Search

We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the new prehospital notification criteria for patients with potential acute stroke in the prehospital setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study from March 2011 to February 2013 of potential acute stroke patients prenotified using the new criteria which were: (1) positive Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS); (2) symptom onset within 3 hours; and (3) blood glucose level > 60 mg/dL. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new criteria were calculated and outcomes of acute stroke patients were reported. Data of all patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) transported to the destination hospital were also obtained to evaluate the compliance of emergency medical technicians. Results: There were 2888 patients suspected of stroke by emergency medical technicians and 221 patients prenotified due to meeting the criteria. The PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity of the new criteria were 76.9%, 96.6%, 64.9%, and 98.1%, respectively. Onset time > 3 hours (24/51, 47.1%) and seizure (27.5%) were the two most common conditions leading to false prenotification. Of all prenotified patients, 23.1% (51/221) received thrombolytic therapy. Hemorrhagic stroke or ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic transformation (53.8%) and minor symptoms or rapid recovery (26.9%) were the most common reasons excluding correctly prenotified patients from thrombolytic therapy. Conclusion: The accuracy of the new prehospital stroke criteria has higher PPV and specificity compared to previous CPSS validation studies.

To determine whether utilization of emergency medical service (EMS) can increase use and expedite delivery of the thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with an ischemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset from a prospective stroke registry. Variables associated with early ED arrival (within 3 hours of stroke onset) and administration of intravenous thrombolytic therapy were analyzed. Results: From January 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011, there were 1081 patients (62.3% men, age 69.6 ± 13 years) included in this study. Among them, 289 (26.7%) arrived in the ED within 3 hours, and 88 (8.1%) received thrombolytic therapy. Patients who arrived at the ED by EMS (n = 279, 25.8%) were independently associated with earlier ED arrival (adjusted odds ratio = 3.68, 95% confidence interval = 2.54–5.33), and higher chance of receiving thrombolytic therapy (adjusted odds ratio = 3.89, 95% confidence interval = 1.86–8.17). Furthermore, utilization of EMS significantly decreased onset-to-needle time by 26 minutes in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy. Conclusion: Utilization of EMS can not only help acute ischemic stroke patients in early presentation to ED, but also effectively facilitate thrombolytic therapy and shorten the onset-to-needle time.