Search

Background: There is no consensus on defining relapse in schizophrenia, and scale-derived criteria with unclear clinical relevance are widely used. We aimed to develop an evidence-based scale-derived set of criteria to define relapse in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder., Methods: We searched the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and obtained individual participant data on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Our main outcomes were PANSS-derived criteria based on worsening in PANSS total score. We examined their relevance using equipercentile linking with CGI-S and functioning scales, and their test-performance in defining relapse with diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis against CGI-S worsening (≥1-point increase together with a score ≥4 points) and psychiatric hospitalisation., Findings: Based on data from seven RCTs (2354 participants; 1348 men [57·3%] and 1006 women [42·7%], mean age of 39·5 years [SD 12·0, range 17-89]; 303 Asian [12.9%], 255 Black [10.8%], 1665 White [70.7%], and other or unspecified 131 [5.6%]), an increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total (range 30-210 points) corresponded to clinically important deterioration in global severity of illness (≥1 point increase in CGI-S, range 1-7) and functioning (≥10 points decline in PSP or SOFAS, range 1-100). The interpretation of percentage changes varied importantly across different baseline scores. An increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total had good sensitivity and specificity using CGI-S as reference standard (sensitivity 82·1% [95% CI 77·1-86·4], specificity 86·9% [82·9-90·3]), as well as good sensitivity but lower specificity compared to hospitalisation (sensitivity 81·7% [74·1-87·7], specificity 69·2% [60·5-76·9]). Requiring either an increase in PANSS total or in specific items for positive and disorganization symptoms further improved test-performance. Cutoffs for situations where high sensitivity or specificity is needed are presented., Interpretation: An increase of either 12 points or more in the PANSS total score, or worsening of specific positive and disorganisation symptom items could be a reasonable evidence-based definition of relapse in schizophrenia, potentially linking symptoms used to define remission and relapse. Percentage changes should not be used to define relapse because their interpretation depends on baseline scores., Funding: German Research Foundation (grant number: 428509362)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RAM has received speaker or consultancy fees from Karuna, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Otsuka, and co-directs a company that designs digital resources to support treatment of mental illness. JMK has been a consultant or advisor for, or has received honoraria from, Alkermes, Allergan, LB Pharmaceuticals, H Lundbeck, Intracellular Therapies, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Minerva, Neurocrine, Newron, Otsuka, Pierre Fabre, Reviva, Roche, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva, and UpToDate, and is a shareholder in LB Pharmaceuticals and Vanguard Research Group. CA has been a consultant to, or has received honoraria or grants from, Acadia, Abbot, Ambrosetti, AMGEN, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Forum, Gedeon Richter, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Merck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, Shire, Schering Plough, Sunovion, and Takeda. WWF has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Angelini, Richter, and Recordati, and grant support from Lundbeck and Otsuka. PF received paid speakership from Otsuka, Recordati, Richter, Rovi, and Janssen, and is a member of advisory boards of Richter, Rovi, and Janssen. AH has received paid speakerships from AbbVie, Janssen, Otsuka, Rercordati, and Lundbeck. He was member of Rovi, Recordati, Otsuka, Lundbeck, and Janssen advisory boards. SRM has received consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, H. Lundbeck, Otsuka, Takeda, Teva, Roche, Genentech, Targacept, Forum, AbbVie, Allergan, and Neurocrine. He has received research support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Takeda, and Neurocrine. NS has been a consultant or advisor to, or has received honoraria, from Alkermes, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Otsuka Canada, and Teva. WGH has received consulting fees or sat on paid advisory boards for In Silico Biosciences, Translational Life Sciences, Newron, Otsuka, and AbbVie. RWB is a data and safety monitoring board member for Merck, Newron, and Roche; on the advisory board for Acadia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Karuna, Neurocrine, and Roche; and consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim. MD is an employee of Minerva Neurosciences. MW He has received advisory board, speaker's, or consultant fees from, and owns stock, with Acadia, Dexcel, Janssen, Lundbeck, Minerva, Pfizer, Roche, and Teva. OH was a part-time employee of H. Lundbeck, and has received investigator-initiated research funding from, or participated in, advisory or speaker meetings organised by Angellini, Autifony, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Heptares, Global Medical Education, Invicro, Jansenn, Lundbeck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Sunovion, Rand, Recordati, Roche, and Viatris/Mylan. Neither he nor his family have holdings/a financial stake in any pharmaceutical company. He has a patent for the use of dopaminergic imaging. CUC has been a consultant or advisor to, or has received honoraria from, AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Axsome, Cardio Diagnostics, Compass, Damitsa, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Medscape, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Noven, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Seqirus, Servier, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a data safety monitoring board for Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharma and Quantics. In the past 3 years, SL has received honoraria as a consultant, adviser, or lecturer from Alkermes, Angelini, Eisai, Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck, Lundbeck Institute, Merck Sharpp and Dome, Otsuka, Recordati, Rovi, Sanofi Aventis, TEVA, Medichem, and Mitsubishi. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Negative symptoms are associated with poor clinical and psychosocial outcome in schizophrenia. Their prevalence and identification in first-episode patients remains controversial. In a large cohort of patients in the early stage of schizophrenia, schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder, we investigated, over the different phases of the OPTiMiSE trial (baseline, 4, 10 and 22 weeks of treatment), the prevalence of negative symptoms of moderate severity, unconfounded by depression and extrapyramidal symptoms at baseline. Moreover, we assessed symptomatic remission, attrition rate and psychosocial functioning in subjects with short-term (4 weeks) persistent unconfounded negative symptoms (PNS) and in those with negative symptoms that did not persist at follow-up and/or were confounded at baseline (N-PNS). Negative symptoms of moderate severity were observed in 59% of subjects at baseline. They were associated with worse psychosocial functioning and longer duration of psychosis at intake in the study. Eleven percent of subjects had PNS unconfounded at baseline and 7.9% had PNS unconfounded at both baseline and end of 4-week treatment. Psychosocial functioning was comparable in PNS and N-PNS subjects at baseline but it was significantly worse in the former group after 4-weeks. PNS subjects showed lower remission and higher attrition rates at the end of all treatment phases. Fifty-six percent of subjects completing phase 3 (clozapine treatment) had PNS, and 60% of them were non-remitters at the end of this phase. The presence of short-term PNS during the first phases of psychosis was associated with poor clinical outcome and resistance to antipsychotic treatment, including clozapine., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest C. Arango has been a consultant to or has received honoraria or grants from Acadia, Angelini, Gedeon Richter, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Roche, Sage, Sanofi, Servier, Shire, Schering Plough, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Sunovion and Takeda. R. Buchanan has served on an advisory board for Avanir, GW Pharma Ltd., Minerva, and Roche; and served on a DSMB for Roche. C.M. Díaz-Caneja has received honorary fees from Sanofi-Aventis and Abbvie, and grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities). S. Galderisi has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria or grants from: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Innova Pharma-Recordati Group, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Sunovion Pharmarmaceuticals, Janssen–Cilag Polska Sp. zo. o., Gedeon Richter-Recordati, Pierre Fabre, Otsuka, Angelini. B. Glenthøj is the leader of a Lundbeck Foundation center of Excellence for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS), which is partially financed by an independent grant from the Lundbeck Foundation based on international review and partially financed by the Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, the University of Copenhagen, and other foundations. Her group has also received a research grant from Lundbeck A/S for another independent investigator-initiated study. All grants are the property of the Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark and administrated by them. She has no other conflicts to disclose. S. Leucht has received honoraria as a consultant/advisor and/or for lectures from LB Pharma, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Boehringer Ingelheim, LTS Lohmann, Janssen, Johnson&Johnson, TEVA, MSD, Sandoz, SanofiAventis, Angelini, Recordati, Sunovion, Geodon Richter. A. Mucci received honoraria, advisory board or consulting fees from the following companies: Amgen Dompé, Angelini-Acraf, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gedeon Richter Bulgaria, Innova-Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer and Pierre Fabre. R. Rodriguez-Jimenez has been a consultant for, spoken in activities of, or received grants from: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid Regional Government(S2010/ BMD-2422 AGES), JanssenCilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Ferrer, Juste, Takeda, Exeltis, Angelini. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Multi-center MRI studies can enhance power, generalizability, and discovery for clinical neuroimaging research in brain disorders. Here, we sought to establish the utility of a clustering algorithm as an alternative to more traditional intra-class correlation coefficient approaches in a longitudinal multi-center human phantom study. We completed annual reliability scans on 'travelling human phantoms'. Acquisitions across sites were harmonized prospectively. Twenty-seven MRI sessions were available across four participants, scanned on five scanners, across three years. For each scan, three metrics were extracted: cortical thickness (CT), white matter fractional anisotropy (FA), and resting state functional connectivity (FC). For each metric, hierarchical clustering (Ward's method) was performed. The cluster solutions were compared to participant and scanner using the adjusted Rand index (ARI). For all metrics, data clustered by participant rather than by scanner (ARI > 0.8 comparing clusters to participants, ARI < 0.2 comparing clusters to scanners). These results demonstrate that hierarchical clustering can reliably identify structural and functional scans from different participants imaged on different scanners across time. With increasing interest in data-driven approaches in psychiatric and neurologic brain imaging studies, our findings provide a framework for multi-center analytic approaches aiming to identify subgroups of participants based on brain structure or function., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Deficits in neurocognition and social cognition are drivers of reduced functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, with potentially shared neurobiological underpinnings. Many studies have sought to identify brain-based biomarkers of these clinical variables using a priori dichotomies (e.g., good vs. poor cognition, deficit vs. nondeficit syndrome)., Methods: We evaluated a fully data-driven approach to do the same by building and validating a brain connectivity-based biomarker of social cognitive and neurocognitive performance in a sample using resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (n = 74 healthy control participants, n = 114 persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 188 total). We used canonical correlation analysis followed by clustering to identify a functional connectivity signature of normal and poor social cognitive and neurocognitive performance., Results: Persons with poor social cognitive and neurocognitive performance were differentiated from those with normal performance by greater resting-state connectivity in the mirror neuron and mentalizing systems. We validated our findings by showing that poor performers also scored lower on functional outcome measures not included in the original analysis and by demonstrating neuroanatomical differences between the normal and poorly performing groups. We used a support vector machine classifier to demonstrate that functional connectivity alone is enough to distinguish normal and poorly performing participants, and we replicated our findings in an independent sample (n = 75)., Conclusions: A brief functional magnetic resonance imaging scan may ultimately be useful in future studies aimed at characterizing long-term illness trajectories and treatments that target specific brain circuitry in those with impaired cognition and function., (Copyright © 2018 Society of Biological Psychiatry. All rights reserved.)

Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are associated with poor functional outcome and place a substantial burden on people with this disorder, their families, and health-care systems. We summarise the evolution of the conceptualisation of negative symptoms, the most important findings, and the remaining open questions. Several studies have shown that negative symptoms might be primary to schizophrenia or secondary to other factors, and that they cluster in the domains of avolition-apathy and expressive deficit. Failure to take this heterogeneity into account might hinder progress in research on neurobiological substrates and discoveries of treatments for primary or enduring negative symptoms. Improvement in recognition and routine assessment of negative symptoms is instrumental for correct management of secondary negative symptoms that are amenable to treatment. If substantial progress is to be made in the understanding and treatment of negative symptoms, then advances in concepts and assessment should be integrated into the design of future studies of these symptoms., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) initiative, funded by an R13 from the National Institute of Mental Health, seeks to enhance translational research in treatment development for impaired cognition in schizophrenia by developing tools from cognitive neuroscience into useful measures of treatment effects on behavior and brain function. An initial series of meetings focused on the selection of a new set of tasks from cognitive neuroscience for the measurement of treatment effects on specific cognitive and neural systems. Subsequent validation and optimization studies are underway and a subset of validated measures with well-characterized psychometric properties will be generally available in 2011. This article describes results of the first meeting of the second phase of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia, which seeks to develop imaging biomarkers and improved animal models to enhance translational research. In this meeting, we considered issues related to the use of methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and transcranial magnetic simulation as biomarkers for treatment development. We explored the biological nature of the signals measured by each method, their validity and reliability as measures of cognition-related neural activity, potential confounds related to drug effects on the signal of interest, and conceptual, methodological, and pragmatic issues related to their use in preclinical, first into human, and multicenter phase II and III studies. This overview article describes the background and goals of the meeting together with a summary of the major issues discussed in more detail in the accompanying articles appearing in this issue of Biological Psychiatry., (Copyright © 2011 Society of Biological Psychiatry. All rights reserved.)

Background: In a previous pilot study, MK-0777--a γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) α2/α3 partial agonist--was reported to improve delayed memory and cognitive measures of prefrontal cortical function in people with schizophrenia. The current study was designed to further examine the efficacy and safety of MK-0777 for the treatment of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia., Methods: Sixty people with DSM-IV schizophrenia entered a 4-week, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Participants were randomized to: MK-0777 3 mg b.i.d. (n = 18); MK-0777 8 mg b.i.d. (n = 21); or placebo (n = 21). Participants were clinically stable. The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery, AX-Continuous Performance Test, and N-Back were used to assess cognition. The University of California San Diego (UCSD) Performance Based Skills Assessment-2 and the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale assessed functional capacity and served as functional outcome coprimary measures., Results: There were no significant group differences on the primary outcome measure, the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score. Secondary analyses suggested that participants randomized to placebo performed significantly better on visual memory and reasoning/problem-solving tests than participants assigned to either MK-0777 dose. There were no significant group differences on the AX-Continuous Performance Test or N-Back d prime scores or UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment-2 and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale total scores. In general, MK-0777 was well-tolerated with minimal side effects., Conclusions: The study results suggest that MK-0777 has little benefit for cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia. The GABA(A) receptor remains a promising target, but a more potent partial agonist with greater intrinsic activity at the GABA(A) α2 site might be needed for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia., (Copyright © 2011 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This overview describes the generation and development of the ideas that led to the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) initiative. It also describes the organization, process, and products of the first meeting. The CNTRICS initiative involves a series of three conferences that will systematically address barriers to translating paradigms developed in the basic animal and human cognitive neuroscience fields for use in translational research aimed at developing novel treatments for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. The articles in this special section report on the results of the first conference, which used a criterion-based consensus-building process to develop a set of cognitive constructs to be targeted for translation efforts.

Background: We adapted visual conditional associative learning paradigms to assess the contextual processing deficit model of schizophrenic cognitive impairment proposed by J.D. Cohen and D. Servan-Schreiber in 1992. In this task subjects learn the associations between four sets of stimuli through the use of feedback. We administered two experimental conditional associative learning conditions: in one, the eight stimuli used to make four pairs were all different; in the other, the pairs were made from different combinations of four identical stimuli, requiring the use of contextual information to mediate correct performance. Two additional associative learning tasks were administered where subjects generated the stimulus pairings or observed the experimenter form the pairs, eliminating the need to learn from feedback., Methods: We tested 37 patients with schizophrenia and 20 healthy control subjects in each conditional associative learning task condition., Results: Patients demonstrated significant impairments on all four conditional associative learning tasks. The demand to process contextual information did not differentially impact patient performance. Patients were better able to learn associations if they generated or observed the pairings rather than utilized feedback to guide learning., Conclusions: Patients with schizophrenia demonstrate pronounced deficits in the ability to utilize feedback to guide learning. We found no evidence of an additional deficit in processing of contextual information.

Despite recognition that schizophrenia must have syndrome status in the absence of proof of a single etiopathophysiologic process, a century of work has been based on designs that conceptualize schizophrenia as a single disease entity. Reducing heterogeneity at several levels of functioning is desirable. In this article we summarize progress using deficit syndrome psychopathology to address heterogeneity. The deficit syndrome has proven to be reliable, with construct validity, as well as predictive validity with biological, treatment, and course variables. We propose a shift in schizophrenia research away from the syndrome level toward study designs that identify more homogeneous entities. Doing so will increase the statistical power of study designs by reducing false positive cases.

The objective was to determine the relationships between eye tracking disorder (ETD) in schizophrenia, specific ocular motor measures, and the deficit syndrome. Twenty-five normal comparison subjects and 53 schizophrenic patients had eye movements tested with infrared oculography using a sinusoidal target. Patients were assessed with the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome. For the patients, the distribution of position root mean square error (a global measure of pursuit) was best fit by a mixture of two normal distributions. This information was used to divide the patients into two subgroups, those with and those without ETD. ETD was almost completely accounted for by several specific ocular motor measures and was significantly associated with the deficit syndrome. The finding that ETD was almost completely accounted for by specific measures bridges a gap of interpretation in this field. ETD and the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia may share a common pathophysiology of cerebral cortical-subcortical circuits.

Previous studies have suggested that clozapine may improve neuropsychological test performance. The current study was designed to examine the comparative efficacy and the long-term effect of clozapine (versus haloperidol), on neuropsychological test performance. Neuropsychological measures of executive/attention, visuospatial, and memory function were administered to schizophrenic patients at baseline, at the end of a 10-week double-blind study, and after 1 year of open clozapine treatment. Symptoms and function ratings were obtained at the same time points. The 10-week double-blind study revealed significant group-by-time interactions for two measures: Categorical Fluency and WAIS-R Block Design. At the end of 1 year of open treatment there were significant improvements in Verbal Fluency, Mooney Faces Closure, and WAIS-R Block Design performance, and trend improvements in Stroop Color-Word Interference, Category Fluency, and WMS-R Logical Memory performance. Improvements in neuropsychological performance were unrelated to symptom changes. Change in selected neuropsychological measures were significantly correlated with improvement in quality of life. The results suggest that long-term clozapine treatment may have beneficial effects on a broad range of cognitive functions.

A low plasma prolactin concentration has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of subsequent relapse in patients with schizophrenia. Prolactin concentration was measured in samples from stable schizophrenic men who were outpatients just prior to neuroleptic withdrawal. No relationship between prolactin concentration and time to subsequent relapse was found. Prolactin concentration may predict time to relapse only in populations characterized by specific demographic features or medication history.

The validity of previously hypothesized predictors of elapse following neuroleptic discontinuation was examined. One hundred sixty-two outpatients, with either Research Diagnostic Criteria schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, were discontinued from neuroleptic medication for a 28-day period or until judged to be relapsed. Pre-discontinuation neuroleptic dosage level, the severity of psychotic symptoms, and the presence of dyskinetic movements prior to neuroleptic discontinuation were the predictor variables. Of the 162 patients, 62.7% did not relapse during the study period. There were no differences in the survival rates between the patients withdrawn from oral versus depot neuroleptics. Neuroleptic dosage, but not severity of psychotic symptoms or dyskinetic movements, predicted relapse. These results support the hypothesis that pre-withdrawal neuroleptic dosage level predicts relapse, but fail to validate either severity of psychotic symptoms or presence of dyskinetic movements as predictors of relapse.

A number of preclinical studies suggest that progesterone may play an important role in the stress response, however, the effects of stress on progesterone in humans has not been established. Also, several lines of evidence indicate that schizophrenia may be associated with abnormal neurobiological responses to stress, but the effects of stress on progesterone in schizophrenia has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of stress on plasma progesterone and cortisol in healthy subjects and to determine if schizophrenic patients have altered stress-induced plasma progesterone levels compared to normal controls. Stress was induced through administration of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), a glucose analog that impairs glucose metabolism resulting in a clinical state comparable to hypoglycemia. There were significant increases in plasma progesterone and cortisol levels following 2DG-induced glucoprivic stress in healthy controls. There was no relationship between stress related progesterone and cortisol elevations. Schizophrenic patients, in comparison to controls, had significantly greater 2DG-induced elevations in progesterone levels but no differences in stress-related cortisol levels. There was evidence that basal progesterone and cortisol levels were elevated in the schizophrenic patients. The implications of these data are discussed.

Stable schizophrenic and schizoaffective outpatients underwent abrupt withdrawal from a fixed dose of neuroleptic. Prolactin concentrations were determined preceding and following drug withdrawal. Basal prolactin concentrations were significantly lower 3, 4, or 5 days following drug withdrawal than on subsequent days. This rebound effect may be related to dopaminergic receptor changes in the tuberoinfundibular system that are induced by chronic neuroleptic administration.