Search

Introduction: Chronic periodontitis is caused by a persistent and expanding interaction between a subgingival pathogenic microbial biofilm and the host immune system. The host's reaction to local factors directly influences the inflammation and bone loss that result from these interactions. Depending on variables like the severity of soft tissue damage and bone loss, treatment options can range from nonsurgical to surgical. Nonsurgical treatments are frequently used as the first-line therapy for inflammatory periodontal disease. In fact, careful scaling and root planing (SRP), a nonsurgical treatment, has been extensively studied and shown to be a highly predictable and effective therapy. According to recent research, using a diode laser (DL) in addition to standard SRP may reduce bacterial count and reinfection significantly. Laser therapy could be helpful in treating periodontal disease because of its antibacterial and detoxifying effects. The goal of this study is to investigate whether using a DL in addition to conventional flap surgery enhances patient outcomes for those with chronic generalized periodontitis., Materials and Methods: The 12 participants in this split-mouth trial with chronic generalized periodontitis were the main subject of the study. All of them had probing pocket depths (PPDs) of at least 5 mm after the initial phase of treatment. Each patient in the control group (Group A) and test group (Group B) received a conventional flap after being randomly assigned to one of the groups. Group B underwent a conventional flap with a 980 nm DL, whereas those in Group A did not receive any DL therapy. Periodontal pockets in both groups were evaluated at baseline, 45 days, and 90 days after a sub-gingival plaque test. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions were used to examine the presence of red complex organisms in the plaque sample., Results: From baseline to 45 days and then to 90 days, clinical attachment loss (CAL), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) all significantly decreased. However, results from 45 days to 90 days were statistically non-significant, with the exception of the GI, where Group B results were significantly different from Group A results from 45 days to 90 days. On the other hand, when a DL was combined with conventional flap surgery in the test group, the quantity of red complex bacteria was significantly decreased., Conclusion: When DL was used in conjunction with conventional flap surgery, the results showed that CAL, PI, and GI were all significantly reduced while the quantity of red complex bacteria was also significantly decreased., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Saha et al.)

Introduction:  Periodontal treatment focuses on maintaining a patient's natural teeth and gums. The gingival margin recedes to a point apical to the tooth in 20%-100% of people. Coronally advanced flap (CAF) is one of several effective treatments for this condition. This surgery covers the tooth root with gingiva. The predictability of this surgery depends on the blood supply, donor tissue, and surgical skills. Platelet concentrates, which include platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), majority of the time is used for various regenerative therapies. Since no bovine thrombin or anticoagulant is needed, its manufacturing is simpler, cheaper, and less biochemically modified than PRP. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is a fibrin matrix that progressively releases platelet cells and cytokines., Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CAF with and without A-PRF in the treatment of Miller's class-II localized gingival recession., Materials and Methods: Twenty patients were chosen who had Miller's class-II localized gingival recession. A random number generator was used to place patients into either the "test" or "control" group. Treatment for both Groups A and B included a coronally advanced flap, but only Group A additionally got autologous platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF). After receiving a detailed explanation of the treatment process, the patient signed an informed consent form. Complete medical and dental histories were taken to see whether there were any absolute or relative contraindications., Results:  Following treatment with either method in the current study, gingival thickness improved considerably. The percentage of root coverage did not change considerably between the two groups. The clinical result might likely have been different if other factors, such as platelet concentration and PRF consistency, had been examined in the current investigation. Furthermore, there was no histological examination of the healing process. As a result, we are unsure of the extent to which PRF affects how effectively connective tissue attaches., Conclusion: The additional use of A-PRF membrane did not provide additional benefits in terms of root coverage outcomes compared with CAF alone. The use of A-PRF membranes significantly reduced the recession depth., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Jagtap et al.)

Introduction  Dental implants replace missing teeth. Dental implants are surgically placed tooth root replacements that secure prosthetic teeth and bridges. Branemark's original dental implant technique included a mesiobuccal flap and a two-stage approach, needing 6-8 months of recovery following extraction, sterile conditions, machined titanium implants, 3-6 months without stress for osseointegration, and a detachable temporary prosthesis. The restoration would usually be ready a year following the implant surgery. Implant treatment seeks the best function, aesthetics, and complication risk. Implant therapy with low patient morbidity and fast extraction-to-restoration times is a secondary target. Instantaneous implant insertion has made implant dentistry more convenient for patients and clinicians. This study measures bone height before, after, and one month after implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods Participants were selected from oral evaluation candidates. This investigation included 11 people missing front maxillary or mandibular teeth or root components. Diagnostic castings determined the interarch connection before surgery. Alginate maxillary and mandibular arch imprints were cast in Type III dental stone for diagnosis. CBCT scans were taken pre-operatively, post-implant, and post-prosthesis. After the tooth was removed, the empty socket was cleaned up with curettes. An intraoral periapical radiograph and manual probing were done to determine the implant's size. The implant was removed for examination after three months, and healing abutments and gingival formers were placed. Finally, fins were placed. The CBCT images also captured the bone height around the implants. The soft tissue parameters were recorded and evaluated at baseline and one-month following prosthetic loading as plaque index (PI). Radiographic evaluation was done at baseline and one-month following functional loading using CBCT. After one month following functional loading, crestal bone levels were measured again with the help of CBCT using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, US). Results The sample population had an average age of 42.81 years, with a standard deviation of 13.44 years. Using a paired t-test, we found that the mean PI dropped significantly from pre-loading levels to one-month post-loading levels, with a p-value of less than 0.001. The mean crestal bone level (mesial) evaluated by CBCT at baseline and one-month post-loading was 2.52 ± 1.97 mm and 1.17 ± 1.31 mm, respectively. The mean difference between mean crestal bone loss (distal) at baseline and one-month post-loading was 0.94 ± 1.89 mm, which was not statistically significant. The mean difference between mean crestal bone loss (buccal) at baseline and one-month post-loading was 1.82 ± 1.60 mm, which was statistically significant. The mean difference between mean crestal bone loss (lingual) at baseline and one-month post-loading was 1.91 ± 1.53 which was statistically significant. Conclusion CBCT provides all the diagnostic data needed for implant placement; hence, it is recommended., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Wakankar et al.)