Search

Background: In contrast to asthma, the indication for bronchodilators prior to bronchoscopy in patients with COPD has not been properly investigated. We therefore performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether use of a short-acting bronchodilator provides a protective effect in patients with COPD undergoing bronchoscopy., Methods: One hundred twenty patients undergoing bronchoscopy were included. Patients with COPD were randomized to receive either 200 mug of salbutamol (n = 40) or placebo (n = 40) before bronchoscopy. Control patients (n = 40) did not receive any inhaled medication. Spirometry was performed before and 2 h after bronchoscopy in all patients. Sedative drug requirements and hemodynamic parameters were recorded., Results: Hemodynamic findings before, during, and after bronchoscopy were similar in patients with COPD randomized to either salbutamol or placebo (p = not significant for all). Compared to prebronchoscopy values, postbronchoscopy percentage of predicted FEV(1) decreased significantly in all three groups: salbutamol (median, - 4.7%; interquartile range [IQR], - 13.3 to 6.6); placebo (median, - 4.8%; IQR, - 19.9 to 8.4); and control subjects (median, - 10.0%; IQR, - 20.2 to - 3.3) [p = 0.023]. The decrease in FEV(1) was similar in all three patient groups (p = 0.432). The relative change in FEV(1) was inversely correlated to the increasing severity of COPD as expressed by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages (p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Premedication with an inhaled short-acting beta-agonist cannot be recommended in patients with COPD undergoing bronchoscopy.

Objective: Topical anesthesia for flexible bronchoscopy can be administered via transcricoid injection, nebulizer, or directly through the bronchoscope in a "spray as you go" fashion. We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate whether nebulized lidocaine provides additional benefit and reduces the total anesthetic dose required during bronchoscopy., Setting: Tertiary care university hospital., Methods: One hundred fifty patients (93 men; age, 20 to 89 years) undergoing diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy were randomized to receive either 4 mL of 4% lidocaine (160 mg) or 4 mL of saline solution as placebo via nebulization. Combined sedation was achieved using 5 mg of IV hydrocodone and midazolam boluses. Supplemental lidocaine doses and total midazolam required as judged by the bronchoscopist were recorded for each patient. After the procedure, both bronchoscopists and patients charted their perception of cough on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Similarly, patients recorded their discomfort related to the procedure on a 10-cm VAS., Results: The most common procedures were BAL in 77 cases (51%), transbronchial biopsy in 40 cases (27%), and transbronchial needle aspiration in 34 cases (23%). Outcome parameters, including hemodynamic findings, duration of the procedure, cough scores for physicians and patients, discomfort score for patients, midazolam doses, and supplemental lidocaine doses, were similar in both groups. Mean total lidocaine dose required in the lidocaine group was 318 +/- 41 mg and was significantly higher than the total dose required in the placebo group (157 +/- 44 mg [+/- SD]) [p < 0.001]., Conclusion: Additional nebulized lidocaine cannot be recommended for flexible bronchoscopy performed under combined sedation.