Search

Introduction: The availability of high-flow oxygen (HFO) machines allowed patients with COVID-19 pneumonia to be comfortably treated for longer periods of time until endotracheal intubation became inevitable. Patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) preceded by HFO treatment may continue to progress and die. Hence there is a belief in physicians that patients treated with HFO might have delayed invasive MV., Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective review of subjects with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the Dubai Hospital ICU. Study variables included time to intubation, duration of HFO, and cumulative duration of tachypnea and tachycardia while on HFO usage. Early intubation was defined as within 24 hours of the start of HFO, and late intubation was defined as after seven days on HFO. Groups were compared for outcome measures; mortality and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital., Results: Clinical outcomes of mortality and LOS in ICU and hospital were not significantly different among patients intubated early versus late. Duration of tachypnea and tachycardia was also not different comparing patients intubated early versus late., Conclusion: There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes in patients intubated early versus late in patients treated with HFO for COVID-19 pneumonia., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Nadeem et al.)

Background COVID-19 is a prothrombotic disease that can cause thromboembolism and microthrombi, which could lead to multiorgan failure and death. Since COVID-19 is a relatively new disease, there are guidelines for anticoagulation dosing for COVID-19 patients without consensus on the dosing. We studied the effects of different doses of anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and hypoxemia on any differences in need for high-flow oxygen, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. We also analyzed the patient population who benefited most from anticoagulation. Methodology We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who were admitted with the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection with positive polymerase chain reaction, pneumonia (confirmed either by chest X-ray or CT chest), and hypoxemia (oxygen saturation of <94%, while on room air). These patients were studied for outcomes (the need for high-flow oxygen, the requirement for mechanical ventilation, and overall mortality) for different doses of anticoagulation (prophylactic, escalated, and therapeutic). Results The sample consists of 132 subjects, predominantly males (116, 87%), with a mean age of 59 years and a standard deviation of 15. About one-third of the participants had diabetes, and more than 50% had hypertension. Additionally, 27 (20.3%) had a history of heart disease, and 70 (53%) of the subjects were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at some point during the study. Among those admitted to the ICU, about 11 (8%) subjects required mechanical ventilation and 16 (12%) passed away during the study. Those who died had higher use of high-flow oxygen, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation and had a longer stay on mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in mortality or need for mechanical ventilation for any strategy of anticoagulation. Conclusions Different doses of anticoagulation did not show any statistically significant relationship between the need for mechanical ventilation and mortality. More patients on high-flow oxygen had received escalated doses of anticoagulation as compared to those who were not on high-flow oxygen. Anticoagulation levels did not have any statistically significant effect on overall survival of patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Nadeem et al.)

This multicenter retrospective investigation aimed to identify predictors of pneumothorax (PTX), pneumomediastinum (PM), and subcutaneous emphysema (SE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the ICU. A total of 256 patients were included, with 128 in the case group and 128 in the control group. The study sample consisted of predominantly male patients with a mean age of around 53 years and a high prevalence of comorbidities. Significant predictors of PTX, PM, and SE included the presence of coronary artery disease, non-rebreather mask usage, high-flow oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, pressor usage, inpatient dialysis, steroid usage, sedative usage, narcotic usage, paralytic usage, elevated C-reactive protein levels, increased lung infiltration, the presence of PM and SE, mode of ventilation, duration of various respiratory support interventions, and severity of illness as indicated by APACHE and SOFA scores. These findings have important implications for the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, as they may help identify and closely monitor at-risk individuals, allowing for timely intervention and potentially improving clinical outcomes. Future research should focus on validating these predictors in larger cohorts and investigating the underlying mechanisms to develop targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Dar et al.)

Background The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) virus has caused millions of deaths. It is difficult to differentiate between pure viral COVID-19 pneumonia and secondary infection. Clinicians often use procalcitonin (PCT) to decide on empiric antibiotic therapy. Methodology We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted with COVID-19 between January 1st, 2020, and June 30th, 2020. Patient demographics, clinical findings, and laboratory findings with a focus on PCT levels were recorded. Coinfection was considered if clinicians ordered a septic workup (urine, blood, and respiratory cultures) or if the physicians started or escalated antimicrobial therapy. PCT levels on the day of culture and daily for the next three days were recorded. Significant PCT change was defined as a decrease in PCT levels of >50% from the initial elevated PCT level. Results In total, 143 (59.8%) patients had one secondary infection. These included pulmonary infections (118, 49.4%), blood infections (99, 41.4%), and urine infections (64, 26.8%). Many patients had more than one documented positive culture: respiratory system and blood together in 80 (33.4%) patients, sputum and urine in 55 (23.1%) patients, and urine and blood in 46 (19.2%) patients. Out of the 143 patients with a positive culture, PCT was abnormal on the day of positive culture in 93 (65.5%), while PCT was abnormal in 64 out of 96 on the day of negative culture (66.7%) (p = 0.89). Individual analysis for PCT levels of respiratory cultures showed out of 118 positive sputum cultures, 86 (72%) had abnormal PCT on the day of culture. PCT in positive versus negative cultures was not significantly different, with median PCT (interquartile range, IQR) of 1.66 (6.61) versus 1.03 (2.23) (p = 0.172). For blood cultures, out of 99 positive blood cultures, 73 (73%) had abnormal PCT levels on the day of the culture. PCT in positive versus negative cultures was significantly elevated, with a median of 1.61 (5.97) vs. 0.65 (1.77) (p < 0.001). For urine, out of 64 positive cultures, 41 (64.1%) had abnormal PCT levels on the day of the culture. PCT in positive versus negative cultures was not significantly different, with a median of 0.71 (2.92) vs. 0.93 (4.71) (p = 0.551). To observe the change in PCT after culture, PCT values for the next three days after culture were analyzed. We found that patients with positive cultures had higher PCT levels than those with negative cultures. There was no significant improvement over the following three days. Patients with abnormal PCT on the day of the suspected infection had a longer length of stay in the hospital, with a median (IQR) of 23.9 days (3.16) vs. 16.9 days (2.18) (p = 0.021). Conclusions Secondary coinfections in patients with COVID-19 infections are not associated with PCT elevation on the day of suspected secondary infection. However, most patients with bacteremia had a significant elevation of PCT on the day of bacteremia before collection and reporting of positive culture. Patients with abnormal PCT levels on the day of suspected infection had a longer hospital stay than patients with normal PCT levels. Subsequent testing of PCT in patients showed no significant improvement in PCT., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Nadeem et al.)

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections may have been associated with secondary infection. Community-acquired or hospital-acquired such infections affect clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the impact of these infections on clinical outcomes., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Dubai hospital., Results: Patients with secondary non-viral infections (SNIs) have higher mortality than patients without SNIs (57.3% vs. 43.7%, p=0.037). Patients with SNIs had more days on mechanical ventilation (MV) 19(11-27) vs. 5(2-10) p<0.001, more LOSICU 22 (15-33) vs. 7 (2-11) p<0.001, and more length of stay in hospital (LOSH) 28 (18-45) vs. 11.5 (6-19), p<0.001. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that SNIs do not predict mortality. Linear logistic regression analysis showed patients with SNIs have increased length of stay in ICUs (LOSICUs), length of stay in hospitals (LOSHs), and prolonged needs for MV., Conclusion: SNIs are high in patients admitted to ICU for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although they do not impact mortality, they prolong the need for MV, LOSICU, and LOSH., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Nadeem et al.)

The objective of this study was to detect if cardiopulmonary bypass time duration has any impact on the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (MV). The study design was a systematic review and regression analysis of pooled data from previously published studies. All available data are from prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional, and observational studies. Participants included only patient/human studies. There were no interventions. PubMed and Cochrane libraries were searched by utilizing different combinations of keywords: cardiopulmonary bypass and mechanical ventilation. Inclusion criteria were: (1) English articles, (2) studies with an adult population that underwent cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), (3) studies where the duration of CPB is provided as well as the duration of mechanical ventilation. A regression analysis was performed on the metadata. For the hours of MV, eight studies with 13 data sets (as some studies provide data in subgroups) were included for a total number of 989 subjects. The duration of CPB ranged from 55 to 173.5 minutes for these operations. Postoperative MV hours ranged from nine to 408 hours. Stepwise multiple regression analysis found that cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPBT), age, diabetes, male gender, and ejection fraction correlated with prolonged mechanical ventilation; CPBT was the most strongly correlated variable. Cardiopulmonary bypass time appears to affect clinical outcomes adversely and is associated with prolonged MV. Avoiding CPB or limiting it to a minimum may decrease the days of MV required., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2019, Nadeem et al.)

Aim Several factors determine the perioperative outcome besides the nature of the congenital heart defect. Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) is a major factor that determines mortality, length of stay (LOS), residual disability, and other functional outcomes. We aim to determine the clinical variables predicting PMV and LOS in hospital, and specifically the impact from the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (ACC). Method We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 413 children consecutively admitted to the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (PCICU) in one year at a single center. We collected demographic information (e.g., age, gender, and weight), perioperative variables, clinical outcomes, length of mechanical ventilation, high-frequency ventilator use, and mortality. We used logistic regression to analyze the data. PMV was defined as mechanical ventilation for longer than seven days. Results A total of 410 records were included in our study. We found no statistically significant association between CPB time and mechanical ventilation days. Forty-seven children had PMV, 362 did not have PMV. We found no statistically significant association between CPB time and mechanical ventilation days after adjusting for covariates. Reanalyzing the data with PMV defined as longer than four days produced the same results. Using a regression model to assess the variables via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator for feature selection, we found no statistically significant association between ACC time and mechanical ventilation days after adjusting for covariates. Conclusion According to our results, CPB and ACC time are not associated with PMV or prolonged hospital LOS., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2019, Mehmood et al.)

Background: Low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) strategy improves outcomes; however, despite recommended by guidelines, adherence to this practice is not high., Methods: Tidal volume for mechanically ventilated patients were recorded for each 12-hour shift, day and night shifts for consecutive 101 patients. Adherence was determined by comparing these tidal volumes to standard low tidal volumes of 6 ml/kg of ideal body weight. Adherence rates were calculated and adherence rates of daytime shifts were compared to those of night time shifts. Adherence rates for weekday shifts were compared with those of weekend shifts. Clinical variables were recorded to analyze predictors of adherence pattern., Results: The sample size was 101 patients with 870 patient-ventilator days with 1734 patient ventilator shifts. Shift adherence was only 47.5%. There was no significant difference between day and night shifts or weekday and weekend shifts. Stepwise multiple regression analysis shows that age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) have significant correlation with adherence to LTVV practice., Conclusion: The study found that adherence to lung protective low tidal volume mechanical ventilation practice is low. Practice adherence is not different over weekend or night shifts. Age, gender, BMI, and PCO2 have significant correlation with adherence to LTVV practice., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.