Search

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) represents a standard procedure in case of symptomatic carotid stenosis of 50-99% within 2 weeks from onset of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) symptoms. The optimal time to perform CEA after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of CEA performed within 2 weeks from IVT., Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of 70 patients affected by symptomatic carotid stenosis have been treated as per the international guidelines during 3 years. Eleven (15.7%) patients have been treated with IVT before CEA for ischemic stroke; remaining 59 (84.3%) patients received only CEA. CEA was performed in median 8 days (range: 2-13) after IVT. We examined the grade of disability before and after surgery as well as at 3 months follow-up, using the modified Ranking Scale (mRS)., Results: Among the patients who underwent CEA + IVT, CEA was performed in median 8 days (range: 2-13) after IVT. One patient received CEA within 48 hours from IVT, 3 patients within 72 hours, and 7 patients within 2 weeks. The complications within 90 days from surgery, in CEA + IVT group, were 3 cases of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) without symptoms. In patients who received only CEA, the complications were 1 case of stroke and 2 cases of ICH. The mortality registered was 0% in both groups. Among CEA + IVT group at 90 days after surgery, 9 patients had a mRS grade of 0-2, 2 patients had mRS of 3-5., Conclusions: In our series, IVT before CEA did not seem to increase the rate of complications. However, the study has several limitations, and further studies must be performed before solid evidence is available for recommendations regarding the timing of CEA after IVT., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess early and midterm results after endovascular aortic arch repair using a double inner branch stent graft (DIBSG) in patients with aortic arch aneurysm or dissection unfit for open surgery., Methods: Between 2012 and 2018, there were 24 patients with aortic arch disease who were treated with a single model of a DIBSG (Terumo Aortic, Glasgow, United Kingdom) in nine Italian cardiovascular centers. We investigated technical success, mortality, occurrence of major complications, and need for reintervention in a multicenter, nonrandomized, retrospective fashion., Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 16.7%. Cerebrovascular events occurred in 25% of patients and major strokes in 12.5%. Two patients experienced a retrograde dissection (8.3%), whereas none reported any type I or type III endoleak. During a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 1-60 months), one patient died of a nonaortic cause and one reported a nonarch-related major stroke. No late secondary intervention was needed during the follow-up. Excluding from the analysis the first six patients treated until 2014 as part of the learning curve, in-hospital mortality, major stroke, and retrograde dissection rates were 11.1%, 11.1%, and 5.6%, respectively., Conclusions: Endovascular aortic arch repair using this model of DIBSG is feasible, and results are acceptable for a new technique in a high-risk subset of patients. Operative mortality suffers the effect of a learning curve, whereas midterm aorta-related survival is promising. Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with a DIBSG should always be considered to give high-risk patients a chance of repair. Large-scale studies are needed to assess the long-term durability of this technique., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)