Search

The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) is among the first recorded waveforms in clinical neurography and one of the most common in clinical use. It is derived from the summated muscle fiber action potentials recorded from a surface electrode overlying the studied muscle following stimulation of the relevant motor nerve fibres innervating the muscle. Surface recorded motor unit potentials (SMUPs) are the fundamental units comprising the CMAP. Because it is considered a basic, if not banal signal, what it represents is often underappreciated. In this review we discuss current concepts in the anatomy and physiology of the CMAP. These have evolved with advances in instrumentation and digitization of signals, affecting its quantitation and measurement. It is important to understand the basic technical and biological factors influencing the CMAP. If these influences are not recognized, then a suboptimal recording may result. The object is to obtain a high quality CMAP recording that is reproducible, whether the study is done for clinical or research purposes. The initial sections cover the relevant CMAP anatomy and physiology, followed by how these principles are applied to CMAP changes in neuromuscular disorders. The concluding section is a brief overview of CMAP research where advances in recording systems and computer-based analysis programs have opened new research applications. One such example is motor unit number estimation (MUNE) that is now being used as a surrogate marker in monitoring chronic neurogenic processes such as motor neuron diseases., (© 2024 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan is useful to study motor unit (MU) loss. It is of interest to develop simple measurements of the scan., Methods: CMAP scan recordings were performed in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle of 20 control subjects and 26 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). They were analyzed using two new measurements called Step index (STEPIX) reflecting the number of steps, and Amplitude index (AMPIX) for amplitude of these steps., Results: In control subjects, STEPIX ranged from 71 to 172 while AMPIX was 78-158 µV. In ALS patients STEPIX was reduced and AMPIX was increased. The degree of change in STEPIX and AMPIX varied among patients reflecting the success or failure of reinnervation. Follow up studies in 9 muscles demonstrated reduced STEPIX and increased AMPIX despite minimal change in the CMAP., Conclusions: STEPIX and AMPIX are deterministic measurements of the CMAP scan made using a spreadsheet program. STEPIX and AMPIX can be inferred as indices for the number of motor units and their size, and demonstrate the expected pattern in ALS patients., Significance: The new algorithm for CMAP scan analysis may be useful to study disease progression in patients with ALS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: When the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) is recorded in motor nerve conduction studies, the reference (E2) electrode can make a significant contribution to the CMAP. This study investigates the E2 recorded signal and its effect on CMAP measurements when E2 electrode is placed at different sites., Methods: The CMAP was recorded using the active electrode on the muscle belly and 4 different E2 electrodes placed at distal and proximal sites. The signal recorded by each electrode was also measured using a reference electrode on the contralateral limb. Signals were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, tibialis anterior and biceps muscles., Results: The E2 recorded a smaller signal when it was placed near or off the proximal tendon or muscle origin. This affected CMAP latency, duration for tibialis anterior. Contrary to expectation, initial upward deflection was noted for E2 signal., Conclusion: A proximal E2 position records a lower volume conducted signal and yields a CMAP that is more representative of the muscle over which the E1 (active) electrode is placed., Significance: The proposed 'Proximal E2' montage may be better suited to assess pathology., (Copyright © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The motor unit size index (MUSIX) is incorporated into the motor unit number index (MUNIX). Our objective was to assess the intra-/inter-rater reliability of MUSIX in healthy volunteers across single subject "round robin" and multi-centre settings., Methods: Data were obtained from (i) a round-robin assessment in which 12 raters (6 with prior experience and 6 without) assessed six muscles (abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, biceps brachii, tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum brevis and abductor hallucis) and (ii) a multi-centre study with 6 centres studying the same muscles in 66 healthy volunteers. Intra/inter-rater data were provided by 5 centres, 1 centre provided only intra-rater data. Intra/inter-rater variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (COV), Bland-Altman plots, bias and 95% limits of agreement., Results: In the round-robin assessment intra-rater COVs for MUSIX ranged from 7.8% to 28.4%. Inter-rater variability was between 7.8% and 16.2%. Prior experience did not impact on MUSIX values. In the multi-centre study MUSIX was more consistent than the MUNIX. Abductor hallucis was the least reliable muscle., Conclusions: The MUSIX is a reliable neurophysiological biomarker of reinnervation., Significance: MUSIX could provide insights into the pathophysiology of a range of neuromuscular disorders, providing a quantitative biomarker of reinnervation., (Copyright © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Estimation of the number of motor units (MUNE) in specific muscles is important to monitor outcome in progressive neurogenic disorders, with potential application in clinical trials. However, in spite of recent developments to identify the most convenient technique for MUNE, all current methods have individual shortcomings. It is essential to understand the scientific concepts that support MUNE and the many methods already proposed. In particular, the core role of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) size in the estimation process is undervalued. Operator-dependent variation in CMAP amplitude or area is the main factor underlying MUNE stability. At present, MUNIX, as standardized in many centers, is probably the best accepted method. Future developments should be based on full understanding of the neurophysiological concepts underlying the MUNE calculation, in order to find a quick, well-tolerated, operator-friendly and reliable method to apply more universally in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) is a quantitative neurophysiological measure that provides an index of the number of lower motor neurons supplying a muscle. It reflects the loss of motor neurons in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). However, it is unclear whether MUNIX also detects motor unit loss in strong, non-wasted muscles., Methods: Three centres measured MUNIX in 49 ALS patients every three months in six different muscles (abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, biceps brachii, tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum brevis, abductor hallucis) on the less affected side. The decline of MUNIX in initially non-wasted, clinically strong muscles (manual muscle testing, MMT grade 5) was analysed before and after onset of weakness., Results: In 49 subjects, 151 clinically strong muscles developed weakness and were included for analysis. The average monthly relative loss of MUNIX was 5.0% before and 5.6% after onset of weakness. This rate of change was significantly higher compared to ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) change over 12months prior to the onset of muscle weakness (p=0.024)., Conclusion: MUNIX is an electrophysiological marker that detects lower motor neuron loss in ALS, before clinical weakness becomes apparent by manual muscle testing., Significance: This makes MUNIX a good biomarker candidate for disease progression and possibly pharmacodynamics responds., (Copyright © 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fasciculation potentials (FPs) are important in supporting the electrodiagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). If classified by shape, FPs can also be very informative for laboratory-based neurophysiological investigations of the motor units., Methods: This study describes a Matlab program for classification of FPs recorded by multi-channel surface electromyogram (EMG) electrodes. The program applies Principal Component Analysis on a set of features recorded from all channels. Then, it registers unsupervised and supervised classification algorithms to sort the FP samples. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the results is provided for the operator to assess the outcome. The algorithm facilitates manual interactive modification of the results. Classification accuracy can be improved progressively until the user is satisfied. The program makes no assumptions regarding the occurrence times of the action potentials, in keeping with the rather sporadic and irregular nature of FP firings., Results: Ten sets of experimental data recorded from subjects with ALS using a 20-channel surface electrode array were tested. A total of 11891 FPs were detected and classified into a total of 235 prototype template waveforms. Evaluation and correction of classification outcome of such a dataset with over 6000 FPs can be achieved within 1-2 days. Facilitated interactive evaluation and modification could expedite the process of gaining accurate final results., Conclusion: The developed Matlab program is an efficient toolbox for classification of FPs., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater test-retest reliability of the Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) in healthy subjects in a multicentre setting., Methods: Six study centres applied the MUNIX technique in 66 healthy subjects. Five to six muscles (biceps brachii, BB; abductor digiti minimi, ADM; abductor pollicis brevis, APB; tibialis anterior, TA; extensor digitorum brevis, EDB and abductor hallucis, AH) were measured in each volunteer four times by two independent examiners., Results: The method was easy to perform and well tolerated. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) varied between centres and muscles. Intra-rater reliability was greatest for the AH (ICC 0.83) and EDB (ICC 0.81). Inter-rater reliability was greatest for the AH (ICC 0.69) and ADM muscles (ICC 0.69). The most critical muscle was the APB muscle (ICC 0.52, total variability). This was mostly due to variability in the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) measurements. MUNIX values of the APB, ADM and TA fell into the same range as in other motor unit number estimation (MUNE) studies., Conclusion: MUNIX measurements in multiple muscles show good inter- and intra-rater reliability in healthy subjects. CMAP amplitude must be controlled to optimize reliability., Significance: Results suggest that MUNIX could serve as a reliable marker for motor neuron loss in diseases like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis., (Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)