Search

Background: It remains controversial whether the abdominoperineal resection (APR) procedure itself has a negative impact on prognosis compared with sphincter-saving surgery (SSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the operation type affects the prognostic outcome in rectal cancer using a multicenter database in Japan., Methods: The study involved 2533 patients who underwent APR or SSS and were registered in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum database, which includes data from 74 centers, between 2003 and 2007. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were local recurrence rate (LRR) and pathological radial margin (pRM) status., Results: Multivariate analysis identified pathological tumor depth, lymph node status, and pRM status to be associated with oncological outcomes (OS, RFS, LRR). Although the oncological outcomes were worse after APR than after SSS in univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.37) or RFS (hazard ratio 1.06; 95% CI 0.87-1.30) between APR and SSS. There was also no significant difference in LRR (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.70-1.77). Multivariate analysis showed that operation type was associated with positive pRM (odds ratio 3.13, 95% CI 0.18-0.56)., Conclusions: There was no significant difference in oncological outcomes between APR and SSS for rectal cancer. The risk of positive pRM was higher for APR and performing radial margin-negative surgery is an important factor in improving the oncological outcomes of APR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent studies indicated that excessive oxidative stress in an animal heart failure model injures both the sympathetic nerve endings and receptors, resulting in disturbance of norepinephrine release and sensitivity to norepinephrine. However, it has not been clarified whether this phenomenon is expressed clinically in patients with heart disease. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of ascorbic acid administration as an antioxidant vitamin in relation to the heart rate and norepinephrine response to exercise in patients after myocardial infarction., Methods: In this randomized crossover trial, 21 male patients who had had myocardial infarction underwent symptom-limited ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise testing twice, that is, without and with ascorbic acid (2 g) administration. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were assessed at rest and at peak exercise, and heart rate responsiveness to the norepinephrine increment from rest to peak exercise (DeltaHR/logDeltaNE) was calculated., Results: In the exercise test after ascorbic acid administration, peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)) improved over baseline. Ascorbic acid administration significantly increased the change in heart rate and norepinephrine from rest to peak exercise and DeltaHR/logDeltaNE. The increment in heart rate was significantly correlated with peak VO(2) in each test., Conclusion: Ascorbic acid intake before exercise improved exercise capacity through enhancement of the heart rate and norepinephrine response to exercise in patients after myocardial infarction. These findings suggest that ascorbic acid intake improves sympathetic dysfunction resulting from injury by excessive oxidative stress after myocardial infarction.

Purpose: It is thought that the mechanisms responsible for impaired chronotropic response to exercise are related to disturbance of cardiovascular autonomic regulation such as the baroreflex. However, it is still unclear whether the baroreflex mechanisms modulate heart rate (HR) responses to exercise via vagal and/or sympathetic alteration. We therefore investigated the effects of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) on the exercise HR response in the early phase of vagal deactivation and in the later phase of sympathetic excitation via metabolic stimulation., Methods: Twenty-four patients (18 males and 6 females, age 59+/-9 years) with heart disease underwent symptom-limited treadmill exercise testing according to the Bruce protocol, and BRS was measured utilizing the phenylephrine method. Subjects were grouped by their resting BRS value: 12 with normal BRS (> or =6 ms/mmHg) and 12 with depressed BRS (<6 ms/mmHg). The HR response to exercise was assessed using two parameters: the increment in HR during exercise and the ratio of HR response to the metabolic reserve (chronotropic index)., Results: (1) In the patients with depressed BRS, the HR responses within 1 min after the start of exercise and from 1 min to peak exercise were attenuated compared with those having a normal BRS (15+/-8 vs. 24+/-8 bpm and 36+/-9 vs. 47+/-15 bpm, respectively). (2) The chronotropic index in the patients with depressed BRS was lower than in those with normal BRS (0.50+/-0.14 vs. 0.64+/-0.08)., Conclusion: These findings suggest that impaired BRS modulates both the parasympathetic influence in early exercise and sympathetic effects in the later phase on HR response to exercise.