Search

Radiation-induced myelopathy is a devastating late effect of radiotherapy. Fortunately, this late effect is exceptional. The clinical presentation of radiation myelopathy is aspecific, typically occurring between 6 to 24 months after radiotherapy, and radiation-induced myelopathy remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most commonly used imaging tool. Radiation oncologists must be extremely cautious to the spinal cord dose, particularly in stereotactic radiotherapy and reirradiation. Conventionally, a maximum dose of 50Gy is tolerated in normofractionated radiotherapy (1.8 to 2Gy per fraction). Repeat radiotherapies lead to consider cumulative doses above this recommendation to offer individualized reirradiation. Several factors increase the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy, such as concomitant or neurotoxic chemotherapy. The development of predictive algorithms to prevent the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy is promising. However, radiotherapy prescription should be cautious, regarding to ALARA principle (as low as reasonably achievable). As the advent of immunotherapy has improved patient survival data and the concept of oligometastatic cancer is increasing in daily practice, stereotactic treatments and reirradiations will be increasingly frequent indications. Predict the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy is therefore a major issue in the following years, and remains a daily challenge for radiation oncologists., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: (125)I-labeled monoclonal antibodies ((125)I-mAbs) can efficiently treat small solid tumors. Here, we investigated the role of apoptosis, autophagy and mitotic catastrophe in (125)I-mAb toxicity in p53(-/-) and p53(+/+) cancer cells., Methods: We exposed p53(-/-) and p53(+/+) HCT116 cells to increasing activities of internalizing (cytoplasmic location) anti-HER1 (125)I-mAbs, or non-internalizing (cell surface location) anti-CEA (125)I-mAbs. For each targeting model we established the relationship between survival and mean nucleus absorbed dose using the MIRD formalism., Results: In both p53(-/-) and p53(+/+) HCT116 cells, anti-CEA (125)I-mAbs were more cytotoxic per Gy than anti-HER1 (125)I-mAbs. Sensitivity to anti-CEA (125)I-mAbs was p53-independent, while sensitivity to anti-HER1 (125)I-mAbs was higher in p53(-/-) HCT 116 cells, suggesting that they act through different signaling pathways. Apoptosis was only induced in p53(+/+) HCT116 cells and could not explain cell membrane radiation sensitivity. Inhibition of autophagy did not modify the cell response to (125)I-mAbs. By contrast, mitotic death was similarly induced in both p53(-/-) and p53(+/+) HCT116 cells by the two types of (125)I-mAbs. We also showed using medium transfer experiments that γ-H2AX foci were produced in bystander cells., Conclusion: Cell membrane sensitivity to (125)I-mAbs is not mediated by apoptosis and is p53-independent. Bystander effects-mediated mitotic death could be involved in the efficacy of (125)I-mAbs binding cell surface receptors., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)