Search

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version of the TEMPS-A questionnaire. Besides the reliability of the temperament scales, validity was the focus of interest. Therefore, the relationship between the TEMPS-A and the well-established personality questionnaire NEO-FFI, whose factors show theoretical overlap with temperaments, was investigated., Method: A total of 227 students aged between 20 and 42 years were asked to fill in both instruments. Reliability coefficients for the five temperament scales and correlations among the scales of both questionnaires were calculated, as well as multiple linear regression analysis with the five personality factors and gender as independent, and the five temperaments as dependent variables., Results: Reliability indices for the five temperament scales were satisfactory, with values ranging between 0.63 (depressive) and 0.76 (anxious). Women scored higher on depressive and anxious scales, whereas men had higher scores on hyperthymic temperament. Correlations within the temperament scales showed close relationships between depressive, anxious and cyclothymic temperaments; cyclothymic and irritable temperament were also related. The personality factors of the NEO-FFI predicted temperaments fairly well and explained between 41% and 58% of the variance; the main effects were exerted by neuroticism and extraversion, while the irritable temperament was primarily explained by low agreeableness., Limitation: The study sample was relatively small and selected., Conclusion: The TEMPS-A scale has sufficient reliability and good validity in a non-clinical sample. It opens new possibilities for clinical research at the interface of mental disorders, temperament and personality. Such research is in progress.

The aim of the study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of suicidal behavior in a cohort of patients with acute transient psychotic disorder (ATPD), diagnosed according to ICD-10 (F23). In a longitudinal study, 42 patients fulfilling the ICD-10 criteria of ATPD were investigated in comparison to matched control groups with 'positive schizophrenia' (PS) and bipolar schizoaffective disorder (BSAD). Suicidal behavior was studied in the index episode and during the long-term course, including a 5-year prospective follow-up. The prevalence of suicidal behavior during the entire course of illness in ATPD was 35.7% compared to 57.1% in BSAD and 40.5% in PS. The difference was not significant when the duration of the illness was taken into account. Suicidal behavior in ATPD was associated with the acute episode, while in PS, suicidal behavior mainly occurred during the longitudinal course. In logistic regression models, suicidal behavior was associated with a higher educational level and lower conscientiousness in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory for patients with PS, but not ATPD. Suicidal behavior in ATPD is frequent, in particular during the acute episode. It seems to be associated with the dramatic psychotic symptomatology during the acute episode.

Background: Temperament is an important factor in affective illness. There is some indication that mixed episodes result from an admixture of inverse temperamental factors (e.g. depressive and/or anxious) to a manic syndrome. To test this hypothesis, which has been first formulated by Akiskal [Clin. Neuropharmacol. 15 (Suppl. 1A) (1992) 632-633], we compared the temperament of non-acute bipolar affective patients with and without the history of a previous mixed episode., Methods: Patients who had been hospitalized for a bipolar disorder were re-assessed at least 6 months after their last in-patient treatment. Those who met the criteria for a partially remitted or full affective or psychotic episode at re-assessment were excluded from the study. Data concerning illness history, current psychopathology (SCID-I interview), depression (BDI), mania (Self-Report Manic Inventory) and temperament (TEMPS-A scale) were obtained. Patients with and without a history of previous mixed episodes were compared., Results: Of 49 eligible former patients, 22 subjects with and 23 subjects without a former mixed episode in bipolar affective disorder fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Subjects suffering from bipolar affective disorder exhibited significantly more depressive and anxious and less hyperthymic temperament, if they had experienced a mixed episode previously. Concerning cyclothymic and irritable temperament, bipolar affective patients with a former mixed episode presented non-significantly higher scores. Patients with a former mixed episode presented with higher depression scores than patients without such a history. No group differences were found concerning current mania scores., Limitations: (1). This is a preliminary report from an ongoing study. (2). Temperament had not been assessed premorbidly. (3). Although group comparisons revealed significant differences, these did not seem great enough to fully explain the emergence of a mixed episode., Conclusion: Our findings support the study's hypothesis that mixed episodes occur more often in subjects with an inverse temperament (e.g. depressive and anxious), although it cannot be ruled out that subsyndromal features of the bipolar illness had an effect on temperament assessment.

Purpose: To analyze whether affective symptoms during psychiatric treatment in childhood or adolescence could predict the later development of depressive symptoms., Method: We used a "catch-up" design. A cohort of former child and adolescent psychiatric patients was assessed in adulthood with standardized instruments according to the criteria of ICD-10 (SCAN) and dimensional values for depression (both self-reported and observer-rated). Initial affective symptoms had been extracted from clinical records according to a standardized system (AMDP)., Results: We assessed 164 former patients. Twelve percent of these fulfilled diagnostic criteria of an affective disorder (F3) according to ICD-10. In univariate analyses of variance the depression scores were significantly related to affective symptoms during childhood treatment, even if the presence of an affective disorder at catch-up was considered as an independent covariate variable. Nevertheless, the latter variable explained a large part of the variance of depression scores, while initial affective symptoms explained no more than 6%., Conclusion: Affective symptoms in childhood and adolescence may predict the later development of subthreshold depressive symptomatology.