Search

BACKGROUND: most of the studies assessing transradial approach for coronary angiography (CA) have been performed through right radial approach (RRA). Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of left radial approach (LRA) compared with RRA for coronary procedures. METHODS: from January 2009 to December 2009, in 2 hospitals, 1,540 patients were randomized to RRA (770 patients) or LRA (770 patients) for percutaneous coronary procedures. The primary end point was fluoroscopy time for CA and for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) evaluated independently. Prespecified subgroup analyses according to patient age and operator experience were planned. RESULTS: in 1,467 patients (732 RRA and 735 LRA), a CA (diagnostic group) was performed, and in 688 (344 each for RRA and LRA), a PCI. In the diagnostic group, LRA was associated with significantly lower fluoroscopy time (149 seconds, interquartile range [IQR] 95-270 seconds) and dose area product fluoroscopy (10.7 Gy cm(2), IQR 6-20.5 Gy cm(2)) compared with the RRA (168 seconds, IQR 110-277 seconds, P = .0025 and 12.1 Gy cm(2), IQR 7-23.8 Gy cm(2), P = .004, respectively). In the PCI group, there were no significant differences in fluoroscopy time (614 seconds, IQR 367-1,087 seconds for LRA and 695 seconds, IQR 415-1,235 seconds, P = .087 for RRA) and dose area product fluoroscopy (53.7 Gy cm(2), IQR 29-101 Gy cm(2) for LRA and 63.1 Gy cm(2), IQR 31-119 Gy cm(2), P = .17 for RRA). According to subgroup analyses, the differences between LRA and RRA were confined to older patients (≥ 70 years old) and to operators in training. CONCLUSIONS: left radial approach for coronary diagnostic procedures is associated with lower fluoroscopy time and radiation dose adsorbed by patients compared with the RRA, particularly in older patients and for operators in training.

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have revolutionized the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. Among different DES types, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) showed better outcomes than paclitaxel-eluting stents. Because novel sirolimus analogues have been implemented in DES, a prospective observational comparison was undertaken to compare major mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-eluting stents in the treatment of bifurcation lesions according to the provisional T-stenting and small protrusion (TAP) technique. Overall, 187 patients (165 men, 65 ± 10 years) were enrolled in the study: 80 patients received a SES, whereas zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were implanted in 53 patients and everolimus-eluting stents (EvES) in 62 patients. Primary end-point of the study was the 12-month incidence of target bifurcation failure (TBF) defined as occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) or angiographic documentation of > 50% restenosis on the main vessel or TIMI flow < 3 on the side branch. Groups were homogeneous according to main clinical and angiographic characteristics. Overall, 17 (9.1%) patients had TBF: 4 (2.1%) patients had nonfatal non-ST-segment elevation MI, 9 (4.8%) patients underwent TVR, and 6 (3.2%) patients had an angiographic restenosis. The rate of TBF was statistically different among the three groups (7.9% in SES group, 18% in ZES group, and 3.3% in EvES group, P = 0.024). Previous MI was associated with a worse outcome (P = 0.025), whereas final kissing balloon was associated with a better outcome (P = 0.045). In conclusion, in this prospective registry, significant differences between DES were found in the outcome of patients treated for coronary bifurcation lesions according to provisional TAP technique. Thus, prospective randomized trials in this field are needed.

AIMS: As data on the use of the latest-generation drugeluting stents (DES) in bifurcation interventions are lacking, we realized a multicenter registry to assess the procedural and clinical results obtained in patients with unselected bifurcated lesions treated with the novel zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stent (ZRS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Three Italian centers participated in the study. Consecutive patients with significant stenosis of bifurcated lesions undergoing DES implantation were treated with ZRS. The recommended technique was the "provisional TAP approach" [main-vessel (MV) stent implantation eventually followed by kissing balloon and sidebranch (SB) stenting according to TAP technique]. Clinical characteristics, procedural details and clinical follow-up data were prospectively recorded. Procedural success was defined as post-percutaneous coronary intervention visual stenosis > 20% on MV and TIMI 3 flow on both MV and SB. Primary endpoint was major adverse coronary events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization) at 9-month follow up. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The target lesion was located in the distal left main in 16% and in the left anterior descending artery in 52%. All but 3 cases were treated according to the provisional TAP approach (kissing balloon rate, 69%; overall SB stenting rate, 10.6%). Procedural success was obtained in 98.3% (3 failures due to final SB TIMI flow < 3). At 9-month follow up, the survival free from MACE was 97.8% (1 cardiac death and 3 repeat revascularizations). CONCLUSION: The use of the latest-generation ZRS in unselected bifurcated lesions treated by a provisional approach is associated with excellent procedural results and with promising clinical outcomes.

Optimal management of patients needing non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting has not been established. Objective. To assess the perioperative outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after coronary bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (up to 2008) after coronary stenting in a single-center registry, prospectively registering clinical and procedural data about revascularization and retrospectively recording surgical details, perioperative therapy and in-hospital outcome after surgery. At our institution, we implant BMS for planned surgery at time of revascularization, and use antiplatelet therapy for surgery required within 1 month of BMS or within 12 months of DES implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as perioperative occurrence of major adverse events, both cardiovascular (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and repeated revascularization) and hemorrhagic (bleeding requiring transfusions or surgical hemostasis). RESULTS: We enrolled 101 patients: 70 treated with BMS (group 1) and 31 with DES (group 2). The mean interval between stenting and surgery was 288 days. The average number of antiplatelet drugs used during the operative period was higher in group 2 than group 1 (p = 0.02). Fifteen patients (15%) experienced major adverse events (5.9% had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, 12% received blood transfusions), without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.72). At multivariate analysis, the predictor of primary endpoint was time interval between stenting and surgery (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: We found similar outcomes for non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting when BMS were selected for planned surgery and dual antiplatelet therapy was used, if indicated, during the operative period.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL), with drug eluting stents (DES), we sought to compare angiographic and clinical outcomes of a simple strategy of stenting main vessel only with balloon dilatation of the side branch with a complex strategy of stenting both branches. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of six studies, randomized (three) or prospective observational (three), including 963 patients, that directly compared the simple strategy to the complex strategy, in the treatment of CBL with DES. RESULTS: Final minimal lumen diameter (MLD) of the side branch was significantly smaller in the simple strategy group [WMD -0.50 mm, 95% CI (-0.76, -0.24), p<0.00001]. The risk of main vessel restenosis [RR 0.66, 95% CI (0.38-1.17), p=0.16], side branch restenosis [RR 0.62, 95% CI (0.24-1.56), p=0.31], follow up death [RR 0.60, 95% CI (0.19-1.86), p=0.38], follow up myocardial infarction [RR 0.71, 95% CI (0.46-1.10), p=0.13], or target vessel revascularization [RR 0.90, 95% CI (0.56-1.46), p=0.67] was similar between the two strategies. The simple strategy showed a trend to a lower risk of early myocardial infarction [RR 0.65, 95% CI (0.41-1.05), p=0.08]. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of unselected CBL with DES, the complex strategy does not penalize angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to the simple strategy. Further randomized studies are needed to assess the benefit of simple or complex strategy in the treatment of specific subsets of bifurcated lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of renal stenting in selected patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients, with chronic ischemic heart disease and severe hypertension and/or impaired renal function undergoing renal stenting, were prospectively enrolled. Mid-term (at least 2 years) follow-up was performed to assess both changes in renal function [serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtrate rate (eGFR)] and blood pressure (BP) control (number of required drugs) and to record the incidence of clinical major adverse events. Moreover, in the first consecutive 24 patients, out-of-range pressure values at 24-hr BP monitoring and GFR at renal scintigraphy were measured at baseline and 1 month after stenting. RESULTS: Seventy patients treated by stenting on 86 renal arteries entered the study. Procedural success rate was 99% and no major complication occurred. At 2-year follow-up, both mean serum creatinine (-0.1 +/- 0.7 mg/dl at follow-up compared to baseline, P = 0.6) and eGFR (+3.7 +/- 23.5 ml/min/1.73m(2) at follow-up compared to baseline, P = 0.2) did not significantly change while the number of drugs required to control BP significantly decreased (2.7 +/- 0.8 to 2.2 +/- 0.7, P < 0.0001). In the subset of 24 patients evaluated at 1 month, GFR significantly increased (62 +/- 20 ml/min to 67 +/- 21 ml/min; P = 0.008) and the rate of the out-of-range systolic pressure values at 24-hr monitoring significantly decreased (51-33%, P = 0.005). Elevated baseline creatinine values and the presence of global renal ischemia were identified as predictors of poor outcome at the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and hypertension and/or renal insufficiency, renal stenting may be performed with very low periprocedural complications and results in unchanged renal function and improved BP control.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcome of unselected patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation on bifurcated lesions using a "provisional T And small Protrusion (TAP)" stenting strategy. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing DES implantation on one major bifurcation lesion were treated by main-vessel (MV) stenting, followed (if needed) by side-branch (SB) rewiring (with a "pullback" technique) and kissing balloon. SB stenting was performed according to the TAP-technique in selected cases. The endpoint of the study was a 12-month incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: The study population included 266 patients (9% unprotected left main). Only 19 patients (7.1%) (with more complex angiographic features) received stents in both the MV and SB using the TAP-technique. Overall, 22 (8.2%) patients had MACE at 1 year. Observed, non-hierarchical MACE were: 1 (0.4%) cardiac death, 11 (4.1%) MI, 2 probable stent thromboses and 12 (4.5%) TVRs. Postprocedural troponin T increase and adverse events up to 12 months were similar between patients treated by MV stenting only or double stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients undergoing DES implantation on bifurcated lesions, a provisional TAP-stenting strategy (with a low rate of SB stenting) appears to be safe and effective.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with implantation of a new thin-strut cobalt-chromium bare-metal-stent (BMS) in the drug-eluting-stent (DES) era. BACKGROUND: Despite the contemporary penetration of DES in the clinical practice, a relevant percentage of patients are still treated by BMS. Data on clinical outcome of novel BMSs are lacking. METHODS: This is a single-centre-registry enrolling patients treated by Skylor stent implantation. During the study, the criteria for BMS selection adopted at our institution ("internal" criteria) were as follows: (1) limited compliance to prolonged double antiplatelet therapy, (2) ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or saphenous vein grafts (SVG) interventions, and (3) in the absence of these conditions, noncomplex (no bifurcations, no chronic total occlusions) lesions considered at low restenosis risk on the basis of arbitrary angiographic criteria (short lesions, large vessels). Primary and secondary end-points were respectively major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target vessel failure (TVF) up to 9-month. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were treated with Skylor stent on 169 lesions. At 9-month follow-up, MACE occurred in 12 patients (8.0%) and TVF in 21 lesions (12.4%). By multivariable analysis, the predictors of MACE were Euroscore>or=9 and ejection fraction < 30% while the predictors of TVF were the absence of the angiographic criteria of low restenosis risk and ejection fraction < 30%. CONCLUSIONS: In the DES era, the use of a last-generation BMS in patients with limited compliance to double antiplatelet therapy, STEMI or SVG interventions, and noncomplex angiographic lesions may be associated with acceptable clinical outcome.

Objectives: To overview and summarize the results emerging from the studies on adjunctive devices (AD) with theoretical anti-embolic properties in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Background: A series of small-to-medium size randomized studies have compared different AD with standard PCI (SP) in the setting of STEMI. The reported results are conflicting. Methods: Eighteen prospective randomized studies on 3180 STEMI patients comparing AD with SP were identified and entered the meta-analysis. Pre-specified angiographic, electrocardiographic (absence of ST-segment resolution, STR) and early (up to 30 days) clinical end-points were assessed. Results: AD were associated with lower rates of angiographically evident distal embolization: OR (95% CI): 0.54 (0.37-0.81). Analyses of angiographic and electrocardiographic reperfusion showed striking heterogeneity among studies and an overall trend toward better results with AD: OR (95% CI) 0.76 (95% CI 0.51-1.12) for TIMI<3, 0.53 (0.37-0.76) for myocardial blush grade (MBG)<3, 0.60 (0.45-0.78) for absence of STR. Subgroup analysis according to the type of AD for the end-point of no STR showed concordant absence of benefit in studies testing distal protection devices, positive results being confined to the studies using thrombectomy devices (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.66). However, the possibility of a "small study" bias within thrombectomy studies cannot be discharged (significant heterogeneity and positive Egger's test). Early major adverse cardiac events were not different between AD and SP. Conclusions: AD use may be associated with reduced rate of angiographic distal embolization, and improved MBG 3 and STR rates. However, efficacy might vary with the type of device employed. Moreover, early clinical outcome is not modified suggesting that further, larger, studies are needed to assess the clinical impact of AD. Condensed abstract: We condu

Objective: We evaluated the acute and long-term results of the use of a new intracardiac microaxial pump, the Impella Recover LP 2.5, during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions in a two-centre registry. Methods: Ten consecutive patients with poor left ventricular function and multivessel or left main coronary artery disease were considered at high risk of haemodynamic compromise and underwent percutaneous coronary interventions with preintervention Impella implantation. Procedural complications, 30-day and 12-month clinical outcome were recorded. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by echocardiography before procedure and after at least 6 months. Results: The Impella was implanted before percutaneous coronary interventions by femoral approach and percutaneous coronary interventions were successfully performed (by contra lateral femoral or radial approach) in all cases. After percutaneous coronary intervention, Impella was removed in all patients, and haemostasis was obtained by prolonged manual compression or by double suture device preimplantation technique. No access-site complication was observed and no patient required transfusions. One patient died after Impella removal due to acute stent thrombosis. The other patients had an uncomplicated in-hospital course and were discharged within 5 days. At 1-year follow-up, no patient died nor suffered acute myocardial infarction, whereas two patients underwent re-percutaneous coronary intervention. Left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up increased significantly in this study population (from 31 +/- 7% to 41% +/- 13%, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Our results support the feasibility and safety of Impella-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients. Prospective randomized trials are needed to test the clinical impact of such an innovative approach.

Overlapping homogenous drug-eluting stents (DESs) may be used instead of overlapping bare metal stents (BMSs) to treat coronary lesions longer than available stents. Yet, no data are available on patients treated with overlapping heterogenous DESs or DESs and BMSs. We prospectively assessed 9-month clinical outcome and 6-month angiographic late loss (evaluated at 5 different lesion segments) in a consecutive series of 40 patients who received overlapping homogenous DESs (sirolimus-eluting stent [SES] or paclitaxel-eluting stent [PES]), heterogenous DESs (SES + PES), or overlapping DESs and BMSs. In 8 patients (7 with angiographic follow-up) with overlapping heterogenous DESs, no angiographic or clinical adverse event was observed. Moreover, in-segment late loss was similar to that of patients who received homogenous DESs. In 8 patients (7 with angiographic follow-up) with overlapping DESs and BMSs, there was a higher incidence of major adverse events (3 repeat percutaneous coronary interventions and 1 death, 50% adverse event rate) and worse in-segment binary restenosis rate compared with patients treated with homogenous or heterogenous DESs (p = 0.02 and 0.012, respectively). Late lumen loss at the site of stent overlap showed significant differences according to type of overlapped stent (1.00 +/- 0.76 mm in DES-BMS overlap, 0.32 +/- 0.55 mm in PES-PES overlap, 0.13 +/- 0.11 in SES-PES overlap, and 0.08 +/- 0.10 mm in SES-SES overlap, p = 0.005). In conclusion, the present study suggests that overlap of DESs and BMSs should be avoided because the antirestenotic effect of DESs is skewed by contiguous BMS implantation. Overlap between SESs and PESs in this very preliminary report was associated with no specific adverse event.

In order to avoid distal embolization in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, both thrombectomy and distal protection devices have been evaluated with conflicting effects on myocardial perfusion. However, the removal of massive coronary thrombus is always problematic, and failure of standard approaches might result in severe microvascular damage. We report a case of the unusual use, in a "Fogarty-like" fashion, of the Spidertrade mark filter to trap and remove a large thrombus that was refractory to aspiration and balloon dilatation before stent implantation in a proximal, infarct-related coronary artery.

Plaque debulking before stenting is still controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of 12 randomized and non-randomized trials comparing directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) before stenting versus stenting alone. Angiographic end points were acute gain, late loss and angiographic restenosis rate. Clinical end points were early major adverse cardiac events [MACEs: death, Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), non-Q-wave MI], late MACEs (death, Q-wave MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Data are expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI, as appropriate. A total of 1216 patients undergoing DCA before stent and 1484 patients undergoing stent alone have been included. DCA before stent was associated to a better acute gain compared to stenting alone (WMD 0.23, [0.18-0.28]; p<0.0001), to a striking reduction of angiographic restenosis rate (OR of 0.67, [0.54-0.84], p=0.0003) and to a significantly lower rate of late TLR (OR 0.73 [0.59-0.91], p=0.006). Late loss did not differ between the two groups (WMD 0.00 [-0.08 and 0.08], p=0.98). We found a higher rate of early MACEs for the combined approach (OR 1.87 [1.16-3.02], p=0.01), with similar prevalence of late MACEs (OR 0.83 [0.65-1.06], p=0.13). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that DCA before stenting is superior to stenting alone with regard to acute angiographic results and TLR with a similar prevalence of late MACEs. The higher prevalence of early MACEs with DCA before stenting, however, is disturbing and probably related to distal embolization.

In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), distal embolization of thrombotic material is more likely to play a key role in the pathogenesis of myocardial no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Thus, interventional techniques able to reduce thrombus burden at the culprit vessel might improve final myocardial reperfusion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new rapid-exchange thrombus-aspirating catheter, the Diver C.E., in patients with thrombotic coronary lesions undergoing PCI. METHODS: Fifty patients with acute myocardial infarction (n = 44) or with non-ST-elevation ACS and angiographic evidence of coronary thrombus (n = 6) undergoing urgent PCI were prospectively enrolled. The Diver C.E. was used to aspirate coronary thrombus from the culprit lesion after placement of the guidewire. Adjunctive balloon inflations and stent implantation were used to achieve good angiographic result. Angiographic coronary flow (by means of TIMI score and corrected TIMI frame count, cTFC), thrombus score (TS), and myocardial perfusion (by means of postintervention myocardial blush grade, MBG) were assessed in all patients. RESULTS: The device could be successfully employed in 96% of the cases (48/50) and yielded significant (P < 0.0001) acute reduction in thrombus burden (TS: predevice 3.5 +/- 0.8, postdevice 2.5 +/- 0.9) and improvement in coronary flow (TIMI grade: predevice 1.0 +/- 0.9, postdevice 2.0 +/- 0.9; CTFC predevice 71 +/- 31, postdevice 39 +/- 26). Final TIMI grade 0-1 was observed in one patient only (2%). A significant (P = 0.02) correlation was found between preintervention TS and efficacy of thrombus aspiration. A more pronounced acute reduction of thrombus burden after thrombus aspiration (TS reduction > or = 2) was associated with a better postintervention angiographic myocardial perfusion (MBG 2.3 +/- 0.9 vs 1.7 +/- 0.8; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This new, easy-to-use, device is able to reduce thrombus burden and to improve coronary flow in pati

Although direct stenting (DS) is increasingly used in clinical practice instead of stent implantation after predilatation (conventional stenting [CS]), its impact has not been scientifically proved. We therefore performed, using Mantel-Haenszel analysis, a meta-analysis of the published randomized studies comparing DS with CS. Furthermore, all the key procedural data were systematically sought out and pooled. Ten trials (2,650 coronary lesions, 2,576 patients) were identified and entered into the analysis. Adopted angiographic exclusion criteria were homogeneous. DS, compared with CS, was found to have a similar success rate (98.7% vs 98.9%) and no specific complications. Across the studies, the mean rate of crossover to predilatation in the DS arm was 5.9%. Overall, DS was associated with a 17% procedural time (95% confidence interval [CI] 14% to 20%), a 18% fluoroscopic time (95% CI 15% to 21%), a 11% contrast volume (95% CI 9% to 14%), and a 22% cost reduction (95% CI 16% to 28%). In the early postintervention period, DS was associated with a trend toward reduction of each of the major adverse events (MACEs) and with a significant reduction of myocardial infarction (MI) + death (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95). However, at 6 months, the OR (95% CI) for death, MI, target lesion revascularization, and MACEs were 0.47 (0.19 to 1.27), 0.72 (0.45 to 1.25), 1.07 (0.77 to 1.46), and 0.82 (0.63 to 1.08), respectively. In the subgroup of studies providing quantitative angiographic data, all the parameters were found to be similar between the CS and DS groups. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis shows that DS compared with CS, in selected coronary lesions, is safe, optimizes equipment use, and may enhance the early results of coronary interventions while warranting similar late clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The main limitation of myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in detecting hibernating myocardium is the poor delivery of radiotracers in hypoperfused areas supplied by severely stenotic coronary arteries. Increasing local availability of radiotracers by intracoronary injection might represent an attractive solution. The hypothesis that the intracoronary administration of sestamibi could improve myocardial SPECT accuracy in detecting hibernating myocardium was addressed in this pilot study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven patients with prior myocardial infarction and severe stenosis of the infarct-related artery underwent myocardial SPECT after intracoronary injection of technetium 99m sestamibi immediately before percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Wall motion and perfusion were evaluated, before and 1 month after PTCA, by 2-dimensional echocardiography and rest-redistribution thallium 201 SPECT. A "low-flow area" was identified on the pre-PTCA Tl-201 SPECT image as the area with less than 50% of maximum radiotracer uptake. Changes in wall motion and perfusion in the low-flow area were compared with results of intracoronary sestamibi imaging. On a pixel-by-pixel analysis, intracoronary sestamibi predicted perfusion recovery within the low-flow area with a 91% sensitivity, a 78% specificity, and an 82% overall accuracy. Only in the 5 patients with an extent of sestamibi uptake greater than one third of the low-flow area was an improved regional and global left ventricular wall motion observed after PTCA (wall motion score index decreased from 1.95 +/- 0.28 to 1.60 +/- 0.34, P =.007; left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 42% +/- 7% to 49% +/- 7%, P =.001; asynergic segments in the low-flow area decreased from 3.6 +/- 0.9 to 1.8 +/- 1.5, P =.021). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior myocardial infarction and severe stenosis of the infarct-related artery, sestamibi uptake after intracoronary administration id