Search

Proteins evolved through the shuffling of functional domains, and therefore, the same domain can be found in different proteins and species. Interactions between such conserved domains often involve specific, well-determined binding surfaces reflecting their important biological role in a cell. To find biologically relevant interactions we developed a method of systematically comparing and classifying protein domain interactions from the structural data. As a result, a set of conserved binding modes (CBMs) was created using the atomic detail of structure alignment data and the protein domain classification of the Conserved Domain Database. A conserved binding mode is inferred when different members of interacting domain families dock in the same way, such that their structural complexes superimpose well. Such domain interactions with recurring structural themes have greater significance to be biologically relevant, unlike spurious crystal packing interactions. Consequently, this study gives lower and upper bounds on the number of different types of interacting domain pairs in the structure database on the order of 1000-2000. We use CBMs to create domain interaction networks, which highlight functionally significant connections by avoiding many infrequent links between highly connected nodes. The CBMs also constitute a library of docking templates that may be used in molecular modeling to infer the characteristics of an unknown binding surface, just as conserved domains may be used to infer the structure of an unknown protein. The method's ability to sort through and classify large numbers of putative interacting domain pairs is demonstrated on the oligomeric interactions of globins.

We identified key residues from the structural alignment of families of protein domains from SCOP which we represented in the form of sparse protein signatures. A signature-generating algorithm (SigGen) was developed and used to automatically identify key residues based on several structural and sequence-based criteria. The capacity of the signatures to detect related sequences from the SWISSPROT database was assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and jack-knife testing. Test signatures for families from each of the main SCOP classes are described in relation to the quality of the structural alignments, the SigGen parameters used, and their diagnostic performance. We show that automatically generated signatures are potently diagnostic for their family (ROC50 scores typically >0.8), consistently outperform random signatures, and can identify sequence relationships in the "twilight zone" of protein sequence similarity (<40%). Signatures based on 15%-30% of alignment positions occurred most frequently among the best-performing signatures. When alignment quality is poor, sparser signatures perform better, whereas signatures generated from higher-quality alignments of fewer structures require more positions to be diagnostic. Our validation of signatures from the Globin family shows that when sequences from the structural alignment are removed and new signatures generated, the omitted sequences are still detected. The positions highlighted by the signature often correspond (alignment specificity >0.7) to the key positions in the original (non-jack-knifed) alignment. We discuss potential applications of sparse signatures in sequence annotation and homology modeling.