Search

In normal subjects, electrical stimulation of trigeminal mucosal afferents (lingual nerve - V3) can elicit a short latency (12.5+/-0. 3 ms; mean+/-S.D.) reflex response in the ipsilateral genioglossus muscle (Maisonobe et al., Reflexes elicited from cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents in normal human subjects. Brain Res. 1998;810:220-228). In the present study on patients with hypoglossal-facial (XII-VII) nerve anastomoses, we were able to record similar R1-type blink reflex responses in the orbicularis oculi muscles, following stimulation of either supraorbital nerve (V1) or lingual nerve (V3) afferents. However, these responses were not present in normal control subjects. Voluntary swallowing movements produced clear-cut facilitations of the R1 blink reflex response elicited by stimulation of V1 afferents. In a conditioning-test procedure with a variable inter-stimulus interval, the R1 blink reflex response elicited by supraorbital nerve stimulation was facilitated by an ipsilateral mucosal conditioning stimulus in the V3 region. This facilitatory effect was maximal when the two stimuli (conditioning and test) were applied simultaneously. This effect was not observed on the R1 component of the blink reflex in the normal control subjects. These data strongly suggest that in patients with XII-VII anastomoses, but not in normal subjects, both cutaneous (V1) and mucosal (V3) trigeminal afferents project onto the same interneurones in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus. This clearly supports the idea that peripheral manipulation of the VIIth and the XIIth nerves induces a plastic change within this nucleus.

It has been shown that in patients in whom the central stump of the hypoglossal nerve has been anastomosed to the peripheral stump of a lesioned facial nerve, supraorbital nerve stimulation can elicit a short-latency reflex (12.5+/-0.6 ms; mean+/-S.D.) in facial muscles similar to the R1 disynaptic blink reflex response, but not followed by an R2 blink reflex component46. Thus in addition to replacing the facial neurons at peripheral synapses, these hypoglossal nerves contribute to a trigemino-hypoglossal reflex. The aim of this work was to study the type of reflex activities which can be elicited in both facial and tongue muscles by electrical stimulation of cutaneous (supraorbital nerve) or mucosal (lingual nerve) trigeminal (V) afferents in normal subjects. The results show that although stimulation of cutaneous V1 afferents elicits the well-known double component (R1-R2) blink reflex response in the orbicularis oculi muscles, it does not produce any detectable reflex response in the genioglossus muscle, even during experimental paradigms designed to facilitate the reflex activity. Conversely, stimulation of mucosal V3 afferents can elicit a single reflex response of the R1 type in the genioglossus muscle but not in the orbicularis oculi muscles, even during experimental paradigms designed to facilitate the reflex activity. These data are discussed in terms of two similar but separate circuits for the R1 responses of cutaneous (blink reflex) and mucosal (tongue reflex) origins. They suggest that in patients with hypoglossal-facial (XII-VII) nerve anastomosis, the short-latency trigemino-'hypoglossal-facial' reflex of the R1 blink reflex type observed in facial muscles following supraorbital nerve stimulation could be due to changes in synaptic effectiveness of the central connectivity within the principal trigeminal nucleus where both cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents project., (Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.)

Functional motor control requires perfect matching of central connectivity of motoneurones with their peripheral connections. However, it is not known to what extent central circuitry is influenced by target muscles, either during development or following a lesion. Surgical interventions aimed at restoring function following peripheral nerve lesions provide an opportunity for studying this interaction in the mature human nervous system. We have followed 8 patients in whom the hypoglossal nerve was anastomosed into a lesioned facial nerve, allowing voluntary contractions of the previously paralyzed muscles. We show that, in addition to replacing the facial neurons at peripheral synapses, a new short-latency trigemino-hypoglossal reflex, of the R1 blink reflex type, can be demonstrated in patients showing recovery, implying a sprouting of trigeminal neurons towards hypoglossal motoneurones, over a distance of at least 0.5 cm. These surprising results show an unexpected influence of the periphery in remodelling central connectivity in man.