Search

Background: Toddler milk products are ultraprocessed milk-based beverages promoted for children aged 9 through 36 months. They often contain added sugars, which may contribute to unhealthy dietary habits. Aggressive promotion of toddler milk, particularly to the Latinx population, has likely led to rapid rises in sales., Objective: The study aims were to qualitatively explore caregivers' experiences with, beliefs about, and attitudes toward toddler milk; to explore caregivers' reactions to health claims and product warnings on toddler milk packaging; and explore whether perceptions of toddler milk differ by Latinx ethnicity., Design: Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted., Participants: Fifteen online in-depth interviews and 4 online focus groups with US caregivers of children aged 9 through 36 months who reported serving toddler milk to their children were conducted in 2021., Statistical Analyses Performed: Audio files were transcribed, coded, and analyzed in NVivo. A thematic analysis with a hybrid analytical approach of deductive and inductive coding was conducted., Results: Caregivers struggled to discern toddler milk from infant formula and perceived formula as a larger term that included toddler milk. Participants described offering toddler milk to their children for its convenience, nutritional profile, and perceived benefits tied to health claims present on the labels. Participants reported that health claims on toddler milk packaging attracted their attention; most participants did not express skepticism about the veracity of the claims. An "added sugar" warning increased understanding of the presence of added sugar in a toddler milk product. Latinx and non-Latinx participants largely reported similar perceptions, beliefs, and patterns of provision of toddler milk., Conclusions: Health claims may lead caregivers to perceive toddler milk as a nutritionally adequate product. Research is needed to investigate caregiver-directed interventions for informing caregivers about the distinction between infant formula and toddler milk., (Copyright © 2023 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Child Protective Services' (CPS) placements of children in out-of-home care disproportionately impact families marginalized by poverty, racism and criminalization. CPS' mandate to protect children from neglect and abuse is frequently criticized as failing to address the multiple social and structural domains shaping parents' lives, especially mothers., Methods: We conducted a thematic narrative analysis of in-depth interviews to explore the impact of child custody loss on 19 women who use drugs residing in Toronto, Canada. We also assessed the potential roles of intersectional forms of violence and inequities in power that can both give rise to child custody loss and mediate its consequences., Results: Trauma was identified as a key impact of separation, further exacerbated by women's cumulative trauma histories and ongoing mother-child apartness. Women described this trauma as unbearable and reported persistent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health conditions. Practices of dissociation through increased use of drugs and alcohol were central in tending to the pain of separation, and were often synergistically reinforced by heightened structural vulnerability observed in increased exposure to housing instability, intimate partner violence, and initiation of injection drug use and sex work. Women's survival hinged largely on hopefulness of reuniting with children, a goal pivotal to their sense of future and day-to-day intentions toward ameliorated life circumstances., Conclusion: Findings highlight needs for strategies addressing women's health and structural vulnerability following custody loss and also direct attention to altering institutional processes to support community-based alternatives to parent-child separation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)