Search

Background: Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm for which few systemic treatment options exist. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib, an oral, switch-control, CSF1R inhibitor, in patients with symptomatic TGCT not amenable to surgery., Methods: MOTION is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 35 specialised hospitals in 13 countries. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of TGCT for which surgical resection could potentially worsen functional limitation or cause severe morbidity. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with interactive response technology to vimseltinib (30 mg orally twice weekly) or placebo, administrated in 28-day cycles for 24 weeks. Patients and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment until week 25, unless progressive disease was confirmed earlier. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST) at week 25 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05059262, and enrolment is complete., Findings: Between Jan 21, 2022, and Feb 21, 2023, 123 patients were randomly assigned (83 to vimseltinib and 40 to placebo). 73 (59%) patients were female and 50 (41%) were male. Nine (11%) of 83 patients assigned to vimseltinib and five (13%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo discontinued treatment before week 25; one patient in the placebo group did not receive any study drug. Objective response rate per RECIST was 40% (33 of 83 patients) in the vimseltinib group vs 0% (none of 40) in the placebo group (difference 40% [95% CI 29-51]; p<0·0001). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1 or 2; the only grade 3 or 4 TEAE that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving vimseltinib was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (eight [10%] of 83). One patient in the vimseltinib group had a treatment-related serious TEAE of subcutaneous abscess. No evidence of cholestatic hepatotoxicity or drug-induced liver injury was noted., Interpretation: Vimseltinib produced a significant objective response rate and clinically meaningful functional and symptomatic improvement in patients with TGCT, providing an effective treatment option for these patients., Funding: Deciphera Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests VB reports institutional research funding from Deciphera Pharmaceuticals and participation on a medical advisory board for Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. SS reports institutional research funding from Abbiski, Daiichi Sankyo, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, and advisory board roles with Daiichi Sankyo and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. SB reports honoraria from Blueprint Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Uptodate, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; consulting or advisory roles with Adcendo, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cogent Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, IDRx, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; institutional research funding from Adcendo, Blueprint Medicine, Incyte, and IDRx; participation on a board for the University of Aachen; unpaid board of directors positions with The Connective Tissue Oncology Society and Deutsche Sarkomstiftung; and a faculty position with the European Society for Medical Oncology. AJW reports consulting or advisory roles and institutional research funding from Daiichi Sankyo and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. MvdS reports travel partly supported by Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. NMB reports research support from Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. AAR reports consulting or advisory roles with Boehringer Ingelheim and Medison; institutional research funding from 23andMe, Abbisko, AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Amgen, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Inhibrx, Iterion Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, MedImmune, Medison, Merck, Neoleukin Therapeutics, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, Symphogen, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; and participation on an advisory board for Inhibrx. AI reports consulting or advisory roles for Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Parthenon, PharmaMar, and Roche; and institutional research funding from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Parthenon, PharmaMar, and Roche. ALC reports honoraria from Bayer, PharmaMar, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. GT reports consulting or advisory roles with Daiichi Sankyo and Servier. KB reports honoraria from Incyte, Lilly, Novartis, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; expert testimony for Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; and advisory board participation for Bayer, GSK, and NEC OncoImmunity. JM-B reports consulting or advisory roles for Amgen, Asofarma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche, and Tecnofarma; speakers bureau involvement for PharmaMar; and institutional research funding from Adaptimmune, Amgen, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cebiotex, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GSK, IMMIX Biopharma, Inhibrx, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Lilly, Lixte, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Philogen, PTC Therapeutics, Rain Therapeutics, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; expert testimony for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Lilly, PharmaMar, and Roche; travel support from Novartis, Pfizer, and PharMar; advisory board participation for Asofarma and Tecnofarma; and a leadership or fiduciary role for Sarcoma Research solutions. EP reports advisory board roles with Daiichi Sankyo, SynOx, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. PRe reports honoraria for participation in advisory boards for Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clinigen, GSK, MundiBioPharma, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, and a leadership position for the German Sarcoma Foundation. PRu reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi; speakers bureaus for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Pierre Fabre; travel support from Orphan Europe and Pierre Fabre; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Philogen, and Pierre Fabre; and institutional research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. CT, FZ, and BH report employment with and stock or other ownership interests in Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. MGS reports employment with, stock or other ownership interests in, and travel support from Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. RR-S reports employment with, stock or other ownership interests in, and patents, royalties, or other intellectual property from Deciphera Pharmaceuticals (inventor in pending patents at Deciphera Pharmaceuticals for which the rights have been transferred to Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; RR-S has not received and will not receive any royalties). MLS reports employment in a leadership role with, stock or other ownership interests in, travel support from, and patents, royalties, or other intellectual property from Deciphera Pharmaceuticals (inventor in pending patents at Deciphera Pharmaceuticals for which the rights have been transferred to Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; MLS has not received and will not receive any royalties). J-YB reports honoraria from Bayer and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; consulting or advisory roles with Bayer and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; institutional research funding from Bayer and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; academic support from the French National Cancer Institute (INCA) NETSARC, INTERSARC, and EURACAN; and funding for travel, accommodation, or expenses from OSE Pharma. WDT reports advisory board roles for Aadi Biosciences, Abbisko, Amgen, AmMax Bio, Avacta, Bayer, BioAtla, Boehringer Ingelheim, C4 Therapeutics, Cogent Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Foghorn Therapeutics, IMGT, Inhibrx, Ipsen, Lilly, PharmaEssentia, Servier, Sonata, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; owns stock or shares in Atropos and Certis Oncology Solutions; reports a patent for Companion Diagnostics for CDK4 inhibitors (14/854,329) and for Enigma and CDH18 (SKI2016–021–03); and reports institutional funding from Deciphera Pharmaceuticals. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Conventional cytotoxic drugs are not effective in alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS). Immune checkpoint (programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1) inhibitors (ICIs) are promising drugs in ASPS. A worldwide registry explored the efficacy of ICI in ASPS., Materials and Methods: Data from adult patients diagnosed with ASPS and treated with ICI for advanced disease in expert sarcoma centers from Europe, Australia and North America were retrospectively collected, including demographics and data related to treatments and outcome., Results: Seventy-six ASPS patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 25 years (range 3-61 years), were registered. All patients received ICI for metastatic disease. Immunotherapy regimens consisted of monotherapy in 38 patients (50%) and combination in 38 (50%) (23 with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor). Among the 68 assessable patients, there were 3 complete responses and 34 partial responses, translating into an overall response rate of 54.4%. After a median follow-up of 36 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 32-40 months] since the start of immunotherapy, 45 (59%) patients have progressed on ICI, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 16.3 months (95% CI 8-25 months). Receiving ICI in first line (P = 0.042) and achieving an objective response (P = 0.043) correlated with a better PFS. Median estimated overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation has not been reached. The 12-month and 24-month OS rates were 94% and 81%, respectively., Conclusions: This registry constitutes the largest available series of ASPS treated with ICI. Our results suggest that the ICI treatment provides long-lasting disease control and prolonged OS in patients with advanced ASPS, an ultra-rare entity with limited active therapeutic options., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a translocated aggressive malignancy with a high incidence of metastases and poor prognosis. There are few studies describing the activity of systemic therapy in CCS. We report a multi-institutional retrospective study of the outcomes of patients with advanced CCS treated with systemic therapy within the World Sarcoma Network (WSN)., Materials and Methods: Patients with molecularly confirmed locally advanced or metastatic CCS treated with systemic therapy from June 1985 to May 2021 were included. Baseline demographic and treatment information, including response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1, was retrospectively collected by local investigators. Descriptive statistics were carried out., Results: Fifty-five patients from 10 institutions were included. At diagnosis, the median age was 30 (15-73) years and 24% (n = 13/55) had metastatic disease. The median age at diagnosis was 30 (15-73) years. Most primary tumours were at aponeurosis (n = 9/55, 16%) or non-aponeurosis limb sites (n = 17/55, 31%). The most common fusion was EWSR1-ATF1 (n = 24/55, 44%). The median number of systemic therapies was 1 (range 1-7). The best response rate was seen for patients treated with sunitinib (30%, n = 3/10), with a median progression-free survival of 4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1-7] months. The median overall survival for patients with advanced/metastatic disease was 15 months (95% CI 3-27 months)., Conclusions: Soft tissue sarcoma-type systemic therapies have limited benefit in advanced CCS and response rate was poor. International, multicentre prospective translational studies are required to identify new treatments for this ultra-rare subtype, and access to early clinical trial enrolment remains key for patients with CCS., Competing Interests: Disclosure AS has received consulting fees from Merck and Medison. RLJ is the recipient of grants/research support from MSD and GSK and is the recipient of consultation fees from Adaptimmune, Athenex, Blueprint, Clinigen, Eisai, Epizyme, Daichii, Deciphera, Immunedesign, Lilly, Merck, Pharmamar, and UptoDate. PR has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, Philogen, and Blueprint Medicines outside of the scope of the trial. AMC has received honoraria as invited speaker from BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre. FD has received honoraria from PharmaMar, GSK, and Bayer, and travel grants from PharmaMar. GGB has received honoraria from Eli Lilly, Eisai, PharmaMar, GSK, and MSD; travel grants from PharmaMar, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly; and personal fees from AboutEvents, EditaMed, and Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)