Search

Objective: To investigate aspects of image quality, feasibility and patient comfort in dedicated spiral breast computed tomography (B-CT) in a large patient cohort., Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. 2418 B-CT scans from 1222 women examined between 04/16/2019 and 04/13/2022 were analyzed. Patients evaluated their comfort during the examination, radiographers carrying out the scans evaluated the patient's mobility and usability of the B-CT device, whereas radiologists assessed lesion contrast, detectability of calcifications, breast coverage and overall image quality. For semi-quantitative assessment, a Likert-Scale was used and statistical significance and correlations were calculated using ANOVAs and Spearman tests., Results: Comfort, mobility and usability of the B-CT were rated each with either "no" or "negligible" complaints in >99%. Image quality was rated with "no" or "negligible complaints" in 96.7%. Lesion contrast and detectability of calcifications were rated either "optimal" or "good" in 92.6% and 98.4%. "Complete" and "almost complete" breast coverage were reported in 41.9%, while the pectoral muscle was found not to be covered in 56.0%. Major parts of the breast were not covered in 2.1%. Some variables were significantly correlated, such as age with comfort (ρ = -0.168, p < .001) and mobility (ρ = -0.172, p < .001) as well as patient weight with lesion contrast (ρ = 0.172, p < .001) and breast coverage (ρ = -0.109, p < .001)., Conclusions: B-CT provides high image quality and contrast of soft tissue lesions as well as calcifications, while covering the pre-pectoral areas of the breast remains challenging. B-CT is easy to operate for the radiographer and comfortable for the majority of women., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The incremental value of copeptin, a novel marker of endogenous stress, for rapid rule-out of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is unclear when sensitive or even high-sensitivity cardiac troponin cTn (hs-cTn) assays are used., Methods: In an international multicenter study we evaluated 1929 consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Measurements of copeptin, three sensitive and three hs-cTn assays were performed at presentation in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all clinical information including coronary angiography and levels of hs-cTnT. The incremental value in the diagnosis of NSTEMI was quantified using four outcome measures: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV). Early presenters (< 4h since chest pain onset) were a pre-defined subgroup., Results: NSTEMI was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 358 (18.6%) patients. As compared to the use of cTn alone, copeptin significantly increased AUC for two (33%) and IDI (between 0.010 and 0.041 (all p < 0.01)), sensitivity and NPV for all six cTn assays (100%); NPV to 96-99% when the 99 th percentile of the respective cTnI assay was combined with a copeptin level of 9 pmol/l (all p < 0.01). The incremental value in early presenters was similar to that of the overall cohort., Conclusion: When used for rapid rule-out of NSTEM in combination with sensitive or hs-cTnI assays, copeptin provides a numerically small, but statistically and likely also clinically significant incremental value., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diabetes is a major risk factor for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Assessment of diabetic patients is challenging due to an often atypical presentation of symptoms. We aimed to evaluate the two novel biomarkers copeptin and high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-TnT) for the improvement of early diagnosis and risk-stratification in patients with diabetes and suspected AMI., Methods: In this prospective international multicenter study we evaluated 379 patients with diabetes in a cohort of 1991 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI. The measurement of biomarkers was performed at presentation., Results: Among the 379 diabetic patients, 32.7% had AMI, and in the 1621 patients without diabetes, 18.8% had AMI. The additional use of copeptin improved the diagnostic accuracy provided by conventional troponin alone (AUC 0.86 vs. 0.79, p=0.004). During a median follow-up of 814 days, 49 (13.1%) diabetic patients died. Cumulative 2-year survival rate for patients with copeptin levels below 9 pmol/l was 96.6% compared to 82.8% in patients above that level (p<0.001). The same was observed for hs-TnT with a cutoff level of 14 ng/l (97.7% vs. 82.0%, p<0.001) respective of cTnT with a cutoff level of 10 ng/l (93.5% vs. 75.6%, p<0.001). In multivariate Cox analysis, copeptin, hs-TnT and cTnT were strong and independent predictors of 24-month-mortality. Using the dual marker strategy (copeptin and troponin) identified two groups of high-risk patients where 22.5% of the group with hs-cTnT and copeptin above the cutoff and 28.6% with cTnT and copeptin above the cutoff died., Conclusion: In diabetic patients, copeptin only slightly improves the early diagnosis of AMI provided by hs-cTnT. However, both markers (copeptin and troponin) predict long-term mortality accurately and independently of each other., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endothelial dysfunction plays a major role in cardiovascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, its quantification has not been available as a clinical tool., Methods: In a prospective international multicentre study, we analyzed the diagnostic and prognostic utility of endothelial dysfunction as quantified by C-terminal proendothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) in 658 consecutive patients presenting with suspected AMI. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Patients were followed long-term for mortality., Results: The adjudicated final diagnosis was AMI in 145 patients (22%). The diagnostic performance of CT-proET-1 for AMI was moderate; its area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve amounted to 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.72; P < 0.001). There was no significant increase in the AUC when CT-proET-1 was added to either cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT). Seventy four percent of patients who died during the first 24 months (n = 50) were in the fourth quartile of the CT-proET-1 presentation value (>82 pmol/L). The prognostic accuracy of CT-proET-1 regarding mortality was tantamount to that of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and outperformed cTnT and hs-cTnT both in patients with AMI and in patients without acute coronary syndrome. CT-proET-1 at presentation yielded high prognostic accuracy that was similar to that of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores. The TIMI risk score could be significantly improved by adding CT-proET-1 (integrated discriminatory improvement [IDI] of 0.074 P = 0.004)., Conclusions: Use of CT-proET-1 improves risk stratification of unselected patients with suspected AMI. CT-proET-1 did not provide additional diagnostic value., (Copyright © 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays allows the assessment of clinical decision values below the 99th percentile., Methods: Final diagnosis and one-year mortality were adjudicated in a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1181 patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. Hs-cTnT (Roche) and cTnI-ultra (Siemens) were measured in a blinded fashion., Results: At presentation hs-cTnT and cTnI-ultra were below the limit of blank (LOB) in 201 (17%) and 549 (47%) patients, below the 75th percentile in 379 (32%) and 623 (53%) patients, below the 95th percentile in 603 (51%) and 808 (68%), and below the 99th percentile in 748 (63%) and 913 (77%), respectively. Sensitivities for the diagnosis of AMI were 100.0% and 96.8% respectively for hs-cTnT and cTnI-ultra (LOB as cut-off value), 99.5% and 96.2% (75th percentile), 96.8% and 93.0% (95th percentile), and 94.1% and 88.1% (99th percentile). The proportion of patients correctly classified as having or not AMI increased from 32.9% (LOB as cut-off value) to 47.8% (75th percentile), 65.9% (95th percentile) and 77.3% (99th percentile) for hs-cTnT and from 61.2% to 67.3%, 81.9% and 89.3% respectively for cTnI-ultra. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was very low and similar for patients below all of these cut-off levels (between 0.7% and 1.5%, p=0.748 for all-groups comparison)., Conclusion: cTn should be considered as a continuous variable. Decision values below the 99th percentile (e.g. the 75th percentile) are associated with a very high NPV for the diagnosis of AMI, but have a lower accuracy than the 99th percentile., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We examined whether undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin (hs-cTn) can be used to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a single blood draw at presentation to the emergency department (ED)., Methods and Results: In a prospective multicenter study we used 4 different hs-cTn assays (hs-cTnT Roche, and hs-cTnI Siemens, hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter and hs-cTnI Abbott) in consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain. The final diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all available data including serial hs-cTnT levels. Mean follow up was 24 months. Among 2072 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnT levels, 21% had an adjudicated diagnosis of AMI. Among AMI patients, 98.2% had initially detectable levels of hs-cTnT (sensitivity 98.2%, 95%CI 96.3%-99.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%, 95%CI 97.0%-99.3%). Undetectable levels of hs-cTnT ruled out AMI in 26.5% of patients at presentation. The NPV was similar with the three hs-cTnI assays: among 1180 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Siemens), the NPV was 98.8%; among 1151 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Beckman Coulter), the NPV was 99.2%; among 1567 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Abbott), the NPV was 100.0%. The percentage of patients with undetectable levels of hs-cTnI was similar among the three hs-cTnI assays and ranged from 11.4% to 13.9%., Conclusions: Undetectable levels of hs-cTn at presentation have a very high NPV and seem to allow the simple and rapid rule out of AMI. This criteria applies to much more patients with hs-TnT as compared to the investigated hs-cTnI assays., (© 2013.)

Background: Current guidelines require a change (rise and/or fall) in levels of cardiac troponin (cTn) for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unknown whether absolute or relative changes provide higher accuracy when using high-sensitivity cTnI assays., Methods: In a prospective international multicentre study, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of early absolute and relative changes in cTnI measured with two novel pre-commercial high-sensitivity assays (Siemens and Beckman Coulter) in 943 unselected patients presenting to the ED with suspected AMI. The final diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated using all available data including serial hs-cTnT levels by two independent cardiologists., Results: The diagnostic accuracy of absolute changes in the diagnosis of AMI as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was very high (e.g. at 2 h, Siemens high-sensitivity cTnI AUC 0.93, 95%Cl 0.90-0.96; Beckman Coulter high-sensitivity cTnI AUC 0.93, 95%Cl 0.90-0.96) and superior to relative changes at all time points (p < 0.001). The results were consistent in clinically important subgroups. Direct comparison of the absolute changes in the two high-sensitivity cTnI assays showed similar accuracy. When combined with the baseline cTnI levels, the difference between absolute and relative changes became much smaller and remained statistically significant only for the Siemens assay., Conclusions: As single variables early absolute changes in high-sensitivity cTnI levels have significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than relative changes. When combined with the baseline cTn level, reflecting clinical practice, both absolute and relative changes provided very high accuracy with much smaller differences between both approaches., (© 2013.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) in the early diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain in comparison with established and novel biomarkers and risk scores., Methods: In this prospective, observational, international, multi-center trial (APACE), MR-proADM was determined in 1179 unselected patients with acute chest pain. Patients were followed for 24 months., Results: MR-proADM concentrations at presentation were higher in patients with AMI (median: 0.78 nmol/l, IQR 0.60-1.13) than in patients with other diagnoses (0.64 nmol/l, IQR 0.49-0.86 nmol/l; p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of MR-proADM for AMI as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.66. Adding MR-proADM to hs-cTnT could not improve its diagnostic accuracy for AMI (p=0.431). Seventy-six percent of all deaths occurred in the fourth quartile of MR-proADM (>0.90 nmol/l). Adding MR-proADM to the TIMI-score (AUC 0.87) predicted 1-year mortality more accurately than the TIMI-score alone (AUC 0.82; p<0.001). Net reclassification improvement (TIMI vs. additionally MR-proADM) amounted to 0.137 (p=0.012). MR-proADM had higher prognostic accuracy as compared to hs-cTnT in patients with AMI (p=0.015) and in those without AMI (p=0.003). MR-proADM at presentation was tantamount to GRACE score and BNP as to its prognostic accuracy for mortality. The AUC for the prediction of cardiovascular events amounted to 0.63., Conclusions: While MR-proADM does not have clinical utility in the early diagnosis of AMI or predicting cardiovascular events in patients with acute chest pain, it may provide prognostic value for all-cause mortality., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)