Search

We evaluated clinical outcomes of radical prostatectomy in 244 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy as initial treatment from January 2000 to December 2011, and were followed up for more than 6 months. Biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of at least 0. 2 ng/ml. We evaluated potential risk factors for significant associations with biochemical recurrence. Median follow-up period after prostatectomy was 49 months (range, 6-144). Of the total, 192, 31, and 20 patients were at pathological stage pT2, pT3a, and pT3b, respectively. In 83 patients with the positive surgical margin, apexes were mostly in the positive area. Of the 68 patients with PSA recurrence, PSA non-relapse rate was 66.6% for 5 years. Multivariate analysis was performed for seminal vesicle invasion, PSA nadir, surgical margins, and Gleason score. Thirty-two patients with PSA recurrence underwent salvage radiotherapy, and the biochemical recurrence rate at 5 years was 73.8%. The group in which the PSA level before salvage radiotherapy was ＜0.5 ng/ml had a low rate of biochemical recurrence. We must consider the recurrence of poorly differentiated or non-confined cancer after radical prostatectomy. These results suggest that early use of salvage radiotherapy is effective for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

The patient visited our hospital because of macrohematuria. Cystoscopical examination did not reveal any bladder tumors but a tumor shadow in the right renal pelvis was revealed by computed tomographic scan. Urothelial carcinoma was suspected and right nephroureterectomy was performed. Pathologically the tumor was diagnosed as inverted papilloma. Four months later during the follow up of the tumor, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder was detected by cystoscopy. Inverted papilloma of the renal pelvis is a rare lesion and only 39 cases to date have been reported. Because inverted papilloma of the upper urinary tract is often associated with other urothelial tumors, careful long-term follow up is advisable.

A 71-year-old man visited our hospital with a complaint of a right intrascrotal mass. An elastic hard mass was palpable in the right intrascrotal extratesticular space. Ultrasonography, computed tomographic scan and magnetic resonance imaging showed a left intrascrotal extratesticular tumor. However, preoperative diagnosis was not decided. Tumor resection was performed, and the histological diagnosis was schwannoma. Intrascrotal extratesticular schwannoma is very rare, and this case was considered as the second report in Japan.