Search

Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma, a variant of the inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, is a rare tumor that is not well described in the radiologic literature. We present a case of a 14-year-old male adolescent who presented with fever, fatigue, and weight loss symptoms and was found to have an abdominal mass on contrast enhanced CT. Initial differentials included lymphoma, pheochromocytoma, desmoid, and sarcoma, and pathological evaluation revealed an epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma. The mass was separate from the surrounding structures of the left upper abdomen with unique radiologic features not previously described in the literature. Prior literature examples of epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma described a heterogenous, enhancing lobulated mass, and our case was a lobulated, avidly enhancing homogenous mass on CT with surrounding inflammation and avid uptake on PET/CT. In addition to the imaging features, we describe the surgical findings, the pathologic features of the tumor, and the oncologic treatment of this patient. This case highlights the importance of including rare tumors such as epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma as a potential differential consideration of an avidly enhancing homogenous abdominal mass in an adolescent.

Introduction: Previous results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after more than or equal to 5 years of follow-up from the “last patient in” date. Methods: Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n = 125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n = 62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary or exploratory endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, time to CNS progression, and safety. Results: At the data cutoff (May 16, 2022), the median survival follow-up was 61 and 51 months in the alectinib and crizotinib arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 41.6 months with alectinib versus 11.1 months with crizotinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.23–0.49). Overall survival data remain immature; 5-year overall survival rates were 66.4% (alectinib arm) versus 56.1% (crizotinib arm). Objective response rate was 91.2% versus 77.4% with alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. CNS progression was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib (cause-specific hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.32). Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib versus crizotinib (42.3 versus 12.6 mo). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: With four additional years of follow-up, these updated results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety of alectinib in Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, and confirm alectinib as a standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

Introduction: The JAVELIN Lung 101 phase 1b/2 trial evaluated avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) combined with lorlatinib or crizotinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) in ALK-positive or ALK-negative advanced NSCLC, respectively. Methods: Starting doses of lorlatinib 100 mg once daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily were administered with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Primary objectives were assessment of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1 and objective response rate in phase 2. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and confirmed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Results: In the avelumab plus lorlatinib group (ALK-positive; n = 31; 28 in phase 1b; three in phase 2), two of 28 assessable patients (7%) had DLT, and the MTD and recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. In the avelumab plus crizotinib group (ALK-negative; n = 12; all phase 1b), five of 12 assessable patients (42%) had DLT, and the MTD was exceeded with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus crizotinib 250 mg twice daily; alternative crizotinib doses were not assessed. Objective response rate was 52% (95% confidence interval, 33%–70%) with avelumab plus lorlatinib (complete response, 3%; partial response, 48%) and 25% (95% confidence interval, 6%–57%) with avelumab plus crizotinib (all partial responses). Conclusions: Avelumab plus lorlatinib treatment in ALK-positive NSCLC was feasible, but avelumab plus crizotinib treatment in ALK-negative NSCLC could not be administered at the doses tested. No evidence of increased antitumor activity was observed in either group. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02584634

Background: MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations are oncogenic drivers observed in approximately 3–4% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Several distinct genetic alterations leading to METex14 have been reported but clinical significances of rare mutations are not well defined as well as outcomes of patients upon MET inhibitors (METi). Case presentation: This report presents the case of a patient with metastatic NSCLC harboring an uncommon MET mutational landscape including notably a novel METex14 mutation (R1022L). Dramatic but transient efficacy was observed under crizotinib, due to early occurrence of acquired both on- and off-target mechanisms of resistance such as MET D1246H mutation and wild-type KRAS amplification. Conclusion: Our case provides additional data on MET rare oncogenic variants and their sensitivity to METi. Systematic assessment of post-tyrosine kinase inhibitor tumor sample remains critical to identify on- and off-target mechanisms that may represent therapeutically targetable drivers in resistant patients.

Ovarian cancer (OC), the second most common form of gynecologic malignancy, has a poor prognosis and is often discovered in the late stages. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the first line of therapy. Nevertheless, treatment OC has proven challenging due to toxicity and the development of acquired resistance to therapy. Tumor microenvironment (TME) has been associated with platinum chemoresistance.Malignant ascites has been used as OC tumor microenvironment and its ability to induce platinum chemoresistance has been investigated.Our results suggest that exposure to OC ascites induces platinum chemoresistance in 11 of 13 cases (85 %) on OC cells. In contrast, 75 % of cirrhotic ascites (3 of 4) failed to confer platinum chemoresistance to OC cells. Cytokine array analysis revealed that IL -6 and to a lesser extent HGF were enriched in OC ascites, whereas IL -22 was enriched in cirrhotic ascites. Pharmaceutical inhibitors targeting the IL -6/ JAK pathway were mildly effective in overcoming platinum chemoresistance induced by malignant ascites. In contrast, crizotinib, an HGF/c- MET inhibitor, and 2-hydroxyestradiol (2HE2) were effective in restoring platinum chemosensitivity to OC.Our results demonstrate the importance of OC ascites in supporting platinum chemoresistance and the potential of combination therapy to restore chemosensitivity of OC cells.

Background: Information regarding the safety of entrectinib for previously treated patients and patients with hepatic dysfunction is limited. This is the first case report of treatment modification attributable to hepatic dysfunction caused by crizotinib. Patients: A 76-year-old Japanese woman was referred to the Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy after a computed tomography (CT) scan at the time of thyroid surgery. The CT scan revealed an enlarged right upper lobe nodule. After careful examination, she was diagnosed with T3N2M1c stage IV ROS1-positive lung adenocarcinoma; therefore, crizotinib (500 mg/day) was prescribed. On day 861 of treatment, crizotinib was discontinued because of repeatedly observed increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Approximately 2 weeks after crizotinib was discontinued, treatment was restarted with entrectinib 600 mg/day. Conclusions: Entrectinib was prescribed because crizotinib caused hepatic dysfunction; however, the patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and the creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels increased. After the dose reduction, she was able to continue treatment safely, without further worsening of the primary tumor or hepatic dysfunction. Therefore, entrectinib may be an option for patients who need treatment modification because of crizotinib-induced hepatic dysfunction. Increased CPK is a previously unknown adverse event occurring with entrectinib. This information is essential to risk management plans involving this drug. Further information regarding increased CPK and rhabdomyolysis occurring in patients treated with entrectinib is needed.

Introduction: MET amplification is a potentially actionable resistance mechanism in ALK-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancer. Studies describing treatment outcomes of this molecular subgroup are lacking. Methods: We assembled a cohort of patients with ALK+ lung cancer and acquired MET amplification (identified by tissue or plasma) who received regimens targeting both ALK and MET. Efficacy and safety were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, respectively. Results: A total of 12 patients were included in the series. MET amplification was detected after a median of 1.5 (range 1–5) lines of therapy. Four distinct regimens were implemented to address MET amplification: crizotinib (n = 2), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = 6), alectinib plus capmatinib (n = 3), and alectinib plus crizotinib (n = 1). Partial responses were observed in five (42%) of 12 patients, including patients who received crizotinib (n = one of two), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = three of six), and alectinib plus capmatinib (n = one of three). Primary progression was observed in four patients (33%). Grades 1 to 2 peripheral edema, occurring in seven (58%) patients, was found with both crizotinib and capmatinib. One patient required dose reduction of capmatinib plus alectinib for persistent grade 2 edema. Across the regimens, one patient discontinued therapy for toxicity, specifically neurocognitive toxicity from lorlatinib plus crizotinib. At progression on ALK+ MET therapy, potential resistance mechanisms included MET copy number changes and ALK kinase domain mutations. Conclusions: Combined ALK and MET inhibition is associated with moderate antitumor activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC with concurrent MET amplification. Prospective studies are indicated to confirm activity and identify individuals most likely to benefit from the treatment.

Resistance to ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors is inevitable, but it has been unclear whether crizotinib might be effective after the development of entrectinib resistance. We here present a case of ROS1-rearranged NSCLC that responded to crizotinib after tumor progression due to MET polysomy during entrectinib treatment. This case suggests that crizotinib is an effective option for patients with MET polysomy, even after disease progression on entrectinib.

Introduction: Alectinib was found to have superior efficacy to crizotinib in the phase 3 ALEX study and is a preferred initial treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. To understand the efficacy of alectinib in U.S. clinical practice, we conducted a retrospective real-world comparative effectiveness analysis of first-line alectinib versus crizotinib. Methods: Adults with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line alectinib (from December 11, 2015) or crizotinib (from January 1, 2014) were included from a real-world database. Propensity scores were applied to balance baseline characteristics. Real-world data (RWD), including real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), real-world overall survival, real-world time to new central nervous system (CNS) metastases, and outcomes in patients with or without baseline CNS metastases were analyzed. The ALEX-like RWD cohort (filtered by ALEX laboratory eligibility criteria) was used to compare real-world comparative effectiveness with ALEX. Results: The RWD cohort comprised 364 patients (141 alectinib; 223 crizotinib); rwPFS (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33–0.65) and real-world overall survival (wHR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31–0.69) were significantly improved with alectinib versus crizotinib. In patients with baseline brain scans, a substantial rwPFS benefit was found regardless of baseline CNS metastases. Real-world time to new CNS metastases was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with (wHR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16–0.52) and without (wHR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24–0.76) baseline CNS metastases. The ALEX-like RWD cohort comprised 325 patients (120 alectinib; 205 crizotinib); alectinib was found to have similar rwPFS benefits with ALEX. Conclusions: Outcomes were significantly improved with first-line alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC in the U.S. real-world setting.

Introduction: ALK inhibitors are one of the success stories in precision medicine for treating patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, developing countries have substantial constraints in using ALK inhibitors, with limited data from India. Methods: An audit of a prospectively collected database of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated from January 2013 to March 2018 was conducted. The SPSS version 20.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 441 patients were available for analysis; 62.5% were males, median age was 50 (range: 19–75) years, and 78.3% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. When all the lines of therapies were included in the analysis, ALK inhibitors could be used in 379 (85.9%) of the total ALK-positive patients and 292 patients (66.2%) received ALK inhibitors in the first line in any strategy. The major reason for not starting ALK inhibitors upfront was financial constraints in 69% of the patients. The median progression-free survival on first-line therapy for the entire cohort was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2–15.9), with a significant difference between patients receiving ALK inhibitor in first line in any strategy versus not in first line (17.2 mo [95% CI: 14.5–19.9] versus 5.9 mo [95% CI: 4.2–7.6], p

Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma, a variant of the inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, is a rare tumor that is not well described in the radiologic literature. We present a case of a 14-year-old male adolescent who presented with fever, fatigue, and weight loss symptoms and was found to have an abdominal mass on contrast enhanced CT. Initial differentials included lymphoma, pheochromocytoma, desmoid, and sarcoma, and pathological evaluation revealed an epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma. The mass was separate from the surrounding structures of the left upper abdomen with unique radiologic features not previously described in the literature. Prior literature examples of epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma described a heterogenous, enhancing lobulated mass, and our case was a lobulated, avidly enhancing homogenous mass on CT with surrounding inflammation and avid uptake on PET/CT. In addition to the imaging features, we describe the surgical findings, the pathologic features of the tumor, and the oncologic treatment of this patient. This case highlights the importance of including rare tumors such as epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma as a potential differential consideration of an avidly enhancing homogenous abdominal mass in an adolescent., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington.)

Introduction: Crizotinib provided meaningful clinical benefit in the initial analysis of a phase 2 study in East Asian patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC (NCT01945021). Nevertheless, overall survival (OS) data were immature. Here, we present the final OS, quality of life (QoL), and safety data after an additional 3 years of follow-up. Methods: In this phase 2, open-label, single-arm trial, East Asian patients with ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC who had received less than or equal to three systemic therapies previously were treated with crizotinib 250 mg twice daily on a continuous daily dosing schedule in 28-day cycles. The OS (secondary end point) was analyzed for the total population, by country, and by number of previous chemotherapy regimens. QoL and safety were also evaluated. Results: With a median duration of follow-up of 56.1 months, the median OS was 44.2 months (95% confidence interval: 32.0–not reached) for the total population (N = 127). Differences in median OS were observed among individual countries and with number of previous regimens. The improvement in QoL found in the previous analysis was maintained with the extended follow-up. Treatment-related adverse events led to crizotinib dose reductions or permanent treatment discontinuations in 17.3% and 2.4%, respectively, of the patients. Conclusions: This is the largest trial of an ALK/ROS1 inhibitor to treat patients with ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC and provides a new benchmark for OS in East Asian patients. The QoL and safety profile with long-term follow-up were consistent with previous reports and support the continued use of crizotinib in the treatment of patients with ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC.

Introduction: We report brigatinib long-term efficacy and safety from phase 1/2 and phase 2 (ALTA) trials in ALK–rearrangement positive (ALK+) NSCLC. Methods: The phase 1/2 study evaluated brigatinib 30 to 300 mg/d in patients with advanced malignancies. ALTA randomized patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC to brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in at 90 mg; arm B). Results: In the phase 1/2 study, 79 of 137 brigatinib-treated patients had ALK+ NSCLC; 71 were crizotinib pretreated. ALTA randomized 222 patients (n = 112 in arm A; n = 110 in arm B). Median follow-up at phase 1/2 study end (≈5.6 y after last patient enrolled) was 27.7 months; at ALTA study end (≈4.4 y after last patient enrolled), 19.6 months (A) and 28.3 months (B). Among patients with ALK+ NSCLC in the phase 1/2 study, median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8–21.2); median overall survival was 47.6 months (28.6–not reached). In ALTA, median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.2 months (7.4–11.1) in arm A and 15.6 months (11.1–18.5) in arm B; median independent review committee (IRC)-assessed PFS was 9.9 (7.4–12.8) and 16.7 (11.6–21.4) months, respectively; median overall survival was 25.9 (18.2–45.8) and 40.6 (32.5–not reached) months, respectively. Median intracranial PFS for patients with any brain metastases was 12.8 (9.2–18.4) months in arm A and 18.4 (12.6–23.9) months in arm B. No new safety signals were identified versus previous analyses. Conclusions: Brigatinib exhibited sustained long-term activity and PFS with manageable safety in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC.

Introduction: The central nervous system (CNS) is a common site of progression among patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer receiving crizotinib. We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the intracranial efficacy of lorlatinib in patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer who developed CNS-only progression on crizotinib. Methods: Patients with metastatic ROS1-rearranged lung cancer with CNS-only progression on crizotinib received lorlatinib 100 mg daily. The primary end point was intracranial disease control rate at 12 weeks per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and safety/tolerability. Results: A total of 16 patients were enrolled between November 2016 and January 2019. Nine patients (56%) had received prior CNS radiation, with a median of 10.9 months between radiation and lorlatinib. At 12 weeks, the intracranial disease control rate was 100% and intracranial objective response rate was 87%. While on study, the complee intracranial response rate was 60%. With median follow-up of 22 months, seven patients experienced disease progression, including five patients with CNS relapse. The median intracranial and extracranial progression-free survivals were 38.8 months (95% confidence interval: 16.9–not reported) and 41.1 months (95% confidence interval: 17.6–not reported), respectively. Molecular analysis of plasma or tissue from patients with extracranial progression on lorlatinib revealed ROS1 G2032R (n = 1), ROS1 L2086F (n = 1), and CCDC6-RET fusion plus ROS1 G2032R (n = 1). The safety profile of lorlatinib was consistent with prior studies. There were 11 patients (69%) who required dose reduction, including one patient who discontinued treatment for grade 3 edema. No grade greater than or equal to 4 adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Lorlatinib induced durable intracranial responses in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC and prior isolated CNS progression on crizotinib.

Introduction: Entrectinib is an approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC. An updated integrated analysis of entrectinib from the ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2 trials is presented, with substantially longer follow-up, more patients, and the first description of the median overall survival (OS). An exploratory analysis of entrectinib in ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC with the central nervous system (CNS)–only progression post-crizotinib is reported. Methods: Adults with ROS1 fusion–positive, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received at least one dose of entrectinib and had 12 months or longer of follow-up were included in the analysis. Co-primary end points were confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) by blinded independent central review. The data cutoff was on August 31, 2020. Results: The efficacy-assessable population comprised 168 ROS1 TKI–naïve patients. The median survival follow-up was 29.1 months (interquartile range, 21.8–35.9). The ORR was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 60.2–74.8); the median DoR was 20.5 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.7 months and the median OS was 47.8 months. In the 25 patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases, the intracranial ORR was 80% (95% CI: 59.3–93.2), median intracranial DoR was 12.9 months, and median intracranial PFS was 8.8 months. Among 18 patients with CNS-only progression on previous crizotinib treatment, two achieved a partial response (11%) and four had stable disease (22%). In seven patients with measurable CNS disease from this cohort, the intracranial ORR was 14% (1 partial response). Conclusions: Entrectinib is active and achieves prolonged survival in ROS1 TKI–naïve patients with ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC. Modest activity is seen in patients with CNS-only progression post-crizotinib.

Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant Parkinson’s disease (PD) and have been associated with familial and sporadic PD. Reducing the kinase activity of LRRK2 is a promising therapeutic strategy since pathogenic mutations increase the kinase activity. Several small-molecule LRRK2 inhibitors are currently under investigation for the treatment of PD. However, drug discovery and development are always accompanied by high costs and a risk of late failure. The use of already approved drugs for a new indication, which is known as drug repositioning, can reduce the cost and risk.In this study, we applied a structure-based drug repositioning approach to identify new LRRK2 inhibitors that are already approved for a different indication. In a large-scale structure-based screening, we compared the protein–ligand interaction patterns of known LRRK2 inhibitors with protein–ligand complexes in the PDB. The screening yielded 6 drug repositioning candidates. Two of these candidates, Sunitinib and Crizotinib, demonstrated an inhibition potency (IC50) and binding affinity (Kd) in the nanomolar to micromolar range. While Sunitinib has already been known to inhibit LRRK2, Crizotinib is a novel LRRK2 binder.Our results underscore the potential of structure-based methods for drug discovery and development. In light of the recent breakthroughs in cryo-electron microscopy and structure prediction, we believe that structure-based approaches like ours will grow in importance.

(1) Background: Just little is known about the interaction of ALK/ROS1-targeting kinase inhibitors with ionizing radiation (IR), particularly regarding side effects. We investigated the toxicity in two different lung cell lines both ALK/ROS1 wildtype (healthy and tumor origin) as representatives for normal lung tissue; (2) Methods: Human lung cell line BEAS-2B and malignant A549 lung cancer cells (ALK/ROS1 wt) were treated with alectinib or crizotinib, 2 Gy irradiation or a combination of KI and IR. Cell toxicity was analyzed by cell death (Annexin, 7AAD), colony forming, migration assay and live-cell imaging (TMRM, DRAQ7, Caspase3/7). Cell cycle (Hoechst) were analyzed by flow cytometry; (3) Results: Crizotinib led to higher cell death rates than alectinib, when cells were treated with 10 µM KI. Alectinib induced a more intense growth inhibition of colonies. Both inhibitors showed additive effects in combination with irradiation. Combination treatment (IR + KI) does not lead to synergistic effect on neither cell death nor colony forming; (4) Conclusions: The influence of simultaneous KI and IR was studied in non-mutated ALK/ROS1 cell lines. Both KIs seems to be well tolerated in combination with thoracic radiotherapy and lacked synergistic reinforcement in cellular toxicity. This supports the feasibility of ALK/ROS1 inhibition in combination with thoracic irradiation in future clinical trials.

The unprecedented growth of the high-throughput next-generation sequencing has facilitated the identification of rare oncogene fusions such as ROS1 for NSCLC. ROS1 rearrangement has been observed in only 2% of cases of NSCLC and has been successfully targeted using various tyrosine kinase inhibitors including crizotinib. However, the on-target and off-target mechanisms of the resistance are still vague. Here, we report a case of a patient with ROS1 rearranged NSCLC presenting primary resistance to crizotinib.

The use of heptamethine cyanine dyes (HMCD) as a vehicle for targeted delivery of drugs to cancer tissues shows promise. The synthesis of drug–dye conjugates is hampered by scalability and purification issues. Herein we disclose synthetic procedure to procure such drug–dye conjugates that avoid the formation of undesired side products. This novel procedure also avoids the use of HPLC, thereby improving the yield and scalability of such drug–dye conjugates. Improving the atom-efficient coupling of drugs to HMCDs, will facilitate the clinical translation of HMCDs as a drug-delivery system for targeted tumour therapies.

Background: Brigatinib is a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting ALK and ROS1. The Barossa study is a multicenter, phase II basket study of brigatinib in patients with ROS1-rearranged solid tumors. ROS1 TKI-naive patients with ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in cohort 1, and ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients treated previously with crizotinib were enrolled in cohort 2. Patients with ROS1-rearranged solid tumors other than NSCLC were enrolled in cohort 3., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients received brigatinib at the dose of 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (RECIST 1.1) assessed by independent central review in cohorts 1 and 2., Results: Between July 2019 and June 2021, 51 patients were enrolled into the study. Of the 51, 47 patients had ROS1-rearranged NSCLC; 28 and 19 of these patients were enrolled in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. The remaining four patients had other ROS1-rearranged solid tumors, including rectal, brain, and pancreas tumor in one patient each, and primary unknown tumor in one patient. The confirmed objective response rate was 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.3% to 86.8%] in cohort 1 (TKI-naive NSCLC patients) and 31.6% (95% CI 12.6% to 56.6%) in cohort 2 (NSCLC patients treated previously with crizotinib). The median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 5.5-22.9 months) in cohort 1 and 7.3 months (95% CI 1.3-17.5 months) in cohort 2. None of the patients in cohort 3 showed any treatment response. Pneumonitis was observed in 9.8% of all the patients., Conclusions: Brigatinib was effective in TKI-naive patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. The safety profile of brigatinib was consistent with that reported from previous studies., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Patient-derived xenografts provide significant advantages over long-term passage cell lines when investigating efficacy of treatments for solid tumors. Our laboratory encountered a high-grade, metastatic, neuroendocrine-like tumor from a pediatric patient that presented with a unique genetic profile. In particular, mutations in TYRO3 and ALK were identified. We established a human patient-derived xenoline (PDX) of this tumor for use in the current study. We investigated the effect of crizotinib, a chemotherapeutic known to effectively target both TYRO3 and ALK mutations. Crizotinib effectively decreased viability, proliferation, growth, and the metastatic properties of the PDX tumor through downregulation of STAT3 signaling, but expression of PDGFRß was increased. Sunitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of PDGFRß and was studied in this PDX independently and in combination with crizotinib. Sunitinib alone decreased viability, proliferation, and growth in vitro and decreased tumor growth in vivo. In combination, sunitinib was able to overcome potential crizotinib-induced resistance through downregulation of ERK 1/2 activity and PDGFRß receptor expression; consequently, tumor growth was significantly decreased both in vitro and in vivo. Through the use of the PDX, it was possible to identify crizotinib as a less effective therapeutic for this tumor and suggest that targeting PDGFRß would be more effective. These findings may translate to other solid tumors that present with the same genetic mutations.

A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study is performed on 48 novel 4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[D]-thiazol-2 derivatives as anticancer agents capable of inhibiting c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase. The present study is conducted using multiple linear regression, multiple nonlinear regression and artificial neural networks. Three QSAR models are developed after partitioning the database into two sets (training and test) via the k-means method. The obtained values of the correlation coefficients by the three developed QSAR models are 0.90, 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. The resulting models are validated by using the external validation, leave-one-out cross-validation, Y-randomization test, and applicability domain methods. Moreover, we evaluated the drug-likeness properties of seven selected molecules based on their observed high activity to inhibit the c-Met receptor. The results of the evaluation showed that three of the seven compounds present drug-like characteristics.In order to identify the important active sites for the inhibition of the c-Met receptor responsible for the development of cancer cell lines, the crystallized form of the Crizotinib-c-Met complex (PDB code: 2WGJ) is used. These sites are used as references in the molecular docking test of the three selected molecules to identify the most suitable molecule for use as a new c-Met inhibitor. A comparative study is conducted based on the evaluation of the predicted properties of ADMET in silico between the candidate molecule and the Crizotinib inhibitor. The comparison results show that the selected molecule can be used as new anticancer drug candidates.

Most patients with NSCLC, initially sensitive, will develop resistance after a period of time after the application of ALK inhibitors. We present here a rare LOC285000-ALK-NCK2 gene fusion with response to crizotinib treatment; the patient achieved a progression-free survival of 23 months.

The oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), crizotinib has been approved as a first-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor in treatment of advanced ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, development of complex renal cysts has been reported with crizotinib usage, highlighting the importance of accurate differentiation between complex renal cysts and new metastasis in NSCLC. Here we describe a case study with confirmed EGFR wild-type and ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma who developed complex renal cysts combined with hemorrhage during crizotinib treatment, with no abnormal clinical symptoms or kidney functions observed. Interestingly, without crizotinib treatment termination or reduction, the complex hemorrhagic renal cysts regressed with self-limiting and healing. The combined usage of ultrasound, CT and MRI techniques in the presented case allowed proper monitoring of the internal changes within complex renal cysts. The patient provided written informed consent authorizing publication of clinical case. Thus, better understanding of the imaging features of crizotinib-related renal cysts combined with hemorrhage would avoid misdiagnoses as a new metastatic renal mass or the aggravation of the primary disease, therefore avoiding further invasive investigation.

Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oncogenic ROS1 rearrangements would inevitably develop drug resistance and disease progression after receiving targeted oncogene therapy. Here, we present a metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patient harboring a CD74–ROS1 fusion who initially responded to crizotinib and then developed resistance after acquiring a rarely reported BRAF V600E mutation.

Drug-resistant mutations constitute a significant cause of crizotinib treatment failure for non-small cell lung cancer, which poses a major clinical challenge in the successful treatment of non-small cell lung cancer; therefore, the discovery of the resistance mechanisms of crizotinib is of utmost importance. Understanding the acquired BRAF 600E mutation is essential for designing new effective therapeutic combinations against disease progression.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate volumetric tumor burden dynamics and tumor growth rates in ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC patients during crizotinib monotherapy. Methods: The study included 44 ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib monotherapy as their initial ALK-directed therapy, who had at least one measurable lung lesion and at least two follow-up CT scans, and experienced tumor volume increase while on crizotinib. The tumor volume (in mm3) of the dominant lung lesion was measured on serial CT scans during therapy for analysis of tumor growth rates after the volume nadir. Results: A total of 231 volume measurements from the nadir to the end of crizotinib therapy or the last follow-up in 44 patients were analyzed in a linear mixed-effects model, fitting time (in months since baseline) as a random effect. When measured from the volume nadir, the tumor growth rate of the logarithm of tumor volume (logeV) was 0.04/month (SE = 0.012, P = 0.0011) in the unadjusted model. When adjusted for the baseline volume (logeV0), the growth rate was again 0.04/month (SE = 0.011, P = 0.0004). When adjusted for clinical variables and logeV0, the growth rate was 0.045/month (SE = 0.012, P = 0.0002), indicating that the tumor growth rate after nadir in this cohort remains very close to 0.04/month regardless of logeV0 or clinical factors. Conclusions: Tumor volume growth rate after nadir in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib was obtained, providing objective reference values that can inform physicians when deciding to keep their patients on ALK directed therapy with slowly progressing lung cancer.

In recent years, serious changes have been observed in the treatment algorithms of especially lung cancer patients. The start-up phase of treatment planning of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients is comprised of driver mutation research. Among the pretreatment options of patients diagnosed with EML4-ALK rearrangement, is crizotinib. The group disgnosed with EML4-ALK rearrangement, composes a little part of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. In this case presented, I will focus on the start of crizotinib treatment and 53-month follow-up in remission in a patient, who has been operated twice and received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy twice, and relapsed for the second time as Stage-4.

A 60-year-old man with a history of smoking was transferred to our hospital for consciousness disorder. A diagnosis of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma associated with a paraneoplastic electrolytic disorder was made following a cutaneous needle biopsy. Both the primary lung lesion and multiple metastases shrunk and his electrolytic disorder resolved after the introduction of a first-line molecular-targeted drug chemotherapy with crizotinib. We herein report a case of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma accompanied by SIADH, successfully treated with crizotinib.

MET is a driver oncogene in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its amplification is associated with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A 56-year-old Japanese male with lung adenocarcinoma harboring an EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation received erlotinib to which he responded for 12 months. After disease progression, re-biopsy analyses revealed newly developed MET amplification. Neither EGFR exon 20 T790M mutation nor MET exon 14 mutations were detected. The MET inhibitor, crizotinib, showed a dramatic response. This is the first report of successful crizotinib single-agent therapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC that acquired MET amplification during erlotinib therapy.

Background: In 2019, we reported the first efficacy and safety analysis of EUCROSS, a phase II trial investigating crizotinib in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer. At that time, overall survival (OS) was immature and the effect of crizotinib on intracranial disease control remained unclear. Here, we present the final analysis of OS, systemic and intracranial activity, and the impact of co-occurring aberrations., Materials and Methods: EUCROSS was a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and efficacy in pre-defined subgroups., Results: Median OS of the intention-to-treat population (N = 34) was 54.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.3 months-not reached (NR); median follow-up 81.4 months] and median all-cause PFS of the response-evaluable population (N = 30) was 19.4 months (95% CI 10.1-32.2 months). Time on treatment was significantly correlated with OS (R = 0.82; P < 0.0001). Patients with co-occurring TP53 aberrations (28%) had a significantly shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 11; 95% CI 2.0-56.0; P = 0.006] and all-cause PFS (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-15; P = 0.025). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement at baseline (N = 6; 20%) had a numerically shorter median OS and all-cause PFS. Median intracranial PFS was 32.2 months (95% CI 23.7 months-NR) and the rate of isolated CNS progression was 24%., Conclusions: Our final analysis proves the efficacy of crizotinib in ROS1-positive lung cancer, but also highlights the devastating impact of TP53 mutations on survival and treatment efficacy. Additionally, our data show that CNS disease control is durable and the risk of CNS progression while on crizotinib treatment is low., Competing Interests: Disclosures SM reports research grants from Novartis and Pfizer, personal fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen, and AstraZeneca as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly and Janssen. JS reports personal fees from Pfizer, Janssen, Merck Sharp Dohme, Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Takeda, and Sanofi as well as support for meetings and/or travels from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Lilly. EF reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Peervoice, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, Turning Point Pharmaceuticals, and Touch Oncology as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Roche. CG reports personal fees from Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, Takeda, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. JC reports grants from Pfizer, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, Eli Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda, Janssen, Sanofi, and Pfizer, as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merck Sharp Dohme. JF reports personal fees from AstraZeneca. EC i C reports personal fees from Pfizer. RNF reports a research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb and personal fees from Janssen. AI reports personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche and Pfizer. LN reports research grants from Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Siemens, and Dracen as well as personal fees from Pfizer, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Roche. MR reports personal fees as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati, Biontech, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung Biopis. RR reports personal fees from Novartis and Janssen. DS reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Healthcare Consulting Cologne, and AbbVie as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, and AbbVie. MS reports research grants from Amgen, Dracen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Siemens Healthineers, and Takeda, personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Siemens Healthineers, and Takeda as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen and Pfizer. MP reports research grants from Pfizer, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and Sanofi as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merck Sharp & Dohme. SM-B reports personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Molecular Health, Novartis, Pfizer, Qiagen, QuIP, and DLS. MS reports a research grant from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, BioNTech, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CureVac, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Takeda, Janssen, and Amgen as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. RB reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Illumina, Janssen, Lilly, Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Qiagen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Targos MP Inc. RB is a co-owner and shareholder of Gnothis Inc. (Stockholm) and TimerTherapeutix (Germany). JW reports research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, personal fees and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Daichi Sankyo, Janssen, Lilly, Loxo, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Nuvalent, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Turning Point Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Select tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used to treat oncogene-driven lung cancers also inhibit MATE-1. When MATE-1 is blocked, creatinine is retained in the serum. Elevated creatinine levels raise the specter of drug-induced intrarenal insufficiency despite the lack of true renal injury. We conducted a systematic analysis of MATE-1 inhibitor (MATEi)-treated patients to comprehensively characterize this phenomenon., Methods: Patients with oncogene-driven lung cancer treated with a wide variety of MATEi TKIs (brigatinib, cabozantinib, capmatinib, crizotinib, entrectinib, lorlatinib, pralsetinib, selpercatinib, and tepotinib) were eligible for an analysis of renal dysfunction. Acute kidney injury was classified on the basis of creatinine levels (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria) as stage 1 (≥1.5× but <2× baseline), stage 2 (≥2× but <3× baseline), or stage 3 (>3× baseline). When available, cystatin C, a marker of kidney function unaffected by MATE-1, was used to evaluate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR)., Results: We identified 863 patients receiving MATEi TKIs including crizotinib (39%, n = 333), lorlatinib (17%, n = 144), cabozantinib (10%, n = 87), selpercatinib (10%, n = 82), capmatinib (9%, n = 77), brigatinib (6%, n = 53), entrectinib (5%, n = 45), tepotinib (5%, n = 41), and pralsetinib (0.1%, n = 1). Of the 90 patients (10%) with acute kidney injury, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stages 1, 2, and 3 were observed in 72% (n = 65), 21% (n = 19), and 7% (n = 6) of patients, respectively. Concurrently drawn creatinine and cystatin C levels on TKI therapy were available for 17 patients. In most cases (n = 15 of 17), the calculated GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine. The percentage of patients whose GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine by less than 10 mL/min, 10 to 19 mL/min, 20 to 29 mL/min, and more than or equal to 30 mL/min was 27% (n = four of 15), 20% (n = three of 15), 20% (n = three of 15), and 33% (n = five of 15), respectively. Long-term data in three patients that spanned 3 years revealed that GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine in 96% (n = 49 of 51) of all time points. Using a virtual clinical trial GFR cutoff of 40 mL/min, the percentage of eligible patients rose from 41% (n = seven of 17) using creatinine calculations to 71% (n = 12 of 17) using cystatin C calculations., Conclusions: The calculated GFR in patients with cancer receiving MATEi TKIs was higher in almost all cases when using cystatin C. When serum creatinine level seems elevated in patients receiving MATE-1 inhibitors, we recommend recalculating GFR using cystatin C before searching for other etiologies of kidney injury and reducing or stopping TKI therapy., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene is observed in 3%–5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib and ceritinib, a next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) active against crizotinib-refractory patients, are clinically available for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients, and multiple next-generation ALK-TKIs are currently under clinical evaluation. These ALK-TKIs exhibit robust clinical activity in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients; however, the emergence of ALK-TKI resistance restricts the therapeutic effect. To date, various secondary mutations or bypass pathway activation-mediated resistance have been identified, but large parts of the resistance mechanism are yet to be identified. Here, we report the discovery of p-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1) overexpression as a ceritinib resistance mechanism in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients. P-gp exported ceritinib and its overexpression conferred ceritinib and crizotinib resistance, but not to PF-06463922 or alectinib, which are next-generation ALK inhibitors. Knockdown of ABCB1 or P-gp inhibitors sensitizes the patient-derived cancer cells to ceritinib, in vitro and in vivo. P-gp overexpression was identified in three out of 11 cases with in ALK-rearranged crizotinib or ceritinib resistant NSCLC patients. Our study suggests that alectinib, PF-06463922, or P-gp inhibitor with ceritinib could overcome the ceritinib or crizotinib resistance mediated by P-gp overexpression.

The development of inhibitors for the tyrosine anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has advanced rapidly, driven by biology and medicinal chemistry. The first generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib was granted US FDA approval with only four years of preclinical and clinical testing. Although this drug offers significant clinical benefit to the ALK-positive patients, resistance has been developed through a variety of mechanisms. In addition to ceritinib, alectinib is another second-generation ALK inhibitor launched in 2014 in Japan. This drug has a unique chemical structure bearing a 5H-benzo[b]carbazol-11(6H)-one structural scaffold with an IC50 value of 1.9 nmol/L, and is highly potent against ALK bearing the gatekeeper mutation L1196M with an IC50 of 1.56 nmol/L. In the clinic, alectinib is highly efficacious in treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and retains potency to combat crizotinib-resistant ALK mutations L1196M, F1174L, R1275Q and C1156Y.

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been used as a biomarker for prognostication and response to treatment. Here, we evaluate ctDNA as a potential biomarker for response to lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with treatment-naive, advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC in the ongoing phase 3 CROWN study (NCT03052608)., Methods: Molecular responses were calculated using mean variant allele frequency (VAF), longitudinal mean change in VAF (dVAF), and ratio to baseline. Efficacy assessments (progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate) were paired with individual patient ctDNA and analyzed for association., Results: Compared with baseline, mean VAF at week 4 was decreased in both treatment arms. Considering all detected somatic variants, a reduction in dVAF (≤0) was associated with a longer PFS in the lorlatinib arm. The hazard ratio (HR) for a dVAF less than or equal to 0 versus more than 0 was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-1.12) in the lorlatinib arm. A similar association was not observed for crizotinib (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.49-2.03). Comparing molecular responders with nonresponders, patients treated with lorlatinib who had a molecular response had longer PFS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.85); patients treated with crizotinib who had a molecular response had similar PFS as those without a molecular response (HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.67-3.30)., Conclusions: In patients with treatment-naive, advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC, early ctDNA dynamics predicted better outcome with lorlatinib but not with crizotinib. These results suggest that ctDNA may be used to monitor and potentially predict efficacy of lorlatinib treatment., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Crizotinib has been approved for the treatment of advanced ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. Its use is associated with the development of complex renal cysts. However, there is limited literature regarding imaging features of renal cystic disease during crizotinib therapy and its complications or progression. Here, we describe a case of a patient with ALK-positive advanced non–small cell lung cancer who developed complex renal cyst during crizotinib treatment. The renal cyst is complicated by infection and abscess formation. Subsequent renal biopsy, antibiotics treatment, and open drainage of loculated renal abscess showed no malignant cells and contributed to the diagnosis. The imaging features should be recognized as renal cystic disease of crizotinib treatment and not to be mistaken as new metastasis and disease progression.

Theranostic probe is becoming a powerful tool for diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Although some theranostic probes have been successfully developed, there is still a great room for improvement in sensitive diagnosis and efficient treatment. Herein, we developed a novel GSH-activable theranostic probe NC-G, which uses 1,8-naphthalimide-4-sulfonamide as a fluorescence imaging group and crizotinib as a highly toxic kinase inhibitor to tumor cells. The probe not only has high sensitivity (DL = 74 nM) and specificity, but also can detect GSH sensitively in cells and zebrafish. In addition, probe NC-G can not only show more obvious fluorescence in tumor cells to achieve sensitive diagnosis of tumor cells, but also release the inhibitor crizotinib to achieve high toxicity to tumor cells. It is worth noting that the consumption of GSH can cause oxidative stress response of cells and the release of SO 2 can induce cell apoptosis during the recognition process of the probe and GSH. Thus, the synergistic effect of crizotinib, GSH depletion, and SO 2 release provides a highly effective therapeutic feature for tumor cells. Therefore, probe NC-G can serve as an excellent theranostic probe for sensitive imaging and highly effective treatment of tumor cells., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Nowadays, the selective release of therapeutic drugs into tumor cells has become an important way of tumor treatment due to the high side effects of chemotherapy drugs. As one of the gas mediators, hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) is closely related to cancer. Due to the high content of H 2 S in tumor cells, it can be used as a signaling molecule that triggers the release of drugs to achieve the selective release of therapeutic drugs. In addition, dual-channel fluorescence imaging technology can be better applied to monitor the drug delivery process and distinguish the state before and after drug release, so as to better track the effect of drug therapy. Based on this, we used NBD amines (NBD-NHR) as the recognition group of H 2 S and connected the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib to construct an activated dual-channel fluorescent probe CZ-NBD. After the probe enters the tumor cells, it consumes H 2 S and releases crizotinib, which is highly toxic to the tumor cells. Importantly, the probe displays significant fluorescence changes in different cells, enabling not only the screening of tumor cells, but also tracking and monitoring drug release and tumor cell activity. Therefore, the construction of probe CZ-NBD provides a new strategy for drug release monitoring in tumor cells., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: After a median follow-up of 18·3 months, the third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, lorlatinib, improved progression-free survival in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the phase 3 CROWN study. Here we report updated efficacy data, including intracranial activity, from an unplanned analysis after 3 years of follow-up., Methods: CROWN is an ongoing, international, randomised, open-label phase 3 trial done in 104 centres in 23 countries worldwide. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older or aged 20 years and older (depending on local regulations) with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, had received no previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease, had at least one extracranial measurable target lesion (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST], version 1.1), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral lorlatinib 100 mg daily or oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by the presence or absence of brain metastasis, and by ethnicity. Since the primary endpoint of the study had been met at the planned interim analysis, no further formal analysis of progression-free survival was planned, per protocol. The current unplanned analysis was done to further characterise tumour-related endpoints with a longer follow-up and is presented descriptively. For the planned study, the primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, duration of response, intracranial duration of response, and safety. Efficacy endpoints were also assessed by the presence or absence of baseline brain metastases. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052608., Findings: Between May 11, 2017, and Feb 28, 2019, 425 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 296 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the lorlatinib (n=149) or crizotinib (n=147) group. At data cutoff for this unplanned analysis (Sept 20, 2021), median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 36·7 months (IQR 31·3-41·9) for lorlatinib and 29·3 months (10·8-35·0) for crizotinib. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was not reached (95% CI not reached-not reached) for lorlatinib and was 9·3 months (7·6-11·1) for crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0·27 [95% CI 0·18-0·39]). 3-year progression-free survival was 64% (95% CI 55-71) in the lorlatinib group and 19% (12-27) in the crizotinib group. Progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, and duration of response were improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n=37 lorlatinib; n=39 crizotinib), the HR for time to intracranial progression for lorlatinib versus crizotinib was 0·10 (95% CI 0·04-0·27); in patients without baseline brain metastases (n=112 lorlatinib; n=108 crizotinib), the HR was 0·02 (95% CI 0·002-0·14). In patients without brain metastases, one (1%) in the lorlatinib group and 25 (23%) in the crizotinib group had intracranial progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 113 (76%) of 149 patients (most commonly due to altered lipid levels) with lorlatinib and in 81 (57%) of 142 patients with crizotinib. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 11 (7%) patients in the lorlatinib group and 14 (10%) patients in the crizotinib group. There were no new safety signals., Interpretation: These updated, long-term data from CROWN show the durable benefit of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and support the use of first-line lorlatinib in patients with and without baseline brain metastases., Funding: Pfizer., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)