Search

With the emergence of high-precision radiotherapy technologies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), MR guided brachytherapy, image guided intensity modulated photon and proton radiotherapy and most recently daily adaptive radiotherapy, reirradiation is increasingly recognized as a viable treatment option for many patients. This includes those with recurrent, metastatic or new malignancies post initial radiotherapy. The primary challenge in reirradiation lies in balancing tumor control against the risk of severe toxicity from cumulative radiation doses to previously irradiated normal tissue.Although technology for precise delivery has advanced at a fast pace, clinical practice of reirradiation still mostly relies on individual expertise, as prospective evidence is scarce, the level of reporting in clinical studies is not standardized and of low quality − especially with respect to cumulative doses received by organs at risk.A recent ESTRO/EORTC initiative proposed a standardized definition of reirradiation and formulated general requirements for minimal reporting in clinical studies [1].As a consequence we found it timely to convene for an international and interdisciplinary meeting with experts in the field to summarize the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps and explore which best practices can be derived for safe reirradiation. The meeting was held on 15.06.2023 in Zurich and was endorsed by the scientific societies SASRO, DEGRO and ESTRO. Here, we report on available evidence and research priorities in the field of reirradiation, as discussed during the meeting.

Background and purpose: Loco-regional recurrence (LRR) dominates the failure pattern after curative radiotherapy in anal cancer. The aim of this study was to estimate dose of LRRs in anal cancer using a point of origin-based method. Method and materials: Of 321 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, 31 patients with LRR (29 local recurrences and 5 regional lymph node recurrences) were available for analysis. The recurrence volumes were delineated on recurrence magnetic resonance imaging (rMRI). Rigid and subsequent deformable co-registration of planning computerised tomography scans and rMRI were performed. Point of origin was estimated as the centre of mass (COM) and an observer-based point of origin (obs-PO). Doses to COM and obs-PO, as well as the full recurrence volume, were estimated and the relation to target volumes was extracted. Results: The median minimum dose to COM was 63.8 Gy (range 32.5–65.1 Gy) and 63.7 Gy (range 35.5–65.2 Gy) to obs-PO of local recurrences. COM was included in the high dose volume (64 Gy) in 86 % of cases, and obs-PO was included in 75 % of cases. There was no difference in minimum dose to COM and obs-PO, and the median distance between the two points was 3.3 mm (range 0.6–19.8 mm). No recurrences occurred in primarily boosted lymph nodes. Conclusion: The majority of LLRs were located within the high dose volume indicating radioresistance as the primary cause of recurrence in anal cancer. No difference between the use of COM and obs-PO was evident.