Search

Objectives: The use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants in South Africa is low with limited data on patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation. We describe contraceptive preferences and reasons for discontinuation among women enrolled in the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial from one trial site., Study Design: ECHO, conducted between 2015 and 2018, enrolled and randomized sexually active women, aged 16 to 35, and desiring contraception, to intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), a copper intrauterine device (copper-IUD) or a levonorgestrel (LNG) implant; follow-up was 12 to 18 months. We interviewed 829 women at the Durban, South Africa trial site at ECHO Trial exit to ascertain contraceptive preferences at randomization. Reasons for randomized contraceptive discontinuation were collected at ECHO Trial exit and 6 months later. Data were analyzed descriptively., Results: At the final ECHO Trial visit, among women using their randomized contraceptive method (n = 757), 21% discontinued DMPA-IM, 20% discontinued LNG implant and 22% discontinued the copper-IUD. About a quarter from each group discontinued due to problems with bleeding. Among women continuing their randomized contraceptive at trial exit (n = 597), 25% discontinued DMPA-IM within 6 months of exiting the study, 8% discontinued LNG implant and 4% discontinued copper-IUD. A third of women reported wanting to be assigned DMPA-IM at randomization, 20% wanted the LNG implant and 18% the copper-IUD., Conclusions: Despite some women having preferences about which contraceptive they might be randomized to, discontinuation rates for all three methods at ECHO Trial exit and 6-month post-trial follow-up were low., Implications: Despite limited prior use of IUDs and implants among women enrolled in this study, and a desire by some women to not receive these methods at randomization, discontinuation rates remained low. The provision of quality contraceptive counselling and support may increase uptake and continued use of implants and IUDs., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Aim of this study is analysing the pooled results of Intra-Operative Electron beam Radiotherapy (IOERT) containing multimodality treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) of two major treatment centres., Methods and Materials: Five hundred sixty five patients with LRRC who underwent multimodality-treatment up to 2010 were studied. The preferred treatment was preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, surgery and IOERT. In uni- and multivariate analyses risk factors for local re-recurrence, distant metastasis free survival, relapse free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival were studied., Results: Two hundred fifty one patients (44%) underwent a radical (R0) resection. In patients who had no preoperative treatment the R0 resection rate was 26%, and this was 43% and 50% for patients who respectively received preoperative re-(chemo)-irradiation or full-course radiotherapy (p < 0.0001). After uni- and multivariate analysis it was found that all oncologic parameters were influenced by preoperative treatment and radicality of the resection. Patients who were re-irradiated had a similar outcome compared to patients, who were radiotherapy naive and could undergo full-course treatment, except the chance of local re-recurrence was higher for re-irradiated patients. Waiting-time between preoperative radiotherapy and IOERT was inversely correlated with the chance of local re-recurrence, and positively correlated with the chance of a R0 resection., Conclusions: R0 resection is the most important factor influencing oncologic parameters in treatment of LRRC. Preoperative (chemo)-radiotherapy increases the chance of achieving radical resections and improves oncologic outcomes. Short waiting-times between preoperative treatment and IOERT improves the effectiveness of IOERT to reduce the chance of a local re-recurrence., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of abdominosacral resections (ASR) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer., Methods: From 1994 until 2012 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) underwent a curative ASR and were enrolled in a database. The postoperative complication rates, predictive factors on oncological outcome and survival rates were registered., Results: Seventy-two patients with LRRC (mean age 63; 44 male, 28 female) and 14 patients with LARC (mean age 65; 6 male, 8 female) underwent ASR. R0 resection was achieved in 37 patients with LRRC and 11 patients with LARC. Twenty-seven patients underwent an R1 resection (3 in the LARC group). Eight patients had an R2 resection, compared to no patients in the LARC group. In respectively 26 and 1 patients of the LRRC and LARC groups a grade 3 or 4 complication occurred and the 30-days mortality rate was respectively 3% and 7%. The 5-years overall survival was 28% and 24% respectively., Conclusion: En bloc radical resection remains the primary goal in the treatment of dorsally located (recurrent) rectal cancer. After thorough patient selection, ASR is a safe procedure to perform, shows acceptable morbidity rates and leads to a good oncological outcome., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)