Search

Purpose of Review: The alarming number of confirmed COVID-19 cases put a strain on the healthcare systems, which had to reallocate human and technical resources to respond to the emergency. Many urologists became integrated into multidisciplinary teams, dealing with this respiratory illness and its unknown management. It aims to summarize the epidemiological, clinical, diagnostical, and therapeutical characteristics of COVID-19, from a practical perspective, to ease COVID-19 management to non-physician staff., Recent Findings: We performed a narrative review of the literature regarding COVID-19, updated to May 8th, 2020, at PubMed and COVID resource platforms of the main scientific editorials. COVID-19, characterized by fever, myalgias, dyspnea, and dry cough, varies widely from asymptomatic infection to death. Arrhythmias and thrombotic events are prevalent. Lymphopenia and inflammatory reactant elevation on laboratory, as well as bilateral and peripheral ground-glass opacities or consolidations on X-Ray, are usually found in its assessment. Little is known about SARS-CoV-2 immunology. To date, no therapy has demonstrated efficacy in COVID-19. Of-level or compassionate-use therapies are prescribed in the context of clinical trials. We should become familiar with specific adverse events and pharmacological interactions. The COVID-19 pandemic has paralyzed the urological activity, and its long-term consequences are unpredictable. Despite not being used to deal with respiratory diseases, the urologists become easily qualified to manage COVID-19 by following protocols and being integrated into multidisciplinary teams, helping to overcome the pandemic.

Purpose of Review: To update the most relevant literature regarding complex cases during kidney transplant setting that recipient presents by himself, especially during implantation surgery due to vascular diseases and/or urinary tract anomalies., Recent Findings: Increasing age of donors and recipients is leading to an increased complexity of kidney transplant implantation surgery. In addition, the high peripheral vascular disease prevalence worldwide increases difficulty of surgery and decreases long-term outcomes as well. Moreover, it also increases transplant morbidity and mortality, both overall and cardiovascular, and finally clearly decreases graft survival. However, dialysis alternative has even worse outcomes in terms of mortality, with a proportional risk of death 2.66 higher compared with transplanted patients. Aorto-iliac prosthesis and 3rd and 4th transplants in occupied iliac fossae do also represent a challenging situation with a clearly increased morbidity and mortality. In some of those particular conditions, orthotopic kidney transplant technique is an alternative with good functional and survival outcomes, but not exempt of complications. Kidney transplant in vascular complex recipients has worse outcomes compared with conventional non-risky population. It remains a challenging surgical and medical procedure with higher morbidity and mortality, and decreased graft survival. However, dialysis mortality is still even greater and a transplant attempt might be justified. Orthotopic kidney transplant technique might play a role in selected patients with aorto-iliac unworkable segments or even in patients with special urinary tract conditions.

Purpose of the Review: To update the most relevant literature regarding complex vascular cases in kidney transplant setting involving the graft, especially during the harvesting procedure and back-table preparation from the subsequent implant., Recent Findings: Challenging situations affecting the kidney graft such as multiple vessels, renal artery aneurysms, kidney anatomical anomalies, or major injuries do not contraindicate the transplant, but require an exhaustive graft viability assessment and several bench surgery techniques. Graft vessel conditioning in the back-table might include simple anastomosis between them, enlarging with venous patch or reconstruction with donor or synthetic grafts. Compared with conventional transplant, literature reports longer warm ischemia time (40 vs 32 min) and slightly increased rates of delayed graft function (10.3% vs 8.2%) and vascular complications (10.8% vs 8.1%), but similar graft and patient survival. Kidney graft vascular complex cases require exhaustive assessment, meticulous harvesting, good surgical technique in the bench table, and proper surgery in the recipient. Despite its complexity, vascular complex kidney transplant offers comparable outcomes in the long term to conventional population when technically well performed, with slightly increased rates of vascular complications and delayed graft function.

Introduction: Around 10 % of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are cystic, while some benign cysts have complex appearance in conventional diagnostic tests such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These renal complex cystic masses (RCCMs) are a challenging entity in urological practice and sometimes have a difficult management, requiring surgical removal. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a very sensitive test detecting microvascularization in real time, and it has been used in the diagnostic workup of these kinds of lesions. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic power of CEUS in the evaluation of RCCM., Material and Methods: This is a prospective observational study between April 2011 and July 2014. A total of 66 patients with 67 RCCMs were enrolled (Bosniak 2-4). Twenty-four patients underwent surgical removal of the RCCM. All participants underwent CEUS (experimental) and CT (control). All CEUS procedures were performed by a single high-experienced observer (urologist). Benign lesions were defined as those Bosniak 2-2F, and malignant were Bosniak 3-4. Statistical analysis was made measuring consistency (kappa index and Landis-Koch scale) and validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of the study., Results: Median size of RCCM measured by CEUS and CT was 3.8 cm (interquartile range (AIQ) 3.2-4.6) and 3.9 cm (AIQ 3.2-4.5), respectively. Kappa index shows good agreement between both tests (0.71; 95 % CI 0.57-0.85), both overall and stratified by categories according to Bosniak classification. CEUS has a sensitivity 100 %, specificity 81.4 %, positive predictive value 70.4 %, and negative predictive value 100 %. A total of eight RCCMs were discordant, and seven of eight classified as malignant by CEUS and not by CT. Of those seven lesions classified as malignant by CEUS, six (six of seven, 85.7 %) were malignant in the pathological exam., Conclusions: CEUS is a very useful tool for assessing RCCM, with good results in terms of consistency and validity. It has a good diagnostic power, with a sensitivity of 100 % and a negative predictive value of 100 %. Its main limitations are the experience required, a special software, and being observer-dependent.

Strict imaging follow-up is mandatory after cryoablation of small renal masses (SRMs). Although it uses ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic iodinated contrast, computed tomography (CT) is still the gold standard test. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a novel technique that informs in real time about renal perfusion avoiding radiation and nephrotoxicity. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes between CEUS and CT in the follow-up of SRMs treated with cryoablation, as well as to assess degree of agreement between them. This is a prospective observational study (May 2012 to December 2013) comparing CEUS and CT in 16 patients with SRMs cryoablated. The on-going protocol of the study includes a CT and CEUS 3 months after treatment and then every 6 months during 5 years. Local relapse was defined as the presence of contrast enhancement in the mass. All the CEUS were performed by a single experienced observer (E.S.). Degree of agreement was measured with kappa index. CEUS detected contrast enhancement in three patients (3/16, 18.8%) and CT in two patients (2/16, 12.5%). Degree of agreement between CEUS and CT, according to Landis-Koch classification, was 0.76 (CI 0.33-1.19; p = 0.0165), which is excellent and higher than expected by random. Sensitivity of the test is 93.75% (15/16). Median time of follow-up after cryoablation is 22 months (15.5-36.5). CEUS has an excellent agreement with CT and a high sensitivity in the follow-up of SRMs treated with cryosurgery, demonstrating its usefulness. Due to these encouraging results, it could become a reference test in the near future for monitoring SRMs after ablative treatment.

Kidney transplant is the best alternative of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). At present, a significant part of patients admitted to waiting list are older and have previous transplants or severe vascular atheromatosis. In these cases, orthotopic kidney transplant (OKT) could be an option. The aim of the study is to present our results with this technique in terms of surgical steps, complications, and outcomes. Between January 1977 and August 2014, 1549 kidney transplants were performed in our transplant unit. Nine of them were OKT and were performed according to principles described by Gil-Vernet. All data were reviewed retrospectively. Nine OKTs were performed in seven males and two females, with a mean age of 49.3 years (range 24-67). Donor mean age was 40.5 (18.5-62.5) and the follow-up mean time was of 91.8 months (8-226). Seven cases were first transplants and two were third transplants, all of them from deceased donors. Indication for the OKT was an unsuitable iliac region in six (66.6%) and abnormalities in the low urinary tract or urinary diversions in three (33.3%). Delayed graft function (DGF) was present in 22.2% (2/9). Three patients (33.3%) developed early surgical complications: one bleeding (Clavien IIIb), one arterial thrombosis (IIIb), and one pancreatic leak (IIIb). Two patients (25%) had late complications: one ureteral stricture (IIIb) and one reflux nephropathy (IIIa). Mean serum creatinine after OKT was 1.7, 1.5, and 1.8 mg/dl at 1 month, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively. Mean graft survival was 80.7 months (range 0-226). At present, three patients are alive with functioning graft, three patients died with functioning graft, two patients returned to dialysis many years after the transplant, and one lost the graft due to an arterial thrombosis in the early postoperative course. OKT is a valid option for patients with unsuitable iliac regions such as those with third transplants, severe atheromatosis, or vena cava thrombosis. It is also an option for those patients with urinary diversions. Functional results are good, although it is a technique not exempted from complications. Two thirds of the patients have a long-term survival of the graft, and a third of the patients die with functioning graft.