Search

Objectives: This study is to determine the management and clinical outcomes of patients investigated with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) according to sex., Background: Women are underdiagnosed with conventional ischemia testing, have lower rates of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at invasive coronary angiography (ICA), yet higher mortality compared to men. Whether FFR CT improves sex-based patient management decisions compared to CCTA alone is unknown., Methods: Subjects with symptoms and CAD on CCTA were enrolled (2015 to 2017). Demographics, symptom status, CCTA anatomy, coronary volume to myocardial mass ratio (V/M), lowest FFR CT values, and management plans were captured. Endpoints included reclassification rate between CCTA and FFR CT management plans, incidence of ICA demonstrating obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) and revascularization rates., Results: A total of 4,737 patients (n = 1,603 females, 33.8%) underwent CCTA and FFR CT . Women were older (age 68 ± 10 years vs. 65 ± 10 years; p < 0.0001) with more atypical symptoms (41.5% vs. 33.9%; p < 0.0001). Women had less obstructive CAD (65.4% vs. 74.7%; p < 0.0001) at CCTA, higher FFR CT (0.76 ± 0.10 vs. 0.73 ± 0.10; p < 0.0001), and lower likelihood of positive FFR CT ≤ 0.80 for the same degree stenosis (p < 0.0001). A positive FFR CT ≤0.80 resulted in equal referral to ICA (n = 510 [54.5%] vs. n = 1,249 [56.5%]; p = 0.31), but more nonobstructive CAD (n = 208 [32.1%] vs. n = 354 [24.5%]; p = 0.0003) and less revascularization (n = 294 [31.4%] vs. n = 800 [36.2%]; p < 0.0001) in women, unless the FFR CT was ≤0.75 where revascularization rates were similar (n = 253 [41.9%] vs. n = 715 [46.4%]; p = 0.06). Women have a higher V/M ratio (26.17 ± 7.58 mm 3 /g vs. 24.76 ± 7.22 mm 3 /g; p < 0.0001) that is associated with higher FFR CT independent of degree stenosis (p < 0.001). Predictors of revascularization included stenosis severity, FFR CT, symptoms, and V/M ratio (p < 0.001) but not female sex (p = 0.284)., Conclusions: FFR CT differs between the sexes, as women have a higher FFR CT for the same degree of stenosis. In FFR CT -positive CAD, women have less obstructive CAD at ICA and less revascularization, which is associated with higher V/M ratio. The findings suggest that CAD and FFR CT variations by sex need specific interpretation as these differences may affect therapeutic decision making and clinical outcomes. (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care [ADVANCE]; NCT02499679)., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures This study was supported by HeartFlow, Inc., Redwood City, California, via individual Clinical Study Agreements with each enrolling institution and with the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) for Core Laboratory activities and Clinical Event Committee adjudication of adverse events. Dr. Fairbairn is on the Speakers Bureau for Heartflow. Dr. Hurwitz-Koweek is on the Speakers Bureau for Heartflow; and has unrestricted grant funding from Siemens and Heartflow. Dr. Nørgaard has received unrestricted institutional research grants from Siemens and HeartFlow. Dr. Nieman has received unrestricted institutional research grants from Siemens, Bayer, GE, and HeartFlow. Dr. Bax has received unrestricted research grants from Edwards Lifescience, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and GE Healthcare; and is on the Speakers Bureau with Abbott. Dr. Pontone is a consultant for GE Healthcare; and has research grants from GE Healthcare and Heartflow. Dr. Raff has received institutional grants from HeartFlow. Dr. Chinnaiyan has received institutional grants from HeartFlow. Dr. Rabbat has received institutional grants from HeartFlow. Dr. Binukrishnan is on the Speakers Bureau for Heartflow. Dr. Rogers is an employee of and has equity in Heartflow. Dr. Berman has received unrestricted research support from Heartflow. Dr. Patel has received grants from HeartFlow, Jansen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, and NHLBI; and has served as a consultant for Jansen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Genzyme, and Merck. Dr. Douglas has received institutional grants from HeartFlow. Dr. Leipsic is a consultant for and has stock options in Circle CVI and Heartflow. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to examine the feasibility, safety, clinical outcomes, and costs associated with computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) in acute chest pain (ACP) patients in a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based triage program., Background: FFR CT is useful in determining lesion-specific ischemia in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, but its utility in ACP has not been studied., Methods: ACP patients with no known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary CTA and coronary CTA with FFR CT were studied. FFR CT  ≤0.80 was considered positive for hemodynamically significant stenosis., Results: Among 555 patients, 297 underwent coronary CTA and FFR CT (196 negative, 101 positive), whereas 258 had coronary CTA only. The rejection rate for FFR CT was 1.6%. At 90 days, there was no difference in major adverse cardiac events (including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unexpected revascularization after the index visit) between the coronary CTA and FFR CT groups (4.3% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.310). Diagnostic failure, defined as discordance between the coronary CTA or FFR CT results with invasive findings, did not differ between the groups (1.9% vs. 1.68%; p = NS). No deaths or myocardial infarction occurred with negative FFR CT when revascularization was deferred. Negative FFR CT was associated with higher nonobstructive disease on invasive coronary angiography (56.5%) than positive FFR CT (8.0%) and coronary CTA (22.9%) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall costs between the coronary CTA and FFR CT groups ($8,582 vs. $8,048; p = 0.550)., Conclusions: In ACP, FFR CT is feasible, with no difference in major adverse cardiac events and costs compared with coronary CTA alone. Deferral of revascularization is safe with negative FFR CT , which is associated with higher nonobstructive disease on invasive angiography., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) provides an evidence synthesis on the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for diagnosis and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in women. From large patient and population cohorts of asymptomatic women, detection of any coronary artery calcium that identifies females with a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk of >7.5% may more effectively triage women who may benefit from pharmacologic therapy. In addition to accurate detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), CT angiography (CTA) identifies nonobstructive atherosclerotic plaque extent and composition which is otherwise not detected by alternative stress testing modalities. Moreover, CTA has superior risk stratification when compared to stress testing in symptomatic women with stable chest pain (or equivalent) symptoms. For the evaluation of symptomatic women both in the emergency department and the outpatient setting, there is abundant evidence from large observational registries and multi-center randomized trials, that CT imaging is an effective procedure. Although radiation doses are far less for CT when compared to nuclear imaging, radiation dose reduction strategies should be applied in all women undergoing CT imaging. Effective and appropriate use of CT imaging can provide the means for improved detection of at-risk women and thereby focus preventive management resulting in long-term risk reduction and improved clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. All rights reserved.)

Background: To date, the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) has been limited to trials and single center experiences. We herein report the incidence of abnormal FFRCT (≤0.80) and the relationship of lesion-specific ischemia to subject demographics, symptoms, and degree of stenosis in the multicenter, prospective ADVANCE registry., Methods: One thousand patients with suspected angina having documented coronary artery disease on coronary CTA and clinically referred for FFR CT were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Patient demographics, symptom status, coronary CTA and FFR CT findings were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the predictors related to abnormal FFR CT ., Results: FFR CT data were analyzed in 952 patients (95.2%). Overall, 51.1% patients had a positive FFR CT value (≤0.80). Patients with ≥3 risk factors had a significantly higher rate of abnormal FFR CT than those with <3 risk factors (60.2% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, baseline diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.21, p = 0.030) and hypertension (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.14-2.14, p = 0.005) were both predictive of abnormal FFR CT . In addition, >70% stenosis was significantly associated with low FFR CT (OR 31.16, 95%CI 12.25-79.22, p < 0.0001) vs. <30% stenosis. Notably, stenosis 30-49% vs. <30% had an increased likelihood of ischemia (OR 3.74, 95%CI 1.52-9.17, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In this real-world registry, CT angiographic stenosis severity in addition to baseline cardiovascular risk factors conferred an increased likelihood of an abnormal FFR CT . Importantly, however, mild CT angiographic stenoses were noted to have an increased hazard for ischemia and the converse holding true for more severe stenoses as well., (Copyright © 2018 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiovascular imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Recently, increased emphasis has been placed on quality in cardiovascular imaging, and it is becoming a central priority for various stakeholders, including patients, physicians, and payers. The changing health care landscape and associated challenges imposed on cardiac imagers, including reductions in reimbursement and growing need for pre-authorization, have also helped bring quality metrics to the forefront. Continuous quality improvement initiatives provide the framework for the team of physicians, technical staff members, administrators, and other health care professionals to deliver high-quality care. Efforts to improve quality in cardiac imaging have started to form the foundation for numerous research studies in this arena, and although few in number, randomized control trials have begun to emerge. This review highlights quality improvement studies focusing on appropriate use education, reporting, and radiation dose reduction in cardiovascular imaging., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is a reliable tool for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) that conveys significant prognostic information. It does not provide data on the hemodynamic significance of a given lesion, particularly in intermediate-grade stenosis. Fractional flow reserve by CT (FFR CT ) can accurately predict the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions. The primary objective of this registry is to determine whether the integration of FFR CT as an adjunct to coronary CTA will lead to a significant change in the management of CAD in patients with stable angina., Methods: The ADVANCE Registry is a multi-center, prospective registry designed to evaluate utility, clinical outcomes and resource utilization following FFR CT -guided treatment in clinically stable, symptomatic patients diagnosed with CAD by coronary CTA. Approximately 5000 patients will be enrolled from up to 50 sites in Europe, USA, Canada and Asia. Requirement for enrollment is the presence of atherosclerosis on coronary CTA. For each enrolled patient, a clinical management review committee will use data from coronary CTA and FFR CT to determine the management plan using the following criteria: (a) optimal medical therapy, (b) percutaneous coronary intervention, (c) coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or (d) more information required. The primary endpoint of the registry is the reclassification rate between the management plan based on coronary CTA alone versus CTA plus FFR CT . The secondary endpoints of the registry include the evaluation of the rate of invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, major adverse coronary events, resource utilization, cumulative radiation dose exposure and the rate of ICA without obstructive CAD at 3-year follow-up., Conclusions: The ADVANCE registry is designed to assess the real-world impact of FFR CT on the clinical management of stable CAD when used along with coronary CTA., (Copyright © 2016 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic yield of triple rule out (TRO) versus coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) scanning in patients with acute chest pain enrolled in a large statewide registry., Background: Although TRO scans provide simultaneous evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), pulmonary embolism (PE), and aortic disease (AD), their use is not well defined., Methods: Patients undergoing TRO or coronary CTA at 53 Michigan institutions for acute chest pain (in the emergency department or inpatient setting) in the ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium) were included. Demographic characteristics, scan findings, and image quality parameters were compared between coronary CTA and TRO scans. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as obstructive CAD (>50% stenosis), PE, or AD; secondary outcomes were radiation dose, contrast volume, and image quality., Results: From July 2007 to September 2013, 12,834 patients underwent computed tomography scanning (TRO, n = 1,555; coronary CTA, n = 11,279). The TRO group had more women (57.1% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001). Diagnostic yield was similar (TRO, 17.4% vs. coronary CTA, 18.3%; p = 0.37), driven by CAD (15.5% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.093); PE and AD were 1.1% and 0.4% (p = 0.004) and 1.7% and 1.1% (p = 0.046). TRO had higher median radiation (9.1 mSv vs. 6.2 mSv; p < 0.0001) and mean contrast (113 ± 6 ml vs. 89 ± 17 ml; p < 0.0001) doses. Nondiagnostic images were frequent in TRO (9.4% vs. 6.5%; p < 0.0001). In emergency department patients, PE and AD were more often detected on TRO. Among inpatients, there were no differences in overall yield or in that of PE, AD, or CAD., Conclusions: TRO was associated with slightly higher yield of PE and AD, specifically in the emergency department. This benefit comes with higher nondiagnostic image quality, radiation, and contrast doses. Although TRO may be of value in selected patients, its indiscriminate use is not warranted. The appropriate use of TRO needs to be further defined. (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium [ACIC]; NCT00640068)., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: β-Blockers are often used for heart rate control during coronary CT angiography (CTA). Increased frequency and severity of allergic reactions to radiocontrast media (RCM) have been reported with concomitant use of β-blockers., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine whether there is a higher incidence of allergic reactions to low-osmolar nonionic RCM in patients undergoing coronary CTA with concomitant β-blockers and to define the overall incidence and severity of allergic reactions in patients undergoing coronary CTA with and without a history of allergy to RCM., Methods: Patients undergoing coronary CTA at 47 institutions participating in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium registry were analyzed. The incidence and severity of allergic reactions were compared between those patients who did and those who did not receive β-blockers, as well as in subgroups of patients with and without a history of prior allergy to RCM., Results: The incidence of allergic reaction in patients who received β-blockers was 45 of 23,867 (0.19%) compared with those who did not receive β-blockers, which was 9 of 5232 (0.17%; P = .84; odds ratio = 1.1). Of the patients with history of allergy to RCM, 4 of 706 patients (0.6%) on β-blockers experienced allergic reactions compared to 1 of 77 patients (1.3%) without β-blockers (P = .40; odds ratio = 0.43)., Conclusions: β-Blocker pretreatment had no effect on the frequency or severity of allergic reaction in patients undergoing coronary CTA, even in patients with a past history of allergy to RCM., (Copyright © 2015 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To establish current radiation dose levels with contemporary scanners capable of prospectively triggered or high-pitch spiral scan modes to previous generation scanners among patients evaluated for coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, aortic disease, and "triple rule out" in a large population of patients at multiple centers., Background: Previous small-scale studies with carefully controlled scan protocols report that CT scanners that facilitate prospectively triggered scanning and provide high-pitch spiral CT scan modes drastically lower radiation doses. However, diagnostic reference levels should be selected by medical bodies on the basis of large surveys of representative sites and reviewed at appropriate time intervals., Methods: Scan data including dose and image quality parameters were collected retrospectively from 64 slice scanners (control) and prospectively after sites installed 128-slice dual-source scanners with high-pitch capability (study). Protocol selection was purposely not specified to survey "real world" results. Blinded quantitative image analysis was performed on every fifth scan., Results: From April 2011 to March 2012, 2085 patients at 9 sites completed the study: 1051 coronary artery disease (509 control, 542 study), 528 pulmonary embolism (267 control, 261 study), 419 aortic disease (268 control, 151 study), and 87 triple rule out (53 control, 34 study). There was a significant reduction in median dose-length product (DLP) from 669 mGy ∙ cm (interquartile range [IQR]: 419-1026 mGy ∙ cm) in the control group to 260 mGy ∙ cm (IQR: 159-441 mGy ∙ cm) in the study group, a reduction by 61% (P < .0001) and was lower in all categories. No significant differences were noted in image quality., Conclusion: Use of advanced scanners facilitating prospectively triggered or high-pitch spiral scan modes results in marked dose reduction across a variety of cardiovascular studies, with no compromise in image quality. These findings may contribute to new target dose recommendations in societal guidelines., (Copyright © 2014 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is useful for identification of symptomatic diabetic individuals at heightened risk for death. Whether CCTA-detected CAD enables improved risk assessment of asymptomatic diabetic individuals beyond clinical risk factors and coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) remains unexplored., Methods: From a prospective 12-center international registry of 27,125 individuals undergoing CCTA, we identified 400 asymptomatic diabetic individuals without known CAD. Coronary stenosis by CCTA was graded as 0%, 1-49%, 50-69%, and ≥70%. CAD was judged on a per-patient, per-vessel and per-segment basis as maximal stenosis severity, number of vessels with ≥50% stenosis, and coronary segments weighted for stenosis severity (segment stenosis score), respectively. We assessed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) - inclusive of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and late target vessel revascularization ≥90 days (REV) - and evaluated the incremental utility of CCTA for risk prediction, discrimination and reclassification., Results: Mean age was 60.4 ± 9.9 years; 65.0% were male. At a mean follow-up 2.4 ± 1.1 years, 33 MACE occurred (13 deaths, 8 MI, 12 REV) [8.25%; annualized rate 3.4%]. By univariate analysis, per-patient maximal stenosis [hazards ratio (HR) 2.24 per stenosis grade, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-3.10, p < 0.001], increasing numbers of obstructive vessels (HR 2.30 per vessel, 95% CI 1.75-3.03, p < 0.001) and segment stenosis score (HR 1.14 per segment, 95% CI 1.09-1.19, p < 0.001) were associated with increased MACE. After adjustment for CAD risk factors and CACS, maximal stenosis (HR 1.80 per grade, 95% CI 1.18-2.75, p = 0.006), number of obstructive vessels (HR 1.85 per vessel, 95% CI 1.29-2.65, p < 0.001) and segment stenosis score (HR 1.11 per segment, 95% CI 1.05-1.18, p < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of MACE. Beyond age, gender and CACS (C-index 0.64), CCTA improved discrimination by maximal stenosis, number of obstructive vessels and segment stenosis score (C-index 0.77, 0.77 and 0.78, respectively). Similarly, CCTA findings improved risk reclassification by per-patient maximal stenosis [integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index 0.03, p = 0.03] and number of obstructive vessels (IDI index 0.06, p = 0.002), and by trend for segment stenosis score (IDI 0.03, p = 0.06)., Conclusion: For asymptomatic diabetic individuals, CCTA measures of CAD severity confer incremental risk prediction, discrimination and reclassification on a per-patient, per-vessel and per-segment basis., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: "Triple rule-out" CT angiography simultaneously evaluates coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, and aortic dissection in a single imaging examination. However, the clinical outcomes of this approach are unknown., Objective: Using standard cardiac CT angiography as a reference, this study was performed to describe the diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing triple rule-out in clinical practice., Methods: We identified consecutive patients at 2 institutions undergoing triple rule-out or cardiac CT angiography for acute chest pain. The primary outcome was a composite diagnostic yield consisting of coronary artery diameter stenosis >50%, pulmonary embolism, and aortic dissection. Other reported outcomes included radiation dose, downstream resource use, and 90-day clinical outcomes., Results: Among 2068 patients (272 triple rule-out and 1796 cardiac CT angiograms), the composite diagnostic yield was 14.3% with triple rule-out and 16.3% with cardiac CT (P = 0.41) and was driven by the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (13.2% triple rule-out versus 16.1% cardiac CT, P = 0.22). The diagnostic yield for pulmonary embolism was low (1.1% triple rule-out and 0.2% cardiac CT, P = 0.052) and no aortic dissections were found in either group. Compared with cardiac CT, the triple rule-out approach was associated with higher radiation exposure (12.0 ± 5.6 mSv versus 8.2 ± 4.0 mSv, P < 0.0001), a greater incidence of subsequent emergency center cardiac evaluations (5.9% versus 2.5%, P = 0.0017), and more downstream pulmonary embolism-protocol CT angiography (3.3% versus 0.9%, P = 0.0034)., Conclusions: Among patients with acute chest pain, a triple rule-out approach resulted in higher radiation exposure compared with cardiac CT, but was not associated with improved diagnostic yield, reduced clinical events, or diminished downstream resource use., (Copyright © 2011 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) of 64-detector rows or greater represents a novel noninvasive anatomic method for evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Early studies suggest a potential for prognostic risk assessment by CCTA findings but were limited by small patient cohorts or single centers. The CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter) registry is a large, prospective, multinational dynamic observational study of patients undergoing CCTA. The primary aim of CONFIRM is to determine the prognostic value of CCTA findings for the prediction of future adverse CAD events., Methods: The CONFIRM registry currently represents 27,125 consecutive patients at 12 cluster sites in 6 countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. CONFIRM sites were chosen on the basis of adequate CCTA volume, site CCTA proficiency, and local demographic characteristics and medical facilities to ensure a broad-based sample of patients. Patients comprising the present CONFIRM cohort include those with suspected but without known CAD, with known CAD, or asymptomatic persons undergoing CAD evaluation. A data dictionary comprising a wide array of demographic, clinical, and CCTA findings was developed by the CONFIRM investigators and is uniformly used for all patients. Patients are followed up after CCTA performance to identify adverse CAD events, including death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, target vessel revascularization, and CAD-related hospitalization., Conclusions: From a number of countries worldwide, the information collected from the CONFIRM registry will add incremental and important insights into CCTA findings that confer prognostic value beyond demographic and clinical characteristics. The results of the CONFIRM registry will provide valuable information about the optimal methods for using CCTA findings., (Copyright © 2011 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the United States alone, nearly 6 million patients present annually to emergency departments with complaints of chest pain suggestive of acute coronary ischemia. Most of these patients have a non-negligible risk for acute coronary syndrome(s) (ACS) and undergo extended observation and workup for an ischemic cause. Of those admitted for extended observation, less than 30% of patients have true ACS. In patients with a low to intermediate probability, cardiac CT performs well in ruling out coronary artery disease, and American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines deem this application to be "appropriate." This article reviews the application of CT for the evaluation of acute chest pain the emergency department.

Background: Morbidly obese persons (body mass index [BMI; in kg/m(2)] >or= 40) have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but have reduced accuracy with conventional cardiac testing and coronary CT angiography (CCTA)., Objective: This study investigated a novel dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) acquisition and reconstruction method for coronary imaging in morbidly obese patients., Methods: This was a observational study in which each patient served as his or her own control. After a single DSCT acquisition using a novel method, standard quarter-scan image reconstructions at a temporal resolution of 83 milliseconds were compared with temporal resolution reconstructions at 105, 125, and 165 milliseconds. Images were evaluated for diagnostic adequacy score and for image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. In each patient, the image reconstruction with the best visual diagnostic score was compared with the control image for quantitative measures., Results: Fifty patients (32 female; mean +/- SD age, 51 +/- 10 y; mean BMI, 44.8 +/- 5.6) were enrolled. Scans were of diagnostic quality in 47 (94%) patients using the "best reconstruction" compared with 38 (76%) patients using quarter-scan reconstruction. Significant improvements were observed in noise (42 +/- 16 HU versus 56 +/- 19 HU; P < 0.0001), contrast-to-noise ratio (8.4 +/- 3.3 HU versus 7.0 +/- 2.2 HU; P = 0.0038), and signal-to-noise ratio (7.6 +/- 2.9 HU versus 6.5 +/- 3.5 HU; P = 0.030)., Conclusions: CCTA with DSCT using a modified scan protocol and adjustable temporal reconstructions provides diagnostic image quality in >90% of morbidly obese patients.