1. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation with bipolar radiofrequency ablation: mid-term results in one hundred consecutive patients.
- Author
-
Melby SJ, Kaiser SP, Bailey MS, Zierer A, Voeller RK, Lall SC, Munfakh N, Moon MR, and Damiano RJ Jr
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents therapeutic use, Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy, Atrial Fibrillation physiopathology, Catheter Ablation adverse effects, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Atrial Fibrillation surgery, Cardiac Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Catheter Ablation instrumentation
- Abstract
Aim: The Cox-Maze procedure was introduced nearly two decades ago for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, our group has replaced most of the incisions of the Cox-Maze procedure with bipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablations (Cox-Maze IV procedure). The purpose of this study was to examine our midterm results with the Cox-Maze procedure using bipolar RF ablation., Methods: From January 2002 to October 2005, 100 consecutive patients underwent a modified Cox-Maze procedure with bipolar RF ablation for AF; 32 were lone operations, and 68 were concomitant procedures. Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and then annually thereafter. Heart rhythm was confirmed by electrocardiography., Results: The mean age of patients was 62+/-13 years; 57% were male. Duration of AF was 6.3+/-7.6 years (0.1 to 40 years), 59% had paroxysmal AF, and 34% had permanent AF. Follow-up was complete for all patients with a mean follow-up of 13+/-10 months. At 12-month follow-up, 91% (49/54) of patients were free of AF. Cross-clamp time in the lone Cox-Maze IV procedure patients was 42+/-15 minutes, while it was 101+/-29 minutes for the Cox-Maze IV with a concomitant procedure (compared to 93+/-34 minutes and 122+/-37 minutes for the traditional procedure, P<0.05). There were four operative deaths., Conclusions: The Cox-Maze IV procedure had good mid-term efficacy. The use of bipolar RF energy significantly decreased operative time and simplified the procedure compared to the traditional Cox-Maze procedure, potentially increasing utilization of the procedure among cardiac surgeons.
- Published
- 2006