Search

ABSTRACT: Avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) causes respiratory and reproductive diseases in birds, including chickens. In the chicken industry, live vaccines against aMPV subtypes A and B, which are the major aMPV subtypes, are widely used to control disease caused by aMPV. In this study, we evaluated the cross protective efficacy of a live aMPV subtype B vaccine administered via 3 different routes (nasal, spray, and oral) against virulent aMPV subtype A in chickens. At 3 wk after vaccination of 1-wk-old specific-pathogen-free chickens, we measured the serological responses. On the same day, we challenged the birds with aMPV subtype A. Protection was evaluated by viral gene detection and histopathological examination at 3 and 5 days postchallenge. Although there were differences in the serological responses according to administration route, all vaccinated birds showed complete protection at 5 days postchallenge. Regardless of administration route, genome of challenge virus was not detected in vaccinated group, and there were significant differences between vaccinated birds and control group. Overall, our results demonstrated that a subtype B aMPV vaccine can provide cross protection against virulent subtype A aMPV in chickens.

Avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) causes respiratory and reproductive diseases in birds, including chickens. In the chicken industry, live vaccines against aMPV subtypes A and B, which are the major aMPV subtypes, are widely used to control disease caused by aMPV. In this study, we evaluated the cross protective efficacy of a live aMPV subtype B vaccine administered via 3 different routes (nasal, spray, and oral) against virulent aMPV subtype A in chickens. At 3 wk after vaccination of 1-wk-old specific-pathogen-free chickens, we measured the serological responses. On the same day, we challenged the birds with aMPV subtype A. Protection was evaluated by viral gene detection and histopathological examination at 3 and 5 days postchallenge. Although there were differences in the serological responses according to administration route, all vaccinated birds showed complete protection at 5 days postchallenge. Regardless of administration route, genome of challenge virus was not detected in vaccinated group, and there were significant differences between vaccinated birds and control group. Overall, our results demonstrated that a subtype B aMPV vaccine can provide cross protection against virulent subtype A aMPV in chickens., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)