Search

CONTEXT: Despite being one of the major drivers of diabetes incidence, the degree of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is not usually evaluated in clinical practice or in large epidemiologic studies. OBJECTIVE: To identify a model of insulin sensitivity using widely available clinical and laboratory parameters in patients with T2D and evaluate its association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. METHODS: One hundred forty patients with T2D underwent a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp to measure total body glucose disposal rate (mg kg-1 minute-1). We used demographic, clinical, and common laboratory parameters to estimate insulin sensitivity (IS) via stepwise linear regression on 85 patients (training cohort) and validated it in the remaining 55 (validation cohort). The identified equation was then applied to 3553 patients with T2D from the 1999-2010 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to evaluate its association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality up to December 2015. RESULTS: The best model included triglycerides, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, albumin excretion rate, and body mass index. The identified IS score correlated well with the clamp-derived glucose disposal rate in both the training (r = 0.77, P < .001) and the validation (r = 0.74, P < .001) cohorts. In the NHANES cohort, after a median follow-up of 8.3 years, 1054 patients died, 265 of cardiovascular causes. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, race-ethnicity, education, cigarette smoke, total cholesterol, chronic kidney disease, blood pressure, prevalent cardiovascular disease, and alcohol consumption, a higher estimated IS was associated with a lower risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: We propose a new model of IS in patients with T2D based on readily available clinical and laboratory data. Its potential applications are in both diagnosis as well as prognos

Aim: To evaluate the long-term efficacy, up to 2 years, of an advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system and to assess predictors of best results of the therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 296 adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus [mean age 42.8 - 16.5 years, men 42.9%, duration of diabetes 22.5 - 12.8 years, body mass index 24.9 - 4.7 kg/m2, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 63.4 - 12.2 mmol/mol (8.0 - 1.1%) ] who used the MiniMed_ 780G system. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics and insulin requirement were analyzed from the 4 weeks before and from every quarter after the switch to the AHCL system. Results: In the first quarter of AHCL treatment, all CGM metrics improved. Time in range (TIR) increased from 58.1 - 17.5% to 70.3 - 9.5% (P < 0.0001). The improvement lasted for up to 2 years of observation regardless of previous insulin therapies. Throughout the period of observation, 53.4% of participants achieved mean TIR >70%, 92.6% mean time below range <4%, and 46% mean glucose management indicator [removed]70%. At multivariable analysis, lower HbA1c remained independently associated with a better glycemic control. However, mean TIR increased more in participants with a higher baseline HbA1c. Conclusions: Switching to an AHCL leads to a rapid improvement in glycemic control lasting for up to 24 months along with a low risk for hypoglycemia, confirming the safety of the system. Lower baseline HbA1c was the main predictor of better efficacy of therapy, although higher baseline HbA1c was associated with the greatest improvement in mean TIR.

There are no data whether hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems are superior to sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy with predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) feature in improving glucose control. Aim of our study was to evaluate the effect on metabolic control and glucose variability of the switch from SAP therapy with PLGS to a HCL system in type 1 diabetic individuals. Forty adults with type 1 diabetes, who had been using SAP therapy with PLGS feature (Minimed 640G; Medtronic, Northridge, CA) for at least 12 months were evaluated in a 6-month case-control observational retrospective study. Twenty subjects who consecutively switched from Minimed 640G to a HCL system (Minimed 670G; Medtronic) (670G group) were compared with a control group consisting of 20 subjects who continued with the MiniMed 640G pump (640G group) matched for age, gender, and HbA1c. At the end of the study there was a significant reduction in average HbA1c levels (-4.9 ± 6.4 mmol/mol [-0.4% ± 0.6%], P < 0.01), sensor glucose concentrations (-15.4 ± 17.7 mg/dL, P < 0.005), coefficient of variation of sensor glucose concentrations (-3.8% ± 3.6%, P < 0.01), percentage time spent in both hyperglycemic range 181-250 mg/dL (-5.1% ± 4.5%, P < 0.05), and >250 mg/dL (-6.1% ± 6.9%, P < 0.05) in the 670G group, whereas they remained unchanged in the 640G group. Percentage of time spent in euglycemic range significantly increased (11.6% ± 8.3%, P < 0.005) only in the 670G group. There was no change in time spent in hypoglycemic range in both groups. In adults with type 1 diabetes, switching from a 640G to a 670G system significantly improved glucose control and reduced glucose variability, thus reaching in most cases the recommended targets for time spent in euglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVE Poor outcomes have been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); thus, it is mandatory to explore novel therapeutic approaches for this population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a multicenter, case-control, retrospective, observational study, sitagliptin, an oral and highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, was added to standard of care (e.g., insulin administration) at the time of hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes who were hospitalized with COVID-19. Every center also recruited at a 1:1 ratio untreated control subjects matched for age and sex. All patients had pneumonia and exhibited oxygen saturation <95% when breathing ambient air or when receiving oxygen support. The primary end points were discharge from the hospital/death and improvement of clinical outcomes, defined as an increase in at least two points on a seven-category modified ordinal scale. Data were collected retrospectively from patients receiving sitagliptin from 1 March through 30 April 2020. RESULTS Of the 338 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes and COVID-19 admitted in Northern Italy hospitals included in this study, 169 were on sitagliptin, while 169 were on standard of care. Treatment with sitagliptin at the time of hospitalization was associated with reduced mortality (18% vs. 37% of deceased patients; hazard ratio 0.44 [95% CI 0.29–0.66]; P = 0.0001), with an improvement in clinical outcomes (60% vs. 38% of improved patients; P = 0.0001) and with a greater number of hospital discharges (120 vs. 89 of discharged patients; P = 0.0008) compared with patients receiving standard of care, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter, case-control, retrospective, observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to the hospital for COVID-19, sitagliptin treatment at the time of hospitalization was associated with reduced mortality and improved clinical outcomes as compared with standard-of-care treatme