Search

The aims of the present open, randomized, single-blind (patient), single institution, phase II study were: i) to compare the therapeutic effectiveness and toxicity of two dosages and schedules of ifosfamide (IFO) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) mainly in the neo-adjuvant setting of patients (pts) with locally advanced (stage III-IV) head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) (primary endpoint); ii) to assess the quality of life (QL) of pts included in the study before and after treatment (secondary endpoint). From July 1996 to June 1997, 28 pts, all males (mean age 56.79 years, range 37-72), hospitalized in the Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, were enrolled in the study. Twenty pts (M/F 20/0, mean age 53.6, range 37-71 years; stage III 1 pt, stage IV 19 pts) were evaluable for response and all 28 pts enrolled were evaluable for toxicity. Arm A: IFO 2.2 g/m2 i.v. as a 4 h infusion on days 1-5, Mesna 600 mg i.v. as push injection at 0 h, 4 h, 8 h on days 1-5, CDDP 20 mg i.v. as a 60 min infusion on days 1-5. The regimen was repeated every 28 days for 2 cycles. Fifteen pts (11 of whom were evaluable) were enrolled in this Arm. Arm B: IFO 1.5 g/m2 i.v. as a 4 h infusion on days 1-5, Mesna 600 mg i.v. as push injection at 0 h, 4 h, 8 h on days 1-5, CDDP 20 mg i.v. as a 60 min infusion on days 1-5. The regimen was repeated every 28 days for 3 cycles. Thirteen pts (9 of whom were evaluable) were enrolled in this Arm. The two Arms were well-balanced for sex, age, site of primary, ECOG PS and clinical stage. After completion of 2 (Arm A) or 3 (Arm B) cycles of chemotherapy, the pts were assessed for response. All evaluable pts received treatment as planned. Six pts (54.5%) of Arm A and 4 pts (44.5%) of Arm B had partial response (PR) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 54.5% and 44.5%, respectively: it is worth noting that all (100%) pts who had PR in Arm B achieved a high-grade PR, i.e. >/=70%, whereas only one pt (16.7%) who had PR in Arm A achieved a high-grade PR. Three pts (27.3%) in Arm A and 2 pts (22.2%) in Arm B had stable disease (SD); 2 pts (18.2%) in Arm A and 3 pts (33.3%) in Arm B had progressive disease (PD). The actual dose intensity was over 80% of the projected dose intensity for both drugs and for both Arms. Over a total of 59 cycles administered, the total number of episodes of toxicity was 24 for Arm A and 17 for Arm B. Three pts out of 28 evaluable for toxicity (10.8%) died for Grade 5 hematological toxicity: all pts were included in Arm A. In Arm A, 2 pts (13.3%) experienced hematological Grade 3 toxicity and 2 pts (13.3%) hematological Grade 4 toxicity. In Arm B no pt experienced Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity. No Grade 3-4 toxicity of any other type was found in either Arm. The QL evaluation, using the Cella's FACT-G scale supplemented with disease-specific scale (FACT-H&N scale), did not show significant beneficial effect of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

In the present study we evaluated the ability of either medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or megestrol acetate (MA) to reduce cisplatin (CDDP)-induced serotonin (5-HT) release from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of cancer patients. Sixteen patients with cancer of different sites, all in advanced stage of disease, were studied (10 for MPA and 6 for MA). The levels of 5-HT in culture supernatants of PBMC stimulated with CDDP were higher than controls (100 nM vs 51 for MPA study and 123 vs 64 for MA study) and were in the same range of PHA-stimulated PBMC. The addition into cultures of MPA or MA was able to significantly reduce the CDDP-induced production of 5-HT (62 nM for MPA, and 46 for MA study). MPA as well as MA are able to inhibit 5-HT production and/or release by CDDP-stimulated PBMC of cancer patients: this finding to our knowledge has not been previously reported. The concentrations of MPA and MA used in cultures were in the same range as those raised in plasma following the clinical administration of daily doses of 1,000/2,000 mg of MPA and 320 to 960 mg of MA.

The aim of this study was to verify whether cisplatin (CDDP) can induce serotonin (5HT) release from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of cancer patients and determine whether methylprednisolone (MP) can inhibit such release. Ten patients (mean age 61.8 years) with cancer of different sites, all but one in advanced stage of disease were studied. Our study showed that unstimulated PBMC of cancer patients release a higher amount of 5HT than that of healthy subjects (57+/-5 nM vs 10+/-1 nM, p<0.001) and that similarly the stimulation with PHA or CDDP induces a higher amount of 5HT release by PBMC of cancer patients than that by PBMC of healthy subjects (74+/-6 vs 32+/-3 nM, p<0.001 and 91+/-8 vs 18+/-2 nM, p<0.001, respectively). The addition of MP to the culture in the presence of CDDP induced a significant decrease of 5HT levels: from 91+/-8 to 53+/-7 nM, p=0.002. This result obtained in cancer patients paralleled that previously obtained by us in healthy subjects. Our data confirm a new mechanism through which CDDP could induce emesis and provide a further possible explanation to the anti-emetic activity of corticosteroids, such as MP.

A phase II randomized controlled trial was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of Schizophyllan (SPG) used in combination with standard chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Several immunological parameters were considered to assess the immunoregulatory activity of SPG in the: same patients. The clinical and immunological evaluations were performed both before and at the end of the study (4 months later). All patients received standard chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma according to one of the following treatment regimens: 1) cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v, day 1, 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. continuous infusion days 1 to 5; 2) cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v, day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) i.v. over 4 h days 2 to 5, vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) i.v. days 2 and 8. Antineoplastic regimens were repeated every 28 days x 4 cycles for approximately 4 months. SPG was administered weekly at a single dose of 40 mg intramuscularly for 4 months in addition to standard chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 22 of whom were evaluable. Thirteen patients were assigned to Arm A (treatment with SPG associated with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2) and 9 patients to Arm B (treatment with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2, alone). The overall response rate was not significantly different between the two Arms (92.3% in Arm A vs. 100% in Arm B), although a higher number of complete responses (CR) (3 = 23.1%) was registered in Arm A. Overall, the SPG treatment does not seem to have induced significant changes of the immunological parameters of our patients: this may be due to both the advanced cancer stage and the effect of chemotherapy, which are both well known causes of immunodepression. The significant differences between the two Arms were only: the CD8(+) lymphocytes were decreased in the patients treated with SPG and increased in controls; serum levels of IL-1 alpha was lower in patients treated with SPG than in the control group; the production in culture of IL-1 alpha was higher in Arm A than in Arm B and IL-6 was higher in Arm B than in Arm A. Treatment with SPG was proven safe and was well-toleratedby all patients.

In this study we examined the levels of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-alpha and sIL-2R in the sera and culture supernatants of PHA-stimulated lymphocytes from a series of 90 cancer patients. The expression of the IL-2R p55 chain (alpha subunit) on PHA-stimulated lymphocytes was also evaluated together with the blastogenic response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to PHA, PHA plus rIL-2 and rIL-2 alone. Ninety cancer patients (70 men and 20 women; mean age 57.8 years, range 27-80) with advanced solid malignancies at different sites were studied. The lymphocyte blastogenic response to PHA was significantly lower in cancer patients than in normal individuals. The proliferative response to rIL-2 alone was also significantly depressed in cancer patients. The frequency of CD25(+) PHA-stimulated lymphocytes from cancer patients was not significantly different from that of the control group. The serum values for IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6 and sIL-2R were significantly higher in cancer patients than in controls, while the serum level of IL-2 was within the normal range. The levels of sIL-2R released in the supernatant of PHA-stimulated PBMC of cancer patients were significantly lower than those of the control group. However, the levels of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-6 and TNF-alpha, in the supernatants of PHA-stimulated PBMC of cancer patients were in the same range as those of the control group. These results suggest that the observed immune-deficiency in cancer patients cannot be explained on the basis of a defective production of key immunoregulatory cytokines since the lymphocytes from cancer patients produced physiological amounts of cytokines. We suggest that the observed defective cell-mediated immunity may be due to a defect in transmembrane signalling by the cytokines.