Search

Background: Diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients is critical to co-manage their underlying disease and infection appropriately. Our study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of screening patients with cancer for COVID-19 infection. Methods: All oncology patients receiving care at Department of Oncology at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh were screened using the acute respiratory infection (ARI) survey. Nasopharyngeal and throat swap for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was performed on patients who have high ARI score (i.e. ≥ 4), or any patient requiring elective/emergency hospitalization, undergoing a procedure as well as screening asymptomatic patients receiving chemotherapy between April 1st and July 30, 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Descriptive and inferential analyses were done and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated considering the COVID-19 PCR as the gold standard. Results: During the study period, a total of 473 patients were included with a median age was 56 years (14–104), 51% were female, 73% had solid tumors, and 66% received treatment within the last 3 months. These patients underwent 688 PCR tests along with ARI survey screening. Testing was done in the outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department setting in 41%, 40% and 19% of the patients, respectively. Majority of tests were screening of asymptomatic patients and only 23% were tested for suspected infections with ARI ≥ 4. A total of 54 patients (8%) had positive PCR for COVID-19 infection. The prevalence of infection varied from month to month ranging from 1.09% in April up to 19.70% in June and correlated with the average daily and active case load at a national level. The diagnostic yield of the ARI score also correlated with infection burden nationally. The PPV and NPV of the ARI as a screening tool was 18.24% (0–31.8) and 95.6% (86.36–98.86%) with the PPN fluctuating considerably in parallel with the prevalence of COVID-19 result. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of the ARI were 55.77% (0–70.59) and 79.4 (69.19–92), respectively. Conclusion: The yield of screening asymptomatic patients with cancer varies based on the community burden of COVID-19 infection. As universal screening can cause delays to patient care, it should be tailored based on the individual patient risks and infection burden in the region.

Background: Management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) has evolved over the last few years especially in terms of work-up and the use of systemic therapy. This consensus statement was developed to present updated guidelines for the management of this disease. Methods: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) of lung cancer experts convened to discuss a set of pertinent questions with importance relevance to the management of ES-NSCLC. ES-NSCLC includes stages I, II and resected stage III. The experts included consultants in chest imaging, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology. Questions were discussed in virtual meetings and then a written manuscript with supporting evidence was drafted, reviewed, and approved by the team members. Results: The Consensus Statement included 9 questions addressing work-up and management of ES-NSCLC. Background information and literature review were presented for each question followed by specific recommendations to address the questions by oncology providers. The Statement was endorsed by various oncology societies in the Gulf region. Conclusion: The Consensus Statement serves as a guide for thoracic MDT members in the management of ES-NSCLC. Adaptation of these to the local setting is dictated usually by available resources and expertise, however, all efforts should be excreted to provide the optimal care to all patients whenever possible.

Background: The risk of getting cancer before full life expectancy and mortalities per year are on the rise in Saudi Arabia. Yet, evidence of economic burden of cancer in the country remains largely unknown. In order to provide evidence, we attempted to estimate the economic burden in terms of indirect cost associated with premature cancer deaths among the active or potentially economically active population aged 15–60 years in Saudi Arabia. Method: Within the framework of the World Health Organization guide of identifying the economic consequences of disease and injury, our method employs cost-of-illness approach. This approach is based on a macroeconomic model that estimates the indirect cost of cancer in terms of total non-health gross domestic product resource loss associated with a disease. We used epidemiological, health system, and macroeconomic data for our estimation. We discounted the net loss at 3% and computed an extension of the loss with a finite and stable upper limit proxied by non-health gross domestic product per capita. We carried out separate analyses for male and female. We conducted sensitivity analyses to account for uncertainties of epidemiological and economic factors on the robustness of the estimated economic burden. We varied the proportion of total cancer deaths, discount rate, and value of health expenditure per capita by ±20%. We further determined which of these factors or parameters had the greatest uncertainty or variation on the net present value total non-health gross domestic product resource loss per Capita. Results: Our results indicate the indirect cost associated with cancer deaths among Saudi population aged 15–60 years to be Int$ 2.57 billion of which Int$ 1.46 billion (57%) was accounted for by females. The total indirect loss of cancer deaths increased by 8% to Int$ 2.77 billion when the loss is allowed to grow with a finite and stable upper limit proxied by non-health gross domestic product per capita over the discounted years of life lost per a death among female and male respectively. Much of the uncertainty in the determination of the value of the loss was accounted for by the proportion of total cancer deaths and discount rate, while health expenditure per capita was responsible for the least variability. Conclusion: Our findings reveal evidence of indirect cost associated with cancer premature deaths in Saudi Arabia. In order to develop cancer control actions, the results of this study can inform health system policymakers not only of the extent of the enormous economic burden but also drawing attention to epidemiological and economic factors that explain the variability of the burden.

Summary: Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).These targeted therapies have been studied extensively in NSCLC in first line and subsequent lines, including maintenance in empiric fashion or in patients with tumors harboring the EGFR mutations.In this manuscript, we will review in details the evolutions of these targeted therapy in the management of NSCLC. Keywords: EGFR, lung cancer, inhibitors