Search

Objectives: To investigate blood flow and microvascular reactivity by laser speckle perfusion imager (Perimed, Jarfalla) in consecutive patients affected by Raynaud's phenomenon at baseline and following dynamic stimulations., Methods: Skin blood flow in the dorsum of the hand was measured at baseline and after cold test and post-occlusive hyperemia test in 56 consecutive subjects affected by Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), 20 primary (PRP) and 36 secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc). Twenty healthy subjects (HS) were studied as controls., Results: After cold test, SSc had a significant reduction of blood flow (-58%) as compared to HS (-19%) (p=0.01). Recovery time was significantly higher in SSc (58 minutes) as compared to HS (18 minutes) and PRP (19 minutes) (p=0.006 and 0.0016, respectively). Peak flow after ischaemic test was significantly reduced in SSc (+237%) as compared to PRP (+485%) (p=0.0068). Post-ischaemic hyperemic area under the curve (AUC) was blunted in SSc (79U/sec) compared to PRP (167 U/sec) (p=0.0126). Proximal distal gradient was noticed in 74% of HS, 45% of PRP and 36% of SSc (p=0.01). Homogeneous pattern of flux distribution was significantly different between HS (95%), PRP (80%), and SSc (16%) (p<0.0001). Among SSc patients, a significant difference in ischaemic challenge was shown between patients with early-SSc versus patients with definite-SSc., Conclusions: Our preliminary results indicate a clearcut alteration of the dynamic of microcirculation in SSc-RP as compared to PRP and HS. Among SSc patients, early-SSc is a separate entity as compared to established disease.

Objectives: The minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) is widely considered an important component of the diagnostic algorithm of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and is mentioned in all the classification criteria sets for the disease. The aim of this study, coordinated by the Italian Society of Rheumatology, was to verify the inter-observer agreement on the evaluation of MSGB among different experienced Italian rheumatologic centres, in order to better standardise the diagnostic methodology., Methods: Seven centres participated in the study, providing a total of 50 MSGB samples. Each center blindly classified all the samples according to the Chisholm and Mason (CM) grading. The results were collected and analysed., Results: The inter-observer agreement was satisfactory when the samples were stratified as consistent and non-consistent with the final diagnosis of pSS (median κ =0.75; mean κ =0.70). Nonetheless, significant discrepancies in the histopathologic evaluation of MSGB emerged when the agreement was assessed on the single scores. Considering the modal CM grading for each sample as the correct grading, upon re-examination, a potential bias in the final clinical diagnosis was detected in 7 out of 50 samples., Conclusions: This study has shown significant discrepancies in the evaluation of MSGB among different rheumatologic centres in the same country. Greater standardisation of the procedure is clearly necessary, both to improve the diagnostic performance and scientific communication.

The Subcommittee members initially agreed on the concepts of disease activity, damage and severity, defining severity as the total effect of disease on organ function. It was decided to start with the assessment of severity using the Medsger's severity scale. A revised version of this scale was constructed. The rationale for the exclusion of other variables was provided.

Several clinical indices have been proposed to measure disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a disorder characterised by alternate phases of flare and remission. Over the last 5 years a European multicenter study was carried out in order to reach a consensus on the definition of SLE activity. A new index, ECLAM (European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement), was created and then validated in the first and in the second parts of the study, respectively. In addition, a comparison between ECLAM and the other most commonly used lupus activity indices was performed. ECLAM appeared to be the best activity index for classifying lupus patients, whether used as a single state index (i.e., to measure activity at a given moment in time) or as a transition index. (i.e., to measure variations in activity over time).

Using a detailed questionnaire, the cumulative historical and current demographic, clinical and serological data on 704 SLE patients from 29 European centres and 14 countries have been assessed. Ninety-three percent of the patients were Caucasian and the female/male ratio was 10:1. Analysis of the cumulative incidence showed that arthralgia/arthritis (94%), rash (69%), Raynaud's phenomenon (49%), serositis (44%) and renal disease (38%) were the most frequent clinical manifestations. Virtually all the patients (98%) were antinuclear antibody positive, while anti-ds-DNA antibodies (76%), hypocomplementaemia (71%) and anti-Ro(SSA) antibodies (35%) were frequent serological abnormalities. Whilst much of this data is in line with previous reports, it is notable that renal, lung, and central nervous system involvement and the frequency of rheumatoid factor, anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibodies were much lower than in most comparable series in the United States. We assume that ethnic differences and the greater present awareness of lupus could explain this variations. Low dose corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anti-malarials were used to treat over half of the patients, 75% of whom were between 15 and 55 years of age. This report offers a useful overview of lupus both clinically and serologically in Europe in the 1990's.

In the first phase of this study, a data-base containing clinical and laboratory findings of 704 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), originating from 29 centres and 14 countries, was used to assess the validity of 4 common indices of disease activity, SLAM, BILAG, SLEDAI and SIS. The physician's judgement of activity was assumed as the unique reference criterion (gold standard). Computer programmes were developed to calculate automatically the 4 activity indices; this computation appeared to correspond with manual computations in a sample of 60 appropriately selected cases. All 4 indices were closely correlated with each other (r in the range of 0.716 to 0.872), and with the physician's score (r in the range of 0.620 to 0.719). In the second phase of the study the activity index developed in part I (ECLAM) was prospectively validated, and its performance compared to that of the other scales, both as a single state index and as a transition index (i.e., its ability to assess disease activity at a single point in time and to detect variations in consecutive readings). A computer-assisted clinical chart was prepared for this purpose. This chart allowed us to calculate automatically all the indices. Two consecutive observation times (time 0, and time 1 three months later) were included in the study protocol. Data on 75 patients from 19 centres were collected, and each patient was observed twice. All the computed indices were closely correlated, both at time 0 (r ranging from 0.725 to 0.884), and at time 1 (r ranging from 0.607 to 0.833).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A European Consensus Group study, involving 29 centres from 14 countries, was performed in order to reach agreement on the definition of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to construct a new disease index. Data on 704 lupus patients were collected and analysed, using univariate and multivariate statistical procedures, to select those clinical and laboratory features of the disorder which best correlate with the global assessment of disease activity assigned to the patients by the physician of each participating centre. A combination of 15 clinical and laboratory variables was shown to be the best predictor of disease activity in SLE. A European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) was then formulated. This index included the 15 selected variables, weighted (with some adjustments) according to their respective regression coefficients in the multivariate model. ECLAM appears to be an effective instrument for scoring patients with different degrees of disease activity. This is the first SLE disease activity index based on data from a very large number of lupus patients followed at a large number of lupus centres in different countries. It might therefore very well serve as a standardised measure for future European clinical studies. Final assessment of the validity, reliability and sensitivity of this index is now underway.