在阅读教学中,依据教学目的和教学对象等的不同,教学内容有所选择与侧重,是很自然、也是可以接受的;但是,无论如何选择或侧重,最终都应该、也必须围绕着并且服务于对阅读内容的理解。但由于这一阅读教学根本理念的缺失,在当下的对外汉语阅读教学中,存在着程度不一的多种教学偏差。本文分析了以下七种偏差现象:(一)偏重语言要素教学;(二)偏重扩大词汇量;(三)偏重孤立的阅读技巧教学;(四)片面追求阅读速度;(五)片面讲求不同的阅读方式;(六)以理解检测替代阅读教学;(七)以离散的、低认知层次的练习引导阅读理解。 Reading is a complex process. To promote effective language learning via reading, the design of reading materials and programs in TCSOL (Teaching Chinese to Speakers of Other Languages) should tailor to not only students' learning preferences but also diverse settings in which the materials are delivered. All too often either the student or the setting is prioritized over the other. Further, the design of reading materials and programs should always aim to facilitate content comprehension, the fundamental goal of reading. If any other purposes overshadow the content comprehension, deviations in reading instruction emerge, which can prevent students from processing the materials and ultimately learn. A better understanding of these deviations can instigate design of reading materials and programs that prioritize comprehension without compromising appropriateness for diverse learning styles and settings. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to identify and discuss various deviations in TCSOL reading instruction in China, as highlighted below. 1. The study of linguistic forms is overemphasized. The two well-accepted objectives of reading instruction are to promote Chinese language learning and comprehension skills. To this end, linguistic learning becomes easily overstated in textbooks and reading programs. For example, a multitude of activities may be devoted to explanations and exercises of vocabulary and grammar well beyond necessity, even taking up one third of the total course time. Detailed discussion and practice of linguistic forms serve for intensive reading, not for extensive reading. 2. The expansion of vocabulary is overemphasized. Vocabulary is always regarded as one of the most striking obstacles for reading and is thus treated as one of the main goals of reading instruction. But having too many new words in a text prohibits students from understanding and subsequently learning the reading materials. There are usually more than 10% new words in an extensive reading text. The author argues that new words must be below 5% to provide scaffolding of students' development of reading skills and command of linguistic forms. 3. Reading strategies alone without context are overly promoted. Reading strategies play a major role in reading abilities. But it is more effective to teach reading strategies with opportunities to directly apply them to a reading process rather than teach them independently. The widely adopted approach now is unfortunately the latter. 4. Reading speed is overly applauded. The increase of reading speed is actually a result of reading practices, albeit frequently being misconstrued as a means for developing reading ability. Many textbooks nowadays establish a challenging reading speed and urge the students to skim through a difficult text to understand the gist. However, reading speed can only be enhanced by long-term careful reading practices in large amounts and some well-designed fast-reading exercises, both of which are based upon comprehension of the content. 5. Different ways of reading are overemphasized. Skimming, scanning and similar reading ways have attracted much attention these years and almost every textbook assigns students to read in one of these ways or another, but no attention has been paid to the learning objectives and benefits of doing so. When instructed this way, students often have little motivation to immerse themselves in the materials, especially under tremendous time pressure. Skimming and scanning, as reading strategies, are too often over-simplified into fast reading, without proper instruction. 6. Reading instruction is replaced by comprehension check. The prevailing procedure of reading instruction is that teacher assigns reading materials to students, checks students' responses to questions on comprehension, and provides brief comments on common mistakes. But what the teacher should do most is to give students scaffolding, helping and instructing while they are reading. Think-aloud and other similar or simplified approaches can be introduced for this purpose. 7. The reading process is guided by discrete, low cognitive level comprehension questions. Comprehension questions are important to guide and determine the quality of reading process and outputs. Dominating questioning forms now are discrete and low cognitive level objective questions that fixate on a narrow aspect of the text and lack holistic viewpoints. Instead, comprehension questions should engage students in advanced cognitive processing that deepens and broadens their understanding of the text through analyzing, applying, evaluating and creating information obtained from the text. In final remarks, it is essential to ensure that reading is always the central activity and comprehension is always the primary objective in the design of textbooks and reading programs. In the pursuit of promoting all-dimensional comprehension in strategic readers, we urge the design of reading materials and programs in TCSOL to refrain from the aforementioned seven types of deviations and adopt a content comprehension-centered approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]