Search

Purpose: To report the long-term outcomes of the RTOG 0424 study of a high-risk, low-grade glioma population treated with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT)., Methods and Materials: For this single-arm, phase 2 study, patients with low-grade gliomas with ≥3 risk factors (age ≥40 years, astrocytoma, bihemispheric tumor, size ≥6 cm, or preoperative neurologic function status >1) received RT (54 Gy in 30 fractions) with TMZ and up to 12 cycles of post-RT TMZ. The initial primary endpoint P was overall survival (OS) at 3 years after registration. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and the association of survival outcomes with methylation status. The initial 3-year report of this study was published in 2015., Results: The study accrued 136 patients, of whom 129 were analyzable. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 9.0 years. The 3-year OS was 73.5% (95% confidence interval, 65.8%-81.1%), numerically superior to the 3-year OS historical control of 54% (P < .001). The median survival time was 8.2 years (95% confidence interval, 5.6-9.1). Five- and 10-year OS rates were 60.9% and 34.6%, respectively, and 5- and 10-year PFS rates were 46.8% and 25.5%, respectively., Conclusions: The long-term results confirmed the findings from the initial report for efficacy, suggesting OS and PFS outcomes with the RT-TMZ regimen exceeded historical control groups treated with radiation alone. Toxicity was acceptable., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Large variation regarding prescription and dose inhomogeneity exists in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. The aim of this modeling study was to identify which dose metric correlates best with local tumor control probability to make recommendations regarding SBRT prescription., Methods and Materials: We combined 2 retrospective databases of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, yielding 1500 SBRT treatments for analysis. Three dose parameters were converted to biologically effective doses (BEDs): (1) the (near-minimum) dose prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) periphery (yielding BED min ); (2) the (near-maximum) dose absorbed by 1% of the PTV (yielding BED max ); and (3) the average between near-minimum and near-maximum doses (yielding BED ave ). These BED parameters were then correlated to the risk of local recurrence through Cox regression. Furthermore, BED-based prediction of local recurrence was attempted by logistic regression and fast and frugal trees. Models were compared using the Akaike information criterion., Results: There were 1500 treatments in 1434 patients; 117 tumors recurred locally. Actuarial local control rates at 12 and 36 months were 96.8% (95% confidence interval, 95.8%-97.8%) and 89.0% (87.0%-91.1%), respectively. In univariable Cox regression, BED ave was the best predictor of risk of local recurrence, and a model based on BED min had substantially less evidential support. In univariable logistic regression, the model based on BED ave also performed best. Multivariable classification using fast and frugal trees revealed BED max to be the most important predictor, followed by BED ave ., Conclusions: BED ave was generally better correlated with tumor control probability than either BED max or BED min . Because the average between near-minimum and near-maximum doses was highly correlated to the mean gross tumor volume dose, the latter may be used as a prescription target. More emphasis could be placed on achieving sufficiently high mean doses within the gross tumor volume rather than the PTV covering dose, a concept needing further validation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) and irinotecan (CPT-11) for 12 months after concurrent chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM)., Methods and Materials: Trial RTOG 04-20, a single-arm, multi-institutional phase 2 trial, was designed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of concomitant TMZ and radiation therapy (RT) followed by adjuvant TMZ combined with CPT-11 given for 12 cycles compared with historical controls of adjuvant TMZ alone given for 6 cycles., Results: A total of 170 patients were enrolled, 152 of whom were eligible. Adjuvant CPT-11 combined with TMZ was more toxic than expected. A higher rate of hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities was more frequently noted with the combination regimen compared with adjuvant TMZ alone. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was 38% compared with 14% reported in the Stupp trial. After an early interim analysis, the adjuvant CPT-11 dose was reduced to 100 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 5 for the first cycle. CPT-11 dose escalation proceeded over the first 3 cycles if tolerated. Median overall survival for all eligible patients was 16.9 months compared with 13.7 months of the historical control (P = .03). Post hoc subgroup analysis suggested an improvement in overall survival for patients with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis class 3, although improvement was limited to 22 patients (14% of eligible patients)., Conclusions: Although irinotecan and TMZ for 12 cycles given after chemoradiation for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma significantly improved median survival compared with historical control data at the time the study was conducted, the historical control median survival time of 13.7 months does not represent the current benchmark for this patient population. Treatment intensification does prolong overall survival compared with the current standard., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy has been associated with increased toxicity when delivered to patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer with a tumor within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). We investigated noncancer deaths for these patients as related to gross tumor volume (GTV) proximity to the PBT, compared with peripheral tumors., Methods and Materials: We included 765 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy to a median of 3 × 18 Gy. Central tumors were treated with a risk-adapted (less-intense) schedule (mostly 8 fractions) in 55% of the patients in the first-centimeter group and 27% of the patients in the second-centimeter group. An average anatomy with contouring of PBT and organs at risk (OARs) was deformed onto each patient to obtain the distance of the GTV to the PBT and doses to OARs. Log-rank, 1-way analysis of variance, and Cox regressions were performed to assess differences in the first-centimeter, second centimeter, and peripheral groups and associations with noncancer deaths., Results: The median overall survival was 42.7 months, the median noncancer death occurred in 57.3 months, and the median follow-up was 34.8 months. Noncancer death in the first-centimeter group (31 patients) was significantly different from noncancer death in the other groups, with a hazard ratio of 3.175 (P < .001). Noncancer death in the second-centimeter group (71 patients) was not different from noncancer death in the peripheral group (P = .53). Doses to OARs were higher in the first- and second-centimeter groups than in the peripheral group for all OARs. High dose to the PBT was associated with noncancer death (D1%; hazard ratio, 1.006 Gy -1 ; P = .003)., Conclusions: Patients with a GTV in the first centimeter surrounding the PBT died more often from causes other than cancer compared with other patients. Noncancer death in patients with a GTV in the second centimeter, who partly received a risk-adapted schedule, was comparable to that in patients with a peripheral tumor., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the impact on overall survival with different salvage therapies, including no treatment, reirradiation, systemic therapy, or radiation and systemic therapy, in participants of a phase 3 clinical trial evaluating dose-dense versus standard-dose temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma., Methods and Materials: This analysis of patients from Trial RTOG 0525 investigated the effect of reirradiation or systemic treatment after tumor progression. Survival from first progression was compared between patients receiving no therapy, systemic therapy alone, radiation alone, and both modalities. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the mortality hazard, controlling for potential confounders., Results: The analysis included 637 patients who progressed and had information on their management, excluding those who died less than half a month after progression. A total of 267 patients (42%) received neither reirradiation nor systemic treatment at progression, 24 (4%) received radiation alone, 282 (44%) received systemic treatment only, and 64 (10%) received both radiation and systemic therapy. Patients who received no treatment had a median survival of 4.8 months, lower than with radiation treatment alone (8.2 months), systemic therapy alone (10.6 months), and both radiation and systemic therapy (12.2 months). In survival models controlling for potential confounders, those who received radiation alone had modestly better survival (hazard ratio HR 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.28), whereas those who underwent systemic therapy either without (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34-0.53) or with radiation therapy (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.63) had better survival. There was no significant survival difference between patients who received radiation only and those who received systemic therapy (either with radiation or alone)., Conclusions: Patients who received no salvage treatment had poorer survival than those who received radiation, chemotherapy, or the combination. However, patient selection for no treatment likely reflects poorer expected prognosis. There was no significant survival difference among those receiving radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or both. Ongoing clinical trials will help define the role of reirradiation after glioblastoma progression., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: European data suggest that 8-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimens may be similar in efficacy with less toxicity than ≤5-fraction SBRT for central lung lesions. However, under current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines, SBRT in the United States (US) is reimbursed for only ≤5 fractions, whereas there are no such restrictions for reimbursement in Canada. We hypothesize that US-specific SBRT reimbursement policies influence the use of ≥5-fraction SBRT in US academic centers in comparison with comparable Canadian centers., Methods and Materials: A 15-question electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in the US and the 10 highest research-funded cancer centers in Canada. Fisher exact test or exact logistic regression if applicable was used, where P<.05 was considered statistically different from neutral., Results: Of the 143 radiation oncologists from 60 US cancer centers and 6 Canadian cancer centers who completed the survey (17.6% response rate), 125 routinely prescribe SBRT. Fifty percent of US physicians versus 0% of Canadian physicians indicated that there are instances when they would like to prescribe >5-fraction SBRT but prescribe ≤5 fractions because of insurance reimbursement (P=.076 and P=.001, respectively). Seventy percent (P=.006) of US radiation oncologists versus 0% (P=.001) of Canadian radiation oncologists report that SBRT clinical investigation is constrained by the insurance reimbursement. The most common reported deterrent to prescribing >5-fraction SBRT in the US was insurance reimbursement (49.5%)., Conclusions: US radiation oncologists are more likely than those in Canada to report that SBRT clinical investigation and >5-fraction SBRT use may be negatively influenced by health insurance reimbursement; this perception was not held by physicians in Canada. Health care environment may significantly affect radiation therapy decision making and practice patterns., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We performed a phase 1 study to determine the maximum tolerable dose and safety of ipilimumab with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases from melanoma., Methods and Materials: Based on the intracranial disease burden, patients underwent WBRT (arm A) or SRS (arm B). The ipilimumab starting dose was 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, starting on day 3 of WBRT or 2 days after SRS. The ipilimumab dose was escalated to 10 mg/kg using a 2-stage, 3+3 design. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerable dose of ipilimumab combined with radiation therapy. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, intracranial and extracranial control, progression-free survival, and toxicity. The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT01703507., Results: The characteristics of the 16 patients enrolled between 2011 and 2014 were mean age, 60 years; median number of brain metastases, 2 (range 1->10); and number with EC disease, 13 (81%). Treatment included WBRT (n=5), SRS (n=11), and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (n=7) or 10 mg/kg (n=9). The median follow-up was 8 months (arm A) and 10.5 months (arm B). A total of 21 grade 1 to 2 neurotoxic effects occurred, with no dose-limiting toxicities. One patient experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity before ipilimumab administration. Ten additional grade 3 toxicities were reported, with gastrointestinal toxicities (n=5; 31%) the most common. No patient developed grade 4 or 5 toxicity. The median progression-free survival and overall survival in arm A was 2.5 months and 8 months and in arm B was 2.1 months and not reached, respectively., Conclusions: Concurrent ipilimumab 10 mg/kg with SRS is safe. The WBRT arm was closed early because of slow accrual but demonstrated safety with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg. No patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Larger studies, including those with combination checkpoint inhibitor therapy and SRS, are warranted., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in octo- and nonagenarians and to compare their outcomes with those of younger patients., Methods and Materials: Patients with primary lung cancer treated with SBRT were identified from a multi-institutional (5 institutions) database of 1083 cases. Details of patient factors, treatment specifics, toxicity, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the database. All events were calculated from the end of radiation therapy. Estimates of local recurrence, regional recurrence, and distant metastases were calculated using the competing risk method. Cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcomes were compared for those aged <70, 70 to 79, and ≥80 years. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations with CSS and OS in patients aged ≥80 years., Results: The median (range) follow-up was 1.7 (1-10) years, and median age was 75 (41-94) years. There were 305 patients aged <70 years (28%), 448 aged 70 to 79 years (41%), and 330 aged ≥80 years (30%). There was no difference in 2-year local recurrence (4.2% vs 5.4% vs 3.7%, respectively, P=.7), regional recurrence (10.4% vs 7.8% vs 5.3%, P=.1), distant metastases (12.2% vs 7.7% vs 9.5%, P=.2), or CSS (90.6% vs 90.3% vs 90.4%, P=.6). Those aged ≥80 years had significantly lower 2-year OS (73.6% vs 67.2% vs 63.3%, P<.01). The grade 3+ pneumonitis rate was 1.3% versus 1.6% versus 1.5% (P=1.0) in patients aged <70, 70 to 79, and ≥80 years, respectively. The 90-day mortality rates for patients aged <70, 70 to 79, and ≥80 years were 1.3%, 2.5%, and 2.4% (P=.01), respectively. In patients aged ≥80 years OS was associated with T category (hazard ratio 1.7; P<.01)., Conclusion: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a safe treatment modality in elderly patients (aged ≥80 years). Despite larger tumor volumes, the tumor control outcomes were comparable to those in younger patients treated with SBRT. All patients with early-stage lung cancer, regardless of age, should be considered for treatment with SBRT., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Fibrotic changes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are difficult to distinguish from local recurrences (LR), hampering proper patient selection for salvage therapy. This study validates previously reported high-risk computed tomography (CT) features (HRFs) for detection of LR in an independent patient cohort., Methods and Materials: From a multicenter database, 13 patients with biopsy-proven LR were matched 1:2 to 26 non-LR control patients based on dose, planning target volume (PTV), follow-up time, and lung lobe. Tested HRFs were enlarging opacity, sequential enlarging opacity, enlarging opacity after 12 months, bulging margin, linear margin disappearance, loss of air bronchogram, and craniocaudal growth. Additionally, 2 new features were analyzed: the occurrence of new unilateral pleural effusion, and growth based on relative volume, assessed by manual delineation., Results: All HRFs were significantly associated with LR except for loss of air bronchogram. The best performing HRFs were bulging margin, linear margin disappearance, and craniocaudal growth. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the number of HRFs to detect LR had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.0), which was identical to the performance described in the original report. The best compromise (closest to 100% sensitivity and specificity) was found at ≥4 HRFs, with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 85%. A model consisting of only 2 HRFs, bulging margin and craniocaudal growth, resulted in a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 100%, with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.9-1.0) (HRFs ≥2). Pleural effusion and relative growth did not significantly improve the model., Conclusion: We successfully validated CT-based HRFs for detection of LR after SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. As an alternative to number of HRFs, we propose a simplified model with the combination of the 2 best HRFs: bulging margin and craniocaudal growth, although validation is warranted., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0424 was a phase 2 study of a high-risk low-grade glioma (LGG) population who were treated with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT), and outcomes were compared to those of historical controls. This study was designed to detect a 43% increase in median survival time (MST) from 40.5 to 57.9 months and a 20% improvement in 3-year overall survival (OS) rate from 54% to 65% at a 10% significance level (1-sided) and 96% power., Methods and Materials: Patients with LGGs with 3 or more risk factors for recurrence (age ≥40 years, astrocytoma histology, bihemispherical tumor, preoperative tumor diameter of ≥6 cm, or a preoperative neurological function status of >1) were treated with RT (54 Gy in 30 fractions) and concurrent and adjuvant TMZ., Results: From 2005 to 2009, 129 evaluable patients (75 males and 54 females) were accrued. Median age was 49 years; 91% had a Zubrod score of 0 or 1; and 69%, 25%, and 6% of patients had 3, 4, and 5 risk factors, respectively. Patients had median and minimum follow-up examinations of 4.1 years and 3 years, respectively. The 3-year OS rate was 73.1% (95% confidence interval: 65.3%-80.8%), which was significantly improved compared to that of prespecified historical control values (P<.001). Median survival time has not yet been reached. Three-year progression-free survival was 59.2%. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 43% and 10% of patients, respectively. One patient died of herpes encephalitis., Conclusions: The 3-year OS rate of 73.1% for RTOG 0424 high-risk LGG patients is higher than that reported for historical controls (P<.001) and the study-hypothesized rate of 65%., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9508 showed a survival advantage for patients with 1 but not 2 or 3 brain metastasis (BM) treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus WBRT alone. An improved prognostic index, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) has been developed. Our hypothesis was that if the data from RTOG 9508 were poststratified by the GPA, the conclusions may vary., Methods and Materials: In this analysis, 252 of the 331 patients were evaluable by GPA. Of those, 211 had lung cancer. Breast cancer patients were excluded because the components of the breast GPA are not in the RTOG database. Multiple Cox regression was used to compare survival between treatment groups, adjusting for GPA. Treatment comparisons within subgroups were performed with the log-rank test. A free online tool (brainmetgpa.com) simplified GPA use., Results: The fundamental conclusions of the primary analysis were confirmed in that there was no survival benefit overall for patients with 1 to 3 metastases; however, there was a benefit for the subset of patients with GPA 3.5 to 4.0 (median survival time [MST] for WBRT + SRS vs WBRT alone was 21.0 versus 10.3 months, P=.05) regardless of the number of metastases. Among patients with GPA 3.5 to 4.0 treated with WBRT and SRS, the MST for patients with 1 versus 2 to 3 metastases was 21 and 14.1 months, respectively., Conclusions: This secondary analysis of predominantly lung cancer patients, consistent with the original analysis, shows no survival advantage for the group overall when treated with WBRT and SRS; however, in patients with high GPA (3.5-4), there is a survival advantage regardless of whether they have 1, 2, or 3 BM. This benefit did not extend to patients with lower GPA. Prospective validation of this survival benefit for patients with multiple BM and high GPA when treated with WBRT and SRS is warranted., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose/objective(s): Angiogenic blockade with irradiation may enhance the therapeutic ratio of radiation therapy (RT) through vascular normalization. We sought to determine the safety and toxicity profile of continuous daily-dosed sunitinib when combined with hypofractionated stereotactic RT (fSRT) for recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGG)., Methods and Materials: Eligible patients had malignant high-grade glioma that recurred or progressed after primary surgery and RT. All patients received a minimum of a 10-day course of fSRT, had World Health Organization performance status of 0 to 1, and a life expectancy of >3 months. During fSRT, sunitinib was administered at 37.5 mg daily. The primary endpoint was acute toxicity, and response was assessed via serial magnetic resonance imaging., Results: Eleven patients with rHGG were enrolled. The fSRT doses delivered ranged from 30 to 42 Gy in 2.5- to 3.75-Gy fractions. The median follow-up time was 40 months. Common acute toxicities included hematologic disorders, fatigue, hypertension, and elevated liver transaminases. Sunitinib and fSRT were well tolerated. One grade 4 mucositis toxicity occurred, and no grade 4 or 5 hypertensive events or intracerebral hemorrhages occurred. One patient had a nearly complete response, and 4 patients had stable disease for >9 months. Two patients (18%) remain alive and progression-free >3 years from enrollment. The 6-month progression-free survival was 45%., Conclusions: Sunitinib at a daily dose of 37.5 mg given concurrently with hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation for rHGG yields acceptable toxicities and an encouraging 6-month progression-free survival., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the impact of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) on self-reported cognitive functioning (SRCF), a functional scale on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)., Methods and Materials: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 0214 randomized patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer to PCI or observation; RTOG 0212 randomized patients with limited-disease small cell lung cancer to high- or standard-dose PCI. In both trials, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)-Recall and -Delayed Recall and SRCF were assessed at baseline (after locoregional therapy but before PCI or observation) and at 6 and 12 months. Patients developing brain relapse before follow-up evaluation were excluded. Decline was defined using the reliable change index method and correlated with receipt of PCI versus observation using logistic regression modeling. Fisher's exact test correlated decline in SRCF with HVLT decline., Results: Of the eligible patients pooled from RTOG 0212 and RTOG 0214, 410 (93%) receiving PCI and 173 (96%) undergoing observation completed baseline HVLT or EORTC QLQ-C30 testing and were included in this analysis. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was associated with a higher risk of decline in SRCF at 6 months (odds ratio 3.60, 95% confidence interval 2.34-6.37, P<.0001) and 12 months (odds ratio 3.44, 95% confidence interval 1.84-6.44, P<.0001). Decline on HVLT-Recall at 6 and 12 months was also associated with PCI (P=.002 and P=.002, respectively) but was not closely correlated with decline in SRCF at the same time points (P=.05 and P=.86, respectively)., Conclusions: In lung cancer patients who do not develop brain relapse, PCI is associated with decline in HVLT-tested and self-reported cognitive functioning. Decline in HVLT and decline in SRCF are not closely correlated, suggesting that they may represent distinct elements of the cognitive spectrum., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A phase 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study subset analysis demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with the addition of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. Because temozolomide (TMZ) and erlotinib (ETN) cross the blood-brain barrier and have documented activity in NSCLC, a phase 3 study was designed to test whether these drugs would improve the OS associated with WBRT + SRS., Methods and Materials: NSCLC patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases were randomized to receive WBRT (2.5 Gy × 15 to 37.5 Gy) and SRS alone, versus WBRT + SRS + TMZ (75 mg/m(2)/day × 21 days) or ETN (150 mg/day). ETN (150 mg/day) or TMZ (150-200 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days/month) could be continued for as long as 6 months after WBRT + SRS. The primary endpoint was OS., Results: After 126 patients were enrolled, the study closed because of accrual limitations. The median survival times (MST) for WBRT + SRS, WBRT + SRS + TMZ, and WBRT + SRS + ETN were qualitatively different (13.4, 6.3, and 6.1 months, respectively), although the differences were not statistically significant. Time to central nervous system progression and performance status at 6 months were better in the WBRT + SRS arm. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was 11%, 41%, and 49% in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P<.001)., Conclusion: The addition of TMZ or ETN to WBRT + SRS in NSCLC patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases did not improve survival and possibly had a deleterious effect. Because the analysis is underpowered, these data suggest but do not prove that increased toxicity was the cause of inferior survival in the drug arms., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of tumor size, prescription dose, and dose to the lungs on posttreatment pulmonary function test (PFT) changes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods and Materials: The analysis is based on 191 patients treated at 5 international institutions: inclusion criteria were availability of pre- and post-SBRT PFTs and dose-volume histograms of the lung and planning target volume (PTV); patients treated with more than 1 SBRT course were excluded. Correlation between early (1-6 months, median 3 months) and late (7-24 months, median 12 months) PFT changes and tumor size, planning target volume (PTV) dose, and lung doses was assessed using linear regression analysis, receiver operating characteristics analysis, and Lyman's normal tissue complication probability model. The PTV doses were converted to biologically effective doses and lung doses to 2 Gy equivalent doses before correlation analyses., Results: Up to 6 months after SBRT, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity changed by -1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.4% to 0) and -7.6% (95% CI, -10.2% to -3.4%) compared with pretreatment values, respectively. A modest decrease in PFTs was observed 7-24 months after SBRT, with changes of -8.1% (95% CI, -13.3% to -5.3%) and -12.4% (95% CI, -15.5% to -6.9%), respectively. Using linear regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and normal tissue complication probability modeling, all evaluated parameters of tumor size, PTV dose, mean lung dose, and absolute and relative volumes of the lung exposed to minimum doses of 5-70 Gy were not correlated with early and late PFT changes. Subgroup analysis based on pre-SBRT PFTs (greater or equal and less than median) did not identify any dose-effect relationship., Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate a significant dose-effect relationship for changes of pulmonary function after SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Despite recent advances in the management of high-grade and recurrent gliomas, survival remains poor. Antiangiogenic therapy has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of high-grade gliomas both in preclinical models and in clinical trials. We sought to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of sorafenib when combined with both radiation and temozolomide in the primary setting or radiation alone in the recurrent setting., Methods and Materials: This was a preclinical study and an open-label phase I dose escalation trial. Multiple glioma cell lines were analyzed for viability after treatment with radiation, temozolomide, or sorafenib or combinations of them. For patients with primary disease, sorafenib was given concurrently with temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) and 60 Gy radiation, for 30 days after completion of radiation. For patients with recurrent disease, sorafenib was combined with a hypofractionated course of radiation (35 Gy in 10 fractions)., Results: Cell viability was significantly reduced with the combination of radiation, temozolomide, and sorafenib or radiation and sorafenib. Eighteen patients (11 in the primary cohort, 7 in the recurrent cohort) were enrolled onto this trial approved by the institutional review board. All patients completed the planned course of radiation therapy. The most common toxicities were hematologic, fatigue, and rash. There were 18 grade 3 or higher toxicities. The median overall survival was 18 months for the entire population., Conclusions: Sorafenib can be safely combined with radiation and temozolomide in patients with high-grade glioma and with radiation alone in patients with recurrent glioma. The recommended phase II dose of sorafenib is 200 mg twice daily when combined with temozolomide and radiation and 400 mg with radiation alone. To our knowledge, this is the first publication of concurrent sorafenib with radiation monotherapy or combined with radiation and temozolomide., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as an effective treatment option for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using data collected by the Elekta Lung Research Group, we generated a tumor control probability (TCP) model that predicts 2-year local control after SBRT as a function of biologically effective dose (BED) and tumor size., Methods and Materials: We formulated our TCP model as follows: TCP = e([BED10 - c ∗ L - TCD50]/k) ÷ (1 + e([BED10 - c ∗ L - TCD50]/k)), where BED10 is the biologically effective SBRT dose, c is a constant, L is the maximal tumor diameter, and TCD50 and k are parameters that define the shape of the TCP curve. Least-squares optimization with a bootstrap resampling approach was used to identify the values of c, TCD50, and k that provided the best fit with observed actuarial 2-year local control rates., Results: Data from 504 NSCLC tumors treated with a variety of SBRT schedules were available. The mean follow-up time was 18.4 months, and 26 local recurrences were observed. The optimal values for c, TCD50, and k were 10 Gy/cm, 0 Gy, and 31 Gy, respectively. Thus, size-adjusted BED (sBED) may be defined as BED minus 10 times the tumor diameter (in centimeters). Our TCP model indicates that sBED values of 44 Gy, 69 Gy, and 93 Gy provide 80%, 90%, and 95% chances of tumor control at 2 years, respectively. When patients were grouped by sBED, the model accurately characterized the relationship between sBED and actuarial 2-year local control (r=0.847, P=.008)., Conclusion: We have developed a TCP model that predicts 2-year local control rate after hypofractionated SBRT for early-stage NSCLC as a function of biologically effective dose and tumor diameter. Further testing of this model with additional datasets is warranted., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Few medical students are given proper clinical training in oncology, much less radiation oncology. We attempted to assess the value of adding a radiation oncology clinical rotation to the medical school curriculum., Methods and Materials: In July 2010, Jefferson Medical College began to offer a 3-week radiation oncology rotation as an elective course for third-year medical students during the core surgical clerkship. During 2010 to 2012, 52 medical students chose to enroll in this rotation. The rotation included outpatient clinics, inpatient consults, didactic sessions, and case-based presentations by the students. Tests of students' knowledge of radiation oncology were administered anonymously before and after the rotation to evaluate the educational effectiveness of the rotation. Students and radiation oncology faculty were given surveys to assess feedback about the rotation., Results: The students' prerotation test scores had an average of 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61-66%). The postrotation test scores improved to an average of 82% (95% CI, 80-83%; 18% absolute improvement). In examination question analysis, scores improved in clinical oncology from 63% to 79%, in radiobiology from 70% to 77%, and in medical physics from 62% to 88%. Improvements in all sections but radiobiology were statistically significant. Students rated the usefulness of the rotation as 8.1 (scale 1-9; 95% CI, 7.3-9.0), their understanding of radiation oncology as a result of the rotation as 8.8 (95% CI, 8.5-9.1), and their recommendation of the rotation to a classmate as 8.2 (95% CI, 7.6-9.0)., Conclusions: Integrating a radiation oncology clinical rotation into the medical school curriculum improves student knowledge of radiation oncology, including aspects of clinical oncology, radiobiology, and medical physics. The rotation is appreciated by both students and faculty., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and consistency of a gradient-based positron emission tomography (PET) segmentation method, GRADIENT, compared with manual (MANUAL) and constant threshold (THRESHOLD) methods., Methods and Materials: Contouring accuracy was evaluated with sphere phantoms and clinically realistic Monte Carlo PET phantoms of the thorax. The sphere phantoms were 10-37 mm in diameter and were acquired at five institutions emulating clinical conditions. One institution also acquired a sphere phantom with multiple source-to-background ratios of 2:1, 5:1, 10:1, 20:1, and 70:1. One observer segmented (contoured) each sphere with GRADIENT and THRESHOLD from 25% to 50% at 5% increments. Subsequently, seven physicians segmented 31 lesions (7-264 mL) from 25 digital thorax phantoms using GRADIENT, THRESHOLD, and MANUAL., Results: For spheres <20 mm in diameter, GRADIENT was the most accurate with a mean absolute % error in diameter of 8.15% (10.2% SD) compared with 49.2% (51.1% SD) for 45% THRESHOLD (p < 0.005). For larger spheres, the methods were statistically equivalent. For varying source-to-background ratios, GRADIENT was the most accurate for spheres >20 mm (p < 0.065) and <20 mm (p < 0.015). For digital thorax phantoms, GRADIENT was the most accurate (p < 0.01), with a mean absolute % error in volume of 10.99% (11.9% SD), followed by 25% THRESHOLD at 17.5% (29.4% SD), and MANUAL at 19.5% (17.2% SD). GRADIENT had the least systematic bias, with a mean % error in volume of -0.05% (16.2% SD) compared with 25% THRESHOLD at -2.1% (34.2% SD) and MANUAL at -16.3% (20.2% SD; p value <0.01). Interobserver variability was reduced using GRADIENT compared with both 25% THRESHOLD and MANUAL (p value <0.01, Levene's test)., Conclusion: GRADIENT was the most accurate and consistent technique for target volume contouring. GRADIENT was also the most robust for varying imaging conditions. GRADIENT has the potential to play an important role for tumor delineation in radiation therapy planning and response assessment., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: We reviewed the treatment for patients with spine metastases who initially received conventional external beam radiation (EBRT) and were reirradiated with 1-5 fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) who did or did not subsequently develop radiation myelopathy (RM)., Methods and Materials: Spinal cord dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for 5 RM patients (5 spinal segments) and 14 no-RM patients (16 spine segments) were based on thecal sac contours at retreatment. Dose to a point within the thecal sac that receives the maximum dose (P(max)), and doses to 0.1-, 1.0-, and 2.0-cc volumes within the thecal sac were reviewed. The biologically effective doses (BED) using α/β = 2 Gy for late spinal cord toxicity were calculated and normalized to a 2-Gy equivalent dose (nBED = Gy(2/2))., Results: The initial conventional radiotherapy nBED ranged from ~30 to 50 Gy(2/2) (median ~40 Gy(2/2)). The SBRT reirradiation thecal sac mean P(max) nBED in the no-RM group was 20.0 Gy(2/2) (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-29.2), which was significantly lower than the corresponding 67.4 Gy(2/2) (95% CI, 51.0-83.9) in the RM group. The mean total P(max) nBED in the no-RM group was 62.3 Gy(2/2) (95% CI, 50.3-74.3), which was significantly lower than the corresponding 105.8 Gy(2/2) (95% CI, 84.3-127.4) in the RM group. The fraction of the total P(max) nBED accounted for by the SBRT P(max) nBED for the RM patients ranged from 0.54 to 0.78 and that for the no-RM patients ranged from 0.04 to 0.53., Conclusions: SBRT given at least 5 months after conventional palliative radiotherapy with a reirradiation thecal sac P(max) nBED of 20-25 Gy(2/2) appears to be safe provided the total P(max) nBED does not exceed approximately 70 Gy(2/2), and the SBRT thecal sac P(max) nBED comprises no more than approximately 50% of the total nBED., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In 2004, the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) published its first physics education curriculum for residents, which was updated in 2007. A committee composed of physicists and physicians from various residency program teaching institutions was reconvened again to update the curriculum in 2009., Methods and Materials: Members of this committee have associations with ASTRO, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology, the American Board of Radiology (ABR), and the American College of Radiology. Members reviewed and updated assigned subjects from the last curriculum. The updated curriculum was carefully reviewed by a representative from the ABR and other physics and clinical experts., Results: The new curriculum resulted in a recommended 56-h course, excluding initial orientation. Learning objectives are provided for each subject area, and a detailed outline of material to be covered is given for each lecture hour. Some recent changes in the curriculum include the addition of Radiation Incidents and Bioterrorism Response Training as a subject and updates that reflect new treatment techniques and modalities in a number of core subjects. The new curriculum was approved by the ASTRO board in April 2010. We anticipate that physicists will use this curriculum for structuring their teaching programs, and subsequently the ABR will adopt this educational program for its written examination. Currently, the American College of Radiology uses the ASTRO curriculum for their training examination topics. In addition to the curriculum, the committee updated suggested references and the glossary., Conclusions: The ASTRO physics education curriculum for radiation oncology residents has been updated. To ensure continued commitment to a current and relevant curriculum, the subject matter will be updated again in 2 years., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the effect of dose and fractionation schedule of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) on the incidence of chronic neurotoxicity (CNt) and changes in quality of life for selected patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC)., Methods and Materials: Patients with LD SCLC who achieved a complete response after chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation were eligible for randomization to undergo PCI to a total dose of 25 Gy in 10 daily fractions (Arm 1) vs. the experimental cohort of 36 Gy. Those receiving 36 Gy underwent a secondary randomization between daily 18 fractions (Arm 2) and twice-daily 24 fractions (Arm 3). Enrolled patients participated in baseline and follow-up neuropsychological test batteries along with quality-of-life assessments., Results: A total of 265 patients were accrued, with 131 in Arm 1, 67 in Arm 2, and 66 in Arm 3 being eligible. There are 112 patients (42.2%) alive with 25.3 months of median follow-up. There were no significant baseline differences among groups regarding quality-of-life measures and one of the neuropsychological tests, namely the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. However, at 12 months after PCI there was a significant increase in the occurrence of CNt in the 36-Gy cohort (p=0.02). Logistic regression analysis revealed increasing age to be the most significant predictor of CNt (p=0.005)., Conclusions: Because of the increased risk of developing CNt in study patients with 36 Gy, a total PCI dose of 25 Gy remains the standard of care for patients with LD SCLC attaining a complete response to initial chemoradiation., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Based on preclinical data indicating the radiosensitizing potential of epothilone B, the present study was designed to evaluate the toxicity and response rate of patupilone, an epothilone B, with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of central nervous system malignancies., Methods and Materials: The present Phase I study evaluated the toxicities associated with patupilone combined with RT to establish the maximal tolerated dose. Eligible patients had recurrent gliomas (n = 10) primary (n = 5) or metastatic (n = 17) brain tumors. Dose escalation occurred if no dose-limiting toxicities, defined as any Grade 4-5 toxicity or Grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization, occurred during treatment., Results: Of 14 patients, 5 were treated with weekly patupilone at 1.5 mg/m(2), 4 at 2.0 mg/m(2), 4 at 2.5 mg/m(2), and 1 at 4 mg/m(2). Of 18 patients, 7 were treated in the 6-mg/m(2) group, 6 in the 8-mg/m(2) group, and 5 in the 10-mg/m(2) group. Primary central nervous system malignancies received RT to a median dose of 60 Gy. Central nervous system metastases received whole brain RT to a median dose of 37.4 Gy, and patients with recurrent gliomas underwent stereotactic RT to a median dose of 37.5 Gy. One dose-limiting toxicity (pneumonia) was observed in group receiving 8-mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. At the subsequent dose level (10 mg/m(2)), two Grade 4 dose-limiting toxicities occurred (renal failure and pulmonary hemorrhage); thus, 8 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was the maximal tolerated dose and the recommended Phase II dose., Conclusion: Combined with a variety of radiation doses and fractionation schedules, concurrent patupilone was well tolerated and safe, with a maximal tolerated dose of 8 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Publications relating esophageal radiation toxicity to clinical variables and to quantitative dose and dose-volume measures derived from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer are reviewed. A variety of clinical and dosimetric parameters have been associated with acute and late toxicity. Suggestions for future studies are presented., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe our initial experience of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy dose reduction comparing two dose cohorts with examination of tumor control rates and serviceable hearing preservation rates., Methods and Materials: After institutional review board approval, we initiated a retrospective chart review to study the hearing outcomes and tumor control rates. All data were entered into a JMP, version 7.01, statistical spreadsheet for analysis., Results: A total of 89 patients with serviceable hearing had complete serial audiometric data available for analysis. The higher dose cohort included 43 patients treated to 50.4 Gy with a median follow-up (latest audiogram) of 53 weeks and the lower dose cohort included 46 patients treated to 46.8 Gy with a median follow-up of 65 weeks. The tumor control rate was 100% in both cohorts, and the pure tone average was significantly improved in the low-dose cohort (33 dB vs. 40 dB, p = 0.023, chi-square). When the patient data were analyzed at comparable follow-up points, the actuarial hearing preservation rate was significantly longer for the low-dose cohort than for the high-dose cohort (165 weeks vs. 79 weeks, p = .0318, log-rank). Multivariate analysis revealed the dose cohort (p = 0.0282) and pretreatment Gardner-Robertson class (p = 0.0215) to be highly significant variables affecting the hearing outcome., Conclusion: A lower total dose at 46.8 Gy was associated with a 100% local control tumor rate and a greater hearing preservation rate. An additional dose reduction is justified to achieve the optimal dose that will yield the greatest hearing preservation rate without compromising tumor control for these patients.

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity and response rate of bortezomib with concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide in the treatment of patients with central nervous system malignancies., Patients and Methods: This open-label, dose-escalation, Phase I clinical study evaluated the safety of three dose levels of intravenously administered bortezomib (0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 mg/m(2)/dose) on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle, in addition to concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide at a daily dose of 75 mg/m(2) starting on Day 1. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity, defined as any Grade 4-5 toxicity or Grade 3 toxicity directly attributable to protocol treatment, requiring hospitalization and/or radiotherapy interruption. The secondary endpoints included feasibility, non-dose-limiting toxicity, and treatment response., Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled, 23 of whom had high-grade glioma (10 recurrent and 13 newly diagnosed). No dose-limiting toxicities were noted in any dose group, including the highest (1.3 mg/m(2)/dose). The most frequent toxicities were Grade 1 and 2 stomatitis, erythema, and alopecia. All 27 patients were evaluable for response. At a median follow-up of 15.0 months, 9 patients were still alive, with a median survival of 17.4 months for all patients and 15.0 months for patients with high-grade glioma., Conclusion: Bortezomib administered at its typical "systemic" dose (1.3 mg/m(2)) is well tolerated and safe combined with temozolomide and radiotherapy when used in the treatment of central nervous system malignancies. A Phase II study to characterize efficacy is warranted.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze changes in quality of life (QOL) and symptoms from pretreatment to 6 weeks posttreatment in a Phase III randomized study (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9801) of amifostine (AM) vs. no AM in patients with Stages II-III non-small-cell lung cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin as induction and then concurrently with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (RT)., Methods and Materials: One hundred thirty-eight patients with baseline and 6-week posttreatment QOL data were analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between those who did and did not have QOL data. The QOL and symptoms were assessed by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Global QOL and Pain subscales and the EORTC-Lung Cancer-13 symptom tool. Clinically relevant changes in QOL were characterized by 10-point differences in individual scores pre/post treatment. A daily diary of patient-rated difficulty swallowing and a weekly physician-rated dysphagia log (using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) were completed during treatment. Weight loss was monitored. Differences in outcomes were examined according to smoking status, alcohol use, and sex., Results: Patients receiving AM reported significantly greater pain reduction after chemoradiation (34% vs. no AM, 21%), less difficulty swallowing during chemoradiation, and less weight loss than patients not receiving AM. However, physician-rated assessments of dysphagia were not significantly different by treatment arm. There were no other significant changes in QOL or symptoms according to treatment arm, smoking status, alcohol use, or sex., Conclusions: Patient evaluations of difficulty swallowing and pain suggest benefits from AM use that are distinct from clinician-rated assessments.

Purpose: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 93-11 trial received radiation doses of 70.9, 77.4, 83.8, or 90.3 Gy. The locoregional control and survival rates were similar among the various dose levels. We investigated the effect of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on the outcome., Methods and Materials: The GTV was defined as the sum of the volumes of the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes. The tumor response, median survival time (MST), and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed separately for smaller (< or =45 cm(3)) vs. larger (>45 cm(3)) tumors., Results: The distribution of the GTV was as follows: < or =45 cm(3) in 79 (49%) and >45 cm(3) in 82 (51%) of 161 patients. The median GTV was 47.3 cm(3). N0 status and female gender were associated with better tumor responses. Patients with smaller (< or =45 cm(3)) tumors achieved a longer MST and better PFS than did patients with larger (>45 cm(3)) tumors (29.7 vs. 13.3 months, p < 0.0001; and 15.8 vs. 8.3 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). Increasing the radiation dose had no effect on the MST or PFS. On multivariate analysis, only a smaller GTV was a significant prognostic factor for improved MST and PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12, p = 0.0002; and HR, 2.0, p = 0.0002, respectively). The GTV as a continuous variable was also significantly associated with the MST and PFS (HR, 1.59, p < 0.0001; and HR, 1.39, p < 0.0001, respectively)., Conclusions: Radiation dose escalation up to 90.3 Gy did not result in improved MST or PFS. The tumor responses were greater in node-negative patients and women. An increasing GTV was strongly associated with decreased MST and PFS. Future radiotherapy trials patients might need to use stratification by tumor volume.

Purpose: To assess the progression patterns in patients with multifocal glioblastoma multiforme who had undergone whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), the historical standard, versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and to identify predictive treatment and pretreatment factors., Methods and Materials: The records of 50 patients with multifocal glioblastoma multiforme treated with RT were reviewed. Univariate analyses were performed using survival methods and the Cox proportional hazards regression method. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression method., Results: The mean age was 61 years, and 71% had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score of > or =70. Of the 50 patients, 32% underwent WBRT and 68%, three-dimensional conformal RT. Progression was local in all evaluable patients, as determined by imaging in 38 patients and early neurologic progression in 12. The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.1 months, and the median survival time (MST) was 8.1 months. The significant independent predictors of TTP on multivariate analysis were a KPS score <70 (p = 0.001), the extent of surgery (p = 0.040), a radiation dose <60 Gy (p = 0.027), and the lack of chemotherapy (p = 0.001). The significant independent predictors of a reduced MST were a KPS score <70 (p = 0.022) and the absence of salvage surgery (p = 0.011) and salvage chemotherapy (p = 0.003)., Conclusion: Local progression was observed in all patients. On multivariate analysis, no significant difference was found in the TTP or MST between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and WBRT. The KPS was a consistent independent predictor of both TTP and MST. On the basis of the progression pattern, we do not recommend WBRT as a mandatory component of the treatment of multifocal glioblastoma multiforme.

Purpose: Discernment of radiotherapy (XRT) effects vs. tumor activity is difficult in brain tumor patients during the months after XRT when white matter hyperintensities sometimes emerge. We examined brain scans in XRT-treated vs. untreated patients for early-delayed post-XRT effects., Methods and Materials: Brain regions susceptible to XRT injury were examined on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for T2-weighted hyperintensities and atrophy in 37 adults with low-grade primary brain tumors (13 nonirradiated and 24 irradiated). Cases evidencing recurrence/growth over the study period were censored. Interactions with age, mood, fatigue, medications, tumor type and grade, extent of resection, and laterality of MRI changes were examined., Results: Hyperintensity and atrophy ratings over time for the treated and untreated groups were not significantly different. White matter atrophy increased unrelated to XRT. In all patients combined, white matter atrophy and hyperintensities were greater at all time points and more lateralized in surgically treated patients., Conclusions: Radiotherapy status was not related to changes in MRI ratings during the weeks/months after XRT. Findings contradict assumptions about radiographically evidenced early-delayed XRT effects. Increases in T2-weighted hyperintensities during the 1-6-month period post-conformal radiotherapy for low-grade tumors are likely not related to early-delayed XRT effects.

Background: Medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) has been treated with a variety of minimally invasive techniques, all of which have been compared with microvascular decompression. For patients not considered good surgical candidates, percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy (GR) and gamma knife (GK) radiosurgery are two minimally invasive techniques in common practice worldwide and used routinely at Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience. Using a common pain scale outcomes questionnaire, we sought to analyze efficacies and morbidities of both treatments., Methods and Materials: Between June 1994 and December 2002, 79 patients were treated with GR and 109 patients underwent GK for the treatment of TN. GR was performed with fluoroscopic guidance as an overnight inpatient procedure. GK was performed using a single 4-mm shot positioned at the root exit zone of the trigeminal nerve. Radiation doses of 70-90 Gy prescribed to the 100% isodose line were used. Treatment outcomes including pain response, pain recurrence, treatment failure, treatment-related side effects, and overall patient satisfaction with GK and GR were compared using a common outcomes scale. Using the Barrow Neurologic Institute pain scale, patients were asked to define their level of pain both before and after treatment: I, no pain and no pain medication required; I, occasional pain not requiring medication; IIIa, no pain and pain medication used; IIIb, some pain adequately controlled with medication; IV, some pain not adequately controlled with medication; and V, severe pain with no relief with medication. We used posttreatment scores of I, II, IIIa, and IIIb to identify treatment success, whereas scores of IV and V were considered treatment failure. Results were compiled from respondents and analyzed using SAS software. Statistical comparisons used log-rank test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon test with significance established at p < 0.05., Results: There were 63 evaluable GK patients and 36 evaluable GR patients. The median follow-up time was 34 and 29 months for the GR and GK groups, respectively. The median age was 69 and 70 years and the median number of years with TN pain was 6 and 7 years in the GR and GK groups, respectively. Thirty-one GR (86%) and 58 GK (92%) patients achieved a successful treatment outcome (p = 0.49). The median time to pain relief was < or = 24 h in the GR group and 3 weeks in the GK group (p < 0.001, ordinal logistic regression). Nineteen GR and 26 GK patients experienced pain recurrence or pain never relieved (p = 0.30). The median time to pain recurrence was 5 and 8 months in the GR and GK groups, respectively (p = 0.22). At last follow-up, however, a statistically significant greater number of GR vs. GK patients had failed treatment. Twelve or 33% of GR patients, whereas 8 or 13% of GK patients, had BNI scores of 4 or 5 (p = 0.019, Fisher's exact test). When both initial and late treatment failures were combined, the overall rate of treatment failures was 39% in the GR group and 24% in the GK group (p = 0.023, log-rank). More GR patients developed facial numbness and facial numbness morbidity than GK patients: 19 GR (54%) and 17 GK patients (30%) developed new facial numbness and 12 GR and 7 GK patients reported either somewhat or very bothersome facial numbness (p = 0.018). On multivariate analysis, only treatment with GK and severity of pain before treatment significantly predicted treatment response. GK patients were more likely to have a lower pain score at last follow-up than were GR patients (p = 0.005, OR = 4.3), and patients with pretreatment pain scores of 5 were more likely to have lower posttreatment pain scores than patients with pretreatment pain scores of 4 and lower (p = 0.003, OR = 4.0)., Conclusion: Despite greater facial numbness morbidity and a higher failure rate, GR provided more immediate pain relief than GK. GR therefore should be considered in patients with disabling trigeminal pain requiring urgent pain relief. For all other patients, GK provides better long-term pain relief with less treatment-related morbidity, and should therefore be considered the preferred treatment for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia who are not suitable candidates for microvascular nerve decompression.

Purpose: To evaluate dosimetric predictors of acute esophagitis (AE) and clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving reirradiation., Methods and Materials: Seventeen patients with NSCLC received reirradiation to the lung tumors/mediastinum, while immobilized in stereotactic body frame (SBF). CT simulation and hypofractionated three-dimensional radiotherapy were used. Two axial segments of esophagus contours merged together were defined as esophagus disc (ED). For each ED, the percentage (%) of the volume of esophageal circumference treated to % of prescribed dose (PD) was assessed. Number of EDs with 50% or any % of volume (V) of esophageal circumference receiving more than or equal to (>/=) 50%, 80%, and 100% of PD (50% V >/=50% PD; 50% V >/=80% PD; any % V >/=100% PD) were calculated. These dosimetric variables and the length of the esophagus within the radiation therapy (RT) port were correlated with AE using exact Wilcoxon test., Results: A median RT dose was 32 Gy with a median fraction size of 4 Gy. Eleven of 13 patients presenting with pain and/or shortness of breath had complete or partial resolution of symptoms. Median survival time from the start of reirradiation in SBF until death was 5.5 months. AE was observed in 7 patients and resolved within 3 months of RT completion. No Grade 3 or higher events were noticed. The length of the esophagus within RT port did not predict for AE (p = 0.71). However, an increased number of EDs predicted for AE for the following dosimetric variables: 50% V >/=50% PD (p = 0.023), 50% V >/=80% PD (p = 0.047), and any % V >/=100% PD (p = 0.004). Patients with at least 2 EDs receiving >/=100% PD to any % V of circumference had AE compared to those with zero EDs., Conclusions: Reirradiation using hypofractionated three-dimensional radiotherapy and SBF immobilization is an effective strategy for palliation of symptoms in selected patients with recurrent NSCLC. The length of the esophagus in the RT field does not predict for AE. However, an increasing number of EDs displaying the combination of longitudinal and circumferential three-dimensional dose distribution along the esophagus is a valuable predictor for AE.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) after surgery in the management of residual or recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas with respect to tumor control and the development of complications., Methods and Materials: The clinical records of patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas who underwent FSRT were retrospectively analyzed. For newly diagnosed tumors, transsphenoidal surgery was performed, and, if residual tumor was identified at 3 months, FSRT was performed. If significant tumor volume persisted, transcranial surgery was performed before FSRT. We originally initiated FSRT with 2-Gy fractions to 46 Gy. We escalated the dose to 50.4 Gy thereafter. As a final modification, we dropped the daily dose to 1.8-Gy fractions delivered within 6 weeks. High-dose conformality and homogeneity was achieved with arc beam shaping and differential beam weighting. The radiographic, endocrinologic, and visual outcomes after FSRT were evaluated., Results: The 68 patients included 36 males and 32 females with an age range of 15-81 years. The median follow-up was 30 months (range, 2-82 months), and the median tumor volume was 6.2 cm(3). Of the 68 patients, 20 were treated to 46 Gy and 48 to 50-52.2 Gy. Most were treated to 50.4 Gy. Eleven patients had recurrent tumors, 54 had residual tumors, and no surgery was performed in 3 patients before FSRT. We noted no radiation-induced acute or late toxicities, except for radiation-induced optic neuropathy in 2 patients. At latest follow-up, the tumor had decreased in size in 26 patients and remained stable in 41 of the 42 remaining patients. Of the 68 patients, 4 (6%) developed hypopituitarism at 6, 11, 12, and 17 months after FSRT. Reviewing available serial Humphrey visual fields, visual fields were objectively improved in 28 patients, and remained stable in 24 patients, and worsened in 2 patients., Conclusion: The findings of this analysis support the use of surgery followed by FSRT as a safe, effective, and integrated treatment for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Additional follow-up is needed to document the long-term tumor control rates, preservation rates for vision and pituitary function, and neurocognitive outcomes.

Purpose: Conventional treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cures less than 5% of patients. We investigated the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) added to conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with carmustine (BCNU) on the survival of patients with GBM., Methods and Materials: A total of 203 patients with supratentorial GBM (tumor < or =40 mm) were randomly assigned either to postoperative SRS followed by EBRT (60 Gy) plus BCNU (80 mg/m(2) Days 1-3 every 8 weeks for six cycles) or to EBRT with BCNU alone. The dose of radiosurgery was tumor size-dependent and ranged from 15 Gy for largest to 24 Gy for smallest tumors. RT and BCNU were identical in both arms., Results: At a median follow-up time of 61 months, the median survival in the radiosurgery group was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval, 11.0-14.8) as compared with 13.6 months (95% confidence interval, 11.2-15.2, p = 0.5711) for the standard treatment group. There were also no significant differences in 2- and 3-year survival rates and in patterns of failure between the two arms. Quality of life deterioration and cognitive decline at the end of therapy, compared with baseline, were comparable and there was no difference in quality-adjusted survival between the arms., Conclusions: Stereotactic radiosurgery followed by EBRT and BCNU does not improve the outcome in patients with GBM nor does it change the general quality of life or cognitive functioning.

Purpose: Tumor response after nonoperative lung cancer therapy is traditionally evaluated by bidimensional measurement of maximum tumor diameters. The purpose of this analysis is to investigate whether tumor largest dimension (based on RECIST [Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors]), bidimensional tumor product, and volume correlate with each other in evaluating tumors of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, the pace of locally advanced NSCLC volumetric response over time, as well as the prognostic value of tumor size, was assessed in this report with software-assisted evaluation of sequential tumor measurement., Methods and Materials: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with thoracic radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy were included, if the following were available: a pretreatment computed tomography (CT) simulation and at least two follow-up diagnostic thoracic CT scans taken at our institution after 1996 that were available in Dicom format for electronic transfer of images from diagnostic radiology to a computer terminal with commercial statistics software (AcQsim/CMS Focus). Primary lung tumor and grossly involved lymph nodes were contoured manually on pre-RT axial images and on all follow-up CT scans. Tumor/lymph node largest dimensions, bidimensional products (BP), and volumes were measured using the same software. Data were presented as percent change in volume or unidimensional and bidimensional measurements, with the CT simulation measurements serving as baseline., Results: A total of 22 patients were evaluated. The median thoracic RT dose was 62.4 Gy (range: 50.0-69.6), and all patients had a Karnofsky performance status > or =80. Chemotherapy (mostly carboplatin/paclitaxel) was given to 17 patients. Nineteen patients had Stage III NSCLC; 1 patient was in Stage I, 1 was in Stage IV, and 1 was recurrent. A total of 107 thoracic CT scans (22 pretreatment and 85 follow-up), averaging 4.9 scans per patient, were analyzed. Tumors reached the smallest volume at a median of 11.0 months from RT completion in all patients, 8.5 months in patients who subsequently failed locally (n = 8), and 11.9 months in those who did not fail locally. Failure rates were as follows: in-field, 36% (8/22); intrathoracic (lung nodules, effusion, pleura), 55% (12/22); and distant, 50% (11/22). Eleven patients are still alive, 4 free of disease. Overall median survival time (MST) is 27.3 months. The median initial tumor volume was 88.0 cc (range: 3.8-218) for all patients; median BP was 33.0 cm(2) (range: 3.1-112.1), and median tumor largest dimension was 7.6 cm (range: 2.2-13.5). The MST of patients with initial tumor volume < or =63.0 cc (n = 9) was >53.0 months and of those with tumor volume > 63.0 cc was 17.3 months. The MST of patients (n = 6) with initial bidimensional tumor product < or =16 cm(2) was >53.0 months and of those with tumor product >16 cm(2) was 17.3 months. The MST of patients with largest initial dimension < or =4 cm was >53.1 months and of those with largest dimension > 4 cm was 25.0 months. At 24 months, 79% of patients with a tumor volume < or =124.0 cc (n = 18) had locally controlled tumors, vs. 0% of patients with tumor volumes >124.0 cc. At the same time point, 93% of patients with BP < or =40 cm(2) were locally controlled, vs. 0% of those with BP > 40 cm(2); 100% of patients with tumor dimensions < or =7.5 cm were locally controlled, vs. 40% of those with dimensions >7.5 cm. The partial responses in our series (assessed as the best response obtained during observation period) were as follows: 4 patients assessed based on either dimension only, product only, or volume only; 15 partial responses based on dimension or product; 16 partial responses based on volume alone; 3 cases of no tumor response, based on dimension or product; and 2 cases based on tumor volume alone. That represents good to excellent agreement among all three methods of measurement., Conclusions: (1) The response of locally advanced NSCLC to nonoperative therapy is a slow process, with tumor volumes reaching their nadir several months after treatment. (2) Smaller initial tumor size, as measured by largest tumor dimension, bidimensional product, or tumor volume, is associated with better local control and survival than larger initial measurements. (3) Any of the three tumor measurements (largest dimension, bidimensional product, or volume) can be used as a reliable tool in assessing lung cancer response to nonoperative therapy. This confirms further the validity of RECIST and does not suggest that tumor volume is significantly superior for response evaluation.

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and, more recently, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) have been recognized as noninvasive alternatives to surgery for the treatment of acoustic schwannomas. We review our experience of acoustic tumor treatments at one institution using a gamma knife for SRS and the first commercial world installation of a dedicated linac for SRT., Methods: Patients were treated with SRS on the gamma knife or SRT on the linac from October 1994 through August 2000. Gamma knife technique involved a fixed-frame multiple shot/high conformality single treatment, whereas linac technique involved daily conventional fraction treatments involving a relocatable frame, fewer isocenters, and high conformality established by noncoplanar arc beam shaping and differential beam weighting., Results: Sixty-nine patients were treated on the gamma knife, and 56 patients were treated on the linac, with 1 NF-2 patient common to both units. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and in the remaining 122 patients, mean follow-up was 119 +/- 67 weeks for SRS patients and 115 +/- 96 weeks for SRT patients. Tumor control rates were high (> or =97%) for sporadic tumors in both groups but lower for NF-2 tumors in the SRT group. Cranial nerve morbidities were comparably low in both groups, with the exception of functional hearing preservation, which was 2.5-fold higher in patients who received conventional fraction SRT., Conclusion: SRS and SRT represent comparable noninvasive treatments for acoustic schwannomas in both sporadic and NF-2 patient groups. At 1-year follow-up, a significantly higher rate of serviceable hearing preservation was achieved in SRT sporadic tumor patients and may therefore be preferable to alternatives including surgery, SRS, or possibly observation in patients with serviceable hearing.

Purpose: Survival of patients with locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is predicted by the stage of the disease and other characteristics. This analysis was undertaken to identify these characteristics in a large cooperative group patient population, as well as to define subgroups of the population with differing outcomes., Patients and Methods: Analysis included 1,999 patients treated in 9 RTOG trials between 1983 and 1994 with thoracic irradiation (RT) with (n = 355) or without chemotherapy (CT)., Results: In univariate analysis, the following characteristics were significantly associated with an improved survival: use of CT, CT delivered without major deviation, abnormal pulmonary function tests, normal hemoglobin, protein, LDH and BUN, presence of dyspnea, hemoptysis, cough or hoarseness, uninvolved lymph nodes, T1 or T2 stage, no malignant pleural effusion (PE), weight loss of < 8%, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of at least 90, adenocarcinoma histology, female gender, and age less than 70 years. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was subsequently applied to identify 5 patient subgroups with significantly different median survival times (MST): Group I, KPS of > or = 90, who received chemotherapy (MST 16.2 months); Group II, KPS of > or = 90, who received no CT, but had no PE (MST 11.9 months); Group III, KPS < 90, younger than 70 years, with non-large cell histology (MST 9.6 months); Group IV, KPS > or = 90, but with PE, or KPS < 90, younger than 70 years, and with large cell histology, or older than 70 years, but without PE (MST 5.6-6.4 months); Group V, older than 70, with PE (MST 2.9 months)., Conclusion: Cisplatinum-based CT improves survival, for excellent prognosis of LA-NSCLC patients, over RT alone. The presence of a malignant pleural effusion is a major negative prognostic factor for survival. The identification of RPA prognostic groups among patients with LA-NSCLC provides prognostic information and may serve as a basis of stratification in future trials.

Purpose: To identify in a multivariate analysis treatment-related factors predisposing patients (pts) with lung cancer to acute esophagitis, expressed as a severity grade or Esophagitis Index (EI)., Methods and Materials: Acute esophagitis is prospectively scored as an RTOG Grade in our institution during and after thoracic radiotherapy. Charts, toxicity forms and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of all pts with lung cancer who received thoracic radiotherapy (RT) between 11/95 and 1/99 were reviewed. Esophagitis grades for each time point were verified by review of weekly physician and nursing treatment notes, hospital discharge summaries and referring physician notes and then plotted on graph against time. The area under the curve was calculated for each patient's graph and was defined as an Esophagitis Index. The length of esophagus was measured on each anterior DRR while assuming that esophagus overlies the vertebral bodies on the anterior films and projects over the edge of the vertebral body on the oblique DRRs. This assumption was confirmed in 10 pts by digitizing esophagus on CT simulator-derived slices and visualizing its position on DRRs. To compare RT doses delivered with different fractionation schemes to standard fractionated doses, the equivalent RT doses were calculated using the linear-quadratic formula and alpha/beta ratio of 10. Univariate and multivariate analyses of several factors potentially influencing the maximum esophagitis grade, as well as EI, were performed., Results: A total of 277 pts were identified. Pts were included in the analysis (n = 105) if they fulfilled the following criteria: chart, toxicity form and DRRs were all available; parallel opposed fields (no multiple fields) were used for both the initial and off cord/cone down fields; and an equivalent dose of 45.0 Gy or more was delivered. Seventy-eight pts had Stage III; 32, Stage IV, and the remainder, Stages I, II, or recurrent lung cancer (85 non-small cell and 18, small cell). Seventy-four pts were treated with definitive intent. Chemotherapy was given concurrently with RT in 58 pts (in 7 pts, with twice daily, or b.i.d., RT) and as induction treatment, in 11. Only 2 pts required a treatment break of more than 1 week. Median total and equivalent RT doses, fraction size, and anterior esophageal length were as follows: 59.9 Gy, 59.9 Gy, 2.0 Gy, and 14 cm (range, 4.2-21). The following maximum grades of esophagitis were recorded: 1, in 54 pts; 2, in 17 pts; 3, in 13 pts, and 4, in 1 pt. The mean EI for all pts; pts treated with standard RT alone; induction chemotherapy and standard RT; concurrent chemotherapy and standard (QD) RT; and b.i.d. RT with concurrent chemotherapy, was 41. 5 (range, 0-317); 13.6; 24.5; 52.4; and 132.1, respectively (p < 0. 001). Three pts developed an esophageal stricture within 3 months beginning RT. In multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with increasing EI: concurrent chemotherapy with QD RT and concurrent chemotherapy with b.i.d. RT (p < 0.001, considered jointly). Both factors were also associated with increasing maximum esophagitis grade (p = 0.011). Esophageal length was not associated with increasing EI or esophagitis grade in either univariate or multivariate analyses., Conclusion: Concurrent chemotherapy and twice daily radiotherapy, especially if combined together, were associated with the highest acute maximum esophagitis grade and esophagitis index in pts with lung cancer. The duration of acute esophagitis was also longest in the concurrent chemotherapy/twice daily radiotherapy group. Esophagitis Index appeared to be a more sensitive measure of acute esophagitis than the maximum esophagitis grade. The increasing length of esophagus in the radiation field did not predict for the severity of acute esophagitis.

Purpose: This study was initiated to evaluate the advantages of using three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (3D TOF MRA), as an adjuvant to conventional stereotactic angiography, in obtaining three-dimensional information about an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) nidus and in optimizing radiosurgical treatment plans., Methods and Materials: Following angiography, contrast-enhanced MRI and MRA studies were obtained in 22 consecutive patients undergoing Gamma Knife radiosurgery for AVM. A treatment plan was designed, based on the angiograms and modified as necessary, using the information provided by MRA. The quantitative analysis involved calculation of the ratio of the treated volume to the MRA nidus volume (the tissue volume ratio [TVR]) for the initial and final treatment plans., Results: In 12 cases (55%), the initial treatment plans were modified after including the MRA information in the treatment planning process. The mean TVR for the angiogram-based plans was 1.63 (range 1.17-2.17). The mean coverage of the MRA nidus by the angiogram-based plans was 93% (range 73-99%). The mean MRA nidus volume was 2.4 cc (range 0. 6-5.3 cc). The MRA-based modifications resulted in increased conformity with the mean TVR of 1.46 (range 1.20-1.74). These modifications were caused by MRA revealing irregular nidi and/or vascular components superimposed on the angiographic projections of the nidi. In a number of cases, the information from MRA was essential in defining the nidus when the projections of the angiographic outlines showed different superior and/or inferior extent of the nidus. In two cases, MRA revealed irregular nidi, correlating well with the angiograms and showed that the angiographically acceptable plans undertreated 27% of the MRA nidus in one case and 18% of the nidus in the other case. In the remaining 10 cases (45%), both MRI and MRA failed to detect the nidus due to surgical clip artifacts and the presence of embolizing glue., Conclusions: The 3D TOF MRA provided information on irregular AVM shape, which was not visualized by angiography alone, and it was superior to MRI for defining the AVM nidus. However, when imaging artifacts obscured the AVM nidus on MRI and MRA, angiography permitted detection of AVM. Utilizing MRA as a complementary imaging modality to angiography increased accuracy of the AVM radiosurgery and allowed for optimal dose planning.

Purpose: The use of total body irradiation (TBI) as a conditioning regimen for bone marrow transplantation often calls for partial transmission kidney blocks. These blocks are frequently designed based on the location of the kidneys during the abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan. At our institution, TBI patients are treated in the standing position. As the kidneys can shift with different patient positions, a study was undertaken to evaluate the magnitude of the changes in the size and location of the kidneys from the supine CT position to the upright treatment position., Methods and Materials: Intravenous contrast was administered to 15 patients. The patients were initially positioned supine on a simulator table and then positioned upright immediately in front of the image intensifier. PA radiographs were obtained with the patients in both positions. Changes in the size of the kidneys and their location relative to the vertebral bodies were noted., Results: In going from the supine to upright position, all the kidneys shifted inferiorly between 0.5 cm and 7.5 cm with an average of 3.6 cm. Most of the kidneys also shifted in the transverse dimension and incurred a change in width. The range of the transverse shift was from 0.9 cm in the lateral direction to 4.9 cm medially. The maximum width broadening was 1.2 cm and the maximum decrease in width was 1.8 cm., Conclusions: When compared to the supine position, patients in the upright position show a dramatic inferior shift of the kidneys with other obvious, but less predictable, changes. For TBI treatments delivered in the upright position, kidney blocks should not be designed on the basis of supine abdominal CT scans.

Purpose: It was observed by Jeremic et al. that a shorter interfraction interval (IFI) was associated with an improved survival in patients (pts) with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX-RT), with or without chemotherapy (CT). Our analysis was undertaken to verify this hypothesis., Methods and Materials: Records of patients treated on 5 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies were reviewed, and an actual IFI, defined as a mean of all daily IFIs, was calculated. RT dose was 1.2 Gy BID to 69.6 Gy. The relationship between the length of IFI and the median survival time and incidence of esophagitis was investigated., Results: In 682 pts eligible for this analysis, a full dose of RT was delivered and at least 90% of all daily IFIs were available. The actual mean IFI was as follows: 4-4.9 h in 51% of pts; 5-5.9 h in 17%; 6-6.9 h in 28% and 7-8 h in 4%. In multivariate analysis, only lack of weight loss, use of CT, low nodal stage and good KPS, but not IFI (4-6 h vs. 6-8 h) were associated with an improved survival for all pts (p values: <0.0001; <0.0001; 0.006; 0.006, and 0.73, respectively), as well as for HFX-RT only pts. For the CT-HFX-RT pts, not enough data points are available for a meaningful analysis. Length of IFI did not influence the incidence of Grade 3 or higher esophagitis (p = 0.82), but use of CT was associated with a 12-fold greater risk of developing severe esophagitis (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Length of IFI (4-6 h vs. 6-8 h) did not influence survival and acute complications incidence in pts with NSCLC treated in RTOG studies with HFX-RT to 69.6 Gy. Previously identified factors, such as use of CT, minimal weight loss, good KPS and low nodal stage, were confirmed again to be associated with a favorable prognosis in a multivariate analysis. Use of CT was associated with a 12-fold greater risk of developing severe esophagitis than HFX-RT alone. It appears that an IFI of 4-8 hr is acceptable in clinical practice for pts with NSCLC, treated with HFX-RT.

Purpose: Despite increased utilization of fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), the incidence and nature of immediate side effects (ISE) associated with these treatment techniques are not well defined. We report immediate side effects from a series of 78 patients., Materials and Methods: Intracranial lesions in 78 adult patients were treated with SRT or SRS, using a dedicated linear accelerator. Those lesions included 13 gliomas, 2 ependymomas, 19 metastatic tumors, 15 meningiomas, 12 acoustic neuromas, 4 pituitary adenomas, 1 optic neuroma, 1 chondrosarcoma, and 11 arteriovenous malformations (AVM). SRT was used in 51 and SRS in 27 patients. Mean target volume was 9.0 cc. Eleven patients received prior external-beam radiation therapy within 2 months before SRT/SRS. Any side effects occurring during and up to 2 weeks after the course of radiation were defined as ISE and were graded as mild, moderate, or severe. The incidence of ISE and the significance of their association with several treatment and pretreatment variables were analyzed., Results: Overall, 28 (35%) of 78 patients experienced one or more ISE. Most of the ISE (87%) were mild, and consisted of nausea (in 5), dizziness/vertigo (in 5), seizures (in 6), and new persistent headaches (in 17). Two episodes of worsening neurological deficit and 2 of orbital pain were graded as moderate. Two patients experienced severe ISE, requiring hospitalization (1 seizure and 1 worsening neurological deficit). ISE in 6 cases prompted computerized tomography of the brain, which revealed increased perilesional edema in 3 cases. The incidence of ISE by diagnosis was as follows: 46% (6 of 13) for gliomas, 50% (6 of 12) for acoustic neuromas, 36% (4 of 11) for AVM, 33% (5 of 15) for meningiomas, and 21% (4 of 19) for metastases. A higher incidence of dizziness/vertigo (4 of 12 = 33%) was seen among acoustic neuroma patients than among other patients (p< 0.01). There was no significant association of dizziness/vertigo with either a higher average and maximum brainstem dose (p = 0.74 and 0.09, respectively) or with 2-Gy equivalents of the average and maximum brainstem doses (p = 0.28 and 0.09, respectively). Higher RT dose to the margin and higher maximum RT dose were associated with a higher incidence of ISE (p = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). However, when RT dose to the margin was converted to a 2-Gy dose-equivalent, it lost its significance as predictor of ISE (p = 0.51). Recent conventional external-beam radiation therapy, target volume, number of isocenters, collimator size, dose inhomogeneity, prescription isodose, pretreatment edema, dose of prior radiation, fraction size (2.0-7.0 Gy with SRT and 13.0-21.0 Gy with SRS), fractionation schedule, and dose to brainstem were not significantly associated with ISE. ISE occurred in 26% (8) of 31 patients taking corticosteroids prior to SRT/SRS and in 20 (42%) of 47 patients not taking them (p = 0.15)., Conclusion: ISE occur in one third of patients treated with SRT and SRS and are usually mild or moderate and self-limited. Dizziness/vertigo are common and unique for patients with acoustic neuromas and are not associated with higher brainstem doses. We are unable to detect a relationship between ISE and higher margin or maximum RT doses. No specific conclusion can be drawn with regard to the effect of corticosteroids, used prior to SRS/SRT, on the occurrence of ISE.

Purpose: A phase I dose escalation of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (H-SRT) in recurrent or persistent malignant gliomas as a means of increasing the biologically effective dose and decreasing the high rate of reoperation due to toxicity associated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and brachytherapy., Materials and Methods: From November 1994 to September 1996, 25 lesions in 20 patients with clinical and/or imaging evidence of malignant glioma persistence or recurrence received salvage H-SRT. Nineteen patients at the time of initial diagnosis had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and one patient had an anaplastic astrocytoma. All of these patients with tumor persistence or recurrence had received initial fractionated radiation therapy (RT) with a mean and median dose of 60 Gy (44.0-72.0 Gy). The median time from completion of initial RT to H-SRT was 3.1 months (0.7-45.5 months). Salvage H-SRT was delivered using daily 3.0-3.5 Gy fractions (fxs). Three different total dose levels were sequentially evaluated: 24.0 Gy/3.0 Gy fxs (five lesions), 30.0 Gy/3.0 Gy fxs (10 lesions), and 35.0 Gy/3.5 Gy fxs (nine lesions). Median treated tumor volume measured 12.66 cc (0.89-47.5 cc). The median ratio of prescription volume to tumor volume was 2.8 (1.4-5.0). Toxicity was judged by RTOG criteria. Response was determined by clinical neurologic improvement, a decrease in steroid dose without clinical deterioration, and/or radiologic imaging., Results: No grade 3 toxicities were observed and no reoperation due to toxicity was required. At the time of analysis, 13 of 20 patients had died. The median survival time from the completion of H-SRT is 10.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 20%. Neurological improvement was found in 45% of patients. Decreased steroid requirements occurred in 60% of patients. Minor imaging response was noted in 22% of patients. Using Fisher's exact test, response of any kind correlated strongly to total dose (p = 0.0056). None of six lesions treated with 21 Gy or 24 Gy responded, whereas there was a 79% response rate among the 19 lesions treated with 30 or 35 Gy. Tumor volumes < or =20 cc were associated with a higher likelihood of response (p = 0.053)., Conclusions: H-SRT used in this cohort of previously irradiated patients with malignant glioma was not associated with the need for reoperation due to toxicity or grade 3 toxicity. This low toxicity profile and encouraging H-SRT dose-related response outcome justifies further evaluation and dose escalation.

Purpose: The effects of tumor size, parametrial involvement, and other variables on treatment outcome for patients with Federation Internationale de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique (FIGO) Stage I or II cervical carcinoma, as well as treatment complications, were analyzed retrospectively., Methods and Materials: Records of 125 patients with FIGO Stage I or II carcinoma of the uterine cervix selected for curative radiotherapy between January 1980 and December 1990 were reviewed. Twelve patients (9.9%) underwent adjuvant extrafascial hysterectomy and 8 patients (6.4%) received chemotherapy. Median age was 55 years. Median follow-up time was 40 months, and minimum follow-up time was 24 months. The data were analyzed for site of first relapse, survival, overall incidence of complications, and incidence of grade 4 complications., Results: The overall 5-year survival was: Stage IA: 100%, Stage IB: 72%, Stage IIA: 90%, and Stage IIB: 72%. The 5-year survival with no evidence of disease (NED) was: Stage IA: 100%, Stage IB: 67%, Stage IIA: 90%, and Stage IIB: 50%. Patients with bulky (> 5 cm) tumors had a shorter overall and NED survival than patients with nonbulky tumors (53% vs. 83%; p = 0.0008 and 44% vs. 78%; p = 0.0001, respectively). Thirty-nine tumor recurrences (39 out of 125 = 31%) occurred and were scored as local (23 out of 125 = 18.3%), if initial failure had a local component, or distant (16 out of 125 = 12.7%), if initial failure was distant only. Patients with bulky (more than 5 cm) tumors (32 out of 125) were more likely to experience a recurrence (18 out of 32 = 56%) than patients with nonbulky tumors (21 out of 93 = 22%; p = 0.0004). The initial site of recurrence was more likely to be local for bulky tumors (14 out of 18 = 78%) than for nonbulky tumors (9 out of 21 = 43%; p = 0.03). The probability of a recurrence increased with the number of involved parametria (none: 20 out of 78 = 25%; one: 12 out of 34 = 35%; two: 7 out of 13 = 54%; p = 0.04 for linear trend), as did the probability that the initial failure was distant rather than local (none: 4 out of 20 = 20%; one: 7 out of 12 = 58%; two: 5 out of 7 = 71%; p = 0.01 for linear trend). Positive lymph nodes, vessel invasion, and low hemoglobin level all correlated with an increased risk of a recurrence (RR 2.41, p = 0.004; RR 2.20, p = 0.01; OR 2.02, p = 0.01, respectively). There were 46 complications among 37 (29%) patients. The incidence of grade 4 complications was 8.8% (11 out of 125). History of pelvic surgery and bulky tumor were significant predictors of a grade 4 complication (p < 0.0001 and 0.021, respectively). Also, a dose rate to point A of > 0.6 Gy/h increased the chance of a grade 4 complication (p = 0.007)., Conclusion: For patients with FIGO Stage I or II cervical carcinoma, tumor size was more predictive of local recurrence than was overall stage, and the extent of parametrial involvement was strongly predictive of distant recurrence, as was the stage. These findings suggest that tumor size and extent of parametrial involvement should be incorporated into the staging system. Patients with bulky tumors had a shorter survival and were more likely to experience a grade 4 toxicity of therapy. Dose rate to point A of > 0.6 Gy/h was associated with the increased risk of grade 4 complications.