Greta Donati, Vincenzo Maria D’Amore, Pasquale Russomanno, Linda Cerofolini, Jussara Amato, Simona Marzano, Maria Salobehaj, Domenico Rizzo, Giulia Assoni, Alfonso Carotenuto, Valeria La Pietra, Daniela Arosio, Pierfausto Seneci, Marco Fragai, Diego Brancaccio, Francesco Saverio Di Leva, and Luciana Marinelli
Today it is widely recognized that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis plays a fundamental role in escaping the immune system in cancers, so that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have been evaluated for their antitumor properties in more than 1000 clinical trials. As a result, some of them have entered the market revolutionizing the treatment landscape of specific cancer types. Nonetheless, a new era based on the development of small molecules as anti PD-L1 drugs has begun. There are, however, some limitations to advancing these compounds into clinical stages including the possible difficulty in counteracting the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in vivo, the discrepancy between the in vitro IC50 (HTFR assay) and cellular EC50 (immune checkpoint blockade co-culture assay), and the differences in ligands’ affinity between human and murine PD-L1, which can affect their preclinical evaluation. Here, an extensive theoretical study, assisted by MicroScale Thermophoresis binding assays and NMR experiments, was performed to provide an atomistic picture of the binding event of three representative biphenyl-based compounds in both human and murine PD-L1. Structural determinants of the species’ specificity were unraveled, providing unprecedented details useful for the design of next generation anti-PD-L1 molecules.