Search

Background and purpose The lockdowns and restrictions enforced periodically during the COVID-19 pandemic posed a serious challenge for non-COVID care, especially in diabetes where telediabetes, the utilization of telemedicine consultations for diabetic care, became more necessary than ever before. Although studies have shed light on the perception of patients, there is a paucity of studies from the perspective of healthcare providers, especially in an Indian context. Moving forward, it is imperative to understand the perspectives of telediabetes providers in this domain. Hence, a nationwide survey was carried out to assess providers' practices and perspectives towards using telemedicine for providing diabetes care in India during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Methods An online questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was carried out involving diabetes care physicians. The study tool was developed after the identification of broad themes and constructs from published literature, national guidelines, and diabetes experts' recommendations, following which, it was validated by six experts and pilot-tested. An online open survey, hosted on a professional platform, was circulated to internists, endocrinologists, and other diabetes care physicians of various institutions, hospitals, and clinics from both public and private sectors across the country through individual and group emails and various mobile messenger services. Results Out of the 239 doctors who responded to the survey, 195 (81.6%) had provided telediabetes services since the COVID-19 outbreak, and 84.1% were actively providing teleconsultations for diabetes at the time of the survey. The majority of participants (63.2%) were private practitioners. Telediabetes engagement was 3.5 hours per day at the peak of the pandemic and reduced significantly to one hour after the end of the pandemic. Video calling was the most preferred modality for consultation, whereas messaging services were preferred for input from the patients. Printed prescription images followed by text messages were the common modalities for sending treatment advice. The overall perception towards telediabetes was positive (50.1%). Most physicians reported being reasonably and somewhat aware (65.6% and 20.5%, respectively) of telemedicine practice guidelines but were not sure about the extent of compliance. Conclusions Our study sheds light not only on the utilization of telediabetes from physicians' perspectives and practices but also on its acceptability while identifying areas requiring clarity and focus moving forward., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Atal et al.)

Background Melatonin was found to have anxiolytic properties in several animal and human studies. The melatonin receptor agonist ramelteon might also have a similar anxiolytic action. Objectives The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of ramelteon in various rat models of anxiety and to explore the possible mechanism of action. Methods The anxiolytic effect was compared between the control group, diazepam group (1 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg), and ramelteon group (0.25 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, and 1 mg/kg) by an elevated plus maze, light-dark box, hole board apparatus, and open field test in Sprague Dawley rats. Antagonists flumazenil, picrotoxin, and Luzindole were used to explore the possible mechanism of action of ramelteon if it showed an anxiolytic property. Results Ramelteon as a standalone drug did not show an anxiolytic effect. However, a combination of ramelteon (1 mg/kg) and diazepam (0.5 mg/kg) showed an anxiolytic effect. Conclusion Further studies can evaluate the use of a fixed-dose combination of ramelteon and already-approved anxiolytic drugs to reduce the dose of the latter., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Nachiappan et al.)

Objectives Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors are recommended as preferred add-on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) after metformin among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). They are generally many folds costlier than other OADs. This is a simulatory analysis to assess the incremental cost escalation and risk reduction with their hypothetical substitution/addition in prescriptions of high-risk patients. Methods A simple simulation of cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using prescriptions of T2DM patients with established cardiovascular (CV) or renal disease or high-risk factors. SGLT-2 and DPP-IV inhibitors with proven benefits/safety were substituted or added in place of other OADs. Increments in treatment costs were calculated, and the anticipated decrease in hazards was extrapolated from cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) and real-world studies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Results Prescriptions of 351 patients with a mean age of 58.04 ± 8.67 years were analyzed. The median annual acquisition cost of drug therapy for diabetes per patient was found to be Indian national rupee (INR) 8,964.4 for the original prescriptions when calculated using median retail prices of drugs prescribed for diabetes. Upon substituting one of the SGLT-2 inhibitors for the other OADs in the regimen, the cost increased to INR 12,265 (increase by 36.8%) for dapagliflozin, and INR 26,718 and INR 29,419 (increase by ~200%), respectively, for canagliflozin and empagliflozin. Upon calculating the ICERs, additional cost to prevent one all-cause death with dapagliflozin substitution is INR 660,020-25,384,369; INR 2,223,326 with empagliflozin substitution and INR 8,069,818 with canagliflozin substitution. The ICER for prevention of hospitalization with HF with dapagliflozin substitution is INR 1,320,040-1,435,543; INR 4,010,706 with empagliflozin and INR 5,548,000 with canagliflozin. To prevent a three-point major adverse cardiac event (3P-MACE), INR 2,062,562 would be needed with dapagliflozin substitution, and INR 3,146,861 and INR 3,859,478 with empagliflozin and canagliflozin, respectively. Incremental costs for various outcomes were higher with the addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors and significantly more if substitution with sitagliptin/linagliptin was also done. The numbers needed to treat were calculated too and ranged from 35 to 1,831 for various outcomes and drugs. Conclusion While the recommendations for use of SGLT-2 and DPP-IV inhibitors are adequately backed by evidence from CVOTs and real-world data, the incremental costs per event reduction are quite high for most outcomes in the Indian context. Dapagliflozin, being available as cheaper generic versions, appears to be most effective for most outcomes. Interpretations are subjective in terms of value assigned for preventing a major event., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Fatima et al.)

Introduction Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have become one of the major causes of mortality among the Indian population. The costs of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and fibrinolytic drugs that are used to treat various thromboembolic disorders and used as prophylactics for individuals at high risk of CVDs vary widely in the Indian pharmaceutical market. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost variation of different brands of drug formulations and to compare the branded prices of the formulations with their corresponding generic and ceiling prices. Materials and methods This study followed an analytical method. Costs of various drugs were obtained from the October - December 2019 edition of the Current Index of Medical Specialities (CIMS) and December 2019 edition of the Monthly Index of Medical Specialities (MIMS) India. Cost ratio and percentage variation in cost per tablet/capsule/injection of different drugs available in the Indian market and manufactured by different pharmaceutical companies were calculated. Comparison of the branded prices with generic and ceiling prices was also performed for different drugs by using information available from official websites. Results Percentage variation in cost among the commonly prescribed drugs for the management of thromboembolic disorders was found to be highest for prasugrel 10 mg tablet (1,408.44%) while it was lowest for fondaparinux 2.5 mg / 0.5 ml injection (20%). Among the commonly prescribed drugs that are under Drugs Prices Control Order (DPCO) price control, streptokinase 1.5 MIU injection had the highest cost variation (132.02%) while enoxaparin 60 mg / 0.6 ml injection had the lowest (4.99%). Among some of the important formulations under the Jan Aushadhi scheme (JAS), acenocoumarol 2 mg tablet had the highest cost variation (680.09%) and cilostazol 50 mg tablet had the lowest (55.46%). Conclusions Wide differences exist in the costs of various anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and fibrinolytics available in the Indian market. The prescribing physician should be aware of theses variations and prescribe medicines accordingly, keeping in mind the financial status of the patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020, Ray et al.)

Atypical antipsychotic drugs have been recommended as the first-line agents in the treatment of schizophrenia. They are usually not associated with extrapyramidal symptoms and hyperprolactinemia. There is no previously reported case on somnambulism associated with risperidone intake. We report a case of risperidone-induced somnambulism in a schizophrenic patient. Somnambulism occurred while the patient was on a dose of 3 mg of risperidone per day. The dose was reduced to 2 mg per day along with the addition of clonazepam 0.5 mg daily at night. No further episode of somnambulism was reported after this. This case suggests the association of risperidone with occurrence of somnambulism. Further evidence to strengthen the causality of this needs to be gathered. This calls for prompt pharmacovigilance reporting of adverse drug events associated especially with antipsychotics., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020, Najmi et al.)