Search

Aim: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a very frequent type of arrhythmia. Atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia through extranodal accessory pathways (AVRT) are the most common types of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. We describe our experience in diagnosing these tachycardia by electrophysiological transesophageal study (ETS)., Methods: Three hundred patients, 155 men and 145 women, (mean age, 37.2 +/- 16 years), with a history of palpitations underwent clinical evaluation and ETS. The clinical features of those with AVNRT and those with AVRT were compared., Results: Of a total of 300 patients, tachycardia was diagnosed only in 234, of which 136 (58%) had AVNRT and 98 (42%) had AVRT. AVNRT patients were older than those with AVRT (P = or < 0.004); patients with AVRT had palpitations earlier (P = or < 0.0001). Dyspnea and asthenia were the most frequent symptoms in the AVNRT patients (P = or < 0,02; P = or < 0.04). There were statistically significant differences between the two patient groups in Wencke-bach time (P = or < 0.05), ventricular-atrial (V-A) interval (P = or < 0.03) and period of induced tachycardia (P = or < 0.04)., Conclusions: ETS revealed important clinical and electrophysiological differences between patients with AVRT and those with AVNRT.

We have evaluated, at baseline and during incremental atrial pacing (AP), intracardiac conduction features of 53 patients with electrocardiographic diagnosis of bifascicular or trifascicular block, free from any pharmacological treatment potentially able to affect atrioventricular (AV) conduction system properties. The patients have been subdivided in the following groups: group A (13 patients), with LBBB and a PQ interval > or = 200 msec; group B (14 patients), with RBBB, LAH with a PQ interval > or = 200 msec; group C (8 patients), with LBBB and a PQ < 200 msec; group D (15 patients), with RBBB, LAH and a PQ < 200 msec; group E (3 patients), with RBBB, LPH and a PQ < 200 msec. In group A, 31% presented a long AH interval (> 140 msec), while 85% showed an increased infra-his conduction time (HV > 55 msec). During AP, only 38.5% maintained a 1:1 AV conduction ratio up to 140 bpm, while 30.8% developed an infra-his Mobitz 2 2nd degree AV block. 15.4% an infrahis 2:1 2nd degree AV block, 15.4% an AV nodal Mobitz 2 2nd degree AV block. In group B, 64% and 29% exhibited respectively an AV nodal and an infrahis conduction delay. During AP, 57.1% maintained a 1:1 AV conduction ratio up to 140 bpm, 14.3% developed an AV nodal Mobitz 1 2nd degree AV block, 14.3% an infrahis Mobitz 1 2nd degree AV block, 7.1% an AV nodal 2:1 2nd degree AV block, 7.1% an infrahis Mobitz 2 2nd degree AV block. In group C, no patient manifested a prolonged AH interval, while 50% exhibited a HV > 55 msec. 62.5% maintained a 1:1 AV conduction ratio up to 140 bpm, 25% developed an AV nodal Mobitz 1 2nd degree AV block and 12.5% an infrahis 2:1 2nd degree AV block. In group D, no patient showed an increased AH interval and only 13% presented a HV interval exceeding 55 msec. During AP, 86.7% maintained a 1:1 AV conduction ratio up to 140 bpm, 6.6% developed an AV nodal Mobitz 1 2nd degree AV block, 6.6% an infrahis 2:1 2nd degree AV block. In group E, no patient showed a prolonged AH interval, while 2/3 (66.6%) exhibited an infrahis conduction delay. During AP, 100% developed an infrahis 2:1 2nd degree AV block. Considering all patients with LBBB (groups A+C) and with RBBB+LAH (groups B+D), no differences were found in terms of PQ, PA and AH intervals, even though, concerning patients with a long PQ (group A vs group B), AH interval resulted significantly longer in patients with RBBB+LAH (121.85 +/- 36.4 msec vs 163.29 +/- 55.96 msec, p = 0.031). Infrahis conduction, independently from the measurement adopted (HVI interval: from the beginning of the His to the onset of the ventricular electrogram recorded at the His region; HV2 interval: from the beginning of the His to the onset of the surface QRS), resulted more compromised in patients with LBBB than in patients with RBBB+LAH (HVI: 75.24 +/- 40.23 msec vs 50.79 +/- 25.16 msec, p = 0.011; HV2: 77.24 +/- 38.12 msec vs 53.92 +/- 29.3 msec, p = 0.015). Such a difference became even more significant when comparing the percentage of patients with a prolonged HV interval (average value > 55 msec) in the above mentioned groups: 71.4% in case of LBBB, 20.7% in case of RBBB+LAH (p < 0.001). Regarding intraventricular conduction (IV), no statistically significant differences were found. In patients with RBBB+LAH, IV was not related to infrahis conduction time and PQ interval appeared more related to AH (r = 0.838, p < 0.001) than to HV (PQ-HV1: r = 0.381, p = 0.041, PQ-HV2: r = 0.474, p = 0.009). Conversely, in patients with LBBB infrahis and IV conduction appeared linearly related (HVI-V: r = 0.416, p = 0.06; HV2-V: r = 0.445, p = 0.043). As for PQ interval, it resulted more closely related to infrahis conduction (PQ-HVI: r = 0.626, p = 0.002; PQ-HV2: r = 0.674, p < 0.001), than to AH (r = 0.533, p = 0.013). In conclusion, infrahis conduction resulted more impaired in patients with LBBB. In this group, differently from patients with RBBB+LAH, infrahis conduction seems to affect the degree of IV conduction delay. (ABST

In this study retrospectively analyse pacemaker-implantation activity carried out during the last 5 years at the Laboratory of Electrophysiology, affiliated with the Cattedra di Cardiologia of the University of Naples--II Ateneo. Evolution in pacing modes is considered with regard to the patient age, the underlying pathologies and the technical progress in the field. The study has been performed in our laboratory, which is fit up for electrophysiologic studies and implantation of either temporary or permanent pacemakers. Patients included in this study have been implanted in our laboratory either for urgency or for election. They have been retrospectively divided into two groups (age < 65 yrs, 129 patients, and age < 65 yrs, 42 patients); in addition the patients have been classified according to the pathology leading to the implantation: atrio-ventricular block (second degree or third degree), low frequency fibrillation, sick sinus syndrome and carotid sinus syndrome. 171 patients have been examined, of whom 129 > 65 yrs. and 42 < 65 yrs. As for the pacing indication, 54 were atrio-ventricular block (56.1%), 50 were sick sinus syndrome (31.6%), 20 low frequency fibrillation (11.7%), and 1 was carotid sinus syndrome (0.6%). The ratio between single- and dual-chamber pacemakers has been progressively changing: in 1987 we implanted 33 single-chamber and no dual-chamber pacemaker, compared to 7 single- and 23 dual-chamber pacemaker implanted in the last year. This trend is in good agreement with literature data.

The results of 22 patient's transesophageal electrophysiologic studies were analyzed to value the meaning of QRS alternans during narrow QRS tachycardia. Standard ECG showed ventricular pre-excitation in eight patients. QRS alternans were in six of them: heart rate was included between 230 and 374 m/sec (301.8 +/- 42 m/sec); in the remaining 16 patients, heart rate was included between 240 and 450 m/sec (350.0 +/- 42 m/sec). Our findings suggest that QRS alternans is related to the rate of tachycardia rather than to the presence of an accessory pathway.

The ECGs of four patients with implanted dual chamber VDD and DDD PMKs are shown to demonstrate the difficulty of their interpretation and show some arrhythmias related to dual chamber pacing. In the first patient the DDD PMK caused a high ventricular frequency synchronizing on the atrial fibrillation "f" waves which occurred suddenly some time after PMK implantation; this problem was solved by programming the PMK in VVI. The second and third case, with implanted DDD and VDD PMK respectively, exemplify atrial sensing dysfunction due to atrial catheter displacement. In the fourth patient, with implanted VDD PMK, VDD stimulation periods and VVI ones alternated due to non-adjusted programming. Therefore, the paper re-emphasizes the need for accurate and periodic controls of patients with implanted PMK to correct dysfunction or undesirable patterns of stimulation.

The Holter examinations of 111 subjects aged more than 65 who then underwent dynamic ecg were investigated in order to assess the clinical significance of cardiac arrhythmias in geriatric age. Group A was formed of 53 patients with no clinical signs of cardiovascular diseases. Thirty-two patients with clinical evidence of ischaemic cardiopathy made up Group B and 26 with arterial hypertension formed Group C. The Holter examinations were evaluated in accordance with current guidelines, considering the basic rhythm, heart rate, pulse formation and conduction disturbances and supraventricular and ventricular hyperkinetic arrhythmias. Sinus base rhythm was present in most cases whereas atrial fibrillation was noted in a similar percentage in the three groups, whether or not cardiovascular disease was present. Supraventricular and ventricular hyperkinetic arrhythmias were extremely common in the elderly and made no discrimination between patients with ischaemic cardiopathy or hypertension and the clinically healthy; for example, ventricular tachycardia was observed in 10.6% of Group A subjects, in 7.1% of Group B and 8.6% of Group C. To conclude, the clinical significance of heart rhythm changes in the elderly remains obscure because in most subjects they are not related to the presence of cardiovascular disease.