1. Perceptions of the effectiveness of using patient encounter data as an education and reflection tool in general practice training.
- Author
-
Klein, Linda, Bentley, Michael, Moad, Dominica, Fielding, Alison, Tapley, Amanda, van Driel, Mieke, Davey, Andrew, Mundy, Ben, FitzGerald, Kristen, Taylor, Jennifer, Norris, Racheal, Holliday, Elizabeth, and Magin, Parker
- Subjects
SUPERVISION of employees ,CROSS-sectional method ,SCALE analysis (Psychology) ,FAMILY medicine ,RESEARCH funding ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,PRIMARY health care ,REFLECTION (Philosophy) ,QUANTITATIVE research ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,INFORMATION needs ,ATTITUDES of medical personnel ,CLINICAL competence ,COLLEGE teacher attitudes ,LEARNING strategies ,NATIONAL competency-based educational tests ,DATA analysis software ,CONFIDENCE intervals - Abstract
Introduction. Patient encounter tools provide feedback and potentially reflection on general practitioner (GP) registrars' in-practice learning and may contribute to the formative assessment of clinical competencies. However, little is known about the perceived utility of such tools. Aim. To investigate the perceived utility of a patient encounter tool by GP registrars, their supervisors, and medical educators (MEs). Methods. General practice registrars, supervisors and MEs from two Australian regional training organisations completed a cross-sectional questionnaire. Registrars rated how Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT), a patient encounter tool, influenced their reflection on, and change in, clinical practice, learning and training. Supervisors' and MEs' perceptions provided contextual information about understanding their registrars' clinical practice, learning and training needs. Results. Questionnaires were completed by 48% of registrars (n = 90), 22% of supervisors (n = 182), and 61% of MEs (n = 62). Most registrars agreed that ReCEnT helped them reflect on their clinical practice (79%), learning needs (69%) and training needs (72%). Many registrars reported changing their clinical practice (54%) and learning approaches (51%). Fewer (37%) agreed that ReCEnT influenced them to change their training plans. Most supervisors (68%) and MEs (82%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars' clinical practice. Similarly, most supervisors (63%) and MEs (68%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars' learning and training needs. Discussion. ReCEnT can prompt self-reflection among registrars, leading to changes in clinical practice, learning approaches and training plans. Reaching its potential as an assessment for learning (as opposed to an assessment of learning) requires effective engagement between registrars, their supervisors and MEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF