1. Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes
- Author
-
Karen Stout-Weider, Thomas Heiden, Evelin Schröck, Anne Helmrich, and Klaus Hermann
- Subjects
Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial ,Letter ,Biology ,Conserved sequence ,Mice ,Species Specificity ,Genetics ,Homologous chromosome ,Animals ,Humans ,Gene ,Conserved Sequence ,In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ,Genetics (clinical) ,Mice, Inbred BALB C ,Chromosome Fragile Sites ,Gene Expression Profiling ,Chromosomal fragile site ,Breakpoint ,Chromosome Mapping ,Computational Biology ,Chromosome ,DNA ,Mice, Inbred C57BL ,Gene expression profiling ,Chromosome Fragile Site - Abstract
Common fragile sites (CFSs) are seen as chromosomal gaps and breaks brought about by inhibition of replication, and it is thought that they cluster with tumor breakpoints. This study presents a comprehensive analysis using conventional and molecular cytogenetic mapping of CFSs and their expression frequencies in two mouse strains, BALB/c and C57BL/6, and in human probands. Here we show that induced mouse CFSs relate to sites of spontaneous gaps and breaks and that CFS expression levels in chromosome bands are conserved between the two mouse strains and between syntenic mouse and human DNA segments. Furthermore, four additional mouse CFSs were found to be homologous to human CFSs on the molecular cytogenetic level (Fra2D-FRA2G, Fra4C2-FRA9E, Fra6A3.1-FRA7G, and Fra6B1-FRA7H), increasing the number of such CFSs already described in the literature to eight. Contrary to previous reports, DNA helix flexibility is not increased in the 15 human and eight mouse CFSs molecularly defined so far, compared to large nonfragile control regions. Our findings suggest that the mechanisms that provoke instability at CFSs are evolutionarily conserved. The role that large transcriptionally active genes may play in CFS expression is discussed.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF