Search

Introduction: The impact of bridging radiation therapy (bRT) for CAR T-cell therapy on absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) kinetics and treatment outcome is unknown., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who received bRT prior to CD-19 CAR-T between 11/2017-4/2023. The change in ALC (ALC Δ RT) was computed by subtracting ALC pre- and post-bRT. Percent bone marrow (%BM) irradiated was calculated by estimating skeletal BM distribution. PFS, DSS, and OS were modeled via Kaplan-Meier., Results: Fifty-one patients received bRT, of which 13 (25.5%) had bulky disease (≥7.5cm). The median bRT dose was 30Gy (range: 4-48Gy); 26 patients (51%) received ≥30Gy. Thirty-one patients (61%) received bRT comprehensively to all disease sites. The median cumulative %BM irradiated was 5.05% (range: 0-50%). At a median follow-up of 10.3 months (95% CI: 7.7-16.4), the 1-year OS, PFS, and DSS rates were 80% (95% CI: 66-99), 78% (64-87), and 82% (68-90), respectively. The incidence of ≥Grade 3 lymphopenia was 33% pre-RT and 68% post-RT, but recovered to 43% at the conditioning chemotherapy (CC) timepoint. There was no correlation between post-RT Grade ≥3 lymphopenia and the receipt of comprehensive bRT, combined modality bridging, ≥30Gy bRT, or bRT to ≥15% of BM (all p>0.2). Among patients with Grade 0-2 lymphopenia pre-RT, increased conversion to Grade ≥3 lymphopenia post-RT correlated with comprehensive or ≥30Gy bRT, but these factors did not impair ALC recovery at CC. There was no association between ALC Δ RT or post-RT ALC with 30 or 90 day response (p>0.25), DSS, PFS, or OS (p>0.3)., Conclusions: Lymphocyte change during bRT is not associated with CAR-T outcomes. Persistent cytopenia risk following bRT is not associated with bRT to ≥30Gy, ≥15% of BM, or comprehensive coverage. While bRT can be delivered safely, we urge careful treatment planning when incorporating into pre-CAR-T regimens., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Emerging evidence suggests proton radiation therapy may offer cognitive sparing advantages over photon radiation therapy, yet dosimetry has not been compared previously. The purpose of this study was to examine dosimetric correlates of cognitive outcomes in children with medulloblastoma treated with proton versus photon radiation therapy., Methods and Materials: In this retrospective, bi-institutional study, dosimetric and cognitive data from 75 patients (39 photon and 36 proton) were analyzed. Doses to brain structures were compared between treatment modalities. Linear mixed-effects models were used to create models of global IQ and cognitive domain scores., Results: The mean dose and dose to 40% of the brain (D40) were 2.7 and 4.1 Gy less among proton-treated patients compared with photon-treated patients (P = .03 and .007, respectively). Mean doses to the left and right hippocampi were 11.2 Gy lower among proton-treated patients (P < .001 for both). Mean doses to the left and right temporal lobes were 6.9 and 7.1 Gy lower with proton treatment, respectively (P < .001 for both). Models of cognition found statistically significant associations between higher mean brain dose and reduced verbal comprehension, increased right temporal lobe D40 with reduced perceptual reasoning, and greater left temporal mean dose with reduced working memory. Higher brain D40 was associated with reduced processing speed and global IQ scores., Conclusions: Proton therapy reduces doses to normal brain structures compared with photon treatment. This leads to reduced cognitive decline after radiation therapy across multiple intellectual endpoints. Proton therapy should be offered to children receiving radiation for medulloblastoma., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)