Search

Objectives: Mobility (international/internal migration, and localized mobility) is a key driver of the HIV epidemic. While mobility is associated with higher-risk sexual behavior in women, a possible association with condom, modern contraceptive, and dual method use among women living with HIV (WLHIV), is unknown. In addition, HIV status and sexual behaviors such as relationship concurrency may also affect condom, modern contraceptive, and dual method use., Study Design: We surveyed sexually active women (N = 1067) aged 15 to 49 in 12 communities in Kenya and Uganda participating in a test-and-treat trial in 2015 to 2016. Generalized (unordered) multinomial logistic regression models accounting for community clustering examined associations between mobility (overnight travel away from home in past 6 months and any migration within past 2 years) and condom, modern contraceptive (i.e., oral contraceptive pills, injectables, intrauterine devices, implants, vasectomy, tubal ligation; excluding male/female condoms), and dual method use within past 6 months, adjusting for key covariates such as HIV status and relationship concurrency., Results: WLHIV relative to HIV-negative women (ratios of relative risk [RRR] = 3.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.40-5.89), and women in concurrent relative to monogamous relationships (RRR = 4.03, 95% CI 1.9-8.50) had higher odds of condom use alone. In contraceptive use models, WLHIV relative to HIV-negative women were less likely to use modern contraceptive methods alone (RRR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.73). Relationship concurrency (RRR = 4.51, 95% CI 2.10-9.67) and HIV status (RRR = 3.97, 95% CI 2.43-6.50) were associated with higher odds of dual method use while mobility was marginally associated with higher odds of dual method use (RRR = 1.65, 95% CI 0.99-2.77, p = 0.057)., Conclusions: Mobility had a potential impact on dual method use in Kenya and Uganda. In addition, our findings highlight that WLHIV were using condoms and dual methods more, but modern contraceptives less, than HIV-negative women. Those in concurrent relationships were also more likely to use condoms or dual methods. These findings suggest that in a context of high mobility, women may be appropriately assessing risks and taking measures to protect themselves and their partners from unintended pregnancies and acquisition and transmission of HIV., Implications: Our findings point to a need to strengthen accessibility of sexual and reproductive health services for both mobile and residentially stable women in settings of high mobility and high HIV prevalence., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: We examined sex-specific associations of partner age disparity and relationship concurrency with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and/or Chlamydia trachomatis (NG/CT) infection, higher-risk relationships, and condom use as proxies for HIV risk., Methods: Data were collected in 2016 from 2179 adults in 12 communities in Uganda and Kenya. Logistic regression models examined associations of age disparity and relationship concurrency with NG/CT infection, condom use, and higher-risk (commercial sex and other higher-risk) relationships in the past 6 months, controlling for covariates., Results: Partner age and relationship concurrency were associated with NG/CT infection in women but not men. Relative to women in age-disparate relationships, women in both age-disparate and age-homogeneous relationships had higher odds of NG/CT infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-9.98). Among men and women, partnership concurrency was associated with higher-risk partnerships. In addition, relative to those with a single age-homogeneous partner, those with concurrent age-homogeneous partners had higher odds of condom use (men: aOR=2.85, 95% CI: 1.89-4.31; women: aOR=2.99, 95% CI: 1.52-5.89). Concurrent age-disparate partnerships were associated with condom use among men only (aOR=4.02, 95% CI: 2.54-6.37)., Conclusion: Findings underscore the importance of targeted HIV prevention efforts for couples in age-disparate and concurrent relationships., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Mobility in sub-Saharan Africa links geographically-separate HIV epidemics, intensifies transmission by enabling higher-risk sexual behavior, and disrupts care. This population-based observational cohort study measured complex dimensions of mobility in rural Uganda and Kenya. Survey data were collected every 6 months beginning in 2016 from a random sample of 2308 adults in 12 communities across three regions, stratified by intervention arm, baseline residential stability and HIV status. Analyses were survey-weighted and stratified by sex, region, and HIV status. In this study, there were large differences in the forms and magnitude of mobility across regions, between men and women, and by HIV status. We found that adult migration varied widely by region, higher proportions of men than women migrated within the past one and five years, and men predominated across all but the most localized scales of migration: a higher proportion of women than men migrated within county of origin. Labor-related mobility was more common among men than women, while women were more likely to travel for non-labor reasons. Labor-related mobility was associated with HIV positive status for both men and women, adjusting for age and region, but the association was especially pronounced in women. The forms, drivers, and correlates of mobility in eastern Africa are complex and highly gendered. An in-depth understanding of mobility may help improve implementation and address gaps in the HIV prevention and care continua., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Increasing Plasmodium falciparum resistance to chloroquine in sub-Saharan Africa necessitates use of alternative antimalarial agents. Affordable alternative treatments include sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and amodiaquine. Combination of antimalarial agents can increase therapeutic efficacy and delay emergence of drug resistance. We compared the efficacy of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and an amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine combination for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in a region of high chloroquine resistance., Methods: Patients with symptoms of uncomplicated falciparum malaria and confirmed disease in Kampala, Uganda, were randomly assigned to receive sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (25 mg/kg sulfadoxine, and 1.25 mg/kg pyrimethamine) plus placebo; amodiaquine (25 mg/kg) plus placebo; or amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. Patients were followed up for 14 days, and clinical and parasitological outcomes were assessed., Findings: 90% (400/445) of patients enrolled in the study successfully completed 14 days of follow-up. Treatment failure based on clinical criteria occurred in 13 of 131 (10%) patients on sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine, nine of 131 (7%) on amodiaquine, and four of 138 (3%) on amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. Based on parasitological criteria, treatment failed in 26%, 16%, and 10% of these patients, respectively. Amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine was significantly more effective than sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine alone in children aged younger than 5 years (clinical failure in 3.5% vs 13.9%, respectively, risk difference 10.4% [95% CI, 1.6-19.3] p=0.021; parasitological failure in 12.8% vs 26.4%, risk difference 13.6% [1.2-26.0] p=0.041)., Interpretation: Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine were all effective for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. The amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine combination was the most effective, and could be the optimum low-cost alternative to chloroquine in Africa.