Search

Background: Gene copy number gain (CNG) is a continuous variable. The relevant cutpoint for HER2, KRAS and MET CNG in non-mall cell lung cancer remains uncertain. As de novo driver oncogenes are largely mutually exclusive, oncogene overlap analysis can be used to explore CNG thresholds., Patient and Methods: We retrospectively analysed NGS of DNA/RNA in 13,702 NSCLC adenocarcinoma samples. Alternate and same-gene driver oncogene co-occurrence with HER2, KRAS and MET CNG was examined. Overall survival (OS) from time of biopsy collection was correlated with CNG and pathogenic mutations in driver oncogenes (Driver+)., Results: The frequency of Driver+ tumors decreased with increasing CNG. Setting CNG thresholds by oncogene overlap and dataset size (CNA ≥ 6 for HER2, KRAS and ≥ 4 for MET), tumors considered relevantly amplified (Amp) for MET, HER2 and KRAS were significantly less likely to be Driver+ (P < .001). When Driver+ did overlap with Amp status, same-gene alterations (mutation and CNG) were significantly enriched for all 3 genes (HER2, KRAS and MET), while BRAF and EGFR mutations were more common in MET-Amp than in HER2- or KRAS-Amp tumors. A negative OS association with Amp status was independent of Driver+ status for HER2 and MET, however not KRAS., Conclusion: Tissue NGS-based HER2, KRAS and MET CNG thresholds set by oncogene overlap identified potentially clinically relevant "Amp" subgroups with altered genetic profiles and decreased survival. Prospective research into targeted therapy benefit in these groups is encouraged., Competing Interests: Disclosures A.S.W. has performed consuting work for MJH Life Sciences, and received speaking fees from The Binaytara Foundation. H.B.K, A.E., A.F, A.V, G.W.S. and D.S. are employed by Caris Life Sciences, A.V. has performed consulting work for George Clinical, G.W.S. has stock options with Caris Life Sciences. S.V.L. has performed advisory board/consulting work for for Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalyst, Daiichi Sankyo, Elevation Oncology, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Guardant Health, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Merus, Mirati, Novartis, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, RAPT, Regeneron, Revolution Medicines, Sanofi, Takeda, and has served on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Candel Therapeutics. P.C.M. has no disclosures. E.L.S has performed advisory board/consulting work for Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jansen, Guidepoint Global, Regeneron, Bionest Partners, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Prescient Healthcare Group, G1Therapeutics, ClearView Healthcare Partners, BioAtla, The Scienomics Group, AstraZeneca, Thirdbridge, Harpoon Therapeutics, CDR-Life, Expert Connect, performed scientific advisory role work for Thetis Pharmaceuticals, and has received honoraria from Takeda, Ideology Health, Horizon CME, OncLive, Regeneron, MH Life Sciences, MECC Global Meetings, Jansen, BeiGeneius, Harpoon Therapeutics, Medscape. D.R.C has performed advisory board/consulting work for Abbvie, Anheart, Apollomics, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Beigene, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genesis, Sutro, Takeda., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is known to express high levels of the proangiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). We assessed the safety and tolerability of cediranib, an oral inhibitor of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases, in combination with etoposide and cisplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-stage (ES) SCLC or metastatic lung neuroendocrine cancer (NEC)., Methods: Patients received up to six 21-day cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m 2 , days 1-3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m 2 , day 1) with once-daily cediranib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Cediranib dosing started at 30 mg with de-escalation cohorts planned based on cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). An expansion cohort of 12 patients was enrolled at the recommended phase II dose., Results: Twenty-two patients (18 with ES SCLC, 4 with NEC) received treatment. Only 4 patients were enrolled at the 30 mg cediranib dose before other studies established 20 mg/day as the recommended dose with chemotherapy. Among the 18 patients enrolled at the 20-mg dose, common adverse events included nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and diarrhea; 8 patients (44%) had grade 1 or 2 hypertension, and 2 (11%) had grade 3 hemoptysis. For all 18 patients, the objective response rate and median progression-free survival duration were 67% and 7.9 months. Plasma levels of VEGF were significantly higher, and those of soluble VEGFR2 were significantly lower, on day 22 than at baseline but were not correlated with tumor shrinkage., Conclusions: Cediranib (20 mg) plus etoposide and cisplatin is well tolerated and has promising clinical activity., Competing Interests: Disclosure Kyle F. Concannon, MD: None. Bonnie S. Glisson, MD: None – Retired. Robert C. Doebele, MD, PhD: Licensing Fees for Biologic Materials: Roche, Foundation Medicine, ThermoFisher, Voronoi, Loxo, Takeda, Casma Therapeutics, Black Diamond, Histocyte. Payment or Honoraria: Clinical Cancer Research Journal (AACR), Guardant. Licensing Fees for Patent: Rain Oncology. Shareholder: Rain Oncology. Chao Huang, MD: None. Marcelo Marotti, MD, PhD: Employee: Summit Therapeutics. Shareholder: AstraZeneca, Summit Therapeutics. D. Ross Camidge, MD, PhD: Consulting Fees: Abbvie,Anheart, Apollomics, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Beigene, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genesis, Sutro, Takeda. John V. Heymach, MD, PhD: Consulting Fees: AbbVie, AnHeart Therapeutics, ArriVent Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BioCurity Pharmaceuticals, BioNTech AG, Blueprint Medicines, BI, BMS, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Curio Science, DAVA Oncology, Eli Lily & Co, EMD Serono, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, IDEOlogy Health, Immunocore, InterVenn Biosciences, Janssen Biotech, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Mirati Therapeutics, Moffitt Cancer Center, ModeX, Nexus Health Systems, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, OncoCyte, RefleXion, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Sandoz Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, uniQure. Honoraria or Speaker Fees: MJH Events, Dr. Neil Love. Support for Attending Meetings: AACR., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Alterations in the highly actionable lung cancer oncogenes, EGFR, ALK, and ROS1, occur across the age spectrum. Pregnancy and plans for motherhood consequently overlap with diagnoses of advanced oncogene-driven NSCLC. Guidelines for cytotoxic agents and pregnancy are well established. Nevertheless, accessible data on targeted lung cancer therapy during pregnancy or egg retrieval has not been collated previously, nor have the issues of reproduction in the setting of specific oncogene-addicted advanced NSCLC been widely discussed., Methods: We performed a narrative review of ex vivo placenta perfusion studies, pharmacologic characteristics, mutagenicity, animal embryo-fetal development studies, and case reports of pathways to motherhood, pregnancies, and egg retrieval while on EGFR-, ALK-, or ROS1-targeted therapy., Results: EGFR inhibitors may reduce female fertility while on therapy owing to decrease in corpora lutea. Odds of pregnancy in women on EGFR and ALK inhibitors may be reduced owing to potential increase in postimplantation loss found in animals. Crizotinib and entrectinib exhibit in vitro mutagenic potential. Several effects on human pregnancies have been noted; however, 11 EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor-exposed infants have been documented free of substantial adverse health effects by ages 4 months to 2 years. Successful gestational surrogacy has been reported in two women treated with crizotinib. Adoption and termination approaches have also been undertaken by some patients., Conclusions: Reproduction may not be out of reach for some patients with advanced NSCLC. Additional explorations of the impact and optimal timing of targeted therapy in egg capture and pregnancy are needed. Wider scientific and societal discussion about the issues of reproduction in advanced NSCLC is warranted., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Simons reports receiving honorarium from Sanofi and Janssen. Dr. Camidge reports receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Anheart, Appolomics, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Beigene, Dizal, Elevation, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Hengrui, Hummingbird, Imagene, Immunocore, Janssen, Medtronic, Mersana, Mirati, Nalo Therapeutics, Onkure, Prelude, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Theseus, Valence, and Xcovery; and having clinical trials (institutional) sponsored by AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blueprint, Dizal, Inhibrx, Karyopharm, Nuvalent, Pfizer, Phosplatin, Psioxus, Rain, Roche/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Turning Point, and Verastem., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are frequently diagnosed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Only recently, clinical trials are broadening eligibility to include patients with brain metastases, offering the potential for some assessment of CNS efficacy to be made. In this work we aim to review the available information on the activity of small molecule targeted drugs for advanced NSCLC with respect to CNS metastases. We analyze a framework for evaluation assessment regarding trials of systemic agents being conducted in patients with, or at risk from, CNS metastases, and provide examples of NSCLC targeted therapies evaluated in the CNS., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Although first-line immunotherapy approaches are standard, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed death-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors, the activity of combined CTLA-4 plus PD-(L)1 inhibition is unknown. This phase 1b study evaluated the safety and efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in adults with advanced NSCLC who received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy as their most recent line of therapy., Methods: Patients with PD-(L)1-relapsed or refractory NSCLC were enrolled between October 25, 2013, and September 17, 2019. Durvalumab 20 mg/kg plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks for four doses, followed by up to nine doses of durvalumab monotherapy every 4 weeks for up to 12 months of treatment or disease progression. Primary end points included safety and objective response rate (ORR) on the basis of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) per blinded independent central review; secondary end points were ORR on the basis of RECIST v1.1 per investigator; duration of response, disease control, and progression-free survival on the basis of RECIST v1.1 per blinded independent central review and investigator; and overall survival., Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT02000947., Results: PD-(L)1-refractory (n = 38) and PD-(L)1-relapsed (n = 40) patients were treated. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (26.3%, PD-(L)1-refractory patients) and diarrhea (27.5%, PD-(L)1-relapsed patients). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 patients. Median follow-up duration was 43.6 months for PD-(L)1-refractory patients and 41.2 months for PD-(L)1-relapsed patients. The ORR was 5.3% for PD-(L)1-refractory patients (one complete response, one partial response) and 0% for PD-(L)1-relapsed patients., Conclusions: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab had a manageable safety profile, but the combination did not have efficacy after PD-(L)1 treatment failure., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: CD73 is overexpressed in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and may promote immune evasion, suggesting potential for combining CD73 blockers with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This phase 1b-2 study (NCT03381274) evaluated the anti-CD73 antibody oleclumab plus the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC., Methods: Patients had tissue T790M-negative NSCLC with TKI-sensitive EGFR mutations after progression on a first- or second-generation EGFR TKI and were osimertinib naive. They received osimertinib 80 mg orally once daily plus oleclumab 1500 mg (dose level 1 [DL1]) or 3000 mg (DL2) intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary end points included safety and objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1., Results: By July 9, 2021, five patients received DL1 and 21 received DL2. Of these patients, 60.0% and 85.7% had any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 20.0% and 14.3% had grade 3 TRAEs, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities, serious TRAEs, or deaths occurred. Four patients were T790M positive on retrospective circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing; three had objective partial responses. In patients who were T790M negative in tumor and ctDNA, objective response rate was 25.0% at DL1 and 11.8% at DL2 (all partial responses); response durations at DL2 were 14.8 and 16.6 months. In patients receiving DL2, excluding those who were T790M positive by ctDNA, median progression-free survival was 7.4 months, and median overall survival was 24.8 months. DL2 was the recommended phase 2 dose., Conclusions: Oleclumab plus osimertinib was found to have moderate activity with acceptable tolerability in previously treated patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: On May 28, 2021, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to sotorasib for second-line or later treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This was the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for this patient population. Due to a paucity of real world data describing clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C mutated NSCLC in the second-line or later, we sought to compile a large, academic medical center-based historical dataset to clarify clinical outcomes in this patient population., Materials and Methods: The clinical outcomes of 396 patients with stage IV (n = 268, 68%) or recurrent, metastatic (n = 128, 32%) KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC were evaluated in this multicenter retrospective chart review conducted through the Academic Thoracic Oncology Medical Investigator's Consortium (ATOMIC). Patients treated at 13 sites in the United States and Canada and diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 (30% 2006-2015, 70% 2016-2020) were included. Primary outcomes included real-world PFS (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of stage IV or metastatic diagnosis, with particular interest in patients treated with second-line docetaxel-containing regimens, as well as clinical outcomes in the known presence or absence of STK11 or KEAP1 comutations., Results: Among all patients with stage IV or recurrent, metastatic KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC (n = 201 with KRAS G12C confirmed prior to first line systemic therapy), the median first-line rwPFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.3-11.8 months) and median OS was 16.8 months (95% CI, 12.7-22.3 months). In this historical dataset, first line systemic therapy among these 201 patients included platinum doublet alone (44%), PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy (30%), platinum doublet chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 inhibitor (18%), and other regimens (8%). Among patients with documented second-line systemic therapy (n = 123), the second-line median rwPFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.9 months), with median rwPFS 4.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-NA) among 10 docetaxel-treated patients (9 received docetaxel and 1 received docetaxel plus ramucirumab). Within the total study population, 49 patients (12%) had a co-occurring STK11 mutation and 3 (1%) had a co-occurring KEAP1 mutation. Among the 49 patients with a co-occurring KRAS G12C and STK11 mutation, median rwPFS on first-line systemic therapy (n = 23) was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.7-NA), and median OS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 10.8-35.3 months)., Conclusion: In this large, multicenter retrospective chart review of patients with KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC we observed a relatively short median rwPFS of 4.6 months among 10 patients with KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC treated with docetaxel with or without ramucirumab in the second-line setting, which aligns with the recently reported CodeBreak 200 dataset., Competing Interests: Disclosure WTI reports serving as a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Janssen, Genentech, Jazz Pharma, G1 Therapeutics, Mirati, OncLive, Clinical Care Options, Chardan, Outcomes Insights, Cello Health, and Curio Science. AS reports consulting/research funding from Genentech, AstraZeneca, and honoraria/consulting from Amgen. CK has served as a consultant for Novartis, Janssen, Astrazeneca, Sanofi, PierianDx, Diffuse pharmaceuticals, Mirati, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. RH is a consultant for Targeted Healthcare Communications. JN reports consulting for Aadi Biosciences, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fujirebio, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Mindmed, Naveris, Takeda, Western Oncolytics, research support from Genentech and Merck, intellectual property from Cansera, and ownership interests with Cansera, Epic Sciences, Indee Bio, and Quantgene. DRC reports advisory roles / Ad hoc advisory boards/consultations 2022: Appolomics (SRC), AstraZeneca/Daiichi (ILD adjudication committee), Beigene (DSMB) Dizal, EMD Serono, Elevation, Hengrui, (DSMB), Hummingbird, Medtronic, Mersana (ILD adjudication committee), Mirati, Nalo Therapeutics, Onkure, Roche, Takeda; 2021: Abbvie, Amgen, Anheart, Apollomics (SRC), AstraZeneca (SRC/SC), Beigene (DSMC), Bio-Thera (DSMB), Blueprint, Daiichi-Sankyo (ILD adjudication committee), Elevation (SRC), Eli Lilly (DSMB and NCCN), EMD Serono, Helsinn (DSMB), Hengrui (DSMC), Janssen, Kestrel (SAB, Shares), Mersana, Nuvalent (SAB), Puma (NCCN), Ribon, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Turning Point; 2020: Amgen, Anchiarno (SAB), Apollomics (SRC), AstraZeneca, Bio-Thera (DSMB), BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo (ILD adjudication committee), Eisai, EMD Serono, Elevation (SRC), Eli Lilly, GSK, Helssin, Janssen, Onkure, Mersana, Pfizer, Qilu, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda. MB, SP, CB, VV, MM, TL, PES, AR, KM, NS, XW, and TP report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Brigatinib is a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in crizotinib-refractory and ALK inhibitor-naive settings. This analysis assessed brigatinib in Asian vs. non-Asian patients from the first-line ALTA-1L trial., Patients and Methods: This was a subgroup analysis from the phase III ALTA-1L trial of brigatinib vs. crizotinib in ALK inhibitor-naive ALK+ NSCLC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in the overall population and BIRC-assessed intracranial ORR and PFS in patients with brain metastases., Results: Of the 275 randomized patients, 108 were Asian. Brigatinib showed consistent superiority in BIRC-assessed PFS vs. crizotinib in Asian (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.20-0.59]; log-rank P = .0001; median 24.0 vs. 11.1 months) and non-Asian (HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.38-0.84]; log-rank P = .0041; median 24.7 vs. 9.4 months) patients. Results were consistent with investigator-assessed PFS and BIRC-assessed intracranial PFS. Brigatinib was well tolerated. Toxicity profiles and dose modification rates were similar between Asian and non-Asian patients., Conclusion: Efficacy with brigatinib was consistently better than with crizotinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-+ NSCLC. There were no clinically notable differences in overall safety in Asian vs. non-Asian patients., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Different subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with different patterns of metastatic spread. Anatomic location of lesions in the chest may influence patterns of cancer growth and the shrinkage to therapy. Consequently, lesion location could affect apparent response rates per RECIST. We sought to explore this and develop, as needed, treatment response assessments less affected by the location., Methods: Cases of advanced oncogene-addicted NSCLC (EGFR, ALK, and ROS1) with pre- and on-therapy imaging during initial targeted therapy were identified. Lesions located in the lung parenchyma, pleural space or intra-thoracic lymph nodes were identified and analyzed separately from each other by RECIST 1.1 (unidimensional measurements) and by a novel MAX methodology (bidimensional measurements) which takes the axis with the greatest absolute percentage change on therapy in each location as the representative measurement., Results: Three hundred three patients with 446 unidimensional measured lesions were included for RECIST analysis. Two hundred forty nine patients with 386 bidimensional measured lesions were included for MAX analysis, as well as the analysis comparing RECIST and MAX. Intrathoracic location significantly impacted percentage shrinkage and the response rate per RECIST. The response rates for pleural, intra-parenchymal and nodal lesions were 34.1%, 49.6%, and 68.3%, respectively (P = .0002). The MAX methodology both increased the apparent treatment effect and made it consistent between intrathoracic locations. For pleural, parenchymal and nodal lesions, the MAX calculated response rate were 83.7%, 72.2%, and 75.4%, respectively (P-value = .24)., Conclusion: Intrathoracic lesion location affects RECIST-based treatment effectiveness estimations. The MAX methodology neutralizes location effect when examining impact of treatment and should be explored further., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Defining clinically relevant MET amplification levels in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging. We hypothesize that oncogene overlap and MET amplicon size decline with increase in MET plasma copy number (pCN), thus enriching for MET-dependent states., Patients and Methods: We interrogated cell-free DNA NGS results of 16,782 patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC to identify those with MET amplification as reported using Guardant360. Co-occurring genomic mutations and copy number alterations within each sample were evaluated. An exploratory method of adjusting for tumor fraction was also performed and amplicon size for MET was analyzed when available., Results: MET amplification was detected in 207 (1.2%) of samples. pCN ranged from 2.1 to 52.9. Of these, 43 (20.8%) had an overlapping oncogenic driver, including 23 (11.1%) METex14 skipping or other MET mutations. The degree of (non-MET) oncogene overlap decreased with increases in pCN. Patients with MET pCN ≥ 2.7 had lower rates of overlapping drivers compared to those with MET pCN < 2.7 (6.1% vs. 16.3%, P = .033). None of the 7 patients with pCN > 6.7 had an overlapping driver. After adjusting for tumor fraction, adjusted pCN (ApCN) was also lower for those with overlapping drivers than those without (median ApCN 4.9 vs. 7.3, P =.024). There was an inverse relationship between amplicon size and pCN., Conclusions: We propose that a high MET pCN and/or ApCN, together with the absence of overlapping oncogenic drivers and small MET amplicon size, will enrich for patients most likely to derive benefit from MET targeted therapy., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This pooled analysis of nine phase I and II trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) monotherapy studies described drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis in patients treated with T-DXd., Methods: Patients who received T-DXd across nine studies were included. Investigator-assessed ILD/pneumonitis events were retrospectively reviewed by an independent adjudication committee; events adjudicated as drug-related ILD/pneumonitis are summarized., Results: The analysis included 1150 patients (breast cancer, 44.3%; gastric cancer, 25.6%; lung cancer, 17.7%; colorectal cancer, 9.3%; other cancer, 3.0%). Median treatment duration was 5.8 (range, 0.7-56.3) months, with a median of 4 (range, 1-27) prior lines of therapy. The overall incidence of adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4% (grade 5, 2.2%). Most patients with ILD/pneumonitis experienced low-grade events (grade 1 or 2, 77.4%); 87.0% had their first event within 12 months [median, 5.4 (range, <0.1-46.8) months] of their first dose of T-DXd. Based on data review, adjudicated ILD/pneumonitis onset occurred earlier than identified by investigators for 53.2% of events [median difference in onset date, 43 (range, 1-499) days]. Stepwise Cox regression identified several baseline factors potentially associated with increased risk of adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis: age <65 years, enrollment in Japan, T-DXd dose >6.4 mg/kg, oxygen saturation <95%, moderate/severe renal impairment, presence of lung comorbidities, and time since initial diagnosis >4 years., Conclusions: In this pooled analysis of heavily treated patients, the incidence of ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4%, with most being low grade and occurring in the first 12 months of treatment. The benefit-risk of T-DXd treatment is positive; however, some patients may be at increased risk of developing ILD/pneumonitis, and further investigation is needed to confirm ILD/pneumonitis risk factors. Close monitoring and proactive management of ILD/pneumonitis are warranted for all., Competing Interests: Disclosure All authors received nonfinancial support (assistance with manuscript preparation) from ArticulateScience, LLC, funded by AstraZeneca. Additional disclosures are as follows: CAP reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Voluntis, outside of the submitted work. SM reports consulting or advisory roles for Daiichi Sankyo, MacroGenics, and AstraZeneca; speakers bureau involvement with Genentech, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Seagen; travel fees from Genentech and Daiichi Sankyo; honoraria from Novartis; and research funding from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Seagen, Synta, and Daiichi Sankyo. HI reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli Lilly Japan, Chugai, Eisai, Kyowa Kirin, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), GSK, Nippon Kayaku, and Bayer; and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli Lilly Japan, Chugai, Eisai, and Kyowa Kirin. ST reports grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Novartis, Taiho, MSD, Chugai, Bayer, and AstraZeneca. EFS reports consulting or advisory roles for Lilly, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck KGaA, MSD Oncology, Takeda, and Bayer; and research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, and Bristol Myers Squibb. SS reports personal fees from Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck KGaA, Seagen, Checkmab, and AstraZeneca. DYC reports personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, and Daiichi Sankyo; and travel fees from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eisai. EM and NS are employees of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in that company. AQ, JS, and CT are employees of Daiichi Sankyo and may own stock or stock options in that company. DRC reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

If a chest lesion is noted to have been visible on imaging conducted prior to a definitive diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, medico-legal action directed against those considered to have missed the initial diagnosis may ensue. Evidence-based approaches to determine the medical impact of the resulting delay are limited. This article reviews strategies for quantifying the medical impact of missed diagnoses and identifies areas for future research. If no nodal or metastatic disease is present at the time of the definitive diagnosis, the potential impact of the delay is sometimes deduced from the differing 5-year overall survival rates of the T status-associated cancer stage at each time point. However, relapse-free survival, specific lung cancer subtype, time from diagnosis and the medical condition of the patient when the evaluation is being made may also have to be considered. In the absence of T-status change, medical impact from any delay is unlikely to be significant, although the effect of changes in patient fitness on outcomes, emotional distress and lost time for the patient's preparation may be argued. When nodal or metastatic involvement is noted at the time of definitive diagnosis, arguments may be made that these did not exist at the time of the missed diagnosis. However, more nuanced calculations considering differences in the risk of spread based on T-stage at each time point would be preferable. Large datasets to inform T to N-status correlations for such calculations already exist, but data to inform T to M-status correlations are limited., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The hepatocyte growth factor receptor MET represents a resistance mechanism to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition in EGFR mutant (mt) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This Phase 2 study tested whether acquired resistance to erlotinib in MET protein positive NSCLC patients enriched for EGFRmt can be overcome by emibetuzumab plus erlotinib., Patient and Methods: Patients with Stage IV NSCLC with acquired resistance to erlotinib and MET diagnostic (+) (≥ 10% of cells expressing MET at ≥ 2+ IHC staining intensity at any time) were randomized (3:1) to receive emibetuzumab 750 mg every 2 weeks with or without erlotinib 150 mg once daily. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) relative to historic control, with a co-primary objective of ORR in patients with MET expression in ≥ 60% of cells ≥ 2+ (MET ≥ 60%)., Results: One hundred and eleven MET+ patients received emibetuzumab plus erlotinib (N = 83) or emibetuzumab monotherapy (N = 28). 89 of 111 MET+ samples were post-erlotinib. ORR was 3.0% for emibetuzumab plus erlotinib (95% CI: 0.4, 10.5) and 4.3% for emibetuzumab (95% CI: 0.1, 21.9), in patients with post-erlotinib progression biopsies available (n = 89). Similar results were observed in patients with MET ≥ 60% expression (n = 74). Disease control rate and progression-free survival were higher for emibetuzumab plus erlotinib (50%/3.3 months) than for emibetuzumab (26%/1.6 months). No unexpected safety signals emerged. Partial responses were observed in patients with and without EGFRmt or MET amplification. EGFR sensitizing mutations were identified retrospectively in 84.2% of those with available tissue (85/101)., Conclusion: Acquired resistance to erlotinib in MET diagnostic (+) patients was not reversed by emibetuzumab plus erlotinib or emibetuzumab monotherapy, although a subset of patients obtained clinical benefit., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations occur in 3% to 4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Currently, four oral MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are in use for the treatment of patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC (tepotinib, capmatinib, savolitinib, and crizotinib). To support optimal management of METex14 skipping NSCLC in this typically older patient population, the safety profiles of these treatment options are reviewed here. Published safety data from prospective clinical trials with MET TKIs in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC were reviewed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in ≥ 10% of patients were reported where feasible. Guidance on clinical monitoring and management of key MET TKI TRAEs and drug-drug interactions is provided. Across the clinical trials, safety data for MET TKIs were reported for 442 patients with METex14 skipping. Peripheral edema was the most reported TRAE (50%-63% of patients; grade ≥ 3: 1%-11%), followed by nausea (26%-46% of patients; grade ≥ 3: 0%-1%). TRAEs led to dose reductions in 33% to 38% of patients and to discontinuation in 7% to 14% of patients, across the MET TKIs. Considerations on interpreting available safety data are provided, along with insights into monitoring and managing specific MET TKI TRAEs of interest and drug-drug interactions. Overall, MET TKIs are tolerable treatment options for patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC, an older population for whom chemo- or immuno-therapy may not be an effective nor tolerable option. More data regarding the effectiveness of safety interventions and management strategies are needed., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr Tsui reports a collaborator role on a research project with Roche/Genentech, outside the submitted work. Dr Aisner reports ad hoc advisory roles with Blueprint Medicines and Takeda Oncology, grants from Genentech, outside the submitted work. Dr Camidge reports having ad hoc advisory roles with Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Takeda Oncology and Sanofi, and principal investigator role in company sponsored trials at the institution with Pfizer Roche/Genentech and Takeda, outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Introduction: Management of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with driver-mutated NSCLC has traditionally incorporated both tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and intracranial radiation. Whether next generation, CNS-penetrant TKIs can be used alone without upfront radiation, however, remains unknown. This multi-institutional retrospective analysis aimed to compare outcomes in patients with EGFR- or ALK-positive NSCLC who received CNS-penetrant TKI therapy alone versus in combination with radiation for new or progressing intracranial metastases., Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from three academic institutions. Two treatment groups (CNS-penetrant TKI alone versus TKI + CNS radiation therapy) were compared for both EGFR- and ALK-positive cohorts. Outcome variables included time to progression, time to intracranial progression, and time to treatment failure, measured from the date of initiation of CNS-penetrant TKI therapy., Results: A total of 147 patients were included (EGFR n = 94, ALK n = 52, both n = 1). In patients receiving radiation, larger metastases, neurologic symptoms, and receipt of steroids were more common. There were no significant differences between TKI and CNS radiation therapy plus TKI groups for any of the study outcomes, including time to progression (8.5 versus 6.9 mo, p = 0.13 [EFGR] and 11.4 versus 13.4 mo, p = 0.98 [ALK]), time to intracranial progression (14.8 versus 20.5 mo, p = 0.51 [EGFR] and 18.1 versus 21.8 mo, p = 0.65 [ALK]), or time to treatment failure (13.8 versus 8.6 mo, p = 0.26 [EGFR] and 13.5 versus 23.2 mo, p = 0.95 [ALK])., Conclusions: These results provide preliminary evidence that intracranial activity of CNS-penetrant TKIs may enable local radiation to be deferred in appropriately selected patients without negatively affecting progression., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In the phase 3 study entitled ALK in Lung cancer Trial of brigAtinib in 1st Line (ALTA-1L), which is a study of brigatinib in ALK inhibitor-naive advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, brigatinib exhibited superior progression-free survival (PFS) versus crizotinib in the two planned interim analyses. Here, we report the final efficacy, safety, and exploratory results., Methods: Patients were randomized to brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in at 90 mg once daily) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was a blinded independent review committee-assessed PFS. Genetic alterations in plasma cell-free DNA were assessed in relation to clinical efficacy., Results: A total of 275 patients were enrolled (brigatinib, n = 137; crizotinib, n = 138). At study end, (brigatinib median follow-up = 40.4 mo), the 3-year PFS by blinded independent review committee was 43% (brigatinib) versus 19% (crizotinib; median = 24.0 versus 11.1 mo, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.66). The median overall survival was not reached in either group (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53-1.22). Posthoc analyses suggested an overall survival benefit for brigatinib in patients with baseline brain metastases (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.89). Detectable baseline EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 and TP53 mutation in plasma were associated with poor PFS. Brigatinib exhibited superior efficacy compared with crizotinib regardless of EML4-ALK variant and TP53 mutation. Emerging secondary ALK mutations were rare in patients progressing on brigatinib. No new safety signals were observed., Conclusions: In the ALTA-1L final analysis, with longer follow-up, brigatinib continued to exhibit superior efficacy and tolerability versus crizotinib in patients with or without poor prognostic biomarkers. The suggested survival benefit with brigatinib in patients with brain metastases warrants future study., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, a Notch pathway ligand highly expressed on SCLC cells. Rova-T was evaluated alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin combined with etoposide [CE]) in frontline treatment of extensive-stage SCLC., Methods: One cycle of CE pre-enrollment was permitted (later mandated). The following four cohorts were enrolled: Rova-T monotherapy (0.3 mg/kg, every 6 [q6] wk × 2; cohort 1; n = 4); Rova-T induction (0.3 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) followed by CE every 21 days (q21) × 4 (cohort 2; n = 5); Rova-T (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) overlapping with CE q21 × 4 (cohort 3; n = 14); and Rova-T maintenance (0.3 mg/kg, q6 wk × 2) after CE q21 × 4 (cohort 4; n = 3)., Results: A total of 26 patients were dosed (cohort 3: 14; cohorts 1, 2, and 4 combined: 12). Median age was 66 years, and 73% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. In cohort 3, seven patients (50%) had confirmed objective responses, with a median progression-free survival of 5.2 months and median overall survival of 10.3 months. Compared with cohorts 1, 2, and 4 combined, cohort 3 had lower frequency of some Rova-T-related adverse events of special interest, such as pleural effusion (0 versus 33%), pericardial effusion (0 versus 17%), ascites (0 versus 8%), peripheral edema (36% versus 42%), generalized edema (0 versus 8%), pneumonia (7% versus 25%), and hypoalbuminemia (0 versus 17%)., Conclusions: Lower Rova-T doses may be associated with lower incidence of some Rova-T-related adverse events of special interest. Rova-T 0.2 mg/kg plus CE (cohort 3) was tolerable; however, there was no clear efficacy benefit of adding Rova-T to CE., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: MET amplification is a rare, potentially actionable, primary oncogenic driver in patients with NSCLC., Methods: The influence of MET amplification on the clinical activity of the ALK, ROS1, and MET inhibitor, crizotinib (250 mg twice daily), was examined in patients with NSCLC (NCT00585195) who were enrolled into high (≥4 MET-to-CEP7 ratio), medium (>2.2 to <4 MET-to-CEP7 ratio), or low (≥1.8 to ≤2.2 MET-to-CEP7 ratio) amplification categories. Retrospective next-generation sequencing profiling was performed on archival tumor tissue. End points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and progression-free survival., Results: A total of 38 patients with a MET-to-CEP7 ratio greater than or equal to 1.8 by local fluorescence in situ hybridization testing received crizotinib. All patients were response-assessable, among whom 21, 14, and 3 had high, medium, and low MET amplification, respectively. ORRs of 8 of 21 (38.1%), 2 of 14 (14.3%), and 1 of 3 (33.3%), median duration of response of 5.2, 3.8, and 12.2 months, and median progression-free survival values of 6.7, 1.9, and 1.8 months were observed for those with high, medium, and low MET amplification, respectively. MET amplification gene copy number greater than or equal to 6 was detected by next-generation sequencing in 15 of 19 (78.9%) analyzable patients. Of these 15 patients, objective responses were observed in six (40%), two of whom had concurrent MET exon 14 alterations. No responses were observed among five patients with concurrent KRAS, BRAF, or EGFR mutations., Conclusions: Patients with high-level, MET-amplified NSCLC responded to crizotinib with the highest ORR. Use of combined diagnostics for MET and other oncogenes may potentially identify patients most likely to respond to crizotinib., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Symptomatic early onset pulmonary events (EOPEs) were observed in 3% to 6% of patients within 1 week of starting brigatinib at 90 mg daily for 7 days followed by 180 mg daily. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to measure pulmonary function changes on initiating brigatinib., Methods: Patients initiating brigatinib were eligible. Pulmonary function test (PFT) with diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), Borg dyspnea scale, six-minute walk test, and blood draw for cytometry by time-of-flight were performed at baseline, day 2, and day 8 plus or minus day 15 of brigatinib. The primary end point was the incidence of PFT-defined EOPEs, prespecified as greater than or equal to 20% DLCO reduction from baseline. An interim analysis was performed owing to a higher than expected incidence of DLCO reduction., Results: A total of 90% (nine of 10) experienced DLCO reduction with the nadir occurring on day 2 or day 8. Median DLCO nadir was -13.33% from baseline (range: -34.44 to -5.00). Three participants met the PFT-defined EOPE criteria. All patients, including these three, were asymptomatic, none required brigatinib interruption or dose reduction, and all patients escalated to 180 mg without further issues. Despite continued dosing, by day 15, all assessed patients experienced DLCO recovery. Dyspnea and six-minute walk test results did not correlate with DLCO changes. Patients with a PFT-defined EOPE had significantly higher levels of activated neutrophils at baseline and day 8., Conclusions: DLCO reduction occurred in 90% during the first 8 days of brigatinib dosing without any related symptoms. DLCO improved in all six patients assessed at day 15 despite continued dosing and dose escalation. Pretreatment levels of neutrophil activation should be explored as a biomarker for developing EOPEs., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We retrospectively examined progression-free survival (PFS) and response by ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) status in patients with advanced ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive NSCLC in the ALEX study., Methods: A total of 303 treatment-naive patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. ALK status was assessed centrally using Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx IHC and Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit. Primary end point is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points of interest are objective response rate and duration., Results: Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly prolonged with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive tumors (n = 203, 67%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.56; p < 0.0001) and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative tumors (n = 61, 20%) (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.78) but not in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors (n = 39, 13%) (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.6-3.2). Objective response rates were higher with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive tumors (90.6% versus 81.4%; stratified OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 0.97-5.07) and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative tumors (96.0% versus 75.0%; OR = 9.29, 95% CI: 1.05-81.88) but not in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors (28.6% versus 44.4%; OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.12-1.74). Next-generation sequencing was performed in 35 of 39 patients with ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors; no ALK fusion was identified in 20 of 35 patients (57.1%) by next-generation sequencing, but 10 of 20 (50.0%) had partial response or stable disease., Conclusions: Outcomes of patients with ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative NSCLC were similar to those of the overall ALEX population. These results suggest that Ventana ALK IHC is a standard testing method for selecting patients for treatment with alectinib., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Brigatinib is a potent next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with activity against ALK resistance mutations and central nervous system activity. We prospectively studied the activity and safety of brigatinib in patients with disease progression after other next-generation ALK TKIs., Methods: Patients with stage IIIB or IV ALK+ NSCLC and progressive disease after next-generation ALK TKIs were eligible. Patients were required to undergo tumor biopsy less than or equal to 60 days before enrollment, and circulating tumor DNA was collected at baseline. Brigatinib treatment was 90 mg daily for 7 days and then escalated to 180 mg daily. Primary end point was objective response rate, and two-stage design was used., Results: Between March 2017 and November 2018, a total of 20 patients were treated in stage 1; median age was 55 years (range: 32-71), median number of previous therapies was three (range: 1-6), median number of previous ALK TKIs was two (range: 1-4), and 11 had central nervous system disease at baseline. The objective response rate was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19%-62%), and the duration of response was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.6-nonassessable). With follow-up of 22 months, the median progression-free survival was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.6-10.1). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were consistent with those of previous studies., Conclusions: Brigatinib has activity in ALK+ NSCLC after previous next-generation ALK TKIs. Further study in patients with disease progression on next-generation ALK TKI is warranted. National Clinical Trials #: NCT02706626., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Almonertinib (HS-10296) is a novel, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) that targets both EGFR-sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. This first-in-human trial aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of almonertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC that had progressed after pevious EGFR TKI therapy., Methods: This phase 1, open-label, multicenter clinical trial (NCT0298110) included dose-escalation (55, 110, 220, and 260 mg) and dose-expansion cohorts (55, 110, and 220 mg) with once daily oral administration of almonertinib. In each expansion cohort, tumor biopsies were obtained for the determination of EGFR T790M status. The safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of almonertinib were evaluated., Results: A total of 120 patients (26 patients in the dose-escalation cohort and 94 patients in the dose-expansion cohort) were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose was not defined in the dose-escalation phase; the 260 mg regimen was not further evaluated in the dose-expansion phase owing to safety concerns and saturation of exposure. The most common treatment-related grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (10%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (3%). Among 94 patients with the EGFR T790M mutation in the dose-expansion cohort, the investigator-assessed objective response rate and disease control rate were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42-63) and 92% (95% CI: 84-96), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.5-not reached) months., Conclusions: Almonertinib is safe, tolerable and effective for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring the EGFR T790M mutation who were pretreated with EGFR TKIs., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We retrospectively examined progression-free survival (PFS) and response by ALK fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) status in patients with advanced ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the ALEX study., Methods: 303 treatment-naïve patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. ALK status was assessed centrally using Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx IHC and Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints of interest: objective response rate (ORR) and duration., Results: Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly prolonged with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors (n = 203, 67%) (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25-0.56) and ALK IHC-positive/FISH-uninformative tumors (n = 61, 20%) (HR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.78), but not ALK IHC-positive/FISH-negative tumors (n = 39, 13%) (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.6-3.2). ORRs were higher with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors 90.6% versus 81.4%; stratified odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% CI: 0.97-5.07) and ALK IHC-positive/FISH-uninformative tumors (96.0% versus 75.0%; OR 9.29, 95% CI: 1.05-81.88), but not ALK IHC-positive/FISH-negative tumors (28.6% versus 44.4%; OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.12-1.74). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 35/39 patients with ALK IHC-positive/FISH-negative tumors; no ALK fusion was identified in 20/35 (57.1%) patients by NGS, but 10/20 (50.0%) had partial response/stable disease., Conclusion: Outcomes of patients with ALK IHC-positive/FISH-positive and ALK IHC-positive/FISH-uninformative NSCLC were similar to the overall ALEX population. These results suggest that Ventana ALK IHC is a standard testing method for selecting patients for treatment with alectinib., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Phase I and II trials provide the initial human safety and tolerability data for new drugs. Nevertheless, the methods for presenting toxicity data are not standardized. Clinicians often first encounter these data at professional conferences. We sought to characterize how the burden of adverse events (AEs) is reported at the largest professional conference in clinical oncology., Methods: We collected toxicity data from all lung cancer-associated phase I and II trial presentations and posters at the American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings from 2017 to 2019. We captured the various AE features, including the minimum incidence used for reporting; whether AEs found were treatment emergent or treatment related, grouped by organ system or separated by individual descriptors; whether combined or separated across dose levels when a dose-escalation component was included; and whether dose-limiting toxicities, serious AE, dose-reduction rules, and denominators for laboratory tests were described., Results: A total of 209 trials were analyzed. There was wide variability in toxicity reporting practices. Six different thresholds for reporting AEs of any grade were used. Treatment-related AEs were reported twice as frequently as treatment-emergent AEs. Toxicities were as likely to be reported across dose levels as by dose level. Terms such as dose-limiting toxicity and serious AE were rarely defined. Dose-reduction rules and denominators for laboratory tests were never defined., Conclusions: Standardization of methods for reporting toxicities could improve the quality and ease of comparability of data on adverse effects in early phase therapeutic trials. A minimal AE data disclosure template is proposed., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We evaluated pulmonary adverse events observed within 7 days after drug initiation in phase 1 to phase 3 studies of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor brigatinib., Methods: The phase 1/2 study enrolled patients with advanced malignancies (dosage range, 30 mg-300 mg once a day); the phase 2 ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113 study treated patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC postcrizotinib at either 90 mg once a day or 90 mg once a day for 7 days followed by 180 mg once a day; and the phase 3 ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of Brigatinib in first Line study treated inhibitor-naive patients with ALK+ NSCLC with brigatinib (180 mg once a day [with 7-day lead-in at 90 mg once a day]) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day). Early-onset pulmonary events (EOPEs) at least possibly associated with brigatinib were captured., Results: In the phase 1/2, ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113, and ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of Brigatinib in first Line studies, 8% (11/137), 6% (14/219), and 3% (4/136) of patients, respectively, had at least possible EOPEs on brigatinib, with frequency appearing to increase with the starting dosage. Across trials, at the 90-mg once-a-day starting dosage (alone or step-up dosing), 4.5% of patients (20/440) had at least possible events (median time to onset, 2 days). A total of 12 patients (3%) had grade 3 or higher events leading to brigatinib discontinuation. Seven patients (1.5%) had grade 1 to grade 2 events and successfully continued brigatinib with or without brigatinib interruption, steroids, or supplemental oxygen. In pooled analysis of these trials, occurrence of EOPEs was significantly associated with continuous 10-year increases in patient age in unadjusted logistic regression analysis, and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and number of previous regimens in multivariate regression., Conclusions: Clinically apparent EOPEs can occur within days of commencing brigatinib in a subset of patients with NSCLC. Identifying clinical parameters associated with a higher risk of developing such events may help mitigate these events., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The clinicopathologic characteristics, acquired resistance patterns, and outcomes among patients with atypical EGFR mutations and HER2 alterations remain underexplored., Patients and Methods: A single-center retrospective review was conducted. Oncogenes assessed include typical EGFR (t-EGFR; exon 19 del and L858R), atypical EGFR (a-EGFR; G719X, exon 20, L861Q), HER2 (exon 19, exon 20, amplifications), gene fusions (ALK, ROS1, RET), RAS (KRAS, NRAS), and RAF (BRAF V600E). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) were collected., Results: Among 570 patients, we found 55 a-EGFR mutations (13 G719X, 38 exon 20, 4 L861Q) and 31 HER2 alterations (2 exon 19 mutations, 27 exon 20 insertions, 2 amplifications). Patients with EGFR and HER2 alterations had increased lung and bone metastases relative to patients with gene fusions, RAS/RAF mutations, and no identified driver oncogenes (P < .001). Patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions had a median PFS to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of 5 months and an OS of 16 months-significantly worse than exon 19 del and L858R (Bonferroni correction; P < .001), but not G719X or L861Q. Relative to t-EGFR mutations, T790M and MET amplification occurred less frequently as acquired resistance mechanisms among a-EGFR samples (P < .001). Ten patients with a-EGFR mutations and HER2 alterations received single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with no radiographic responses and a median PFS of 2 months., Conclusion: EGFR and HER2-mutated NSCLC have a high rate of synchronous lung and bone metastases. Patients with a-EGFR mutations have inferior responses to EGFR-directed therapies with lower rates of acquired T790M and MET amplification. Responses to ICIs are uniformly poor. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We report updated data from a phase 2 randomized study evaluating brigatinib in crizotinib-refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive NSCLC., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to take either oral brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg (arm B), stratified by central nervous system (CNS) metastases and best response to crizotinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses included CNS versus ex-CNS target lesion response and correlation of depth of response with PFS and OS., Results: Among 222 randomized patients (112 and 110 in arms A and B, respectively), 59 (27%) remained on brigatinib at analysis (median follow-up: 19.6 versus 24.3 months). At baseline, 71% and 67% had brain lesions among A and B arms, respectively. Investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate was 46% versus 56%. Median IRC-assessed PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval: 7.4-12.8) versus 16.7 months (11.6-21.4). Median OS was 29.5 months (18.2-not reached) versus 34.1 months (27.7-not reached). IRC-confirmed intracranial objective response rate in patients with measurable baseline brain lesions was 50% (13 of 26) versus 67% (12 of 18); median duration of intracranial response was 9.4 versus 16.6 months. IRC-assessed iPFS was 12.8 versus 18.4 months. Across arms, median IRC-assessed PFS was 1.9, 5.5, 11.1, 16.7, and 15.6 months for patients with no, 1%-25%, 26%-50%, 51%-75%, and 76%-100% target lesion shrinkage, respectively. No new safety findings were observed with longer follow-up., Conclusions: Brigatinib (180 mg once daily with lead-in) continues to demonstrate robust PFS, long iPFS and duration of intracranial response, and high intracranial objective response rate in crizotinib-refractory patients. Depth of response may be an important end point to capture in future targeted therapy trials., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Nivolumab monotherapy is approved in the United States for third-line or later metastatic small cell lung cancer based on pooled data from nonrandomized and randomized cohorts of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 trial of nivolumab ± ipilimumab (CheckMate 032; NCT01928394). We report updated results, including long-term overall survival (OS), from the randomized cohort., Methods: Patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression after one to two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 3:2 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by number of prior chemotherapy regimens and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review., Results: Overall, 147 patients received nivolumab and 96 nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Minimum follow-up for ORR/progression-free survival/safety was 11.9 months (nivolumab) and 11.2 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). ORR increased with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (21.9% versus 11.6% with nivolumab; odds ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-4.26; p = 0.03). For long-term OS, minimum follow-up was 29.0 months (nivolumab) versus 28.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab); median (95% confidence interval) OS was 5.7 (3.8-7.6) versus 4.7 months (3.1-8.3). Twenty-four-month OS rates were 17.9% (nivolumab) and 16.9% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 12.9% (nivolumab) versus 37.5% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and treatment-related deaths were n =1 versus n = 3, respectively., Conclusions: Whereas ORR (primary endpoint) was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, OS was similar between groups. In each group, OS remained encouraging with long-term follow-up. Toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Rare cases of early-onset pulmonary events (EOPEs) occurring within days of the start of administration of brigatinib have been reported (incidence 3%-6% with use of the recommended dose of 90 mg for 7 days and then a 180-mg step-up dosing regimen). Current prescribing information suggests dose interruption and then dose reduction for grade 1 or 2 events and discontinuation for recurrent or higher grade events. However, clinical experience suggests that alternative strategies exist to safely maintain dosing., Methods: Case vignettes illustrating different EOPE clinical scenarios were assembled; they included (1) successful treatment through the initial EOPE, (2) successful rechallenge after the EOPE, (3) successful rechallenge after the EOPE with utilization of a shallower step-up regimen, and (4) unsuccessful rechallenge., Results: Rapid tolerization to EOPEs within 5 to 8 days may occur with continued dosing, suggesting that dose interruption could be avoided with close observation and temporary supportive care (including supplemental oxygen). If dose interruption occurs, restarting administration of brigatinib at 30 mg, followed by dose increases in 30-mg increments every 3 days to the full dose as tolerated ("shallow step-up dosing") may maximize safety during rechallenge. As compromised baseline respiratory function may increase the rate of clinically apparent EOPEs, proactive use of shallow step-up dosing could be considered in select cases., Conclusions: Clinically apparent EOPEs are a rare complication of brigatinib. They occur within days of starting administration of the drug, with rapid tolerization possible during continued dosing. Adapting the EOPE nomenclature to include the word transient (TEOPE) may further clinician and patient understanding in distinguishing these events from the pneumonitis seen with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Improved education and appropriate supportive care and dosing should allow more patients to maximally and safely benefit from brigatinib., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: At the prior data cutoff (February 9, 2017) the ALEX trial showed superior investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) for alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, advanced NSCLC (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.65, p < 0.001). The median PFS in the alectinib arm was not reached versus 11.1 months with crizotinib. Retrospective analyses suggest that the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene-ALK variant (EML4-ALK) may influence ALK-inhibitor treatment benefit. We present updated analyses, including exploratory subgroup analysis by EML4-ALK variant, after an additional 10 months' follow-up (cutoff December 1, 2017)., Methods: Patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib, 600 mg, or crizotinib, 250 mg, until disease progression, toxicity, death, or withdrawal. PFS was determined by the investigators. Baseline plasma and tissue biomarker samples were analyzed by using hybrid-capture, next-generation sequencing to determine EML4-ALK variant., Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced. Investigator-assessed PFS was prolonged with alectinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.58). The median PFS times were 34.8 months with alectinib and 10.9 months with crizotinib. EML4-ALK fusions were detectable in 129 patient plasma samples and 124 tissue samples; variants 1, 2, and 3/ab did not affect PFS, objective response rate, or duration of response. Investigator-assessed PFS was longer for alectinib than for crizotinib across EML4-ALK variants 1, 2, and 3a/b in plasma and tissue. Despite longer treatment duration (27.0 months in the case of alectinib versus 10.8 months in the case of crizotinib), the safety of alectinib compared favorably with that of crizotinib., Conclusion: Alectinib continues to demonstrate superior investigator-assessed PFS versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive NSCLC, irrespective of EML4-ALK variant., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We retrospectively analyzed the effects of crizotinib on serum creatinine and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced NSCLC across four trials (NCT00585195, NCT00932451, NCT00932893, and NCT01154140)., Methods: Changes from baseline data in serum creatinine and eGFR, calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine-based equation, were assessed over time. eGFR was graded using standard chronic kidney disease criteria., Results: Median serum creatinine increased from 0.79 mg/dL at baseline to 0.93 mg/dL after 2 weeks of treatment (median percentage increase from baseline, 21.2%), was stable from week 12 (0.96 mg/dL) to week 104 (1.00 mg/dL), and decreased to 0.90 mg/dL at 28 days after last dose (median percentage increase from baseline, 13.1%). Median eGFR decreased over time (96.42, 80.23, 78.06 and 75.45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at baseline, week 2, week 12, and week 104, respectively) and increased to 83.02 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at 28 days after the last dose. Median percentage decrease from baseline was 14.9%, 17.0%, and 10.4% at week 2, week 12, and 28 days after last dose of crizotinib, respectively. Overall, 12.6% of patients had a shift from eGFR grade less than or equal to 3a (≥45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) at baseline to greater than or equal to 3b (<45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) post-baseline., Conclusions: Crizotinib resulted in a decline in creatinine-based estimates of renal function mostly over the first 2 weeks of treatment. However, there was minimal evidence of cumulative effects with prolonged treatment and these changes were largely reversible following treatment discontinuation, consistent with previous reports suggesting this may be predominantly an effect on creatinine secretion as opposed to true nephrotoxicity., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Clinical variables describing the natural history and longitudinal therapy outcomes of stage IV anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement positive (ALK-positive) NSCLC and their relationship with long-term overall survival (OS) have not previously been described in detail., Methods: Patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with an ALK inhibitor at the University of Colorado Cancer Center from 2009 through November 2017 were identified retrospectively. OS curves were constructed by using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to determine the relationship of variables with OS., Results: Of the 110 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who were identified, 105 received crizotinib as their initial ALK inhibitor. With a median follow-up time of 47 months, the median OS time from diagnosis of stage IV disease was 81 months (6.8 years). Brain metastases at diagnosis of stage IV disease (hazard ratio = 1.01, p = 0.971) and year of stage IV presentation (p = 0.887) did not influence OS. More organs with tumor at diagnosis of stage IV disease was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.49 for each additional organ with disease, including the CNS [p = 0.002]). Each additional month of pemetrexed-based therapy was associated with a 7% relative decrease in risk of death., Conclusion: Patients with stage IV ALK-positive NSCLC can have prolonged OS. Brain metastases at diagnosis of stage IV disease does not influence OS. Having more organs involved with tumor at stage IV presentation is associated with worse outcomes. Prolonged benefit from pemetrexed is associated with better outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Genomic variants that lead to MET proto-oncogenem receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) exon 14 skipping represent a potential targetable molecular abnormality in NSCLC. Consequently, reliable molecular diagnostic approaches that detect these variants are vital for patient care., Methods: We screened tumor samples from patients with NSCLC for MET exon 14 skipping by using two distinct approaches: a DNA-based next-generation sequencing assay that uses an amplicon-mediated target enrichment and an RNA-based next-generation sequencing assay that uses anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction for target enrichment., Results: The DNA-based approach detected MET exon 14 skipping variants in 11 of 856 NSCLC samples (1.3%). The RNA-based approach detected MET exon 14 skipping in 17 of 404 samples (4.2%), which was a statistically significant increase compared with the DNA-based assay. Among 286 samples tested by both assays, RNA-based testing detected 10 positives, six of which were not detected by the DNA-based assay. Examination of primer binding sites in the DNA-based assay in comparison with published MET exon 14 skipping variants revealed genomic deletion involving primer binding sequences as the likely cause of false negatives. Two samples positive via the DNA-based approach were uninformative via the RNA-based approach due to poor-quality RNA., Conclusions: By circumventing an inherent limitation of DNA-based amplicon-mediated testing, RNA-based analysis detected a higher proportion of MET exon 14 skipping cases. However, RNA-based analysis was highly reliant on RNA quality, which can be suboptimal in some clinical samples., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This study aims to determine whether advanced ROS1 gene-rearranged NSCLC (ROS1+ NSCLC) has a higher than expected thromboembolic event (TEE) rate., Methods: Venous and arterial TEEs within ±365 days of diagnosis of ROS1+, ALK+, EGFR+, or KRAS+ advanced NSCLC at five academic centers in the United States and China were captured (October 2002-April 2018). The primary endpoint was incidence of TEE in ROS1+ compared to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+, EGFR+, and KRAS+ NSCLC within ±90 days of diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to assess if the odds of TEE differed among oncogene drivers., Results: Eligible data from 95 ROS1+, 193 ALK+, 300 EGFR+, and 152 KRAS+ NSCLC patients were analyzed. The incidence rate of TEE was 34.7% (n = 33), 22.3% (n = 43), 13.7% (n = 41), and 18.4% (n = 28), respectively. In univariate analysis, the odds of a TEE in ROS1+ NSCLC were higher than ALK+, EGFR+, and KRAS+ cohorts. In multivariable analysis, the odds of a TEE were significantly higher for ROS1+ compared to EGFR+ and KRAS+ cohorts, the odds ratio (OR) was 2.44, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.31-4.57 (p = 0.005), and OR: 2.62, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.26-5.46 (p = 0.01), respectively. Although numerically superior, the odds for a TEE with ROS1+ compared to ALK+ was not statistically significant (OR: 1.45, p = 0.229). Overall survival was not significantly different in patients with or without TEE within ±90 days of diagnosis in the overall study cohort or within each molecular group., Conclusions: The risk of peridiagnostic TEEs is significantly elevated in patients with advanced ROS+ NSCLC compared to EGFR+ and KRAS+ cases. TEE risk may be similarly elevated in ALK+ NSCLC., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)