Search

To investigate the relationship of chromosomal aberrations at blastic crisis (BC) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), with previous therapies and with atomic bomb (AB) exposure, we studied 114 CML patients who developed BC, including 23 AB survivors in Hiroshima. In total, only 45.6% showed major-route abnormalities, which figure was far lower than those previously reported, implying possibility of geographical difference. Occurrence of major-route abnormality was not associated with either duration of chronic phase or survival time after BC. Patients treated with interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) showed lower frequency of major-route abnormalities and lower number of abnormal chromosomes than did patients treated with busulfan (Bu). The frequency of trisomy 8 was lower and monosomy 7 was higher in IFNalpha-treated than in Bu-treated patients. The frequency of unusual abnormalities at BC in IFNalpha-treated patients was indistinguishable from those in Bu-treated patients and, notably, a more common (40%) feature in IFNalpha-treated patients was no change in the cytogenetic picture. Thus, we conclude that IFNalpha action on chromosome aberration is basically quite neutral and that IFNalpha does not induce any specific aberrations, including unusual ones at BC, with an exception of deletion of chromosome 7. Atomic bomb exposure status did not make any difference in secondary abnormalities at BC.

To investigate the relationship between the pattern of methylation at the major breakpoint cluster region (M-BCR) and transformation of chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) from the chronic to the blastic phase, the M-BCR methylation status was examined serially from chronic to blastic phase in 23 CML patients. The DNA of mononuclear cells from bone marrow or peripheral blood was digested with restriction enzymes HpaII and BglII, and hybridized with a 5'M-BCR probe. The methylation status was stable during evolution of CML from chronic to the myeloid blastic phase. Cells in both phases showed consistent methylation patterns consisting of fully methylated rearranged fragments of variable size, 4.8, 3.1/3.0, and 2.7/2.5 kb. Conversely, there was substantial heterogeneity in methylation patterns in patients with lymphoid crisis. All lymphoid-crisis patients studied in blastic phase showed a pattern distinct from that of the chronic phase in the same patient, as well as from the myeloid pattern, suggesting cell lineage-specific M-BCR methylation. Moreover, in four of six patients with lymphoid crisis, the chronic-phase patterns were different from those of cases with myeloid crisis. Ph-positive and -negative acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) showed methylation patterns different from those of lymphoid crisis in CML. Although the number of patients with lymphoid crisis studied has been limited, these results suggest that analysis of M-BCR methylation status may be of clinical use in distinguishing lymphoid from myeloid crises and predicting the cell lineage of a crisis when the disease is still in the chronic phase.

We analyzed 32 patients with various hematological malignancies including acute myelocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a breakpoint at 11q22-q25 of chromosome 11, but who did not have rearrangements of the MLL/ALL-1 gene. The breakpoint in each patient was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 21 cosmid probes and 2 YAC probes. Breakpoints for each "rearrangement" involving translocations such as t(1;11), t(2;11), inv(11), t(11;15), and t(10;11) found in 5 of the 11 patients had breakpoints in a small region from Ccl11-430 to Ccl11-526 at 11q22-q23.1. Furthermore, breakpoints for chromosome deletions at 11q21-q23 in 10 patients were located in the same region as that of translocations. A commonly deleted region among 8 patients was identified from Ccl11-526 to Ccl11-555 at 11q23.1. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed that breakpoints for additive chromosome [add(11)] aberrations, which had additional material of unknown origin at 11q23 to 11q25 in 11 patients, were not located at 11q23 but rather at the more telomeric site of Ccl11-503 to VIJ(2)2072 at 11q25. These results indicated that the patients had several restricted breakpoint sites, which means that these chromosomal regions have recurrent oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes for pathogenesis for leukemia and lymphoma.

Thirty-six patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) in the blastic phase were examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization to clarify the mechanisms of progression of the disease. Two of 19 CML patients in the blastic phase (10.5%) had an extra fused BCR-ABL gene on structurally complex chromosome aberrations in addition to the Ph chromosome. Another patient had an extra ABL oncogene on the end of a deleted chromosome, resulting in three copies of the ABL oncogene. These three patients showed additional chromosome aberrations, such as der(12), der(15), and der(18), which differ from the standard karyotypic evolution in the blastic phase. Amplification of the fused BCR-ABL gene or the ABL oncogene seemed to be induced by transposition. These segmental transpositions suggest that these regions have high genetic instability possibly leading to blastic transformation.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is suitable for detecting different types of chromosome aberrations on interphase nuclei even in specimens with no or few chromosome metaphases. However, it is not known why FISH is superior to conventional G-banding analysis. The sensitivity of interphase FISH was compared to that of G-banding analysis in 288 leukemia/lymphoma patients for 10 different types of chromosome aberrations: t(9;22) (M- and m-BCR), t(8;21), 11q23 abnormalities, t(15;17), del(5)/-5, del(13)/-13, +8, -7, and +12. The results revealed that t(15;17) positive cells could not proliferate well in culture, leading to underestimation of abnormality by G-banding. Monosomy 7 in acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) as well as trisomy 12 and deletion chromosome 13 in chronic lymphocytic leukemias (CLL) were also severely underestimated by G-banding. On the other hand, no discrepancies were observed in t(8;21), t(9;22), translations involving 11q23, or in trisomy 8. These findings indicate the superiority of interphase FISH over conventional cytogenetics for detecting chromosome abnormalities in small clones, especially for monosomy 7 or (15;17) translocations.

To detect a translocation (8;21)(q22;q22) in interphase cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we investigated three probe combinations: single-color hybridization with two cosmid probes (cY8 and cY3), single-color hybridization with four cosmid probes (cY8, cY3, cY107, and cYR4), and dual-color hybridization with two cosmid probes (cY107 and cYR4) from the AML1 gene flanking or overlapping the breakpoint region. Over 95% of nuclei gave sufficient signals in all three probe combinations, and the detection rates were not statistically different among them. Among 18 patients examined at diagnosis, 12 with t(8;21) were also monitored for the number of residual leukemic cells after chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation (BMT). There were some discrepancies between morphology and genetic (especially FISH) results at partial, or even complete remission. As leukemic cells with t(8;21) can maturate, morphological assessment alone is insufficient to evaluate the residual leukemic cells. Interphase FISH provided more precise information about the clinical status of patients with an 8;21 translocation after treatment.

We present here a 78-year-old female patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), French-American-British classification M2, exhibiting isodicentric chromosome 21, idic(21)(q22), at the time of diagnosis. The patient had three idic(21)(q22), besides the del(5)(q13q32), add(21)(q22), dic(21;22) (q22;q13), and +22. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies with whole-chromosome painting and centromere-specific probes for chromosome 21 verified the diagnosis of idic(21)(q22). There were no distinct clinicohematological characteristics of AML with isodicentric 21. The patient was treated with remission-induction therapy followed by consolidation therapy. Two years later, the patient showed the disappearance of isodicentric 21 but retained del(5)(q13q32) and gained other chromosomal abnormalities, +add(17)(p11) and -16. To our knowledge, this is the first report of AML with acquired idic(21)(q22).