Search

The leaf economics spectrum (LES) is hypothesized to result from a trade-off between resource acquisition and conservation. Yet few studies have examined the evolutionary mechanisms behind the LES, perhaps because most species exhibit relatively specialized leaf economics strategies. In a genetic mapping population of the phenotypically diverse grass Panicum virgatum, we evaluate two interacting mechanisms that may drive LES evolution: 1) genetic architecture, where multiple traits are coded by the same gene (pleiotropy) or by genes in close physical proximity (linkage), and 2) correlational selection, where selection acts non-additively on combinations of multiple traits. We found evidence suggesting that shared genetic architecture (pleiotropy) controls covariation between two pairs of leaf economics traits. Additionally, at five common gardens spanning 17 degrees of latitude, correlational selection favored particular combinations of leaf economics traits. Together, these results demonstrate how the LES can evolve within species.

For succession to proceed from herbaceous to woody dominance, trees must colonize herbaceous communities and grow. Success across these two phases of succession might result from different interactions with the herbaceous community. First, colonizing trees must compete against larger, established herbs, while subsequent growth occurs among similarly sized or smaller herbs. This shift from colonization to growth may cause three drivers of secondary succession— nutrients, consumers, and herbaceous diversity—to differentially affect tree colonization and growth. Initially, these drivers should favor larger, established herbs, reducing colonization. Later, when established trees can better compete with herbs, these drivers should benefit trees and increase their growth. In a four-year study, we added nutrients to, excluded aboveground consumers from, and manipulated initial richness of, the herbaceous community, then allowed trees to naturally colonize these communities (from intact seedbanks or as seed-rain) and grow. Nutrients and consumers had opposing effects on tree colonization and growth: adding nutrients and excluding consumers reduced tree colonization, but later increased established tree growth (height, basal diameter). Together, this shows stage-specific impacts of nutrients and consumers that may improve predictions of the rate and trajectory of succession: factors that initially limited tree colonization later helped established trees to grow.

Host and parasite richness are generally positively correlated, but the stability of this relationship during community assembly remains untested. The composition of host communities can alter parasite transmission, and the relationship between host and parasite richness is sensitive to parasite transmission. Thus, changes in composition during host community assembly could strengthen or weaken the relationship between host and parasite richness. Host community assembly, in turn, can be driven by many processes, including resource enrichment. To test the hypothesis that host community assembly can alter the relationship between host and parasite richness, we experimentally crossed host diversity and resource supply to hosts, then allowed communities to assemble. As previously shown, initial host diversity and resource supply determined the trajectory of host community assembly, altering post-assembly host species richness, richness-independent host phylogenetic diversity, and colonization by exotic host species. Throughout community assembly, host richness predicted parasite richness. As predicted, this effect was moderated by exotic abundance: communities dominated by exotic species exhibited a stronger positive relationship between post-assembly host and parasite richness. Ultimately, these results suggest that, by modulating parasite transmission, community assembly can modify the relationship between host and parasite richness, providing a novel mechanism to explain contingencies in this relationship.