Search

Purpose: This study investigated the association between positive and negative family support and psychosocial outcomes among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using psychological data collected from 175 TGD youth (aged 13-18 years) at time of hormone readiness assessment within a multispecialty gender clinic between May 2021 and February 2023. As part of this assessment process, TGD youth provided responses to a variety of measures, including the Youth Self-Report and the Family Environment Scale., Results: Negative family support scales were more strongly associated with more outcomes than positive support scales. The exclusion and abuse, viewing gender expression as morally wrong, and trying to change gender scales were each associated with significantly higher Youth Self-Report T-scores for internalizing problems (βs = 6.86, 6.26, 5.56, all p < .01), externalizing problems (βs = 4.58, 4.42, 4.19, all p < .02), and total problems (βs = 6.70, 6.45, 5.34, all p < .02). The explicit care and support scale was associated with significantly lower T-scores for externalizing problems (β = -3.54 p = .02) and total problems (β = -3.35, p = .04). Overall support was also associated with higher T-scores in internalizing problems (b = -2.90, p = .02), externalizing problems (β = -2.40, p = .03), and total problems (β = -2.79, p = .03)., Discussion: Family support plays a critical role in the psychosocial wellbeing of TGD youth. TGD youth reporting positive family support reported fewer mental health concerns, less experiences of nonaffirmation, and lower levels of internalized transphobia. TGD youth reporting negative family support were found to have an increased risk of suicidal ideation., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: While many transgender and gender diverse individuals rapidly achieve amenorrhea on testosterone, emerging data have identified that breakthrough bleeding can occur in up to one-third of individuals with long-term use. Breakthrough bleeding can worsen dysphoria and patients may seek management to reattain amenorrhea. Because of this, there is a need to assess efficacy of management approaches., Objective: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate methods used by patients and their providers to manage breakthrough bleeding which arises after 1 year of testosterone use. Secondary aims included describing the diagnostic approaches to breakthrough bleeding, and proposing an algorithm for classification and management of breakthrough bleeding in this patient population., Study Design: This was an institutional review board-approved single tertiary center, retrospective chart review of transgender and gender diverse individuals on testosterone gender affirming hormone therapy who experienced breakthrough bleeding after 1 year of use. Charts were reviewed to determine patient characteristics, testosterone use, and breakthrough bleeding management approaches., Results: Of the 96 individuals who had been on testosterone for 1 year and experienced breakthrough bleeding, 97% (n=93) engaged in at least 1 approach to management. The mean age at initiation of testosterone was 21.9 (standard deviation 5.4) and the median duration of time on testosterone was 54.5 months (interquartile range 33.5, 82). Only 16% (n=15) were using menstrual suppression at the time of their breakthrough bleeding episode. Breakthrough bleeding was successfully managed in 77 (79%), following between 1 and 4 attempted approaches. More than half of management attempts (63%) were successful on the first try. When management approaches were analyzed independently, the range of success associated with any particular approach was between 33% and 100%. Other than hysterectomy, which was fully successful at managing breakthrough bleeding, no approach was significantly better than no intervention. This was true both for individuals who did and did not bleed with missed testosterone doses. Regardless of what approach was used, after a failed attempt, the next attempt was successful in more than half of individuals. Of the 16 who underwent hysterectomy, 1 did so in part as a first line approach to manage breakthrough bleeding., Conclusion: In this study, use of medical management methods was not found to be superior to observation alone in the management of breakthrough bleeding. In the absence of data supporting superiority of any method, we recommend tailoring method attempts to patients' goals., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Little is known about the maintenance of amenorrhea among transgender and gender-diverse individuals with uteri who are using long-term testosterone gender-affirming hormone therapy. Emerging data describe breakthrough bleeding among adolescents on long-term testosterone therapy and among adults who are seeking a gender-affirming hysterectomy. More studies are needed to better understand breakthrough bleeding patterns among transgender and gender-diverse individuals with uteri who are using testosterone, including the frequency, timing, and etiology of bleeding and how these patterns may differ between adults and younger populations., Objective: The primary aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and patterns of breakthrough bleeding in a cohort of transgender and gender-diverse individuals who had been on testosterone for longer than 12 months and who had uteri in situ. Secondary aims included identifying the time to first bleed for those who experienced breakthrough bleeding and the risk factors associated with breakthrough bleeding while on testosterone therapy., Study Design: This was an institutional review board-approved, single tertiary center, retrospective chart review of transgender and gender diverse individuals who had been on testosterone for at least 1 year. A primary survival analysis that evaluated the incidence of bleeding was combined with descriptive analyses and an evaluation of the factors associated with bleeding., Results: Of the 279 patients included in the analysis, the median age of testosterone initiation was 22 years (interquartile range, 19-41), and the median follow-up time was 34 months (range, 12-278). The absolute proportion of individuals who ever experienced breakthrough bleeding on testosterone was 34% (n=96; 95% confidence interval, 29-40). Patients who experienced breakthrough bleeding initiated testosterone at a younger age (20.5 vs 22.0 years; P=.04), had lower mean serum testosterone levels (389.14 vs 512.7 ng/dL; P=.001), were more likely to have a mean testosterone level <320 ng/dL (52% vs 48%; P=.001), and had higher mean estradiol levels (62% vs 49%; P=.003). Survival analyses estimated a breakthrough bleeding incidence rate of 0.09 per year (95% confidence interval, 0.07-1.0). Although 58 people underwent a hysterectomy during the follow-up period, 64% of the cohort who maintained a uterus eventually experienced breakthrough bleeding. The median time to the initial bleeding episode was 22 months (interquartile range, 12-201) after testosterone initiation., Conclusion: These results suggest that a substantial fraction of transgender and gender-diverse individuals who are using testosterone will experience at least 1 episode of breakthrough bleeding even after their initial year of testosterone use. We recommend that clinicians inform all patients that breakthrough bleeding is a common occurrence even after the first year on testosterone therapy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Compare psychosocial function at the time of hormone readiness assessment for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth who received pubertal blockade to prevent a nonaffirming puberty with those who did not., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of psychological assessment data from hormone readiness evaluations conducted at a multispecialty gender clinic. Participants include all TGD youth between the ages of 13 and 17 assessed for hormone readiness between 2017 and 2021., Results: Our cohort consisted of 438 TGD youth, 40 who were prescribed pubertal blockade at Tanner stage 2 or 3, and 398 who had not. The blocker population was younger, more likely to be assigned male and affirming a female identity, and had a different racial/ethnic identity distribution. Having puberty blocked was associated with significantly lower T-scores on the Youth Self Report for internalizing problems (β = -7.4, p < .001), anxiety problems (β = -4.6, p = .003), depressive problems (β = -6.5, p < .001), stress problems (β = -4.0, p = .01), and total problems (β = -4.9, p = .003). The blocker population was also significantly less likely to report any suicidal thoughts (odds ratio = 0.38, p = .05). With the exception of increased risk of suicidal thoughts, these associations remained significant when adjusted for gender., Discussion: At the time of hormone readiness evaluation, TGD youth who received pubertal blockade at Tanner 2 or 3 were found to have less anxiety, depression, stress, total problems, internalizing difficulties, and suicidal ideation than TGD peers who had been through more of a nonaffirming puberty., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study sought to prospectively examine the effects of gender-affirming chest reconstruction on gender congruence and chest dysphoria in transmasculine and nonbinary adolescents and young adults., Methods: Individuals between the ages of 15-35 who were seeking gender-affirming chest surgery were enrolled as part of a broader, longitudinal study of transgender surgical experiences. Their chest dysphoria and gender congruence were measured at baseline, six months, and one year, using the Transgender Congruence and Chest Dysphoria scales. Repeated measures analysis of variance were used to detect differences in scores across assessment points. Where there were significant differences indicated, Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used to determine which differences in mean scores were significant between assessment points, as well as how results differed by demographic factors., Results: The analytical sample consisted of 153 individuals who had completed both the baseline and at least one follow-up assessment - 36 (24%) endorsing a nonbinary gender and 59 (38%) under the age of 18. Repeated measures analysis of variance indicated significant differences in gender congruence, appearance congruence, and chest dysphoria between at least two assessment points for the total sample and each subgroup (binary/non-binary and adult/minor). Honestly significant difference tests indicated no significant differences between the postoperative assessments by age or binary gender., Discusson: Gender-affirming chest reconstruction improves gender and appearance congruence and reduces chest dysphoria in both non-binary and binary populations of adolescents and young adults. These data support the need to improve access to gender-affirming chest reconstruction for adolescents and young adults and to remove legislative and other barriers to care., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As gender-affirming surgeries are being performed, new techniques have been developed to meet patient desires, including recent reports of several gender-affirming procedures being combined into a single operative encounter. Such a development may provide several advantages to both patients and providers. However, it is less clear whether combining these procedures affects patient safety and surgical case planning factors. To address this, we compared the complication rates and the length of hospital stay and operative time for standalone and combined gender-affirming procedures (e.g., hysterectomy and bilateral mastectomy, breast augmentation, and vaginoplasty) performed between 2005 and 2019 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. There were 1857 standalone mastectomies, 826 standalone hysterectomies, and 30 cases where they were combined. There were 379 vaginoplasties, 648 breast augmentations, and 31 cases where they were combined. There was no evidence of differences in overall health status between those undergoing combined and standalone procedures. Two-sample proportion testing did not find significant differences in any of the complications experienced between standalone and combined procedures. Similarly, two-sample t-tests did not find significant differences in the length of the hospital stays nor in the length of the operative encounter between standalone and combined masculinizing surgeries. Combining breast augmentation and vaginoplasty, however, saved an average of 97.86 min (p = .000) of operating time. These results suggest that combining gender-affirming procedures may be a safe and viable option for individuals who desire multiple gender-affirming procedures and may even be an advantageous option for patients and practitioners alike., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)