Search

Purpose: To illustrate the importance of systemic evaluation in retinal dystrophies through examples of Alstrom syndrome, Bardet Biedl syndrome, and Refsum disease. Observations: Detailed eye evaluations, including visual acuity, visual field, slit lamp examination, and indirect ophthalmoscopy were performed. Retinal imaging included fundus photography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Functional testing of the retina was done using full field electroretinography (ffERG). In addition, molecular genetic testing was performed using a ciliopathy panel, a retinal dystrophy panel, and whole genome sequencing (WGS).We report three individuals who presented with vision concerns first to ophthalmology, noted to have retinal dystrophy, and then referred to genomic medicine for genetic testing. Additional evaluation led to suspicion of specific groups of systemic disorders and guided appropriate genetic testing. The first individual presented with retinal dystrophy, obesity, and short stature with no reported neurocognitive deficits. Genetic testing included a ciliopathy panel that was negative followed by WGS that identified biallelic variants in ALMS: a novel frame-shift pathogenic variant c.6525dupT (p.Gln2176Serfs*17) and a rare nonsense pathogenic variant c.2035C > T (p.Arg679Ter) consistent with Alstrom syndrome. The second individual presented with retinal dystrophy, central obesity, and mild neurocognitive deficits. A ciliopathy genetic testing panel identified a homozygous pathogenic variant in BBS7: c.389_390del (p.Asn130Thrfs*4), confirming the diagnosis of Bardet Biedl syndrome. The third individual presented with progressive vision loss due to retinitis pigmentosa, anosmia, hearing loss, and shortened metatarsals and digits. Genetic testing identified two variants in PHYH: c.375_375del (p.Glu126Argfs*2) a pathogenic variant and c.536A > G (p.His179Arg), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), suggestive of Refsum disease. Additional biochemical testing revealed markedly elevated phytanic acid with a low concentration of pristanic acid and normal concentrations of very long-chain fatty acids (C22:0, C24:0, C26:0), a pattern consistent with a diagnosis of Refsum disease. Conclusions and importance: In individuals who present with retinal dystrophy to ophthalmologists, additional systemic manifestations such as sensorineural hearing loss, anosmia, or polydactyly, should be sought and a positive history or examination finding should prompt an immediate referral to a clinical geneticist for additional evaluation and appropriate genetic testing. This facilitates pre-test genetic counseling and allows for more accurate diagnosis, prognosis, and management of affected individuals along with better recurrence risk estimates for family members. Identification of an underlying etiology also enhances the understanding of the pathophysiology of disease and expands the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum. Ultimately, successful recognition of these diseases facilitates development of targeted therapies and surveillance of affected individuals.

Purpose: To present the case of two siblings with a genetic diagnosis of Bardet Biedl syndrome (BBS) type 1, yet different clinical profiles and disease manifestations. Observations: Sequencing analysis revealed a p.Met390Arg pathogenic variant in the BBS1 gene of both patients, as well as several additional variants of uncertain significance Patient 1 was 41 years old, had three primary (cone-rod dystrophy, hypogonadism, and truncal obesity) and three secondary (arterial hypertension, strabismus, and astigmatism) BBS features. He also had insulin resistance, as well as low levels of total testosterone and cortisol. Patient 2 was 43 years old, had two primary (cone-rod dystrophy and truncal obesity), and four secondary (arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, strabismus, and astigmatism) BBS features. Both patients had severe maculopathy; however, patient 1 had bone-spicules that extended up to the mid-periphery, in a perivenular pattern, and significant vascular attenuation with “ghost vessel” appearance towards the temporal periphery, a feature that was absent on patient 2. Conclusions and Importance: The intrafamilial phenotypic variability among our patients supports the hypothesis that BBS is a disease with genetic, hormonal, and environmental triggers interacting to produce phenotypic variability. Although our report may not establish a definite relationship between environmental and genetic influences, their role should be explored in future studies.