1. Clinical research imperatives: principles and priorities from the perspective of Allied Health executives and managers.
- Author
-
Hillier, Susan, Lodge, Duncan, Nolan, Jo, Yandell, Rosalie, Chur-Hansen, Anna, George, Stacey, and Lynch, Elizabeth
- Subjects
PROFESSIONAL practice ,FOCUS groups ,MEDICAL quality control ,RESEARCH evaluation ,MEDICAL care ,INTERVIEWING ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,ALLIED health personnel ,PUBLIC health administration ,THEMATIC analysis ,RESEARCH ,PRIORITY (Philosophy) ,ATTITUDES of medical personnel ,RESEARCH methodology ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,QUALITY assurance ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,LABOR supply ,INDIGENOUS Australians - Abstract
Objective: It is widely understood that a key means of improving health systems and patient outcomes is through research – accessing, understanding, generating and applying research evidence-based practice. To promote more targeted and strategic research in Allied Health practice, this study sought to establish the principles, areas and priorities for clinical research as perceived by Allied Health leaders in the South Australian public health system. Methods: The study used a mixed-methods design (full, sequential and equal model). Participants were recruited from the South Australian Department of Health and Wellbeing employment lists for Allied Health senior leaders. Consenting participants attended face-to-face focus groups; after an overview presentation, they discussed the principles for Allied Health research, followed by areas and priorities for research. Summaries of the responses were themed descriptively and circulated electronically so participants could confirm the research areas and ascribe priority ratings, clinical populations and services. Results: A total of 28 people attended the stakeholder forum (5 online); 20 responded to the second-round electronic summary. Nine principles of research action were agreed. Fourteen research areas were identified and prioritised. There was a relatively consistent prioritisation of measuring Allied Health value, Allied Health workforce, hospital avoidance and closing the gap for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples health outcomes – whether the individuals were thinking about their own service or the state as a whole. Conclusions: Allied Health leadership identified key principles and priorities for research to improve service delivery and patient outcomes. These priorities should generate further discussion and interest for novice and experienced researchers and leaders and can be used to inform granting and project plans. What is known about the topic? Allied Health are well equipped to engage in research but have limited capacity. What does this paper add? We have identified key priorities and principles to inform Allied Health research activity. What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners, funders and other stakeholders can develop these identified principles and priorities to direct research time and resources for the most impact on health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF