Search

In the literature on relative clauses (e. g. Alexiadou et al. 2000: 4), it is occasionally observed that the German complex definite determiner d-jenige (roughly 'the one') must share company with a restrictive relative clause, in contrast to bare determiners der/die/das (Roehrs 2006: 213--215; Gunkel 2006; Gunkel 2007). Previous works such as Sternefeld (2008: 378--379) and Blümel (2011) treat the relative clause as a complement of D to account for its mandatory occurrence. While such syntactic analyses have intuitive appeal, they pose problems for a compositional semantic analysis. The goal of this paper is twofold. First, we report on two rating studies providing empirical evidence for the obligatoriness of relative clauses in German DPs introduced by the complex determiner d-jenige. Secondly, following Simonenko (2014, 2015), we provide an analysis of the phenomenon at the syntax-semantics interface that captures familiar (Blümel 2011) as well as novel related observations. Particularly, the analysis accounts for the facts that postnominal modifiers can figure in d-jenige-DPs and that the element can have anaphoric demonstrative pronominal uses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]