Search

The Columbia River Treaty (CRT) signed between the United States and Canada in 1961 is known as one of the most successful transboundary water treaties. Under continued cooperation, both countries equitably share collective responsibilities of reservoir operations and flood control and hydropower benefits from treaty dams. As the balance of benefits is the key factor of cooperation, future cooperation could be challenged by external social and environmental factors which were not originally anticipated or change in the social preferences of the two actors. To understand the robustness of cooperation dynamics, we address two research questions. (i) How does social and environmental change influence cooperation dynamics? (ii) How do social preferences influence the probability of cooperation for both actors? We analyzed infrastructural, hydrological, economic, social, and environmental data to inform the development of a socio-hydrological system dynamics model. The model simulates the dynamics of flood control and hydropower benefit sharing as a function of the probability to cooperate, which in turn is affected by the share of benefits. The model is used to evaluate scenarios that represent environmental and institutional change and changes in political characteristics based on social preferences. Our findings show that stronger institutional capacity ensures equitable sharing of benefits over the long term. Under the current CRT, the utility of cooperation is always higher for Canada than non-cooperation, which is in contrast to the United States. The probability to cooperate for each country is lowest when they are self-interested but fluctuates in other social preference scenarios.

The Columbia River Treaty, signed in 1961, solidifies cooperation between the United States and Canada to manage the operation of the Columbia River’s extensive dam network jointly to optimize benefits for the whole system. Under the treaty, Canada operates dams to provide flood protection and maximize hydropower potential downstream. In exchange, the U.S. compensates Canada with half of the estimated benefits of the treaty, which provides an economic incentive to cooperate not seen in many other transboundary basins. However, since the treaty was established, this highly-managed system has responded to unanticipated external social and environmental factors. For example, mounting social pressure in the 1990s to protect the aquatic environment resulted in operational changes to U.S. dams to accommodate flows for fish migration, which ultimately resulted in financial losses for hydropower producers. These changes affected the relative benefits each country receives from cooperation. Utilizing a range of hydrological, economic, social, and environmental datasets, a socio-hydrological model was developed that simulates system operations using historical data to mimic operational changes, shifts in flood control and hydropower production, and cooperation dynamics.Renegotiations of the Columbia River Treaty started in 2018, and the new treaty in 2024 must include provisions for environmental protection that were, originally, not considered. The purpose of this study is to use the established model to envision how changing conditions such as climate change, spring fish flows, and First Nation rights would affect each country’s willingness to cooperate. For example, how would changes in snowpack upstream or seasonal changes in precipitation alter the hydrology of the basin and, in turn, the benefits each country receives from cooperation. This scenario analysis provides insight into how a revised treaty that takes future uncertainties into account would affect the balance of benefits to maintain or disrupt cooperation on the Columbia River.