Search

Coronary calcified lesions are commonly encountered and coronary atherectomy is commonly used for lesion modification during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The release of adenosine during atherectomy can result in bradyarrhythmias and aminophylline is commonly used to prevent this reaction. We identified 138 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy. A total of 159 calcified lesions were treated, and the atherectomy device was orbital atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, and both in 52 %, 42 %, and 6 %; respectively. After administration of aminophylline, 4.3 % of patients required intraprocedural insertion of a transvenous pacer (TVP), and 18.1 % of patients required administration of IV atropine. Technical success was achieved in 98.6 % of patients, and no adverse reactions to aminophylline were reported. All patients survived to discharge. In conclusion, aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy was safe and effective. No adverse effects of aminophylline were seen, and the rate of bailout TVP placement was low.

We describe the case of a 62-year-old man presenting 2 months after a reversed great saphenous vein femoropopliteal bypass performed for critical limb ischemia. He was found to have early, high-grade bypass graft stenosis on duplex ultrasound. Subsequent angiography demonstrated flow limitations secondary to two areas of retained venous valves in the proximal and mid-portions of the vein graft. The culprit valve lesions were successfully lysed endovascularly with a HawkOne (Medtronic) directional atherectomy device. This case demonstrates a safe, novel use of a directional atherectomy device for treatment of remnant valves causing hemodynamically significant flow problems in peripheral vein grafts.

Objective: We evaluated how contemporary data on infrapopliteal vessel preparation have been reported to identify knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research. Methods: A literature search was performed on Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar to identify clinical research studies reporting on the outcomes of vessel preparation in below-the-knee lesions between 2006 and 2021. Studies were excluded if they were case reports or case series with a sample size of

Background: With an aging population and an increase in the comorbidity burden of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the management of coronary calcification for optimal PCI is critical in contemporary practice., Objectives: This study sought to examine the trends and outcomes of coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), rotational/orbital atherectomy, or both among patients who underwent PCI in Michigan., Methods: We included all PCIs between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, performed at 48 Michigan hospitals. Outcomes included in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and procedural success., Results: IVL was used in 1,090 patients (2.57%), atherectomy was used in 1,743 (4.10%) patients, and both were used in 240 patients (0.57% of all PCIs). IVL use increased from 0.04% of PCI cases in January 2021 to 4.28% of cases in June 2022, ultimately exceeding the rate of atherectomy use. The rate of MACEs (4.3% vs 5.4%; P = 0.23) and procedural success (89.4% vs 89.1%; P = 0.88) were similar among patients treated with IVL compared with atherectomy, respectively. Only 15.6% of patients treated with IVL in contemporary practice were similar to the population enrolled in the pivotal IVL trials. Among such patients (n = 169), the rate of MACEs (0.0%) and procedural success (94.7%) were similar to the outcomes reported in the pivotal IVL trials., Conclusions: Since its introduction in February 2021, coronary IVL use has steadily increased, exceeding atherectomy use in Michigan by February 2022. Contemporary use of IVL and atherectomy is generally associated with high rates of procedural success and low rates of complications., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Support for the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium and the Michigan Value Collaborative is provided by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network as part of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Value Partnerships program. Although Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and BMC2 work collaboratively, the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of BCBSM or any of its employees. Further, BCBSM does not have access to BMC2 data, and all patient episodes occurring at engaged hospitals are included in the data registries, regardless of payer. Dr Madder has received research support, consulting fees, speaker honoraria, and serves on the Advisory Board of Corindus, a Siemens Healthineers Company; has received research support, consulting fees, and speaker honoraria from Infraredx; has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular; and serves on the Advisory Board of Spectrawave and Medtronic. Dr Basir is a consultant for Abiomed, Cardiovascular Systems, Chiesi, Saranas, and Zoll. Dr Kaki serves on the Speakers Bureau of Abiomed, Abbott, CSI, Medtronic, Shockwave, and Terumo. Dr Azzalini has received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare, Asahi Intecc, Philips, Abbott Vascular, Reflow Medical, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr Gurm has received research support from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan; is the co-founder of, owns equity in, and is a consultant to Amplitude Vascular Systems; owns equity in Jiaxing Bossh Medical Technology Partnership; is a consultant for Osprey Medical; and is the chair of the Clinical Events Committee for the PERFORMANCE trial sponsored by Contego Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To compare one year outcomes after atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy vs. plain balloon angioplasty before application of drug coated balloons for treating femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease., Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were screened until May 2023 for randomised controlled trials., Review Methods: This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were patients with claudication and those with critical limb threatening ischaemia with lesion characteristics of all lengths, stenosis, calcification, and occlusions. The primary outcome was freedom from target lesion re-intervention at one year. Secondary outcomes were rate of bailout stenting, major amputation, and all cause mortality at one year. Pooled point estimates were calculated with a standard random effects model. Further sensitivity analyses were completed with a mixed treatment Bayesian model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 (RoB2) and certainty of evidence assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework., Results: Four RCTs comprising 549 patients (two studies evaluating directional atherectomy, one evaluating rotational atherectomy, one evaluating intravascular lithotripsy against plain balloon angioplasty) were included. The weighted mean length of femoropopliteal lesions was 103.4 ± 6.67 mm. Results of the mixed treatment Bayesian analysis were consistent with pooled analysis for all outcomes. There were no significant differences in freedom from target lesion revascularisation (GRADE, high) (RoB2, low), major amputation (GRADE, low), or mortality (GRADE, moderate). Bailout stenting rates were significantly reduced with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy compared with plain balloon angioplasty (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.89) (GRADE, moderate) (RoB2, low)., Conclusion: This review found that intravascular lithotripsy or atherectomy did not appear to incur a statistically significant advantage in freedom from target lesion revascularisation, major amputation, or mortality rate at one year. There was moderate certainty of evidence that bailout stenting is significantly reduced after vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Most surgeons employ an endovascular-first approach to the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but controversy remains regarding the ideal interventions for the management of isolated popliteal artery disease (IPAD). Indeed, there are a paucity of data that compare outcomes of popliteal stents vs other peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of PVIs in IPAD., Methods: The Vascular Study Group of New England database was queried for all IPAD PVIs performed for atherosclerotic occlusive disease from 2010 to 2021. Those with at least 1 year of follow-up data available were included for analysis. The primary endpoint was 1-year freedom from a composite target lesion (TL) treatment failure that included restenosis >50% on duplex, reintervention, or ipsilateral major amputation., Results: We included 689 procedures performed on 634 patients. Of these, 250 (36.3%) were treated with plain balloons (POBA), 215 (31.2%) had stents, 170 (24.7%) had special balloons (drug-coated, cutting, or lithotripsy), and 54 (7.8%) atherectomies were performed. Stent placement was associated with lower freedom from TL treatment failure (72.6%) than special balloon (81.2%; P = .048) and atherectomy (88.9%; P = .012), but not POBA (76.8%; P = .293). On multivariable logistic regression, stents (odds ratio, 0.637; P = .021) and preoperative P2Y12 inhibitor therapy (odds ratio, 0.683; P = .048) were both associated with lower freedom from intervention failure., Conclusions: Popliteal stent placement is associated with a higher rate of TL treatment failure at 1 year when compared with other PVIs including special balloon angioplasty and atherectomy, but not POBA, and should therefore be avoided in favor of special balloons or atherectomy whenever feasible., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The frequency of atherectomy in lower extremity arterial disease has increased substantially over the past several years, specifically in the office-based laboratory (OBL) setting, yet the efficacy compared with other interventions and the consequences of distal embolization remain unknown. Embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been used at varying rates depending on physician and practice setting. Previous studies have described lesion characteristics to consider when weighing the benefits and drawbacks associated with device use. Our study focuses on the use of atherectomy and EPDs in femoropopliteal arterial disease to better characterize resource use trends and postoperative outcomes in the inpatient and OBL interventional settings., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on endovascular interventions performed for femoral-popliteal occlusive disease that were entered into the Vascular Quality Initiative data registry between 2017 and 2021. A one:one greedy match, adjusted analysis based on inpatient or OBL location of procedure was used to compare the groups. Hierarchical logistical regression with selective use of principal component analysis was used to further explore the differences in EPD use and immediate postoperative outcomes. A proportional hazard model was used to demonstrate differences in reintervention rates up to 2 years postoperatively between patients who underwent atherectomy in the inpatient vs OBL treatment setting., Results: 2849 matched pairs were inlcuded in the final analysis. In our cohort, there was 22% EPD use overall, 40% in the hospital setting and 4.4% in the OBL setting (P < .001). Among the patients with available follow-up information, OBL intervention setting increased probability of reintervention by 18% at 2 years postoperatively compared with the inpatient setting; however, there was no difference associated with EPD placement and rate of reintervention., Conclusions: Use of EPDs in the OBL setting compared with the hospital setting is dramatically decreased; however, no increased incidence of postoperative complications was seen compared to procedures performed in the hospital setting when controlling for patient and lesion characteristics. Patients with available follow-up data were more likely to undergo ipsilateral reintervention between 6 months and 2 years postoperatively if atherectomy was done in the OBL setting. Dedicated studies are encouraged to ensure patient safety, effective resource allocation, and long-term efficacy of OBL atherectomy as an ever-growing number of peripheral arterial procedures are transitioned to the OBL setting., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) has been identified as a key feature of rupture-prone plaques, noninvasive imaging-based features for its detection in coronary artery have not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of the ratio between the signal intensities of coronary plaque and cardiac muscle (PMR) on non-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) in magnetic resonance with IPH in the directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) specimens. Methods: Fifteen lesions from 15 patients, who underwent DCA and T1WI, were prospectively enrolled. The snap-frozen samples obtained by DCA were used for immunohistochemical staining against a protein specific to erythrocyte membranes (glycophorin A) and macrophages. The percentage of glycophorin A and macrophages was graded using a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher percentages. Results: PMR showed a strong positive correlation with glycophorin A scores (ρ = 0.772, p

Burr entrapment remains a serious complication of rotational atherectomy. This report describes an advanced technique for the management of entrapped atherectomy burrs. Commonly strategies were unsuccessful. A chronic total occlusion angioplasty technique was used successfully: the subintimal dilation and “external crushing” plaque modification technique. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Objective: Analysis of regional data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) suggested improved survival for patients undergoing stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty and atherectomy. Using national data from the VQI linked to Medicare claims data through the Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network program, this study aimed to compare the rates of mortality, reintervention, and amputation after endovascular interventions (atherectomy, stenting, and balloon angioplasty) for two separate cohorts: patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and patients with claudication., Methods: This was a secondary data analysis of Society for Vascular Surgery National VQI data linked to Medicare claims, between October 2016 and December 2019. Patients aged ≥65 years with symptoms of claudication or CLTI and a diagnosis of occlusive disease were included. Urgent or emergent interventions or those with concurrent procedures (endarterectomy, bypass, or bilateral intervention) were excluded. Interventions were grouped into (1) balloon angioplasty only; (2) stent (with or without balloon angioplasty); or (3) atherectomy (alone, with or without stent, with or without balloon angioplasty). Propensity score-matched cohorts were constructed to conduct pairwise intervention comparisons of mortality, reintervention, and amputation rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive propensity scores for each patient. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) analyses were performed., Results: A total of 9785 (2665 claudication, 7120 CLTI) eligible patients were identified. After propensity score matching for the CLTI group, 2826, 3608, and 2796 pairs of cases were used to compare balloon angioplasty vs atherectomy, balloon angioplasty vs stent, and stent vs atherectomy, respectively. No statistically significant difference in mortality was observed among all interventions. However, atherectomy was associated with a significant increase in reintervention rate compared with balloon angioplasty (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.39; P = .01) and compared with stenting (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.46; P < .01) within the first year after the index procedure. Of note, both atherectomy (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P < .05) and stenting (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90; P < .01) showed lower rates of major amputation when compared with balloon angioplasty within 1 year after the index procedure. In the claudication group, there were no significant differences observed among interventions for peripheral arterial disease for mortality, reintervention, or amputation rates., Conclusions: Further studies are needed to identify appropriate indications for atherectomy, because there may be a subset of patients with CLTI who benefit from this therapy with respect to amputation rates. Until then, caution should be exercised when using atherectomy because it is also associated with higher reintervention rates., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The percutaneous treatment of calcified coronary lesions remains challenging and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. In addition, coronary artery calcification is associated with more frequent peri-procedural myocardial infarction., Study Design and Objectives: The ShOckwave ballooN or Atherectomy with Rotablation in calcified coronary artery lesions (SONAR) study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, international, multicenter, open label trial (NCT05208749) comparing a lesion preparation strategy with either shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) or rotational atherectomy (RA) before drug-eluting stent implantation in 170 patients with moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions. The primary endpoint is difference in the rate of peri-procedural myocardial infarction. Key secondary endpoints include rate of peri-procedural microvascular dysfunction, peri-procedural myocardial injury, descriptive study of IMR measurements in calcified lesions, technical and procedural success, interaction between OCT calcium score and primary endpoint, 30-day and 1-year major adverse clinical events., Conclusions: The SONAR trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction between 2 contemporary calcium modification strategies (Shockwave IVL and RA) in patients with calcified coronary artery lesions. Furthermore, for the first time, the incidence of peri-procedural microvascular dysfunction after Shockwave IVL and RA will be evaluated and compared., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JB reports research grants and speaking fees from Abbott Vascular and Biotronik AG, and consulting fees from Biotronik AG, Boston Scientific and Elixir. NMVM reports research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca and advisory fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Anteris, JenaValve, Siemens, and Teleflex. JD reports consulting fees from Topmedical and Boston Scientific., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The safety and efficacy of coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of ostial lesions are not yet fully established. We sought to evaluate (OA) treatment of severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions., Methods: A retrospective analysis of subjects treated with OA for severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions, at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB) from January 2014 to September 2020, was completed. Study baseline characteristics, lesion and vessel characteristics, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were analyzed and compared., Results: A total of 609 patients that underwent PCI with OA were identified. The majority of patients (81.9 %) had non-ostial lesions, while 16.6 % had ostial lesions (of which 2.8 % classified as aorto-ostial) and 1.5 % had unknown lesion anatomy. The mean age of the overall cohort was 74.0 ± 9.3 years, and 63.5 % were male. All patients received drug-eluting stent (DES) placement, and the overall freedom from MACE was 98.5 %, with no significant difference observed between the ostial and non-ostial groups. The freedom from cardiac death and MI was also similar between the two groups. There were low rates of bleeding complications and severe angiographic complications, and no persistent slow flow/no reflow was reported., Conclusions: This study demonstrated no significant differences in in-hospital MACE outcomes between patients with ostial versus non-ostial lesions, indicating that OA is a safe and effective treatment option for both lesion types, including those classified as aorto-ostial., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest NB, MBL, and AJK report receiving consulting fees from Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (CSI). BJM is employed by and owns stock in CSI. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: While endovascular approaches are considered first line treatment for stenosis or occlusion of the lower limb arteries, major dissections and embolic events remain procedural risks. Newer technologies are needed which limit these complications while achieving desired clinical outcomes., Methods: The Auryon atherectomy system (AngioDynamics) consists of a 355-nm wavelength solid-state Nd:YAG short pulse laser combined with dedicated optical catheters. This single-center, retrospective chart review assessed the safety and efficacy of this device in patients with PAD treated at our center between March and December 2020., Results: A total of 55 patients were included. Mean age was 73.7 ± 9.3 years with 63.6 % of patients being males. Lesions were above the knee only for 16.4 % of patients, below the knee only for 3.6 %, and both above and below the knee for 80.0 % of patients. One patient had in-stent restenosis. Chronic total occlusions and critical limb ischemia were present for 43.6 % of patients respectively. Procedural success, defined as <30 % residual stenosis without any complications, was achieved in 85.5 % of patients. Stenosis/re-occlusion occurred in 25.5 % of patients at a mean of 168.9 ± 73.4 days with resultant target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 218.3 ± 92.4 days. Four patients underwent minor amputations. No patients experienced procedure-related complications. One patient died unrelated to the procedure., Conclusion: The Auryon laser system was shown to be safe and effective in this real-world patient population with no procedural adverse events or deaths and improvements in patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The author declares the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Aaron Kovaleski reports consultant relationships with AngioDyamics, Inc. and Surmodics, Inc., (Copyright © 2023 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Escaned is supported by the Intensification of Research Activity project INT22/00088 from Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III; and has served as speaker and advisory board member for Philips. Dr Shabbir has received consultation and speaker fees from Philips. Dr Travieso has received an unrestricted research grant from Philips. Dr Mejía-Rentería has received speaker fees from Philips, Abbott, and Medis Medical Imaging. Dr Gonzalo has received consultation and speaker fees from Philips and Abbott. Dr Salinas has received speaker fees from Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a higher risk of developing peripheral artery disease (PAD) and its adverse health outcomes than individuals with normal renal function. Among patients with CKD, PAD is predominantly characterized by the calcification of the medial layer of arterial vessels in addition to intimal atherosclerosis and calcification. Vascular calcification (VC) is initiated by CKD-associated hyperphosphatemia, hypercalcemia, high concentrations of parathyroid hormone (PTH) as well as inflammation and oxidative stress. VC is widely prevalent in this cohort (>80% dialysis and 50% patients with CKD) and contributes to reduced arterial compliance and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The most severe form of PAD is critical limb ischemia (CLI) which has a substantial risk for increased morbidity and mortality. Percutaneous endovascular interventions with transluminal angioplasty, atherectomy, and intravascular lithotripsy are the current nonsurgical treatments for severe calcific plaque. Unfortunately, there are no randomized controlled trials that address the optimal approach to PAD and CLI revascularization in patients with CKD., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are several retrospective studies comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) and orbital atherectomy (OA), but all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in those studies were not performed under intracoronary imaging guidance., Objectives: This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI with RA vs OA., Methods: The DIRO (To directly compare RA and OA for calcified lesions, a prospective randomized trial) trial was conducted. We enrolled patients with de novo calcified lesions (arc >180°) assessed by OCT or angiographically moderate or severe calcifications if the OCT catheter could not cross the lesion before any intervention. Eligible patients were randomly 1:1 allocated to lesion preparation with RA vs OA. Stent expansion was defined as the minimum stent area divided by the distal reference area multiplied by 100. Tissue modification was assessed using preatherectomy and postatherectomy OCT images. Procedural outcomes including periprocedural myocardial infarctions were evaluated. Furthermore, clinical events and vascular healing evaluated by OCT at 8 months postprocedure were assessed., Results: The stent expansion was significantly greater in the RA group vs the OA group (99.5% vs 90.6%; P = 0.02). The maximum atherectomy area was significantly larger in the RA group than in the OA group (1.34 [IQR: 1.02-1.89] mm 2 vs 0.83 [IQR: 0.59-1.11] mm 2 ; P = 0.004). The procedural outcomes and clinical events at 8 months did not differ between the groups. The vascular healing was sufficient in both groups., Conclusions: The prospective randomized DIRO trial revealed that RA could produce a more favorable tissue modification, which may lead to a larger stent expansion than OA in heavily calcified lesions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Nishino has received donations from Abbott Medical Japan, Boston Scientific Japan, Medtronic, and Japan Lifeline, unrelated to the present work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) usually have concomitant calcified coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring atherectomy to improve lesion compliance and odds of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a paucity of data regarding PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS., Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 2016 through 2019 using ICD-10 codes to identify individuals with AS who underwent PCI with or without atherectomy (Orbital Atherectomy [OA], Rotational or Laser Atherectomy [non-OA]). Temporal trends, safety, outcomes, costs, and correlates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were assessed using discharge weighted data., Results: Hospitalizations of 45,420 AS patients undergoing PCI with or without atherectomy were identified and of those, 88.6 %, 2.3 %, and 9.1 % were treated with PCI-only, OA, or non-OA, respectively. There was an increase in PCIs (8855 to 10,885), atherectomy [OA (165 to 300) and non-OA (795 to 1255)], and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use (625 to 1000). The median cost of admission was higher in the atherectomy cohorts ($34,340.77 in OA, $32,306.2 in non-OA) as compared to the PCI-only cohort ($23,683.98). Patients tend to have decreased odds of MACE with IVUS guided atherectomy and PCI., Conclusions: This large database revealed a significant increase in PCI with or without atherectomy in AS patients from 2016 to 2019. Considering the complex comorbidities of AS patients, the overall complication rates were well distributed among the different cohorts, suggesting that IVUS guided PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS is feasible and safe., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest K. Vedantam, C. Torres, M. Donatelle, M. Shehadeh, J. Flaherty, R. Swaminathan, S. Rao, M. Leon MD, A. Kirtane, and N. Beohar have no conflict of interest to declare. B. Martinsen employed by and owns stock in Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thrombi are common in steno-occlusive lesions of infrainguinal atherosclerotic diseases. Despite the easy passage of guidewires through these lesions, conventional ballooning or stenting cannot effectively treat them, and patients are at risk of distal embolization. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of using a rotational aspiration atherectomy system to treat infrainguinal atherosclerotic disease., Methods: Patients underwent revascularization of target lesions using the Jetstream™ Atherectomy System. The primary endpoint was the freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) 12-month after the procedure. Outcomes were evaluated according to the clinical severity, lesion type, use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs), and lesion length, characteristics, and sites. Survival analysis for CD-TLR over time was plotted. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM; Armonk, NY, USA). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant., Results: In total, 150 patients (91.2% male; mean age, 69.8 years; 66.2% with diabetes) with de novo or restenotic infrainguinal lesions were enrolled. The mean lesion length was 17.2 cm, 75.0% were occlusive, and 38.2% had severe calcification. The lesion types were sclerotic (64.7%), thrombosclerotic (20.6%), thrombotic (8.8%), and in-stent (5.9%). Adjunctive DCB was used in 86.8% of patients. The 12-month primary patency rate (PPR) and CD-TLR rates were 81.6% and 90.1%, respectively. The 12-month CD-TLR rate was significantly better in the sclerotic and thrombosclerotic groups than in the thrombotic group (100% and 100% vs. 66.7%; P = 0.001). The 12-month PPR was significant better in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A and B groups than TASC C and D groups (P = 0.02). The 12-month PPR is significantly better after using a DCB or stent placement than after using a simple balloon (P = 0.01). There were no major adverse events, including procedure-related death, myocardial infarction, or major amputation., Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the Jetstream atherectomy device for complex infrainguinal lesions. This system functions optimally with TASC A/B lesions and sclerotic or thrombosclerotic lesions., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A recent shift in the location where peripheral endovascular interventions (PVI) are performed has occurred, from traditional settings such as hospital outpatient departments (HOPD), to ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) and outpatient-based laboratories (OBL). Different settings may influence the safety and efficacy of the PVI, as well as how it is done. This study aims to compare the postprocedural outcomes and intraprocedural details between the three settings., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for all elective infrainguinal PVIs for occlusive peripheral arterial disease between January 2016 and December 2021. The primary outcomes were rates of postprocedural hospital admissions, postprocedural medical complications, and access site complications. Secondary outcomes included technical success and intraprocedural details, such as types and number of devices used, amount of contrast, and fluoroscopy time. The χ 2 test, analysis of variance, and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the outcomes., Results: A total of 66,101 PVI cases (HOPD, 57,062 [83.33%]; ASC, 4591 [6.95%]; OBL, 4448 [6.73%]) were included in the study. There were 445 cases requiring hospital admission (HOPD, 398 [0.70%]; ASC, 26 [0.57%]; OBL, 21 [0.47%]; P = .126). There were no significant differences in cardiac, pulmonary, or renal complications. Access site complications occurred in less than 1.7% of all cases and were significantly higher in OBLs when compared with ASCs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-8.03; P = .001) and significantly lower in ASCs in comparison to HOPDs (aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.41; P < .001). Technical success occurred in at least 92% of all cases, regardless of setting. There was a 16-fold increase in the use of atherectomy devices in an OBL vs HOPD setting (aOR, 16.79; 95% CI, 11.77-23.95; P < .001) and a five-fold increase in the use of atherectomy devices in an ASC vs HOPD setting (aOR, 5.37; 95% CI, 2.47-11.65; P < .001). There was a five-fold decrease in the use of special balloons in an OBL vs HOPD setting (aOR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.39; P < .001) and a four-fold decrease when comparing ASCs with HOPDs (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.51; P < .001)., Conclusions: Elective PVIs performed in any outpatient setting proved to be safe and technically successful. However, there are significant differences in the way PVIs are performed in each setting, such as the greater use of atherectomy devices in OBLs and greater use of special balloons in HOPDs. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the durability and reintervention outcomes and understand factors associated with practice pattern variability across these different settings., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for lower extremity peripheral artery disease have been increasing, particularly in the office-based setting. Our goal was to evaluate practice patterns for PVI by site of service using a contemporary real-world dataset., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry was queried from 2010-2021. Site of service was classified as hospital/inpatient, hospital/outpatient, and ambulatory/office-based center. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and periprocedural outcomes were analyzed., Results: There were 54,897 hospital/inpatient (43.2%), 64,105 hospital/outpatient (50.4%), and 8,179 ambulatory/office-based center (6.4%) PVI. When comparing the 2 outpatient settings, ambulatory/office-based center patients were older than hospital/outpatient (mean age 70.7 vs. 68.7 years), more often female sex (41.4% vs. 39.1%), never smokers (27.5% vs. 18.5%), primary Medicare (61.6% vs. 55.9%), nonambulatory (6.5% vs. 4.7%), less often with coronary artery disease (30.2% vs. 34.1%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (18.1% vs. 26.9%), congestive heart failure (13% vs. 17.2%), obesity (30.9% vs. 33.6%), and less often on a statin (71.4% vs. 76.1%) (P < 0.001). Ambulatory/office-based center procedures were more likely for claudication (60.1% vs. 55.8%), more often involved femoro-popliteal (73.1% vs. 64.6%) and infrapopliteal (36.7% vs. 24.3%), and less often iliac interventions (24.1% vs. 33.6%) (P < 0.001).Overall, atherectomy was used in 14.2% of hospital/inpatient, 19.4% of hospital/outpatient, and 63.4% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. Stents were used in 41.8% of hospital/inpatient, 45.1% of hospital/outpatient, and 48.8% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. However, stent grafts were used in 12.5% of hospital/inpatient, 8.8% of hospital/outpatient, and only 1.3% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. On multivariable analysis, compared with hospital/inpatient, atherectomy use was associated with ambulatory/office-based center setting (Odds ratio 10.9, 95% confidence interval 10.3-11.5, P < 0.001) and hospital/outpatient setting (Odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.51-1.62, P < 0.001). Periprocedure complications including hematoma requiring intervention (0.3%), any stenosis/occlusion (0.2%), and distal embolization (0.6%) were quite low across all settings., Conclusions: There are substantial variations in patient populations, procedural indications, and types of interventions undertaken during PVI across different locations. Ambulatory/office-based procedures more commonly treat claudicants, use atherectomy, and less often use stent grafts. Further research is warranted to investigate long-term trends in practice patterns and long-term outcomes, for PVI in the ever-expanding ambulatory/office-based setting., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The objective of the study was to compare drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty alone and directional atherectomy (DA) combined with DCB angioplasty in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LE-PAD)., Methods: Subjects treated with DCB angioplasty alone (group A) and DA combined with DCB angioplasty (group B) were enrolled in the study. A retrospective chart review was performed between the 4 years. Subjects with severe and occluded LE-PAD were included. Demographic data, atherosclerotic vessel properties, and procedural data were recorded. For both groups, success rates (technical, procedural, and clinical) were presented., Results: In total, 226 patients were evaluated. For baseline characteristics, only tobacco use and hyperlipidemia were higher in group B (P = 0.001 and P = 0.010, respectively). For the ankle-brachial index, no significant difference existed at the first, third, sixth, 12th or 24th month follow-ups. No significant difference existed for the Rutherford class at the first, third, sixth, or 12th months according to the groups. A significant difference was found at 24-month Rutherford levels. The incidence of severe claudication in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (13 [12.4%] for group A and 3 [2.8%] for group B, P = 0.035). The stenosis rate after predilatation in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (54.56 ± 5.36 for group A and 59.20 ± 6.21 for group B, P = 0.012). The distribution of full patency in the 12th month in group B was significantly higher than that in group A. The rate of 70-100% stenosis in the 12th month was significantly higher in group A than in group B. According to the groups, the distribution of the patients who were lost to follow-up and died during the follow-up and secondary results, primary patency rates, and 2-year disease-free survival rates were also similar., Conclusions: Atherectomy combined with DCB is superior for the long-term treatment of LE-PAD., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The impact of intravascular imaging guidance [intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT)] on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing orbital atherectomy (OA) and percutaneous intervention (PCI) are not well characterized. The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2015 to 2019 was used to select all cases of OA. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of in-hospital, 30-day, and 180-day hospitalization outcomes between patients who underwent PCI with OA vs without intravascular imaging were calculated using a propensity-matched analysis. A total of 15,681 patients undergoing PCI after OA (12,649 with no-imaging, 3032 with imaging) were identified. Due to a significant difference in the baseline characteristics, a matched sample of 3008 in the no-imaging group and 3032 in the imaging group was selected. On adjusted analysis, the odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86) were significantly lower in patients undergoing IVUS/OCT guided OA and PCI compared with those having PCI without imaging. There was no difference in the rate of in-hospital stroke (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51-1.45) and major bleeding (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.16) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the 30- and 180-day odds of readmission, major bleeding, coronary dissection, pericardial effusion, and AKI between the two groups. IVUS and OCT use during PCI with OA for patients with calcified coronary artery disease appear to be associated with reduced in-hospital mortality at index admission. Prospective trials are necessary to determine the long-term benefits of imaging with PCI., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We evaluated limb salvage (LS), amputation-free survival (AFS), and target extremity reintervention (TER) after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), stenting, and atherectomy for treatment of infrapopliteal disease (IPD) with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI)., Methods: All index peripheral vascular interventions for IPD and CLTI were identified from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry. Of the multilevel procedures, the peripheral vascular intervention type was indexed to the infrapopliteal segment. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline differences between groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to calculate and compare LS and AFS., Results: The 3-year LS for stenting vs POBA was 87.6% vs 81.9% (P = .006) but was not significant on Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.76; P = .08). AFS was superior for stenting vs POBA (78.1% vs 69.5%; P = .001; HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90; P = .003). LS was similar for POBA and atherectomy (81.9% vs 84.8%; P = .11) and for stenting and atherectomy (87.6% vs 84.8%; P = .23). The LS rate after propensity score matching for POBA vs stenting was 83.4% vs 88.2% (P = .07; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.017; P = .062). The AFS rate for stenting vs POBA was 78.8% vs 69.4% (P = .005; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89; P = .005). No significant differences were found between stenting and atherectomy (P = .21 for atherectomy; and P = .34 for POBA). The need for TER did not differ across the groups but the interval to TER was significantly longer for stenting than for POBA or atherectomy (stenting vs POBA, 12.8 months vs 7.7 months; P = .001; stenting vs atherectomy, 13.5 months vs 6.8 months; P < .001)., Conclusions: Stenting and atherectomy had comparable LS and AFS for patients with IPD and CLTI. However, stenting conferred significant benefits for AFS compared with POBA but atherectomy did not. Furthermore, the interval to TER was nearly double for stenting compared with POBA or atherectomy. These factors should be considered when determining the treatment strategy for this challenging anatomic segment., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel endovascular treatment for calcified common femoral artery disease (CFA). Data on midterm effectiveness for clinically driven target lesions revascularization (CD-TLR) is lacking. This study investigated CD-TLR during 18-month follow-up in patients requiring IVL for CFA disease treatment., Methods: In a single-center retrospective cohort study, electronic medical record of patients undergoing IVL for CFA disease from January 2018 to March 2020 were reviewed. Primary outcome was CD-TLR estimated by Kaplan-Meier method during 18-month follow-up. Univariate logistic regression was used to compare differences in CD-TLR by the type of adjunct therapy used., Results: Among 54 CFA lesions in 50 patients, mean age (SD) was 75(8) years, gender and race were predominantly male (74%, n = 37) and white (94%, n = 47), respectively. Rutherford class III claudication was most common (70%, n = 35) with mean ABI of 0.66 (0.26) and mean angiographic stenosis of 77% (13%). Adjunct use of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty was 83% (n = 45) and atherectomy was 39% (n = 21). Residual angiographic stenosis was <30% in all cases. Complications included dissection requiring stent placement (2%, n = 1). After 18-months, 18% (n = 9) died unrelated to procedural complications and 6% (n = 3) were lost to follow-up. 18-month cumulative freedom from CD-TLR was 80.6% (95% CI: 69.1%, 92%). Univariate logistic regression did not reveal a statistically significant difference in CD-TLR with type of adjunct therapy used (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: IVL with adjunct use of DCB and/or atherectomy is safe and effective in treatment of calcified CFA disease. Randomized studies are required to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Peter Soukas is a site principal investigator for Shockwave Medical Company. Dr. Herbert Aronow is a consultant for Data Safety and Monitoring Board for the Philips ILLUMENATE studies. All other authors have no declaration of interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: How to implement robotic-assisted PCI safely and when to escalate to more complex cases has not been previously described. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted PCI in the first year of a newly established robotic-assisted PCI program., Methods: All patients who underwent robotic-assisted PCI in the first 12 months at a single academic center were included in the study. Lesion complexity was characterized as "PRECISE-like", "CORA-PCI-like", or "CORA-PCI excluded" based on established criteria. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as <30% residual stenosis after stenting with a final TIMI flow grade 2-3 and no procedural complications. Secondary outcomes included robotic success, defined as clinical success with robotic completion, unintentional manual conversion rate, procedure time, and procedural complications., Results: Of the 57 consecutive lesions treated, 12 (22.6%) had a PRECISE-like lesion complexity while 32 (56.1%) had a CORA- PCI-like, and 13 (22.8%) a CORA-PCI excluded lesion complexity. There was no significant difference in clinical success (100.0% vs. 96.7% vs. 100.0%, p = 1.00) among the groups but robotic success was numerically lower as complexity increased (100.0% vs. 80.0% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.15), with an increased frequency of manual conversion. There was no significant difference in procedural complication rates among the groups. The robotic completion rate improved during the study period., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted PCI, can be safely implemented in a moderate-sized academic center, with a rapid escalation in patient and lesion complexity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Hirai has disclosed speaking fees and consultation fees from Abiomed, Siemens Healthineers, and Asahi Intecc. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to report., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Small, older studies have suggested that the use of atherectomy devices has become common in peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) despite the paucity of strong clinical guidelines. We analyzed the 10-year trends in the use of atherectomy for PVIs across the United States and identified the main predictors of atherectomy use., Methods: Using the Vascular Quality Initiative registry, we identified all patients who had undergone endovascular PVIs for occlusive lower extremity arterial disease from 2010 to 2019. Procedures in which an atherectomy device had been used as the primary or secondary device were classified as the atherectomy group. We calculated the frequency of atherectomy use over time and across geographic regions. Using regression modeling, we identified the factors that were independently associated with atherectomy use., Results: A total of 205,377 PVIs had been performed for 152,693 unique patients. During the 10-year period, 16.6% of the PVI procedures had used atherectomy, increasing from 8.5% in 2010 to 19.7% in 2019 (P trend  < .0001). Across 17 geographic regions, we found a significant difference in the prevalence of atherectomy use, ranging from 8.2% to 29%. The strongest predictor of atherectomy use was performance of PVI in an office setting (odds ratio [OR], 10.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.17-11.09) or ambulatory center (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.65-4.39) vs a hospital setting. The presence of severe (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.4-2.85) or moderate (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.69) lesion calcification was also predictive of atherectomy use. Other predictive factors included elective status, insurance provider, lesion length, prior PVI, claudication symptoms, and diabetes mellitus., Conclusions: Atherectomy use in PVI significantly increased from 2010 to 2019. We found wide regional variability in the use of atherectomy that seemed to be driven more strongly by nonclinical factors., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Despite limited evidence supporting atherectomy alone over stenting/angioplasty as the index peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), the use of atherectomy has rapidly increased in recent years. We previously identified a wide distribution of atherectomy practice patterns among US physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of index atherectomy with reintervention., Methods: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all beneficiaries who underwent elective first-time femoropopliteal PVI for claudication between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Subsequent PVI reinterventions were examined through June 30, 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare rates of PVI reinterventions for patients who received index atherectomy versus nonatherectomy procedures. Reintervention rates were also described for physicians by their overall atherectomy use (by quartile). A hierarchical Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate patient and physician-level characteristics associated with reinterventions., Results: A total of 15,246 patients underwent an index PVI for claudication in 2019, of which 59.7% were atherectomy. After a median of 603 days (interquartile range, 77-784 days) of follow-up, 41.2% of patients underwent a PVI reintervention, including 48.9% of patients who underwent index atherectomy versus 29.8% of patients who underwent index nonatherectomy (P < .001). Patients treated by high physician users of atherectomy (quartile 4) received more reinterventions than patients treated by standard physician users (quartiles 1-3) (56.8% vs 39.6%; P < .001). After adjustment, patient factors association with PVI reintervention included receipt of index atherectomy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.46), Black race (vs White; aHR; 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34), diabetes (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21), and urban residence (aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22). Physician factors associated with reintervention included male sex (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.04), high-volume PVI practices (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37), and physicians with a high use of index atherectomy (aHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.27-1.74). Vascular surgeons had a lower risk of PVI reintervention than cardiologists (vs vascular; aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38), radiologists (aHR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.31-1.83), and other specialties (aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.11). The location of services delivered was not associated with reintervention (P > .05)., Conclusions: The use of atherectomy as an index PVI for claudication is associated with higher PVI reintervention rates compared with nonatherectomy procedures. Similarly, high physician users of atherectomy perform more PVI reinterventions than their peers. The appropriateness of using atherectomy for initial treatment of claudication needs critical reevaluation., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Effective treatment strategies and medical devices continue to be needed in Japan and the United States of America (US) to mitigate the growing burden of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease. Unfortunately, there can be a delay in gaining cardiovascular device approval in Japan after a device has already been approved and is in use in the US. The Harmonization by Doing (HBD) program; however, can eliminate this delay and reduce the cost of completing a clinical trial in Japan. The HBD proof-of-concept study, COAST, resulted in approval of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System Micro Crown simultaneously in Japan and the US on the same day. Subsequently, the Diamondback 360® Coronary OAS Classic Crown also received approval in Japan. The COAST study provides further evidence that global clinical trials via HBD for medical devices are practical and advantageous., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest BJM is an employee of and holds stock in CSI. KK and RT are former employees of and hold stock in CSI. SS, SKS, RAS, MWK, and FI have consulting agreements with CSI. NEF has no declarations of interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD), often with severe calcification, is present in up to 75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Management of CAD in such patients is challenging. Orbital atherectomy (OA) is an effective treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions prior to stent implantation. However, there is limited data on the use of OA for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific CAD patients prior to TAVR (OA PCI + TAVR)., Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with moderate/severe calcific CAD and moderate/severe AS who underwent staged OA PCI + TAVR at one high-volume institution. Data were analyzed to assess the 1-year major adverse cardiac events after index OA PCI [MACE: death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction (MI)]., Results: There were 18 patients (mean age of 82) treated with staged OA PCI + TAVR, and of those, 10 (56%) were male, 7 (39%) Caucasian, and 11 (61%) Hispanic/Latino. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 49% and congestive heart failure was present in 12 patients (67%). There were no angiographic complications (0%), stent thrombosis (0%), or stroke events (0%). The 30-day and 1-year MACE rates were 5.6% (0% death, 0% TLR, 5.6% MI) and 17% (0% death, 11% TLR, and 17% MI [all non-Q-wave MI]), respectively., Conclusions: In this single-center observational cohort series, patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions treated with OA prior to TAVR had low rates of MACE at 30 days and 1 year. The results demonstrate the feasibility and safety of OA for the treatment of complex calcific coronary lesions prior to TAVR. An up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD is also provided., Table of Contents Summary: There is limited data on the use of orbital atherectomy (OA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific coronary artery disease (CAD) patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and 1-year outcome of OA PCI pre-TAVR in patients with complex CAD and severe aortic stenosis (AS). We also aimed to provide a brief up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD. This retrospective cohort study found that OA is feasible and safe for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions before TAVR, resulting in acceptable 30-day and 1-year outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest N. Beohar, N. Mohammed, and N. Kherada have no conflict of interest to declare. B. Martinsen and Zs. Igyarto are employed by and own stock in Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)