In this instalment of the How I Do It series on severe asthma, we tackle the clinical conundrum of choosing the right biologic for the right patient with severe asthma. With 6 biologics now approved for use in this area comprising 4 different targeting strategies (anti-Ig E: omalizumab; anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5-receptor: mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab; anti-IL-4-receptor: dupilumab; anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin: tezepelumab), this question is increasingly complex. Recognizing that no head-to-head trial has compared biologics, we based our review on the expected effects of inhibiting different aspects of type 2 airway inflammation, supported whenever possible by clinical trial and real-world data. We use 4 variations of a case of severe uncontrolled asthma to develop concepts and considerations introduced in the previous installment ("Workup of Severe Asthma") and discuss pregnancy-related, biomarker-related, comorbidity-related, and corticosteroid dependency-related considerations when choosing a biologic. The related questions of deciding when, why, and how to switch from one biologic to another also are discussed. Overall, we consider that the choice of biologics should be based on the available clinical trial data for the desired efficacy outcomes, the biomarker profile of the patient, safety profiles (eg, when pregnancy is considered), and opportunities to target 2 comorbidities with 1 biologic. Using systemic and airway biomarkers (blood eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide) and other phenotypic characteristics, we suggest a framework to facilitate therapeutic decision-making. Post hoc studies and new comparative studies are needed urgently to test this framework and to determine whether it allows us to make other clinically useful predictions., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: S. C. reports nonrestricted research grants from the NIHR Oxford BRC, the Quebec Respiratory Health Research Network, the Fondation Québécoise en Santé Respiratoire, AstraZeneca, bioMérieux, and Sanofi-Genyme-Regeneron; support as the Association Pulmonaire du Québec’s Research Chair in Respiratory Medicine and as a clinical research scholar of the Fonds de Recherche du Québec; speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Valeo Pharma; consultancy fees from FirstThought, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Regeneron, Access Biotechnology, and Access Industries; and sponsorship to attend or speak at international scientific meetings by or for AstraZeneca and Sanofi-Regeneron. He is an advisory board member and will have stock options for Biometry, Inc., a company that is developing an Feno device (myBiometry). He advised the Institut National d’Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux for an update of the asthma general practice information booklet for general practitioners. D. J. J. has received advisory board and speaker’s fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Teva, GSK, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Chiesi outside of the submitted work. I. D. P. has received speaker’s honoraria for speaking at sponsored meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Aerocrine AB, Almirall, Novartis, Teva, Chiesi, Sanofi/Regeneron, Menarini, and GSK in the last 5 years and has received payments for organizing educational events from AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Teva. He has received honoraria for attending advisory panels with Genentech, Sanofi/Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Teva, Merck, Circassia, Chiesi, and Knopp and has received payments to support Food and Drug Administration approval meetings from GSK. He has received sponsorship to attend international scientific meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, AstraZeneca, Teva, and Chiesi. He has received a grant from Chiesi to support a phase 2 clinical trial in Oxford. He is copatent holder of the rights to the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and has received payments for its use in clinical trials from Merck, Bayer, and Insmed. In 2014-2015 he was an expert witness for a patent dispute involving AstraZeneca and Teva. M. E. W. reports grants and personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, GSK, and Cohero Health; personal fees from Regeneron, Genentech, Sentien, Restorbio, Equillium, and Genzyme; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Teva; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; and grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)