Search

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing has transformed our understanding of microbial community ecology. However, preparing metagenomic libraries for high-throughput DNA sequencing remains a costly, labor-intensive, and time-consuming procedure, which in turn limits the utility of metagenomes. Several library preparation procedures have recently been developed to offset these costs, but it is unclear how these newer procedures compare to current standards in the field. In particular, it is not clear if all such procedures perform equally well across different types of microbial communities, or if features of the biological samples being processed (e.g., DNA amount) impact the accuracy of the approach. To address these questions, we assessed how five different shotgun DNA sequence library preparation methods, including the commonly used Nextera® Flex kit, perform when applied to metagenomic DNA. We measured each method’s ability to produce metagenomic data that accurately represents the underlying taxonomic and genetic diversity of the community. We performed these analyses across a range of microbial community types (e.g., soil, coral-associated, mouse-gut-associated) and input DNA amounts. We find that the type of community and amount of input DNA influence each method’s performance, indicating that careful consideration may be needed when selecting between methods, especially for low complexity communities. However, cost-effective preparation methods we assessed are generally comparable to the current gold standard Nextera® DNA Flex kit for high-complexity communities. Overall, the results from this analysis will help expand and even facilitate access to metagenomic approaches in future studies.IMPORTANCEMetagenomic library preparation methods and sequencing technologies continue to advance rapidly, allowing researchers to characterize microbial communities in previously underexplored environmental samples and systems. However, widely-accepted standardized library preparation methods can be cost-prohibitive. Newly available approaches may be less expensive, but their efficacy in comparison to standardized methods remains unknown. In this study, we compared five different metagenomic library preparation methods. We evaluated each method across a range of microbial communities varying in complexity and quantity of input DNA. Our findings demonstrate the importance of considering sample properties, including community type, composition, and DNA amount, when choosing the most appropriate metagenomic library preparation method.

Gut microbiome research increasingly utilizes zebrafish (Danio rerio) given their amenability to high-throughput experimental designs. However, the utility of zebrafish for discerning translationally relevant host-microbiome interactions is constrained by a paucity of knowledge about the biological functions that zebrafish gut microbiota can execute, how these functions associate with zebrafish physiology, and the degree of homology between the genes encoded by the zebrafish and human gut microbiomes. To address this knowledge gap, we generated a foundational catalog of zebrafish gut microbiome genomic diversity consisting of 1,569,102 non-redundant genes from twenty-nine individual fish. We identified hundreds of novel microbial genes as well as dozens of biosynthetic gene clusters of potential clinical interest. The genomic diversity of the zebrafish gut microbiome varied significantly across diets and this variance associated with altered expression of intestinal genes involved in inflammation and immune activation. Zebrafish, mouse, and human fecal microbiomes shared > 50% of their total genomic diversity and the vast majority of gene family abundance for each individual metagenome (∼99%) was accounted for by genes that comprised this shared fraction. These results indicate that the zebrafish gut houses a functionally diverse microbial community that manifests extensive homology to that of humans and mice despite substantial disparities in taxonomic composition. We anticipate that the gene catalog developed here will enable future mechanistic study of host-microbiome interactions using the zebrafish model.ImportanceZebrafish have emerged as an important model system for defining host-microbiome interactions. However, the utility of this model is blunted by limited insight into the functions that are carried by zebrafish gut microbiota, their relationship with zebrafish physiology, and their consistency with the functions carried by human gut microbiota. To address these limitations, we constructed the first genomic database of zebrafish gut microbiome diversity. We use this novel resource to demonstrate that the genomic diversity of the zebrafish gut microbiome varies with diet and this variance links with altered intestinal gene expression. We also identify substantial homology between zebrafish, human, and mouse metagenomic diversity, indicating that these microbiomes may operate similarly.

While recent research reveals that the gut microbiome drives vertebrate health, little is known about whether the mechanisms these microbes employ to interact with physiology are consistent across host species. To help close this knowledge gap, we compared gut metagenomes across 10 vertebrate species, including biomedical animal models, to define the inter-species variation in the biochemical pathways encoded by gut microbiota. Doing so revealed gut-enriched pathways conserved across vertebrates, as well as pathways that vary concordantly with host evolutionary history. Overall, the functional capacity of the non-human gut microbiome generally reflects that of humans, though a subset of the pathways encoded by human gut microbiota are not well represented in non-human microbiomes. Collectively, these results support the use of animal models to study the mechanisms through which gut microbes impact human health, but suggest that researchers should cautiously consider which model will optimally represent a specific mechanism of interest.SignificanceEfforts to understand how the gut microbiome interacts with human physiology frequently relies on the use of animal models. However, it is generally not understood if the biochemical pathways encoded in gut microbiomes of these different animal models – which define the routes of interaction between gut microbes and their hosts – reflect those found in the human gut. To address this question, we compared gut metagenomes generated 10 different vertebrate lineages. In so doing, our study revealed that non-human gut metagenomes generally encode a set of pathways that are consistent with those found in the human gut. However, some human metagenome pathways are poorly represented in non-human guts, including pathways implicated in disease. Moreover, our analysis identified pathways that appear to be conserved across vertebrates, as well as pathways that are linked to the evolutionary history of their hosts, observations that hold potential to clarify the basis for phylosymbiosis.

A tantalizing hypothesis posits that mammals coevolved with their gut microbiota. Unfortunately, the limited resolution of microbial taxonomy hinders the exploration of this hypothesis and specifically challenges the discovery of gut microbes that are linked to mammalian evolution. To address this, we developed a novel approach that groups microbes into new, more meaningful taxonomic units based on their common ancestry and ecological redundancy. Treating mammalian lineages as different ecosystems, we quantified the distribution of these microbial taxa across mammals. Our analysis discovered monophyletic clades of gut bacteria that are unexpectedly prevalent, or conserved, across all mammals, as well as conserved clades that are exclusive to particular mammalian lineages. These clades often manifest phylogenetic patterns indicating that they are subject to selection. Lineage - specific changes in clade conservation, including a human-accelerated loss of conserved clades, suggest that mammalian evolution associates with a change in the selective regimes that act on gut microbiota. Collectively, these results point to the existence of microbes that possess traits that facilitate their dispersion or survival in the mammalian gut, possibly because they are subject to host selection. Ultimately, our analysis clarifies the relationship between the diversification of the gut microbiome and mammalian evolutionary history.

Helminth parasites represent a significant threat to wild, domesticated, and research animal health. Pseudocapillaria tomentosa is a common intestinal nematode parasite and an important source of infection in zebrafish. Symptoms of the infection vary widely from no clinical signs to sever emaciation and mortality, however, the reasons underpinning these disparate outcomes are unclear. Components of the microbiome may interact with parasites to influence their success in the gut while parasite infections are also known to influence the composition of the gut microbiome. In this study we evaluated the longitudinal changes in the gut microbiome structure and gut physiology during experimental P. tomentosa infection in adult 5D line zebrafish. We observed less severe signs of infection and less mortality in these fish than previously described in AB line fish. However, inflammation and epithelial hyperplasia in the intestine was still observed in infected 5D line fish. The composition of the microbiome changed rapidly during the infection and these changes were associated with parasite stage of development and burden. Individual taxa covaried with parasite abundance in the intestine intimating the gut microbiome may influence parasite burden. Associations between taxa and parasite abundance in some cases appeared to be phylogenetically patterned. Strong positive associations were observed between OTUs phylotyped to Proteobacteria and abundance of adult parasites and parasite eggs. Together these experiments demonstrate that P. tomentosa infection results in a rapid and temporally dynamic disruption of the zebrafish gut microbiome and clarify how interactions between the gut microbiome and intestinal parasites may impact fish populations.

Growing evidence indicates that disrupting the microbial community that comprises the intestinal tract, known as the gut microbiome, can contribute to the development or severity of disease. As a result, it is important to discern the agents responsible for microbiome disruption. While animals are frequently exposed to a diverse array of environmental chemicals, little is known about their effects on gut microbiome stability and structure. Here, we demonstrate how zebrafish can be used to glean insight into the effects of environmental chemical exposure on the structure and ecological dynamics of the gut microbiome. Specifically, we exposed forty-five adult zebrafish to triclosan-laden food for four or seven days or a control diet, and analyzed their microbial communities using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Triclosan exposure was associated with rapid shifts in microbiome structure and diversity. We find evidence that several operational taxonomic units (OTUs) associated with the family Enterobacteriaceae appear to be susceptible to triclosan exposure, while OTUs associated with the genus Pseudomonas appeared to be more resilient and resistant to exposure. We also found that triclosan exposure is associated with topological alterations to microbial interaction networks and results in an overall increase in the number of negative interactions per microbe in these networks. Together these data indicate that triclosan exposure results in altered composition and ecological dynamics of microbial communities in the gut. Our work demonstrates that because zebrafish afford rapid and inexpensive interrogation of a large number of individuals, it is a useful experimental system for the discovery of the gut microbiome’s interaction with environmental chemicals.