Search

Background: Placental growth factor (PlGF)-based testing has high diagnostic accuracy for predicting pre-eclampsia needing delivery, significantly reducing time to diagnosis and severe maternal adverse outcomes. The clinical benefit of repeat PlGF-based testing is unclear. We aimed to determine whether repeat PlGF-based testing (using a clinical management algorithm and nationally recommended thresholds) reduces adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant individuals with suspected preterm pre-eclampsia., Methods: In this multicentre, parallel-group, superiority, randomised controlled trial, done in 22 maternity units across England, Scotland, and Wales, we recruited women aged 18 years or older with suspected pre-eclampsia between 22 weeks and 0 days of gestation and 35 weeks and 6 days of gestation. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to revealed repeat PlGF-based testing or concealed repeat testing with usual care. The intervention was not masked to women or partners, or clinicians or data collectors, due to the nature of the trial. The trial statistician was masked to intervention allocation. The primary outcome was a perinatal composite of stillbirth, early neonatal death, or neonatal unit admission. The primary analysis was by the intention-to-treat principle, with a per-protocol analysis restricted to women managed according to their allocation group. The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 85912420., Findings: Between Dec 17, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 1253 pregnant women were recruited and randomly assigned treatment; one patient was excluded due to randomisation error. 625 women were allocated to revealed repeat PlGF-based testing and 627 women were allocated to usual care with concealed repeat PlGF-based testing (mean age 32·3 [SD 5·7] years; 879 [70%] white). One woman in the concealed repeat PlGF-based testing group was lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference in the primary perinatal composite outcome between the revealed repeat PlGF-based testing group (195 [31·2%]) of 625 women) compared with the concealed repeat PlGF-based testing group (174 [27·8%] of 626 women; relative risk 1·21 [95% CI 0·95-1·33]; p=0·18). The results from the per-protocol analysis were similar. There were four serious adverse events in the revealed repeat PlGF-based testing group and six in the concealed repeat PlGF-based testing group; all serious adverse events were deemed unrelated to the intervention by the site principal investigators and chief investigator., Interpretation: Repeat PlGF-based testing in pregnant women with suspected pre-eclampsia was not associated with improved perinatal outcomes. In a high-income setting with a low prevalence of adverse outcomes, universal, routine repeat PlGF-based testing of all individuals with suspected pre-eclampsia is not recommended., Funding: Tommy's Charity, Jon Moulton Charitable Trust, and National Institute for Health and Care Research Guy's and St Thomas' Biomedical Research Centre., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AHS has received funds from Perkin Elmer (Revvity) and QuidelOrtho for expenses to meetings and has received money from Roche as a consultant on strategy. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate PlGF, sFlt-1, and novel endothelial biomarkers hyaluronan and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM), for the prediction of superimposed pre-eclampsia in women with chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Study Design: Prospective cohort study of pregnant women with CKD in UK., Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes including superimposed pre-eclampsia were based on predetermined criteria. Test performances of plasma PlGF, serum sFlt-1:PlGF, hyaluronan and VCAM concentrations were evaluated as area under the receiver-operating curve and at established and exploratory threshold concentrations., Results: There were 232 pregnancies in 221 women with CKD. One third (76/232) developed superimposed pre-eclampsia. From 21 to 37 weeks' gestation, plasma PlGF was decreased among women that developed superimposed preeclampsia. Plasma PlGF levels < 150 pg/ml had the highest sensitivity (79% 95% CI: 58-91%) and negative predictive value (97%, 95% CI: 93-99%) for the prediction of delivery with superimposed pre-eclampsia within 14 days. Predictive performances of hyaluronan and VCAM were lower than for plasma PlGF. Low plasma PlGF, high hyaluronan and high VCAM concentrations had lower predictive performance in women with pre-pregnancy CKD stages 3-5 compared to stages 1-2. sFlt-1:PlGF > 38 did not usefully predict the need to deliver in women with CKD when measured in serum., Conclusions: Increased surveillance for the need for delivery should take place in women with CKD and plasma PlGF below 150 pg/ml after 20 weeks' gestation, with awareness that predictive value is reduced as excretory kidney function declines. Maternal endothelial dysfunction may alter the PlGF threshold at which superimposed pre-eclampsia manifests in women with CKD., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of angiogenic biomarkers in determining need for delivery in seven days in women with late preterm preeclampsia., Study Design: In a prospective observational cohort study in 36 maternity units across England and Wales, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor (PlGF) and sFlt-1 in determining the risk of complications requiring delivery in late preterm (34 +0 to 36 +6 weeks' gestation) preeclampsia. Angiogenic biomarkers were measured using the Quidel (PlGF) and Roche (sFlt-1:PlGF ratio) assays. Additional clinical data was obtained for use within the established 'Prediction of complications in early-onset pre-eclampsia' (PREP)-S prognostic model. Biomarkers were assessed using standard methods (sensitivity, specificity, Receiver Operator Curve areas). Estimated probability of early delivery from PREP-S was compared to actual event rates., Main Outcome Measures: Clinically indicated need for delivery for pre-eclampsia within seven days., Results: PlGF (Quidel) testing had high sensitivity (97.9%) for delivery within seven days, but negative predictive value was only 71.4%, with low specificity (8.4%), with similar results from sFlt-1/PlGF assay. The area under the curve for PlGF was 0.60 (SE 0.03), and 0.65 (0.03), and 0.64 (0.03) for PREP-S in combination with PlGF, and sFlt-1:PlGF, respectively., Conclusions: Angiogenic biomarkers do not add to clinical assessment to help determine need for delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia. Existing models developed in women with early-onset pre-eclampsia to predict complications cannot be used to predict clinically indicated need for delivery in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to establish a rule-in threshold for the DELFIA Xpress placental growth factor (PlGF) 1-2-3 test. Plasma EDTA samples from 305 women presenting with suspected pre-eclampsia before 35 weeks' gestation were analysed using three different PlGF-based tests: PlGF 1-2-3 test (Perkin Elmer); Triage PlGF test (Quidel); Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (Roche). The rule-in threshold for PlGF 1-2-3 test created with equivalent specificity of the Quidel and Roche tests was 50 pg/ml. This can be used as a rule-in test for diagnosis of preterm pre-eclampsiarequiring delivery within 14 days (specificity 95.0% (95% CI 91.7-97.2%), positive predictive value50 (95% CI 30.6-69.4%), positive likelihood ratio 10.7 (5.8-20)., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)