Search

Bees are critical for food crop pollination, yet their populations are declining as agricultural practices intensify. Pollinator-attractive field border plantings (e.g. hedgerows and forb strips) can increase bee diversity and abundance in agricultural areas; however, recent studies suggest these plants may contain pesticides. Pesticide exposure for wild bees remains largely unknown; however, this information is needed to inform agricultural practices and pesticide regulations meant to protect bees. It is important to determine whether border plantings that attract and support pollinators may also deliver pesticides to them. In this study, we collected various samples for pesticide residue analysis, including: multiple species of wild bees, honey bees, flowers from four types of bee-attractive field border plants, and soil. Silicone bands were also utilized as passive aerial samplers of pesticide residues. The five pesticides detected most frequently across all samples were the insecticide bifenthrin, the herbicides thiobencarb, metolaclor, and propanil, and the fungicide fluopyram. We detected the greatest number of parent pesticides in bands (24), followed by soil (21). Pesticides were also detected in field border plant flowers (16), which do not receive direct pesticide applications, and included many products which were not applied to adjacent field crops. Pesticide concentrations were lower in bees than in flowers but higher in bees than in soils. Pesticide residue per bee (ng/bee) increased with increasing wild bee size, though pesticide concentration (ng/g) did not increase. While honey bees and wild bees contained a similar number and concentration of pesticides overall, pesticide mixtures varied by bee type, and included some mixtures known to cause sublethal effects. The results from this study highlight the benefits of measuring more sample types to capture the total exposome of bees, including a greater range of bee species, as well as the need to consider exposure to pesticides at the landscape level., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pollination management recommendations are becoming increasingly precise, context-specific and knowledge-intensive. Pollination is a service delivered across landscapes, entailing policy constructs across agricultural landscapes. Diversified farming practices effectively promote pollination services. Yet it remains difficult to secure large-scale uptake by farming communities. A strong foundation upon which to base policy formulation stems from respecting the perspective of farmers and local communities on the need to conserve pollinators, alongside scientific understanding. Ecological intensification resonates with both indigenous knowledge, local communities and scientific understanding. It emphasizes that the regulating functions of nature require both landscape-level agroecosystem design and recognition of the complexity of agricultural systems. Facilitating ecological intensification across landscapes requires collective decision-making, with institutional innovation in local structures and food system governance., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

When final (5th) instar larvae of Precis coenia were treated with the juvenile hormone analog (JHA) methoprene, they underwent a supernumerary larval molt, except for certain regions of their imaginal disks, which deposited a normal pupal cuticle. Evidently those regions had already become irreversibly committed to pupal development at the time JHA was applied. By applying JHA at successively later times in the instar, the progression of pupal commitment could be studied. Pupal commitment in the proboscis, antenna, eye, leg and wing imaginal disks occurred in disk-specific patterns. In each imaginal disk there were distinct initiation sites where pupal commitment began during the first few hours of the final larval instar, and from which commitment spread across the remainder of the disk over a 2- to 3-day period. The initiation sites were not always located in homologous regions of the various disks. As a rule, pupal commitment also spread from imaginal disk tissue to surrounding epidermal tissue. The regions of pupal commitment in all disks except those of the wings, coincided with the regions of growth of the disk. Only portions of the disk that had undergone cell division and growth underwent pupal commitment. Shortening the growth period did not prevent pupal commitment in the wing imaginal disk, indicating that, in this disk at least, a normal number of cell divisions was not crucial in reprogramming of disk cells for pupal cuticle synthesis. The apparent growth spurt of imaginal disks that occurs during the last part of the final larval instar is merely the final stage of normal and constant exponential growth. Juvenile hormone (JH) and ecdysteroids appeared to play little role in the regulation of normal imaginal disk growth. Instead, growth of the disks may be under intrinsic control. Interestingly, even though endogenous fluctuation in JH titers do not affect imaginal disk growth, exogenous JHA proved able to inhibit both pupal commitment, cell movement, and growth of the disks during the last larval instar. This function of JH could be important under certain adverse conditions, such as when metamorphosis is delayed in favor of a supernumerary larval molt.

The commitment of cells to pupal development in the larvae of holometabolous insects can be prevented by treatment with juvenile hormone (JH) or a JH mimic during a critical period early in the last larval instar. By treating larvae of different ages with a JH mimic, pupal commitment of the epidermis of the butterfly, Precis coenia, was found to occur in a strict temporal and spatial progression, which was serially homologous and occurred independently in each segment. The mechanism underlying this sequence of pupal commitment was examined by cauterizing regions of the epidermis to observe the effects of local ablation on the pattern of pupal commitment revealed by treatment with the JH mimic. Cautery of the segmental site of origin of pupal commitment, the dorsal midline, suppressed pupal commitment in the rest of the operated segment, indicating that the midline has a special effect on commitment of the rest of the segment. Cautery off the midline produced asymmetries in the pattern of pupal commitment; when placed close to the midline, such cauteries prevented pupal commitment in the region "downstream" of the cautery, suggesting that a signal (diffusible or transducible) emanates from the midline. Finally, cautery of a circle around the midline inhibited pupal commitment only outside the circle, showing that cautery could act as a barrier to the passage of a signal coming from the midline. These results suggest that inductive as well as hormonal signals are involved in the regulation of pupal commitment in the epidermis of the lepidopteran, P. coenia.